Filtered by vendor Nodejs
Subscribe
Search
Total
107 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-22930 | 4 Debian, Netapp, Nodejs and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Nextgen Api, Node.js and 1 more | 2024-01-05 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Node.js before 16.6.0, 14.17.4, and 12.22.4 is vulnerable to a use after free attack where an attacker might be able to exploit the memory corruption, to change process behavior. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22939 | 5 Debian, Netapp, Nodejs and 2 more | 8 Debian Linux, Nextgen Api, Node.js and 5 more | 2024-01-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| If the Node.js https API was used incorrectly and "undefined" was in passed for the "rejectUnauthorized" parameter, no error was returned and connections to servers with an expired certificate would have been accepted. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22931 | 4 Netapp, Nodejs, Oracle and 1 more | 10 Active Iq Unified Manager, Nextgen Api, Oncommand Insight and 7 more | 2024-01-05 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Node.js before 16.6.0, 14.17.4, and 12.22.4 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution, XSS, Application crashes due to missing input validation of host names returned by Domain Name Servers in Node.js dns library which can lead to output of wrong hostnames (leading to Domain Hijacking) and injection vulnerabilities in applications using the library. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22940 | 5 Debian, Netapp, Nodejs and 2 more | 7 Debian Linux, Nextgen Api, Node.js and 4 more | 2024-01-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Node.js before 16.6.1, 14.17.5, and 12.22.5 is vulnerable to a use after free attack where an attacker might be able to exploit the memory corruption, to change process behavior. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3672 | 6 C-ares Project, Fedoraproject, Nodejs and 3 more | 17 C-ares, Fedora, Node.js and 14 more | 2024-01-05 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 5.6 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in c-ares library, where a missing input validation check of host names returned by DNS (Domain Name Servers) can lead to output of wrong hostnames which might potentially lead to Domain Hijacking. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. | |||||
| CVE-2023-32005 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2023-12-22 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Node.js version 20, affecting users of the experimental permission model when the --allow-fs-read flag is used with a non-* argument. This flaw arises from an inadequate permission model that fails to restrict file stats through the `fs.statfs` API. As a result, malicious actors can retrieve stats from files that they do not have explicit read access to. This vulnerability affects all users using the experimental permission model in Node.js 20. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the permission model is an experimental feature of Node.js. | |||||
| CVE-2023-44487 | 31 Akka, Amazon, Apache and 28 more | 127 Http Server, Opensearch Data Prepper, Apisix and 124 more | 2023-12-20 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. | |||||
| CVE-2023-30589 | 2 Fedoraproject, Nodejs | 2 Fedora, Node.js | 2023-12-12 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The llhttp parser in the http module in Node v20.2.0 does not strictly use the CRLF sequence to delimit HTTP requests. This can lead to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS). The CR character (without LF) is sufficient to delimit HTTP header fields in the llhttp parser. According to RFC7230 section 3, only the CRLF sequence should delimit each header-field. This impacts all Node.js active versions: v16, v18, and, v20 | |||||
| CVE-2023-30581 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2023-12-11 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The use of __proto__ in process.mainModule.__proto__.require() can bypass the policy mechanism and require modules outside of the policy.json definition. This vulnerability affects all users using the experimental policy mechanism in all active release lines: v16, v18 and, v20. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the policy is an experimental feature of Node.js | |||||
| CVE-2023-30588 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2023-12-04 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| When an invalid public key is used to create an x509 certificate using the crypto.X509Certificate() API a non-expect termination occurs making it susceptible to DoS attacks when the attacker could force interruptions of application processing, as the process terminates when accessing public key info of provided certificates from user code. The current context of the users will be gone, and that will cause a DoS scenario. This vulnerability affects all active Node.js versions v16, v18, and, v20. | |||||
| CVE-2023-30590 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2023-12-04 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The generateKeys() API function returned from crypto.createDiffieHellman() only generates missing (or outdated) keys, that is, it only generates a private key if none has been set yet, but the function is also needed to compute the corresponding public key after calling setPrivateKey(). However, the documentation says this API call: "Generates private and public Diffie-Hellman key values". The documented behavior is very different from the actual behavior, and this difference could easily lead to security issues in applications that use these APIs as the DiffieHellman may be used as the basis for application-level security, implications are consequently broad. | |||||
