Search
Total
201818 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-35304 | 2022-07-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2022-35303 | 2022-07-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2022-35302 | 2022-07-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2022-35301 | 2022-07-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2022-35300 | 2022-07-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32951 | 2022-07-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2022-29926 | 2022-07-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation in Cybozu, Inc. showed that it was not a vulnerability. Notes: https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN14077132/ | |||||
| CVE-2022-29931 | 1 Raytion | 1 Custom Security Manager | 2022-07-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| The administration interface of the Raytion Custom Security Manager (Raytion CSM) in Version 7.2.0 allows reflected Cross-site Scripting (XSS). | |||||
| CVE-2021-46815 | 2022-07-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2021-46789. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2021-46789. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-46789 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2022-31762 | 1 Huawei | 3 Emui, Harmonyos, Magic Ui | 2022-07-12 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| The AMS module has a vulnerability in input validation. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause privilege escalation. | |||||
| CVE-2022-31755 | 1 Huawei | 3 Emui, Harmonyos, Magic Ui | 2022-07-12 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| The communication module has a vulnerability of improper permission preservation. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect system availability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-31751 | 1 Huawei | 3 Emui, Harmonyos, Magic Ui | 2022-07-12 | 4.9 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| The kernel emcom module has multi-thread contention. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect system availability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1328 | 2 Debian, Mutt | 2 Debian Linux, Mutt | 2022-07-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Buffer Overflow in uudecoder in Mutt affecting all versions starting from 0.94.13 before 2.2.3 allows read past end of input line | |||||
| CVE-2022-27241 | 1 Mendix | 1 Mendix | 2022-07-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Mendix Applications using Mendix 7 (All versions < V7.23.31), Mendix Applications using Mendix 8 (All versions < V8.18.18), Mendix Applications using Mendix 9 (All versions < V9.11), Mendix Applications using Mendix 9 (V9.6) (All versions < V9.6.12). Applications built with an affected system publicly expose the internal project structure. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to read confidential information. | |||||
| CVE-2022-25622 | 1 Siemens | 23 Simatic Cfu Diq, Simatic Cfu Diq Firmware, Simatic Cfu Pa and 20 more | 2022-07-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC CFU DIQ (All versions), SIMATIC CFU PA (All versions), SIMATIC ET200AL IM157-1 PN (All versions), SIMATIC ET200MP IM155-5 PN HF (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions >= V4.2), SIMATIC ET200SP IM155-6 MF HF (All versions), SIMATIC ET200SP IM155-6 PN HA (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC ET200SP IM155-6 PN HF (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions >= V4.2), SIMATIC ET200SP IM155-6 PN/2 HF (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions >= V4.2), SIMATIC ET200SP IM155-6 PN/3 HF (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions >= V4.2), SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, CM 8x IO-Link, M12-L (All versions >= V5.1.1), SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, DI 16x24VDC, M12-L (All versions >= V5.1.1), SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, DI 8x24VDC, M12-L (All versions >= V5.1.1), SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, DIQ 16x24VDC/2A, M12-L (All versions >= V5.1.1), SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, DQ 8x24VDC/0,5A, M12-L (All versions >= V5.1.1), SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, DQ 8x24VDC/2A, M12-L (All versions >= V5.1.1), SIMATIC PN/MF Coupler (All versions), SIMATIC PN/PN Coupler (All versions >= 4.2), SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU family (incl. related ET200 CPUs and SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V2.0.0), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU family (incl. related ET200 CPUs and SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 H V6 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V6.0.10), SIMATIC S7-400 PN/DP V7 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-410 V10 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-410 V8 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC TDC CP51M1 (All versions), SIMATIC TDC CPU555 (All versions), SIMATIC WinAC RTX (All versions), SIMIT Simulation Platform (All versions), SINAMICS DCM (All versions with Ethernet interface), SINAMICS G110M (All versions with Ethernet interface), SINAMICS G115D (All versions with Ethernet interface), SINAMICS G120 (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions with Ethernet interface), SINAMICS G130 (All versions), SINAMICS G150 (All versions), SINAMICS S110 (All versions with Ethernet interface), SINAMICS S120 (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SINAMICS S150 (All versions), SINAMICS S210 (All versions), SINAMICS V90 (All versions with Ethernet interface), SIPLUS HCS4200 CIM4210 (All versions), SIPLUS HCS4200 CIM4210C (All versions), SIPLUS HCS4300 CIM4310 (All versions), SIPLUS NET PN/PN Coupler (All versions >= 4.2). The PROFINET (PNIO) stack, when integrated with the Interniche IP stack, improperly handles internal resources for TCP segments where the minimum TCP-Header length is less than defined. This could allow an attacker to create a denial of service condition for TCP services on affected devices by sending specially crafted TCP segments. | |||||
| CVE-2022-25373 | 1 Zohocorp | 1 Manageengine Supportcenter Plus | 2022-07-12 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Zoho ManageEngine SupportCenter Plus before 11020 allows Stored XSS in the request history. | |||||
| CVE-2021-23017 | 5 F5, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 2 more | 13 Nginx, Fedora, Ontap Select Deploy Administration Utility and 10 more | 2022-07-12 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 9.4 CRITICAL |
| A security issue in nginx resolver was identified, which might allow an attacker who is able to forge UDP packets from the DNS server to cause 1-byte memory overwrite, resulting in worker process crash or potential other impact. | |||||
| CVE-2021-29998 | 2 Siemens, Windriver | 69 Ruggedcom Win Subscriber Station, Ruggedcom Win Subscriber Station Firmware, Scalance X200-4 P Irt and 66 more | 2022-07-12 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Wind River VxWorks before 6.5. There is a possible heap overflow in dhcp client. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9669 | 1 Wordfence | 1 Wordfence | 2022-07-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| ** DISPUTED ** The Wordfence plugin 7.2.3 for WordPress allows XSS via a unique attack vector. NOTE: It has been asserted that this is not a valid vulnerability in the context of the Wordfence WordPress plugin as the firewall rules are not maintained as part of the Wordfence software but rather it is a set of rules hosted on vendor servers and pushed to the plugin with no versioning associated. Bypassing a WAF rule doesn't make a WordPress site vulnerable (speaking in terms of software vulnerabilities). | |||||
| CVE-2019-6569 | 1 Siemens | 10 Scalance X-200, Scalance X-200 Firmware, Scalance X-300 and 7 more | 2022-07-12 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| The monitor barrier of the affected products insufficiently blocks data from being forwarded over the mirror port into the mirrored network. An attacker could use this behavior to transmit malicious packets to systems in the mirrored network, possibly influencing their configuration and runtime behavior. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2300 | 1 Microweber | 1 Microweber | 2022-07-12 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Stored in GitHub repository microweber/microweber prior to 1.2.19. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22472 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Spectrum Protect Plus Container Backup And Restore, Linux Kernel | 2022-07-12 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Spectrum Protect Plus Container Backup and Restore (10.1.5 through 10.1.10.2 for Kubernetes and 10.1.7 through 10.1.10.2 for Red Hat OpenShift) could allow a remote attacker to bypass IBM Spectrum Protect Plus role based access control restrictions, caused by improper disclosure of session information. By retrieving the logs of a container an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to bypass login security of the IBM Spectrum Protect Plus server and gain unauthorized access based on the permissions of the IBM Spectrum Protect Plus user to the vulnerable Spectrum Protect Plus server software. IBM X-Force ID: 225340. | |||||
