Search
Total
201818 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-26549 | 1 Smartfoxserver | 1 Smartfoxserver | 2021-02-16 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| An XSS issue was discovered in SmartFoxServer 2.17.0. Input passed to the AdminTool console is not properly sanitized before being returned to the user. This can be exploited to execute arbitrary HTML code in a user's browser session in context of an affected site. | |||||
| CVE-2021-26953 | 1 Postscript Project | 1 Postscript | 2021-02-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in the postscript crate before 0.14.0 for Rust. It might allow attackers to obtain sensitive information from uninitialized memory locations via a user-provided Read implementation. | |||||
| CVE-2021-26954 | 1 Qwutils Project | 1 Qwutils | 2021-02-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in the qwutils crate before 0.3.1 for Rust. When a Clone panic occurs, insert_slice_clone can perform a double drop. | |||||
| CVE-2021-26917 | 1 Bitmessage | 1 Pybitmessage | 2021-02-16 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| ** DISPUTED ** PyBitmessage through 0.6.3.2 allows attackers to write screen captures to Potentially Unwanted Directories via a crafted apinotifypath value. NOTE: the discoverer states "security mitigation may not be necessary as there is no evidence yet that these screen intercepts are actually transported away from the local host." NOTE: it is unclear whether there are any common use cases in which apinotifypath is controlled by an attacker. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21444 | 1 Sap | 1 Businessobjects Business Intelligence | 2021-02-16 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| SAP Business Objects BI Platform, versions - 410, 420, 430, allows multiple X-Frame-Options headers entries in the response headers, which may not be predictably treated by all user agents. This could, as a result, nullify the added X-Frame-Options header leading to Clickjacking attack. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21015 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento | 2021-02-16 | 8.5 HIGH | 8.0 HIGH |
| Magento versions 2.4.1 (and earlier), 2.4.0-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.6 (and earlier) are vulnerable to an OS command injection via the customer attribute save controller. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution by an authenticated attacker. Access to the admin console is required for successful exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21016 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento | 2021-02-16 | 9.0 HIGH | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Magento versions 2.4.1 (and earlier), 2.4.0-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.6 (and earlier) are vulnerable to OS command injection via the WebAPI. Successful exploitation could lead to remote code execution by an authenticated attacker. Access to the admin console is required for successful exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21018 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento | 2021-02-16 | 9.0 HIGH | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Magento versions 2.4.1 (and earlier), 2.4.0-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.6 (and earlier) are vulnerable to OS command injection via the scheduled operation module. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution by an authenticated attacker. Access to the admin console is required for successful exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21019 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento | 2021-02-16 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Magento versions 2.4.1 (and earlier), 2.4.0-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.6 (and earlier) are vulnerable to XML injection in the Widgets module. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution by an authenticated attacker. Access to the admin console is required for successful exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2020-24685 | 1 Abb | 3 Ac500 Cpu Firmware, Pm573-eth, Pm583-eth | 2021-02-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| An unauthenticated specially crafted packet sent by an attacker over the network will cause a denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability. Vulnerability allows attacker to stop the PLC. After stopping (ERR LED flashing red), physical access to the PLC is required in order to restart the application. This issue affects: ABB AC500 V2 products with onboard Ethernet version 2.8.4 and prior versions. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21020 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento | 2021-02-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Magento versions 2.4.1 (and earlier), 2.4.0-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.6 (and earlier) are vulnerable to an access control bypass vulnerability in the Login as Customer module. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to restricted resources. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21022 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento | 2021-02-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Magento versions 2.4.1 (and earlier), 2.4.0-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.6 (and earlier) are vulnerable to an insecure direct object reference (IDOR) in the product module. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to restricted resources. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35125 | 1 Acquia | 1 Mautic | 2021-02-16 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 9.6 CRITICAL |
| A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the forms component of Mautic before 3.2.4 allows remote attackers to inject executable JavaScript via mautic[return] (a different attack method than CVE-2020-35124, but also related to the Referer concept). | |||||
| CVE-2021-21023 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento | 2021-02-16 | 3.5 LOW | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| Magento versions 2.4.1 (and earlier), 2.4.0-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.6 (and earlier) are vulnerable to a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the admin console. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary JavaScript execution in the victim's browser. Access to the admin console is required for successful exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17582 | 1 Libzip | 1 Libzip | 2021-02-16 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A use-after-free in the _zip_dirent_read function of zip_dirent.c in libzip 1.2.0 allows attackers to have an unspecified impact by attempting to unzip a malformed ZIP archive. NOTE: the discoverer states "This use-after-free is triggered prior to the double free reported in CVE-2017-12858." | |||||
