Filtered by vendor Tenable
Subscribe
Search
Total
102 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-7063 | 4 Debian, Opensuse, Php and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Leap, Php and 1 more | 2022-05-08 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In PHP versions 7.2.x below 7.2.28, 7.3.x below 7.3.15 and 7.4.x below 7.4.3, when creating PHAR archive using PharData::buildFromIterator() function, the files are added with default permissions (0666, or all access) even if the original files on the filesystem were with more restrictive permissions. This may result in files having more lax permissions than intended when such archive is extracted. | |||||
| CVE-2022-24828 | 3 Fedoraproject, Getcomposer, Tenable | 3 Fedora, Composer, Tenable.sc | 2022-05-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Composer is a dependency manager for the PHP programming language. Integrators using Composer code to call `VcsDriver::getFileContent` can have a code injection vulnerability if the user can control the `$file` or `$identifier` argument. This leads to a vulnerability on packagist.org for example where the composer.json's `readme` field can be used as a vector for injecting parameters into hg/Mercurial via the `$file` argument, or git via the `$identifier` argument if you allow arbitrary data there (Packagist does not, but maybe other integrators do). Composer itself should not be affected by the vulnerability as it does not call `getFileContent` with arbitrary data into `$file`/`$identifier`. To the best of our knowledge this was not abused, and the vulnerability has been patched on packagist.org and Private Packagist within a day of the vulnerability report. | |||||
| CVE-2017-18214 | 2 Momentjs, Tenable | 2 Moment, Nessus | 2022-02-14 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The moment module before 2.19.3 for Node.js is prone to a regular expression denial of service via a crafted date string, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-4055. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3712 | 6 Debian, Mcafee, Netapp and 3 more | 16 Debian Linux, Epolicy Orchestrator, Clustered Data Ontap and 13 more | 2022-02-08 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y). | |||||
| CVE-2020-1967 | 10 Broadcom, Debian, Fedoraproject and 7 more | 26 Fabric Operating System, Debian Linux, Fedora and 23 more | 2021-12-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Server or client applications that call the SSL_check_chain() function during or after a TLS 1.3 handshake may crash due to a NULL pointer dereference as a result of incorrect handling of the "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension. The crash occurs if an invalid or unrecognised signature algorithm is received from the peer. This could be exploited by a malicious peer in a Denial of Service attack. OpenSSL version 1.1.1d, 1.1.1e, and 1.1.1f are affected by this issue. This issue did not affect OpenSSL versions prior to 1.1.1d. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1g (Affected 1.1.1d-1.1.1f). | |||||
| CVE-2020-7065 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Php and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Php and 1 more | 2021-12-02 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| In PHP versions 7.3.x below 7.3.16 and 7.4.x below 7.4.4, while using mb_strtolower() function with UTF-32LE encoding, certain invalid strings could cause PHP to overwrite stack-allocated buffer. This could lead to memory corruption, crashes and potentially code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2020-7070 | 7 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 4 more | 7 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 4 more | 2021-12-02 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In PHP versions 7.2.x below 7.2.34, 7.3.x below 7.3.23 and 7.4.x below 7.4.11, when PHP is processing incoming HTTP cookie values, the cookie names are url-decoded. This may lead to cookies with prefixes like __Host confused with cookies that decode to such prefix, thus leading to an attacker being able to forge cookie which is supposed to be secure. See also CVE-2020-8184 for more information. | |||||
| CVE-2020-7069 | 8 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 5 more | 8 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 5 more | 2021-12-02 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In PHP versions 7.2.x below 7.2.34, 7.3.x below 7.3.23 and 7.4.x below 7.4.11, when AES-CCM mode is used with openssl_encrypt() function with 12 bytes IV, only first 7 bytes of the IV is actually used. This can lead to both decreased security and incorrect encryption data. | |||||
| CVE-2021-23358 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Tenable and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Fedora, Tenable.sc and 1 more | 2021-09-22 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| The package underscore from 1.13.0-0 and before 1.13.0-2, from 1.3.2 and before 1.12.1 are vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Injection via the template function, particularly when a variable property is passed as an argument as it is not sanitized. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5794 | 2 Microsoft, Tenable | 2 Windows, Nessus Network Monitor | 2021-09-09 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in Nessus Network Monitor versions 5.11.0, 5.11.1, and 5.12.0 for Windows could allow an authenticated local attacker to execute arbitrary code by copying user-supplied files to a specially constructed path in a specifically named user directory. The attacker needs valid credentials on the Windows system to exploit this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9261 | 1 Tenable | 1 Log Correlation Engine | 2021-08-31 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Tenable Log Correlation Engine (aka LCE) before 4.8.1 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2019-16168 | 7 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 4 more | 19 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 16 more | 2021-07-31 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In SQLite through 3.29.0, whereLoopAddBtreeIndex in sqlite3.c can crash a browser or other application because of missing validation of a sqlite_stat1 sz field, aka a "severe division by zero in the query planner." | |||||
| CVE-2020-5808 | 1 Tenable | 1 Tenable.sc | 2021-07-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In certain scenarios in Tenable.sc prior to 5.17.0, a scanner could potentially be used outside the user's defined scan zone without a particular zone being specified within the Automatic Distribution configuration. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21371 | 1 Tenable | 1 Jira Cloud | 2021-03-18 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| Tenable for Jira Cloud is an open source project designed to pull Tenable.io vulnerability data, then generate Jira Tasks and sub-tasks based on the vulnerabilities' current state. It published in pypi as "tenable-jira-cloud". In tenable-jira-cloud before version 1.1.21, it is possible to run arbitrary commands through the yaml.load() method. This could allow an attacker with local access to the host to run arbitrary code by running the application with a specially crafted YAML configuration file. This is fixed in version 1.1.21 by using yaml.safe_load() instead of yaml.load(). | |||||
