Filtered by vendor Pivotal Software
Subscribe
Search
Total
149 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-3773 | 2 Oracle, Pivotal Software | 3 Financial Services Analytical Applications Infrastructure, Flexcube Private Banking, Spring Web Services | 2023-12-27 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Spring Web Services, versions 2.4.3, 3.0.4, and older unsupported versions of all three projects, were susceptible to XML External Entity Injection (XXE) when receiving XML data from untrusted sources. | |||||
| CVE-2022-31683 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Concourse | 2023-08-08 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Concourse (7.x.y prior to 7.8.3 and 6.x.y prior to 6.7.9) contains an authorization bypass issue. A Concourse user can send a request with body including :team_name=team2 to bypass team scope check to gain access to certain resources belong to any other team. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1273 | 2 Apache, Pivotal Software | 3 Ignite, Spring Data Commons, Spring Data Rest | 2022-07-25 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Spring Data Commons, versions prior to 1.13 to 1.13.10, 2.0 to 2.0.5, and older unsupported versions, contain a property binder vulnerability caused by improper neutralization of special elements. An unauthenticated remote malicious user (or attacker) can supply specially crafted request parameters against Spring Data REST backed HTTP resources or using Spring Data's projection-based request payload binding hat can lead to a remote code execution attack. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1259 | 2 Pivotal Software, Xmlbeam | 3 Spring Data Commons, Spring Data Rest, Xmlbeam | 2022-07-25 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Spring Data Commons, versions 1.13 prior to 1.13.12 and 2.0 prior to 2.0.7, used in combination with XMLBeam 1.4.14 or earlier versions, contains a property binder vulnerability caused by improper restriction of XML external entity references as underlying library XMLBeam does not restrict external reference expansion. An unauthenticated remote malicious user can supply specially crafted request parameters against Spring Data's projection-based request payload binding to access arbitrary files on the system. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1274 | 1 Pivotal Software | 2 Spring Data Commons, Spring Data Rest | 2022-07-25 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Spring Data Commons, versions 1.13 to 1.13.10, 2.0 to 2.0.5, and older unsupported versions, contain a property path parser vulnerability caused by unlimited resource allocation. An unauthenticated remote malicious user (or attacker) can issue requests against Spring Data REST endpoints or endpoints using property path parsing which can cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption). | |||||
| CVE-2017-4974 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2022-07-01 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation cf-release versions prior to v258; UAA release 2.x versions prior to v2.7.4.15, 3.6.x versions prior to v3.6.9, 3.9.x versions prior to v3.9.11, and other versions prior to v3.16.0; and UAA bosh release (uaa-release) 13.x versions prior to v13.13, 24.x versions prior to v24.8, and other versions prior to v30.1. An authorized user can use a blind SQL injection attack to query the contents of the UAA database, aka "Blind SQL Injection with privileged UAA endpoints." | |||||
| CVE-2017-4992 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2022-06-03 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation cf-release versions prior to v261; UAA release 2.x versions prior to v2.7.4.17, 3.6.x versions prior to v3.6.11, 3.9.x versions prior to v3.9.13, and other versions prior to v4.2.0; and UAA bosh release (uaa-release) 13.x versions prior to v13.15, 24.x versions prior to v24.10, 30.x versions prior to 30.3, and other versions prior to v37. There is privilege escalation (arbitrary password reset) with user invitations. | |||||
| CVE-2017-4991 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2022-06-03 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation cf-release versions prior to v260; UAA release 2.x versions prior to v2.7.4.16, 3.6.x versions prior to v3.6.10, 3.9.x versions prior to v3.9.12, and other versions prior to v3.17.0; and UAA bosh release (uaa-release) 13.x versions prior to v13.14, 24.x versions prior to v24.9, 30.x versions prior to 30.2, and other versions prior to v36. Privileged users in one zone are allowed to perform a password reset for users in a different zone. | |||||
| CVE-2017-4972 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2022-06-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation cf-release versions prior to v257; UAA release 2.x versions prior to v2.7.4.14, 3.6.x versions prior to v3.6.8, 3.9.x versions prior to v3.9.10, and other versions prior to v3.15.0; and UAA bosh release (uaa-release) 13.x versions prior to v13.12, 24.x versions prior to v24.7, and other versions prior to v30. An attacker can use a blind SQL injection attack to query the contents of the UAA database. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11287 | 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Pivotal Software and 2 more | 5 Debian Linux, Fedora, Rabbitmq and 2 more | 2022-05-15 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Pivotal RabbitMQ, versions 3.7.x prior to 3.7.21 and 3.8.x prior to 3.8.1, and RabbitMQ for Pivotal Platform, 1.16.x versions prior to 1.16.7 and 1.17.x versions prior to 1.17.4, contain a web management plugin that is vulnerable to a denial of service attack. The "X-Reason" HTTP Header can be leveraged to insert a malicious Erlang format string that will expand and consume the heap, resulting in the server crashing. | |||||