| CVE-2023-32558 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2023-12-04 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The use of the deprecated API `process.binding()` can bypass the permission model through path traversal. This vulnerability affects all users using the experimental permission model in Node.js 20.x. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the permission model is an experimental feature of Node.js. | |||||
| CVE-2023-30585 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2023-12-02 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in the Node.js (.msi version) installation process, specifically affecting Windows users who install Node.js using the .msi installer. This vulnerability emerges during the repair operation, where the "msiexec.exe" process, running under the NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM context, attempts to read the %USERPROFILE% environment variable from the current user's registry. The issue arises when the path referenced by the %USERPROFILE% environment variable does not exist. In such cases, the "msiexec.exe" process attempts to create the specified path in an unsafe manner, potentially leading to the creation of arbitrary folders in arbitrary locations. The severity of this vulnerability is heightened by the fact that the %USERPROFILE% environment variable in the Windows registry can be modified by standard (or "non-privileged") users. Consequently, unprivileged actors, including malicious entities or trojans, can manipulate the environment variable key to deceive the privileged "msiexec.exe" process. This manipulation can result in the creation of folders in unintended and potentially malicious locations. It is important to note that this vulnerability is specific to Windows users who install Node.js using the .msi installer. Users who opt for other installation methods are not affected by this particular issue. | |||||
| CVE-2023-39331 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2023-11-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A previously disclosed vulnerability (CVE-2023-30584) was patched insufficiently in commit 205f1e6. The new path traversal vulnerability arises because the implementation does not protect itself against the application overwriting built-in utility functions with user-defined implementations. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the permission model is an experimental feature of Node.js. | |||||
| CVE-2023-39332 | 2 Fedoraproject, Nodejs | 2 Fedora, Node.js | 2023-11-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Various `node:fs` functions allow specifying paths as either strings or `Uint8Array` objects. In Node.js environments, the `Buffer` class extends the `Uint8Array` class. Node.js prevents path traversal through strings (see CVE-2023-30584) and `Buffer` objects (see CVE-2023-32004), but not through non-`Buffer` `Uint8Array` objects. This is distinct from CVE-2023-32004 which only referred to `Buffer` objects. However, the vulnerability follows the same pattern using `Uint8Array` instead of `Buffer`. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the permission model is an experimental feature of Node.js. | |||||
| CVE-2023-30586 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2023-11-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Node.js 20 that allowed loading arbitrary OpenSSL engines when the experimental permission model is enabled, which can bypass and/or disable the permission model. The attack complexity is high. However, the crypto.setEngine() API can be used to bypass the permission model when called with a compatible OpenSSL engine. The OpenSSL engine can, for example, disable the permission model in the host process by manipulating the process's stack memory to locate the permission model Permission::enabled_ in the host process's heap memory. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the permission model is an experimental feature of Node.js. | |||||
| CVE-2023-38552 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2023-11-16 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| When the Node.js policy feature checks the integrity of a resource against a trusted manifest, the application can intercept the operation and return a forged checksum to the node's policy implementation, thus effectively disabling the integrity check. Impacts: This vulnerability affects all users using the experimental policy mechanism in all active release lines: 18.x and, 20.x. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the policy mechanism is an experimental feature of Node.js. | |||||
| CVE-2021-4044 | 3 Netapp, Nodejs, Openssl | 26 500f, 500f Firmware, A250 and 23 more | 2023-11-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Internally libssl in OpenSSL calls X509_verify_cert() on the client side to verify a certificate supplied by a server. That function may return a negative return value to indicate an internal error (for example out of memory). Such a negative return value is mishandled by OpenSSL and will cause an IO function (such as SSL_connect() or SSL_do_handshake()) to not indicate success and a subsequent call to SSL_get_error() to return the value SSL_ERROR_WANT_RETRY_VERIFY. This return value is only supposed to be returned by OpenSSL if the application has previously called SSL_CTX_set_cert_verify_callback(). Since most applications do not do this the SSL_ERROR_WANT_RETRY_VERIFY return value from SSL_get_error() will be totally unexpected and applications may not behave correctly as a result. The exact behaviour will depend on the application but it could result in crashes, infinite loops or other similar incorrect responses. This issue is made more serious in combination with a separate bug in OpenSSL 3.0 that will cause X509_verify_cert() to indicate an internal error when processing a certificate chain. This will occur where a certificate does not include the Subject Alternative Name extension but where a Certificate Authority has enforced name constraints. This issue can occur even with valid chains. By combining the two issues an attacker could induce incorrect, application dependent behaviour. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.1 (Affected 3.0.0). | |||||