| CVE-2021-20076 | 1 Tenable | 1 Tenable.sc | 2021-03-10 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Tenable.sc and Tenable.sc Core versions 5.13.0 through 5.17.0 were found to contain a vulnerability that could allow an authenticated, unprivileged user to perform Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the Tenable.sc server via Hypertext Preprocessor unserialization. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5812 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus Amazon Machine Image | 2021-02-10 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Nessus AMI versions 8.12.0 and earlier were found to either not validate, or incorrectly validate, a certificate which could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1559 | 7 Canonical, Debian, F5 and 4 more | 18 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Traffix Signaling Delivery Controller and 15 more | 2021-01-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q). | |||||
| CVE-2020-5793 | 2 Microsoft, Tenable | 3 Windows, Nessus, Nessus Agent | 2020-11-16 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in Nessus versions 8.9.0 through 8.12.0 for Windows & Nessus Agent 8.0.0 and 8.1.0 for Windows could allow an authenticated local attacker to copy user-supplied files to a specially constructed path in a specifically named user directory. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by creating a malicious file and copying the file to a system directory. The attacker needs valid credentials on the Windows system to exploit this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5407 | 7 Canonical, Debian, Nodejs and 4 more | 20 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Node.js and 17 more | 2020-09-18 | 1.9 LOW | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| Simultaneous Multi-threading (SMT) in processors can enable local users to exploit software vulnerable to timing attacks via a side-channel timing attack on 'port contention'. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5774 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2020-08-28 | 3.6 LOW | 7.1 HIGH |
| Nessus versions 8.11.0 and earlier were found to maintain sessions longer than the permitted period in certain scenarios. The lack of proper session expiration could allow attackers with local access to login into an existing browser session. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3974 | 2 Microsoft, Tenable | 2 Windows, Nessus | 2020-08-24 | 8.5 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| Nessus 8.5.2 and earlier on Windows platforms were found to contain an issue where certain system files could be overwritten arbitrarily, potentially creating a denial of service condition. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3962 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2020-08-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.3 LOW |
| Content Injection vulnerability in Tenable Nessus prior to 8.5.0 may allow an authenticated, local attacker to exploit this vulnerability by convincing another targeted Nessus user to view a malicious URL and use Nessus to send fraudulent messages. Successful exploitation could allow the authenticated adversary to inject arbitrary text into the feed status, which will remain saved post session expiration. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5765 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2020-07-20 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Nessus 8.10.0 and earlier were found to contain a Stored XSS vulnerability due to improper validation of input during scan configuration. An authenticated, remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in a user's session. Tenable has implemented additional input validation mechanisms to correct this issue in Nessus 8.11.0. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5737 | 1 Tenable | 1 Tenable.sc | 2020-04-23 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Stored XSS in Tenable.Sc before 5.14.0 could allow an authenticated remote attacker to craft a request to execute arbitrary script code in a user's browser session. Updated input validation techniques have been implemented to correct this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000029 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2019-12-31 | 3.5 LOW | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| Tenable Nessus before 6.8 has a stored XSS issue that requires admin-level authentication to the Nessus UI, and would potentially impact other admins (Tenable IDs 5218 and 5269). | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000028 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2019-12-31 | 3.5 LOW | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| Tenable Nessus before 6.8 has a stored XSS issue that requires admin-level authentication to the Nessus UI, and would only potentially impact other admins. (Tenable ID 5198). | |||||
| CVE-2016-4448 | 9 Apple, Hp, Mcafee and 6 more | 21 Icloud, Iphone Os, Itunes and 18 more | 2019-12-27 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Format string vulnerability in libxml2 before 2.9.4 allows attackers to have unspecified impact via format string specifiers in unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3982 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2019-10-28 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Nessus versions 8.6.0 and earlier were found to contain a Denial of Service vulnerability due to improper validation of specific imported scan types. An authenticated, remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to cause a Nessus scanner to become temporarily unresponsive. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1154 | 1 Tenable | 1 Securitycenter | 2019-10-03 | 3.3 LOW | 8.8 HIGH |