| CVE-2021-21024 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento | 2021-02-16 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Magento versions 2.4.1 (and earlier), 2.4.0-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.6 (and earlier) are affected by a blind SQL injection vulnerability in the Search module. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to restricted resources by an unauthenticated attacker. Access to the admin console is required for successful exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21025 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento | 2021-02-16 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Magento versions 2.4.1 (and earlier), 2.4.0-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.6 (and earlier) are vulnerable to XML injection in the product layout updates. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution by an authenticated attacker. Access to the admin console is required for successful exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21026 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento | 2021-02-16 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Magento versions 2.4.1 (and earlier), 2.4.0-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.6 (and earlier) are affected by an improper authorization vulnerability in the integrations module. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to restricted resources by an unauthenticated attacker. Access to the admin console is required for successful exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21027 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento | 2021-02-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Magento versions 2.4.1 (and earlier), 2.4.0-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.6 (and earlier) are affected by a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the GraphQL API. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized modification of customer metadata by an unauthenticated attacker. Access to the admin console is not required for successful exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2021-25141 | 2 Arubanetworks, Hpe | 30 Aruba 2530ya, Aruba 2530ya Firmware, Aruba 2530yb and 27 more | 2021-02-16 | 4.9 MEDIUM | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| A security vulnerability has been identified in in certain HPE and Aruba L2/L3 switch firmware. A data processing error due to improper handling of an unexpected data type in user supplied information to the switch's management interface has been identified. The data processing error could be exploited to cause a crash or reboot in the switch management interface and/or possibly the switch itself leading to local denial of service (DoS). The user must have administrator privileges to exploit this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21030 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento | 2021-02-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Magento versions 2.4.1 (and earlier), 2.4.0-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.6 (and earlier) are vulnerable to a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) in the customer address upload feature. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary JavaScript execution in the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21031 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento | 2021-02-16 | 7.5 HIGH | 5.6 MEDIUM |
| Magento versions 2.4.1 (and earlier), 2.4.0-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.6 (and earlier) do not adequately invalidate user sessions. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to restricted resources. Access to the admin console is not required for successful exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21032 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento | 2021-02-16 | 7.5 HIGH | 5.6 MEDIUM |
| Magento versions 2.4.1 (and earlier), 2.4.0-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.6 (and earlier) do not adequately invalidate user sessions. Successful exploitation of this issue could lead to unauthorized access to restricted resources. Access to the admin console is not required for successful exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21014 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento | 2021-02-16 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Magento versions 2.4.1 (and earlier), 2.4.0-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.6 (and earlier) are vulnerable to a file upload restriction bypass. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution by an authenticated attacker. Access to the admin console is required for successful exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2018-21270 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2021-02-16 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Versions less than 0.0.6 of the Node.js stringstream module are vulnerable to an out-of-bounds read because of allocation of uninitialized buffers when a number is passed in the input stream (when using Node.js 4.x). | |||||
| CVE-2020-28644 | 1 Owncloud | 1 Owncloud | 2021-02-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The CSRF (Cross Site Request Forgery) token check was improperly implemented on cookie authenticated requests against some ocs API endpoints. This affects ownCloud/core version < 10.6. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1966 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1969 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1970 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1972 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1973 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1974 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35617 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35618 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35619 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35620 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35621 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3813 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3814 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3815 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3816 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3817 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3818 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3819 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3820 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3821 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3822 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3823 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3824 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35500 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||