| CVE-2023-32002 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2023-08-24 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The use of `Module._load()` can bypass the policy mechanism and require modules outside of the policy.json definition for a given module. This vulnerability affects all users using the experimental policy mechanism in all active release lines: 16.x, 18.x and, 20.x. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the policy is an experimental feature of Node.js. | |||||
| CVE-2023-32006 | 2 Fedoraproject, Nodejs | 2 Fedora, Node.js | 2023-08-22 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| The use of `module.constructor.createRequire()` can bypass the policy mechanism and require modules outside of the policy.json definition for a given module. This vulnerability affects all users using the experimental policy mechanism in all active release lines: 16.x, 18.x, and, 20.x. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the policy is an experimental feature of Node.js. | |||||
| CVE-2023-32004 | 2 Fedoraproject, Nodejs | 2 Fedora, Node.js | 2023-08-22 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been discovered in Node.js version 20, specifically within the experimental permission model. This flaw relates to improper handling of Buffers in file system APIs causing a traversal path to bypass when verifying file permissions. This vulnerability affects all users using the experimental permission model in Node.js 20. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the permission model is an experimental feature of Node.js. | |||||
| CVE-2023-32003 | 2 Fedoraproject, Nodejs | 2 Fedora, Node.js | 2023-08-22 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| `fs.mkdtemp()` and `fs.mkdtempSync()` can be used to bypass the permission model check using a path traversal attack. This flaw arises from a missing check in the fs.mkdtemp() API and the impact is a malicious actor could create an arbitrary directory. This vulnerability affects all users using the experimental permission model in Node.js 20. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the permission model is an experimental feature of Node.js. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3602 | 4 Fedoraproject, Netapp, Nodejs and 1 more | 4 Fedora, Clustered Data Ontap, Node.js and 1 more | 2023-08-08 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address to overflow four attacker-controlled bytes on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service) or potentially remote code execution. Many platforms implement stack overflow protections which would mitigate against the risk of remote code execution. The risk may be further mitigated based on stack layout for any given platform/compiler. Pre-announcements of CVE-2022-3602 described this issue as CRITICAL. Further analysis based on some of the mitigating factors described above have led this to be downgraded to HIGH. Users are still encouraged to upgrade to a new version as soon as possible. In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.7 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3,3.0.4,3.0.5,3.0.6). | |||||
| CVE-2021-3450 | 10 Fedoraproject, Freebsd, Mcafee and 7 more | 35 Fedora, Freebsd, Web Gateway and 32 more | 2023-08-04 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a "purpose" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named "purpose" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verification routines, but it can be overridden or removed by an application. In order to be affected, an application must explicitly set the X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT verification flag and either not set a purpose for the certificate verification or, in the case of TLS client or server applications, override the default purpose. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1h and newer are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1h-1.1.1j). | |||||
| CVE-2022-21824 | 4 Debian, Netapp, Nodejs and 1 more | 11 Debian Linux, Oncommand Insight, Oncommand Workflow Automation and 8 more | 2022-07-30 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 8.2 HIGH |
| Due to the formatting logic of the "console.table()" function it was not safe to allow user controlled input to be passed to the "properties" parameter while simultaneously passing a plain object with at least one property as the first parameter, which could be "__proto__". The prototype pollution has very limited control, in that it only allows an empty string to be assigned to numerical keys of the object prototype.Node.js >= 12.22.9, >= 14.18.3, >= 16.13.2, and >= 17.3.1 use a null protoype for the object these properties are being assigned to. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32213 | 2 Llhttp, Nodejs | 2 Llhttp, Node.js | 2022-07-27 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| The llhttp parser in the http module in Node.js v17.x does not correctly parse and validate Transfer-Encoding headers and can lead to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS). | |||||
| CVE-2022-32214 | 2 Llhttp, Nodejs | 2 Llhttp, Node.js | 2022-07-27 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| The llhttp parser in the http module in Node.js does not strictly use the CRLF sequence to delimit HTTP requests. This can lead to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS). | |||||
| CVE-2022-32215 | 2 Llhttp, Nodejs | 2 Llhttp, Node.js | 2022-07-27 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| The llhttp parser in the http module in Node v17.6.0 does not correctly handle multi-line Transfer-Encoding headers. This can lead to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS). | |||||