| CVE-2017-4967 | 3 Debian, Pivotal Software, Vmware | 3 Debian Linux, Rabbitmq, Rabbitmq | 2022-05-15 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in these Pivotal RabbitMQ versions: all 3.4.x versions, all 3.5.x versions, and 3.6.x versions prior to 3.6.9; and these RabbitMQ for PCF versions: all 1.5.x versions, 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.18, and 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.15. Several forms in the RabbitMQ management UI are vulnerable to XSS attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2017-4965 | 3 Debian, Pivotal Software, Vmware | 3 Debian Linux, Rabbitmq, Rabbitmq | 2022-05-15 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in these Pivotal RabbitMQ versions: all 3.4.x versions, all 3.5.x versions, and 3.6.x versions prior to 3.6.9; and these RabbitMQ for PCF versions: all 1.5.x versions, 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.18, and 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.15. Several forms in the RabbitMQ management UI are vulnerable to XSS attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2017-4966 | 3 Debian, Pivotal Software, Vmware | 3 Debian Linux, Rabbitmq, Rabbitmq | 2022-05-15 | 2.1 LOW | 7.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in these Pivotal RabbitMQ versions: all 3.4.x versions, all 3.5.x versions, and 3.6.x versions prior to 3.6.9; and these RabbitMQ for PCF versions: all 1.5.x versions, 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.18, and 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.15. RabbitMQ management UI stores signed-in user credentials in a browser's local storage without expiration, making it possible to retrieve them using a chained attack. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1258 | 4 Netapp, Oracle, Pivotal Software and 1 more | 42 Oncommand Insight, Oncommand Unified Manager, Oncommand Workflow Automation and 39 more | 2021-12-16 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Spring Framework version 5.0.5 when used in combination with any versions of Spring Security contains an authorization bypass when using method security. An unauthorized malicious user can gain unauthorized access to methods that should be restricted. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22112 | 3 Oracle, Pivotal Software, Vmware | 8 Communications Element Manager, Communications Interactive Session Recorder, Communications Unified Inventory Management and 5 more | 2021-12-08 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Spring Security 5.4.x prior to 5.4.4, 5.3.x prior to 5.3.8.RELEASE, 5.2.x prior to 5.2.9.RELEASE, and older unsupported versions can fail to save the SecurityContext if it is changed more than once in a single request.A malicious user cannot cause the bug to happen (it must be programmed in). However, if the application's intent is to only allow the user to run with elevated privileges in a small portion of the application, the bug can be leveraged to extend those privileges to the rest of the application. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3802 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Spring Data Java Persistance Api | 2021-10-29 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| This affects Spring Data JPA in versions up to and including 2.1.6, 2.0.14 and 1.11.20. ExampleMatcher using ExampleMatcher.StringMatcher.STARTING, ExampleMatcher.StringMatcher.ENDING or ExampleMatcher.StringMatcher.CONTAINING could return more results than anticipated when a maliciously crafted example value is supplied. | |||||
| CVE-2015-5173 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2021-08-25 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors involving emails with password recovery links, aka "Cross Domain Referer Leakage." | |||||
| CVE-2015-5171 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2021-08-25 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The password change functionality in Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to expire existing sessions. | |||||
| CVE-2015-5172 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2021-08-25 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to expire password reset links. | |||||
| CVE-2015-5170 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2021-08-25 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks on PWS and log a user into an arbitrary account by leveraging lack of CSRF checks. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2165 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 2 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2021-08-25 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The Loggregator Traffic Controller endpoints in cf-release v231 and lower, Pivotal Elastic Runtime versions prior to 1.5.19 AND 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.20 are not cleansing request URL paths when they are invalid and are returning them in the 404 response. This could allow malicious scripts to be written directly into the 404 response. | |||||
| CVE-2016-0780 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 2 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2021-08-25 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| It was discovered that cf-release v231 and lower, Pivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime 1.5.x versions prior to 1.5.17 and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.18 do not properly enforce disk quotas in certain cases. An attacker could use an improper disk quota value to bypass enforcement and consume all the disk on DEAs/CELLs causing a potential denial of service for other applications. | |||||