| CVE-2022-26135 | 1 Atlassian | 3 Jira Data Center, Jira Server, Jira Service Management | 2022-07-12 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in Mobile Plugin for Jira Data Center and Server allows a remote, authenticated user (including a user who joined via the sign-up feature) to perform a full read server-side request forgery via a batch endpoint. This affects Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center from version 8.0.0 before version 8.13.22, from version 8.14.0 before 8.20.10, from version 8.21.0 before 8.22.4. This also affects Jira Management Server and Data Center versions from version 4.0.0 before 4.13.22, from version 4.14.0 before 4.20.10 and from version 4.21.0 before 4.22.4. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37205 | 1 Siemens | 95 Simatic Drive Controller Cpu 1504d Tf, Simatic Drive Controller Cpu 1504d Tf Firmware, Simatic Drive Controller Cpu 1507d Tf and 92 more | 2022-07-12 | 7.1 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC Drive Controller family (All versions >= V2.9.2 < V2.9.4), SIMATIC ET 200SP Open Controller CPU 1515SP PC2 (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions >= V21.9 < V21.9.4), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions >= V4.5.0 < V4.5.2), SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU family (incl. related ET200 CPUs and SIPLUS variants) (All versions >= V2.9.2 < V2.9.4), SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller (All versions >= V21.9 < V21.9.4), SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced (All versions >= V4.0 < V4.0 SP1), TIM 1531 IRC (incl. SIPLUS NET variants) (All versions >= V2.2). An unauthenticated attacker could cause a denial-of-service condition in a PLC when sending specially prepared packets over port 102/tcp. A restart of the affected device is needed to restore normal operations. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37204 | 1 Siemens | 95 Simatic Drive Controller Cpu 1504d Tf, Simatic Drive Controller Cpu 1504d Tf Firmware, Simatic Drive Controller Cpu 1507d Tf and 92 more | 2022-07-12 | 7.1 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC Drive Controller family (All versions < V2.9.2), SIMATIC Drive Controller family (All versions >= V2.9.2 < V2.9.4), SIMATIC ET 200SP Open Controller CPU 1515SP PC (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC ET 200SP Open Controller CPU 1515SP PC2 (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V21.9), SIMATIC ET 200SP Open Controller CPU 1515SP PC2 (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions >= V21.9 < V21.9.4), SIMATIC ET 200SP Open Controller CPU 1515SP PC2 Ready4Linux (All versions), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V4.5.0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions >= V4.5.0 < V4.5.2), SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU family (incl. related ET200 CPUs and SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V2.9.2), SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU family (incl. related ET200 CPUs and SIPLUS variants) (All versions >= V2.9.2 < V2.9.4), SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller (All versions < V21.9), SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller (All versions >= V21.9 < V21.9.4), SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced (All versions < V4.0), SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced (All versions >= V4.0 < V4.0 SP1), TIM 1531 IRC (incl. SIPLUS NET variants) (All versions >= V2.2). An unauthenticated attacker could cause a denial-of-service condition in a PLC when sending specially prepared packet over port 102/tcp. A restart of the affected device is needed to restore normal operations. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37185 | 1 Siemens | 95 Simatic Drive Controller Cpu 1504d Tf, Simatic Drive Controller Cpu 1504d Tf Firmware, Simatic Drive Controller Cpu 1507d Tf and 92 more | 2022-07-12 | 7.1 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC Drive Controller family (All versions >= V2.9.2 < V2.9.4), SIMATIC ET 200SP Open Controller CPU 1515SP PC2 (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions >= V21.9 < V21.9.4), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions >= V4.5.0 < V4.5.2), SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU family (incl. related ET200 CPUs and SIPLUS variants) (All versions >= V2.9.2 < V2.9.4), SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller (All versions >= V21.9 < V21.9.4), SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced (All versions >= V4.0 < V4.0 SP1), TIM 1531 IRC (incl. SIPLUS NET variants) (All versions >= V2.2). An unauthenticated attacker could cause a denial-of-service condition in a PLC when sending specially prepared packets over port 102/tcp. A restart of the affected device is needed to restore normal operations. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40359 | 1 Siemens | 5 Simatic Batch, Simatic Net Pc, Simatic Route Control and 2 more | 2022-07-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in OpenPCS 7 V8.2 (All versions), OpenPCS 7 V9.0 (All versions < V9.0 Upd4), OpenPCS 7 V9.1 (All versions), SIMATIC BATCH V8.2 (All versions), SIMATIC BATCH V9.0 (All versions), SIMATIC BATCH V9.1 (All versions), SIMATIC NET PC Software V14 (All versions), SIMATIC NET PC Software V15 (All versions), SIMATIC NET PC Software V16 (All versions < V16 Update 6), SIMATIC NET PC Software V17 (All versions < V17 SP1), SIMATIC PCS 7 V8.2 (All versions), SIMATIC PCS 7 V9.0 (All versions < V9.0 SP3 UC04), SIMATIC PCS 7 V9.1 (All versions < V9.1 SP1), SIMATIC Route Control V8.2 (All versions), SIMATIC Route Control V9.0 (All versions), SIMATIC Route Control V9.1 (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC V15 and earlier (All versions < V15 SP1 Update 7), SIMATIC WinCC V16 (All versions < V16 Update 5), SIMATIC WinCC V17 (All versions < V17 Update 2), SIMATIC WinCC V7.4 (All versions < V7.4 SP1 Update 19), SIMATIC WinCC V7.5 (All versions < V7.5 SP2 Update 5). When downloading files, the affected systems do not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname. An attacker could then cause the pathname to resolve to a location outside of the restricted directory on the server and read unexpected critical files. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1593 | 1 Site Offline Or Coming Soon Project | 1 Site Offline Or Coming Soon | 2022-07-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| The Site Offline or Coming Soon WordPress plugin through 1.6.6 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, and it also lacking sanitisation as well as escaping in some of them. As a result, attackers could make a logged in admin change them and put Cross-Site Scripting payloads in them via a CSRF attack | |||||
| CVE-2021-24906 | 1 Wp-experts | 1 Protect Wp Admin | 2022-07-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The Protect WP Admin WordPress plugin before 3.6.2 does not check for authorisation in the lib/pwa-deactivate.php file, which could allow unauthenticated users to disable the plugin (and therefore the protection offered) via a crafted request | |||||
| CVE-2021-24893 | 1 Stars Rating Project | 1 Stars Rating | 2022-07-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The Stars Rating WordPress plugin before 3.5.1 does not validate the submitted rating, allowing submission of long integer, causing a Denial of Service in the comments section, or pending comment dashboard depending if the user sent it as unauthenticated or authenticated. | |||||
| CVE-2014-3650 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Aerogear | 2022-07-11 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Multiple persistent cross-site scripting (XSS) flaws were found in the way Aerogear handled certain user-supplied content. A remote attacker could use these flaws to compromise the application with specially crafted input. | |||||
| CVE-2022-34894 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Hub | 2022-07-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In JetBrains Hub before 2022.2.14799, insufficient access control allowed the hijacking of untrusted services | |||||
| CVE-2022-23719 | 1 Pingidentity | 1 Pingid Integration For Windows Login | 2022-07-11 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 6.4 MEDIUM |
| PingID Windows Login prior to 2.8 does not authenticate communication with a local Java service used to capture security key requests. An attacker with the ability to execute code on the target machine maybe able to exploit and spoof the local Java service using multiple attack vectors. A successful attack can lead to code executed as SYSTEM by the PingID Windows Login application, or even a denial of service for offline security key authentication. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23718 | 1 Pingidentity | 1 Pingid Integration For Windows Login | 2022-07-11 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| PingID Windows Login prior to 2.8 uses known vulnerable components that can lead to remote code execution. An attacker capable of achieving a sophisticated man-in-the-middle position, or to compromise Ping Identity web servers, could deliver malicious code that would be executed as SYSTEM by the PingID Windows Login application. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23717 | 1 Pingidentity | 1 Pingid Integration For Windows Login | 2022-07-11 | 4.9 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| PingID Windows Login prior to 2.8 is vulnerable to a denial of service condition on local machines when combined with using offline security keys as part of authentication. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21276 | 1 Polrproject | 1 Polr | 2022-07-11 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.3 CRITICAL |