| CVE-2022-32223 | 2 Microsoft, Nodejs | 2 Windows, Node.js | 2022-07-27 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| Node.js is vulnerable to Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Hijacking under certain conditions on Windows platforms.This vulnerability can be exploited if the victim has the following dependencies on a Windows machine:* OpenSSL has been installed and “C:\Program Files\Common Files\SSL\openssl.cnf” exists.Whenever the above conditions are present, `node.exe` will search for `providers.dll` in the current user directory.After that, `node.exe` will try to search for `providers.dll` by the DLL Search Order in Windows.It is possible for an attacker to place the malicious file `providers.dll` under a variety of paths and exploit this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-31150 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Undici | 2022-07-26 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js. It is possible to inject CRLF sequences into request headers in undici in versions less than 5.7.1. A fix was released in version 5.8.0. Sanitizing all HTTP headers from untrusted sources to eliminate `\r\n` is a workaround for this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32210 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Undici | 2022-07-25 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| `Undici.ProxyAgent` never verifies the remote server's certificate, and always exposes all request & response data to the proxy. This unexpectedly means that proxies can MitM all HTTPS traffic, and if the proxy's URL is HTTP then it also means that nominally HTTPS requests are actually sent via plain-text HTTP between Undici and the proxy server. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44533 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2022-07-25 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 did not handle multi-value Relative Distinguished Names correctly. Attackers could craft certificate subjects containing a single-value Relative Distinguished Name that would be interpreted as a multi-value Relative Distinguished Name, for example, in order to inject a Common Name that would allow bypassing the certificate subject verification.Affected versions of Node.js that do not accept multi-value Relative Distinguished Names and are thus not vulnerable to such attacks themselves. However, third-party code that uses node's ambiguous presentation of certificate subjects may be vulnerable. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44532 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2022-07-25 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 converts SANs (Subject Alternative Names) to a string format. It uses this string to check peer certificates against hostnames when validating connections. The string format was subject to an injection vulnerability when name constraints were used within a certificate chain, allowing the bypass of these name constraints.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this escape SANs containing the problematic characters in order to prevent the injection. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44531 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2022-07-25 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| Accepting arbitrary Subject Alternative Name (SAN) types, unless a PKI is specifically defined to use a particular SAN type, can result in bypassing name-constrained intermediates. Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 was accepting URI SAN types, which PKIs are often not defined to use. Additionally, when a protocol allows URI SANs, Node.js did not match the URI correctly.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this disable the URI SAN type when checking a certificate against a hostname. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32222 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2022-07-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A cryptographic vulnerability exists on Node.js on linux in versions of 18.x prior to 18.40.0 which allowed a default path for openssl.cnf that might be accessible under some circumstances to a non-admin user instead of /etc/ssl as was the case in versions prior to the upgrade to OpenSSL 3. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32212 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2022-07-21 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| A OS Command Injection vulnerability exists in Node.js versions <14.20.0, <16.20.0, <18.5.0 due to an insufficient IsAllowedHost check that can easily be bypassed because IsIPAddress does not properly check if an IP address is invalid before making DBS requests allowing rebinding attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8201 | 3 Fedoraproject, Nodejs, Opensuse | 3 Fedora, Node.js, Leap | 2022-05-24 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| Node.js < 12.18.4 and < 14.11 can be exploited to perform HTTP desync attacks and deliver malicious payloads to unsuspecting users. The payloads can be crafted by an attacker to hijack user sessions, poison cookies, perform clickjacking, and a multitude of other attacks depending on the architecture of the underlying system. The attack was possible due to a bug in processing of carrier-return symbols in the HTTP header names. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8252 | 3 Fedoraproject, Nodejs, Opensuse | 3 Fedora, Node.js, Leap | 2022-05-24 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| The implementation of realpath in libuv < 10.22.1, < 12.18.4, and < 14.9.0 used within Node.js incorrectly determined the buffer size which can result in a buffer overflow if the resolved path is longer than 256 bytes. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8251 | 2 Fedoraproject, Nodejs | 2 Fedora, Node.js | 2022-05-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Node.js < 14.11.0 is vulnerable to HTTP denial of service (DoS) attacks based on delayed requests submission which can make the server unable to accept new connections. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8174 | 3 Netapp, Nodejs, Oracle | 9 Active Iq Unified Manager, Oncommand Insight, Oncommand Workflow Automation and 6 more | 2022-05-12 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| napi_get_value_string_*() allows various kinds of memory corruption in node < 10.21.0, 12.18.0, and < 14.4.0. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8172 | 2 Nodejs, Oracle | 5 Node.js, Banking Extensibility Workbench, Blockchain Platform and 2 more | 2022-05-12 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| TLS session reuse can lead to host certificate verification bypass in node version < 12.18.0 and < 14.4.0. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8277 | 4 C-ares Project, Fedoraproject, Nodejs and 1 more | 8 C-ares, Fedora, Node.js and 5 more | 2022-05-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A Node.js application that allows an attacker to trigger a DNS request for a host of their choice could trigger a Denial of Service in versions < 15.2.1, < 14.15.1, and < 12.19.1 by getting the application to resolve a DNS record with a larger number of responses. This is fixed in 15.2.1, 14.15.1, and 12.19.1. | |||||
| CVE-2021-43803 | 2 Nodejs, Vercel | 2 Node.js, Next.js | 2022-02-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Next.js is a React framework. In versions of Next.js prior to 12.0.5 or 11.1.3, invalid or malformed URLs could lead to a server crash. In order to be affected by this issue, the deployment must use Next.js versions above 11.1.0 and below 12.0.5, Node.js above 15.0.0, and next start or a custom server. Deployments on Vercel are not affected, along with similar environments where invalid requests are filtered before reaching Next.js. Versions 12.0.5 and 11.1.3 contain patches for this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22883 | 4 Fedoraproject, Netapp, Nodejs and 1 more | 8 Fedora, E-series Performance Analyzer, Node.js and 5 more | 2021-12-08 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Node.js before 10.24.0, 12.21.0, 14.16.0, and 15.10.0 is vulnerable to a denial of service attack when too many connection attempts with an 'unknownProtocol' are established. This leads to a leak of file descriptors. If a file descriptor limit is configured on the system, then the server is unable to accept new connections and prevent the process also from opening, e.g. a file. If no file descriptor limit is configured, then this lead to an excessive memory usage and cause the system to run out of memory. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22884 | 4 Fedoraproject, Netapp, Nodejs and 1 more | 12 Fedora, Active Iq Unified Manager, E-series Performance Analyzer and 9 more | 2021-12-08 | 5.1 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Node.js before 10.24.0, 12.21.0, 14.16.0, and 15.10.0 is vulnerable to DNS rebinding attacks as the whitelist includes “localhost6”. When “localhost6” is not present in /etc/hosts, it is just an ordinary domain that is resolved via DNS, i.e., over network. If the attacker controls the victim's DNS server or can spoof its responses, the DNS rebinding protection can be bypassed by using the “localhost6” domain. As long as the attacker uses the “localhost6” domain, they can still apply the attack described in CVE-2018-7160. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6304 | 3 Nodejs, Novell, Openssl | 3 Node.js, Suse Linux Enterprise Module For Web Scripting, Openssl | 2021-11-17 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Multiple memory leaks in t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1u, 1.0.2 before 1.0.2i, and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0a allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via large OCSP Status Request extensions. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6306 | 4 Hp, Nodejs, Novell and 1 more | 7 Icewall Federation Agent, Icewall Mcrp, Icewall Sso and 4 more | 2021-11-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The certificate parser in OpenSSL before 1.0.1u and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2i might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read) via crafted certificate operations, related to s3_clnt.c and s3_srvr.c. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000168 | 2 Nghttp2, Nodejs | 2 Nghttp2, Node.js | 2021-10-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| nghttp2 version >= 1.10.0 and nghttp2 <= v1.31.0 contains an Improper Input Validation CWE-20 vulnerability in ALTSVC frame handling that can result in segmentation fault leading to denial of service. This attack appears to be exploitable via network client. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in >= 1.31.1. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22918 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2021-09-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Node.js before 16.4.1, 14.17.2, 12.22.2 is vulnerable to an out-of-bounds read when uv__idna_toascii() is used to convert strings to ASCII. The pointer p is read and increased without checking whether it is beyond pe, with the latter holding a pointer to the end of the buffer. This can lead to information disclosures or crashes. This function can be triggered via uv_getaddrinfo(). | |||||
| CVE-2021-22921 | 2 Microsoft, Nodejs | 2 Windows, Node.js | 2021-09-20 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Node.js before 16.4.1, 14.17.2, and 12.22.2 is vulnerable to local privilege escalation attacks under certain conditions on Windows platforms. More specifically, improper configuration of permissions in the installation directory allows an attacker to perform two different escalation attacks: PATH and DLL hijacking. | |||||