| CVE-2016-0761 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 2 Garden Linux, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2021-08-25 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Cloud Foundry Garden-Linux versions prior to v0.333.0 and Elastic Runtime 1.6.x version prior to 1.6.17 contain a flaw in managing container files during Docker image preparation that could be used to delete, corrupt or overwrite host files and directories, including other container filesystems on the host. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3191 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2021-08-25 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| With Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release versions v209 or earlier, UAA Standalone versions 2.2.6 or earlier and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Runtime 1.4.5 or earlier the change_email form in UAA is vulnerable to a CSRF attack. This allows an attacker to trigger an e-mail change for a user logged into a cloud foundry instance via a malicious link on a attacker controlled site. This vulnerability is applicable only when using the UAA internal user store for authentication. Deployments enabled for integration via SAML or LDAP are not affected. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3190 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2021-08-25 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| With Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release versions v209 or earlier, UAA Standalone versions 2.2.6 or earlier and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Runtime 1.4.5 or earlier the UAA logout link is susceptible to an open redirect which allows an attacker to insert malicious web page as a redirect parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2015-1834 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 2 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2021-08-25 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A path traversal vulnerability was identified in the Cloud Foundry component Cloud Controller that affects cf-release versions prior to v208 and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime versions prior to 1.4.2. Path traversal is the 'outbreak' of a given directory structure through relative file paths in the user input. It aims at accessing files and directories that are stored outside the web root folder, for disallowed reading or even executing arbitrary system commands. An attacker could use a certain parameter of the file path for instance to inject '../' sequences in order to navigate through the file system. In this particular case a remote authenticated attacker can exploit the identified vulnerability in order to upload arbitrary files to the server running a Cloud Controller instance - outside the isolated application container. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3189 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2021-08-25 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| With Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release versions v208 or earlier, UAA Standalone versions 2.2.5 or earlier and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Runtime 1.4.5 or earlier, old Password Reset Links are not expired after the user changes their current email address to a new one. This vulnerability is applicable only when using the UAA internal user store for authentication. Deployments enabled for integration via SAML or LDAP are not affected. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1262 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-deployment, Cloud Foundry Uaa, Cloud Foundry Uaa-release | 2021-08-17 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| Cloud Foundry Foundation UAA, versions 4.12.X and 4.13.X, introduced a feature which could allow privilege escalation across identity zones for clients performing offline validation. A zone administrator could configure their zone to issue tokens which impersonate another zone, granting up to admin privileges in the impersonated zone for clients performing offline token validation. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1265 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 2 Cf-deployment, Cloud Foundry Diego | 2021-08-17 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| Cloud Foundry Diego, release versions prior to 2.8.0, does not properly sanitize file paths in tar and zip files headers. A remote attacker with CF admin privileges can upload a malicious buildpack that will allow a complete takeover of a Diego Cell VM and access to all apps running on that Diego Cell. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11282 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 2 Cf-deployment, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2021-08-17 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Cloud Foundry UAA, versions prior to v74.3.0, contains an endpoint that is vulnerable to SCIM injection attack. A remote authenticated malicious user with scim.invite scope can craft a request with malicious content which can leak information about users of the UAA. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11283 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 2 Cf-deployment, Cloud Foundry Smb Volume | 2021-08-17 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cloud Foundry SMB Volume, versions prior to v2.0.3, accidentally outputs sensitive information to the logs. A remote user with access to the SMB Volume logs can discover the username and password for volumes that have been recently created, allowing the user to take control of the SMB Volume. | |||||
| CVE-2016-0781 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 5 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime and 2 more | 2021-08-06 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| The UAA OAuth approval pages in Cloud Foundry v208 to v231, Login-server v1.6 to v1.14, UAA v2.0.0 to v2.7.4.1, UAA v3.0.0 to v3.2.0, UAA-Release v2 to v7 and Pivotal Elastic Runtime 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.20 are vulnerable to an XSS attack by specifying malicious java script content in either the OAuth scopes (SCIM groups) or SCIM group descriptions. | |||||