| In SecurityCenter versions prior to 5.7.0, a username enumeration issue could allow an unauthenticated attacker to automate the discovery of username aliases via brute force, ultimately facilitating unauthorized access. Server response output has been unified to correct this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8050 | 1 Tenable | 1 Appliance | 2019-10-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Tenable Appliance 4.4.0, and possibly prior, contains a flaw in the Web UI that allows for the unauthorized manipulation of the admin password. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1141 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2019-10-03 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| When installing Nessus to a directory outside of the default location, Nessus versions prior to 7.0.3 did not enforce secure permissions for sub-directories. This could allow for local privilege escalation if users had not secured the directories in the installation location. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8051 | 1 Tenable | 1 Appliance | 2019-10-03 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Tenable Appliance 3.5 - 4.4.0, and possibly prior versions, contains a flaw in the simpleupload.py script in the Web UI. Through the manipulation of the tns_appliance_session_user parameter, a remote attacker can inject arbitrary commands. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7850 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2019-10-03 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Nessus 6.10.x before 6.10.5 was found to be vulnerable to a local privilege escalation issue due to insecure permissions when running in Agent Mode. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7849 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2019-10-03 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Nessus 6.10.x before 6.10.5 was found to be vulnerable to a local denial of service condition due to insecure permissions when running in Agent Mode. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7199 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2019-10-03 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Nessus 6.6.2 - 6.10.3 contains a flaw related to insecure permissions that may allow a local attacker to escalate privileges when the software is running in Agent Mode. Version 6.10.4 fixes this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6543 | 2 Microsoft, Tenable | 3 Windows, Appliance, Nessus | 2019-10-03 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 7.3 HIGH |
| Tenable Nessus before 6.10.2 (as used alone or in Tenable Appliance before 4.5.0) was found to contain a flaw that allowed a remote, authenticated attacker to upload a crafted file that could be written to anywhere on the system. This could be used to subsequently gain elevated privileges on the system (e.g., after a reboot). This issue only affects installations on Windows. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3961 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2019-06-26 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Nessus versions 8.4.0 and earlier were found to contain a reflected XSS vulnerability due to improper validation of user-supplied input. An unauthenticated, remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability via a specially crafted request to execute arbitrary script code in a users browser session. | |||||
| CVE-2017-5179 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2019-03-19 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Tenable Nessus before 6.9.3 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3923 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2019-02-12 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Nessus versions 8.2.1 and earlier were found to contain a stored XSS vulnerability due to improper validation of user-supplied input. An authenticated, remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability via a specially crafted request to execute arbitrary script code in a user's browser session. Tenable has released Nessus 8.2.2 to address this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2014-4980 | 1 Tenable | 2 Nessus, Web Ui | 2018-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The /server/properties resource in Tenable Web UI before 2.3.5 for Nessus 5.2.3 through 5.2.7 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via the token parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1155 | 1 Tenable | 1 Securitycenter | 2018-10-03 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| In SecurityCenter versions prior to 5.7.0, a cross-site scripting (XSS) issue could allow an authenticated attacker to inject JavaScript code into an image filename parameter within the Reports feature area. Properly updated input validation techniques have been implemented to correct this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1148 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2018-06-20 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In Nessus before 7.1.0, Session Fixation exists due to insufficient session management within the application. An authenticated attacker could maintain system access due to session fixation after a user password change. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1147 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2018-06-19 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| In Nessus before 7.1.0, a XSS vulnerability exists due to improper input validation. A remote authenticated attacker could create and upload a .nessus file, which may be viewed by an administrator allowing for the execution of arbitrary script code in a user's browser session. In other scenarios, XSS could also occur by altering variables from the Advanced Settings. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1142 | 1 Tenable | 1 Appliance | 2018-04-19 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Tenable Appliance versions 4.6.1 and earlier have been found to contain a single XSS vulnerability. Utilizing a specially crafted request, an authenticated attacker could potentially execute arbitrary JavaScript code by manipulating certain URL parameters related to offline plugins. | |||||
| CVE-2017-11508 | 1 Tenable | 1 Securitycenter | 2017-11-22 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| SecurityCenter versions 5.5.0, 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 contain a SQL Injection vulnerability that could be exploited by an authenticated user with sufficient privileges to run diagnostic scans. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by entering a crafted SQL query into the password field of a diagnostic scan within SecurityCenter. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to gain unauthorized access. | |||||
| CVE-2017-11506 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2017-08-24 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| When linking a Nessus scanner or agent to Tenable.io or other manager, Nessus 6.x before 6.11 does not verify the manager's TLS certificate when making the initial outgoing connection. This could allow man-in-the-middle attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2122 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2017-05-19 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting vulnerability in Nessus versions 6.8.0, 6.8.1, 6.9.0, 6.9.1 and 6.9.2 allows remote authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9259 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2017-03-01 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Tenable Nessus before 6.9.1 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9260 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2017-02-03 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Tenable Nessus before 6.9 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors related to handling of .nessus files. | |||||
| CVE-2014-7280 | 1 Tenable | 1 Web Ui | 2015-09-08 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Web UI before 2.3.4 Build #85 for Tenable Nessus 5.x allows remote web servers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the server header. | |||||