| Polr is an open source URL shortener. in Polr before version 2.3.0, a vulnerability in the setup process allows attackers to gain admin access to site instances, even if they do not possess an existing account. This vulnerability exists regardless of users' settings. If an attacker crafts a request with specific cookie headers to the /setup/finish endpoint, they may be able to obtain admin privileges on the instance. This is caused by a loose comparison (==) in SetupController that is susceptible to attack. The project has been patched to ensure that a strict comparison (===) is used to verify the setup key, and that /setup/finish verifies that no users table exists before performing any migrations or provisioning any new accounts. This is fixed in version 2.3.0. Users can patch this vulnerability without upgrading by adding abort(404) to the very first line of finishSetup in SetupController.php. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40643 | 1 Eyesofnetwork | 1 Eyesofnetwork | 2022-07-11 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| EyesOfNetwork before 07-07-2021 has a Remote Code Execution vulnerability on the mail options configuration page. In the location of the "sendmail" application in the "cacti" configuration page (by default/usr/sbin/sendmail) it is possible to execute any command, which will be executed when we make a test of the configuration ("send test mail"). | |||||
| CVE-2021-3560 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Polkit Project and 1 more | 7 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Polkit and 4 more | 2022-07-11 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| It was found that polkit could be tricked into bypassing the credential checks for D-Bus requests, elevating the privileges of the requestor to the root user. This flaw could be used by an unprivileged local attacker to, for example, create a new local administrator. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32284 | 1 Yokogawa | 2 Aw810d, Aw810d Firmware | 2022-07-11 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Use of insufficiently random values vulnerability exists in Vnet/IP communication module VI461 of YOKOGAWA Wide Area Communication Router (WAC Router) AW810D, which may allow a remote attacker to cause denial-of-service (DoS) condition by sending a specially crafted packet. | |||||
| CVE-2022-27627 | 1 Cybozu | 1 Garoon | 2022-07-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting vulnerability in Organization's Information of Cybozu Garoon 4.10.2 to 5.5.1 allows a remote attacker to execute an arbitrary script on the logged-in user's web browser. | |||||
| CVE-2013-4561 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2022-07-11 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| In a openshift node, there is a cron job to update mcollective facts that mishandles a temporary file. This may lead to loss of confidentiality and integrity. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23728 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2022-07-11 | 6.6 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Attacker can reset the device with AT Command in the process of rebooting the device. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-210011. | |||||
| CVE-2022-31943 | 1 Mingsoft | 1 Mcms | 2022-07-11 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| MCMS v5.2.8 was discovered to contain an arbitrary file upload vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40597 | 1 Edimax | 2 Ic-3140w, Ic-3140w Firmware | 2022-07-11 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The firmware of EDIMAX IC-3140W Version 3.11 is hardcoded with Administrator username and password. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32091 | 1 Mariadb | 1 Mariadb | 2022-07-11 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| MariaDB v10.7 was discovered to contain an use-after-poison in in __interceptor_memset at /libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32089 | 1 Mariadb | 1 Mariadb | 2022-07-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| MariaDB v10.5 to v10.7 was discovered to contain a segmentation fault via the component st_select_lex_unit::exclude_level. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32088 | 1 Mariadb | 1 Mariadb | 2022-07-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| MariaDB v10.2 to v10.7 was discovered to contain a segmentation fault via the component Exec_time_tracker::get_loops/Filesort_tracker::report_use/filesort. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32087 | 1 Mariadb | 1 Mariadb | 2022-07-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| MariaDB v10.2 to v10.7 was discovered to contain a segmentation fault via the component Item_args::walk_args. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32086 | 1 Mariadb | 1 Mariadb | 2022-07-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| MariaDB v10.4 to v10.8 was discovered to contain a segmentation fault via the component Item_field::fix_outer_field. | |||||
| CVE-2022-31112 | 1 Parseplatform | 1 Parse-server | 2022-07-11 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 8.2 HIGH |
| Parse Server is an open source backend that can be deployed to any infrastructure that can run Node.js. In affected versions parse Server LiveQuery does not remove protected fields in classes, passing them to the client. The LiveQueryController now removes protected fields from the client response. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable t upgrade should use `Parse.Cloud.afterLiveQueryEvent` to manually remove protected fields. | |||||