| CVE-2016-3084 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 5 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime and 2 more | 2021-08-06 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| The UAA reset password flow in Cloud Foundry release v236 and earlier versions, UAA release v3.3.0 and earlier versions, all versions of Login-server, UAA release v10 and earlier versions and Pivotal Elastic Runtime versions prior to 1.7.2 is vulnerable to a brute force attack due to multiple active codes at a given time. This vulnerability is applicable only when using the UAA internal user store for authentication. Deployments enabled for integration via SAML or LDAP are not affected. | |||||
| CVE-2017-4960 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2021-08-06 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry release v247 through v252, UAA stand-alone release v3.9.0 through v3.11.0, and UAA Bosh Release v21 through v26. There is a potential to subject the UAA OAuth clients to a denial of service attack. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4468 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 5 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime and 2 more | 2021-08-06 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| SQL injection vulnerability in Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) before 238; UAA 2.x before 2.7.4.4, 3.x before 3.3.0.2, and 3.4.x before 3.4.1; UAA BOSH before 11.2 and 12.x before 12.2; Elastic Runtime before 1.6.29 and 1.7.x before 1.7.7; and Ops Manager 1.7.x before 1.7.8 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2017-4973 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry Cf, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2021-08-06 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation cf-release versions prior to v257; UAA release 2.x versions prior to v2.7.4.14, 3.6.x versions prior to v3.6.8, 3.9.x versions prior to v3.9.10, and other versions prior to v3.15.0; and UAA bosh release (uaa-release) 13.x versions prior to v13.12, 24.x versions prior to v24.7, and other versions prior to v30. A vulnerability has been identified with the groups endpoint in UAA allowing users to elevate their privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2017-4994 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry Cf, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2021-08-06 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation cf-release versions prior to v263; UAA release 2.x versions prior to v2.7.4.18, 3.6.x versions prior to v3.6.12, 3.9.x versions prior to v3.9.14, and other versions prior to v4.3.0; and UAA bosh release (uaa-release) 13.x versions prior to v13.16, 24.x versions prior to v24.11, 30.x versions prior to 30.4, and other versions prior to v40. There was an issue with forwarded http headers in UAA that could result in account corruption. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8032 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry Cf, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2021-08-06 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 6.6 MEDIUM |
| In Cloud Foundry cf-release versions prior to v264; UAA release all versions of UAA v2.x.x, 3.6.x versions prior to v3.6.13, 3.9.x versions prior to v3.9.15, 3.20.x versions prior to v3.20.0, and other versions prior to v4.4.0; and UAA bosh release (uaa-release) 13.x versions prior to v13.17, 24.x versions prior to v24.12. 30.x versions prior to 30.5, and other versions prior to v41, zone administrators are allowed to escalate their privileges when mapping permissions for an external provider. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6636 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 5 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime and 2 more | 2021-08-06 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The OAuth authorization implementation in Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) before 242; UAA 2.x before 2.7.4.7, 3.x before 3.3.0.5, and 3.4.x before 3.4.4; UAA BOSH before 11.5 and 12.x before 12.5; Elastic Runtime before 1.6.40, 1.7.x before 1.7.21, and 1.8.x before 1.8.1; and Ops Manager 1.7.x before 1.7.13 and 1.8.x before 1.8.1 mishandles redirect_uri subdomains, which allows remote attackers to obtain implicit access tokens via a modified subdomain. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6637 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 5 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime and 2 more | 2021-08-06 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 9.6 CRITICAL |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) before 242; UAA 2.x before 2.7.4.7, 3.x before 3.3.0.5, and 3.4.x before 3.4.4; UAA BOSH before 11.5 and 12.x before 12.5; Elastic Runtime before 1.6.40, 1.7.x before 1.7.21, and 1.8.x before 1.8.2; and Ops Manager 1.7.x before 1.7.13 and 1.8.x before 1.8.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that approve or deny a scope via a profile or authorize approval page. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6659 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2021-08-06 | 2.6 LOW | 8.1 HIGH |
| Cloud Foundry before 248; UAA 2.x before 2.7.4.12, 3.x before 3.6.5, and 3.7.x through 3.9.x before 3.9.3; and UAA bosh release (aka uaa-release) before 13.9 for UAA 3.6.5 and before 24 for UAA 3.9.3 allow attackers to gain privileges by accessing UAA logs and subsequently running a specially crafted application that interacts with a configured SAML provider. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6651 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 5 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime and 2 more | 2021-08-06 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The UAA /oauth/token endpoint in Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) before 243; UAA 2.x before 2.7.4.8, 3.x before 3.3.0.6, and 3.4.x before 3.4.5; UAA BOSH before 11.7 and 12.x before 12.6; Elastic Runtime before 1.6.40, 1.7.x before 1.7.21, and 1.8.x before 1.8.2; and Ops Manager 1.7.x before 1.7.13 and 1.8.x before 1.8.1 allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges by leveraging possession of a token. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5407 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Spring Security | 2021-06-14 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Spring Security versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.4 and 5.3.x prior to 5.3.2 contain a signature wrapping vulnerability during SAML response validation. When using the spring-security-saml2-service-provider component, a malicious user can carefully modify an otherwise valid SAML response and append an arbitrary assertion that Spring Security will accept as valid. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5408 | 2 Pivotal Software, Vmware | 2 Spring Security, Spring Security | 2021-06-14 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Spring Security versions 5.3.x prior to 5.3.2, 5.2.x prior to 5.2.4, 5.1.x prior to 5.1.10, 5.0.x prior to 5.0.16 and 4.2.x prior to 4.2.16 use a fixed null initialization vector with CBC Mode in the implementation of the queryable text encryptor. A malicious user with access to the data that has been encrypted using such an encryptor may be able to derive the unencrypted values using a dictionary attack. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5007 | 2 Pivotal Software, Vmware | 2 Spring Framework, Spring Security | 2021-06-08 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Both Spring Security 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.0 and the Spring Framework 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.x, 4.2.x rely on URL pattern mappings for authorization and for mapping requests to controllers respectively. Differences in the strictness of the pattern matching mechanisms, for example with regards to space trimming in path segments, can lead Spring Security to not recognize certain paths as not protected that are in fact mapped to Spring MVC controllers that should be protected. The problem is compounded by the fact that the Spring Framework provides richer features with regards to pattern matching as well as by the fact that pattern matching in each Spring Security and the Spring Framework can easily be customized creating additional differences. | |||||
| CVE-2021-26987 | 2 Netapp, Pivotal Software | 4 Element Plug-in For Vcenter Server, Management Services For Element Software And Netapp Hci, Solidfire \& Hci Management Node and 1 more | 2021-03-22 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Element Plug-in for vCenter Server incorporates SpringBoot Framework. SpringBoot Framework versions prior to 1.3.2 are susceptible to a vulnerability which when successfully exploited could lead to Remote Code Execution. All versions of Element Plug-in for vCenter Server, Management Services versions prior to 2.17.56 and Management Node versions through 12.2 contain vulnerable versions of SpringBoot Framework. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11269 | 2 Oracle, Pivotal Software | 2 Banking Corporate Lending, Spring Security Oauth | 2021-01-30 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Spring Security OAuth versions 2.3 prior to 2.3.6, 2.2 prior to 2.2.5, 2.1 prior to 2.1.5, and 2.0 prior to 2.0.18, as well as older unsupported versions could be susceptible to an open redirector attack that can leak an authorization code. A malicious user or attacker can craft a request to the authorization endpoint using the authorization code grant type, and specify a manipulated redirection URI via the redirect_uri parameter. This can cause the authorization server to redirect the resource owner user-agent to a URI under the control of the attacker with the leaked authorization code. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3778 | 2 Oracle, Pivotal Software | 2 Banking Corporate Lending, Spring Security Oauth | 2021-01-30 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Spring Security OAuth, versions 2.3 prior to 2.3.5, and 2.2 prior to 2.2.4, and 2.1 prior to 2.1.4, and 2.0 prior to 2.0.17, and older unsupported versions could be susceptible to an open redirector attack that can leak an authorization code. A malicious user or attacker can craft a request to the authorization endpoint using the authorization code grant type, and specify a manipulated redirection URI via the "redirect_uri" parameter. This can cause the authorization server to redirect the resource owner user-agent to a URI under the control of the attacker with the leaked authorization code. This vulnerability exposes applications that meet all of the following requirements: Act in the role of an Authorization Server (e.g. @EnableAuthorizationServer) and uses the DefaultRedirectResolver in the AuthorizationEndpoint. This vulnerability does not expose applications that: Act in the role of an Authorization Server and uses a different RedirectResolver implementation other than DefaultRedirectResolver, act in the role of a Resource Server only (e.g. @EnableResourceServer), act in the role of a Client only (e.g. @EnableOAuthClient). | |||||
| CVE-2017-8028 | 2 Debian, Pivotal Software | 2 Debian Linux, Spring-ldap | 2021-01-20 | 5.1 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| In Pivotal Spring-LDAP versions 1.3.0 - 2.3.1, when connected to some LDAP servers, when no additional attributes are bound, and when using LDAP BindAuthenticator with org.springframework.ldap.core.support.DefaultTlsDirContextAuthenticationStrategy as the authentication strategy, and setting userSearch, authentication is allowed with an arbitrary password when the username is correct. This occurs because some LDAP vendors require an explicit operation for the LDAP bind to take effect. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3793 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Application Service | 2020-10-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Pivotal Apps Manager Release, versions 665.0.x prior to 665.0.28, versions 666.0.x prior to 666.0.21, versions 667.0.x prior to 667.0.7, contain an invitation service that accepts HTTP. A remote unauthenticated user could listen to network traffic and gain access to the authorization credentials used to make the invitation requests. | |||||