Search
Total
201818 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-8654 | 3 Debian, Jasper Project, Redhat | 7 Debian Linux, Jasper, Enterprise Linux Desktop and 4 more | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| A heap-buffer overflow vulnerability was found in QMFB code in JPC codec caused by buffer being allocated with too small size. jasper versions before 2.0.0 are affected. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8656 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2019-10-09 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Jboss jbossas before versions 5.2.0-23, 6.4.13, 7.0.5 is vulnerable to an unsafe file handling in the jboss init script which could result in local privilege escalation. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9036 | 1 Tarantool | 1 Msgpuck | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An exploitable incorrect return value vulnerability exists in the mp_check function of Tarantool's Msgpuck library 1.0.3. A specially crafted packet can cause the mp_check function to incorrectly return success when trying to check if decoding a map16 packet will read outside the bounds of a buffer, resulting in a denial of service vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9037 | 1 Tarantool | 1 Tarantool | 2019-10-09 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| An exploitable out-of-bounds array access vulnerability exists in the xrow_header_decode function of Tarantool 1.7.2.0-g8e92715. A specially crafted packet can cause the function to access an element outside the bounds of a global array that is used to determine the type of the specified key's value. This can lead to an out of bounds read within the context of the server. An attacker who exploits this vulnerability can cause a denial of service vulnerability on the server. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9124 | 1 Revive-adserver | 1 Revive Adserver | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Revive Adserver before 3.2.3 suffers from Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts. The login page of Revive Adserver is vulnerable to password-guessing attacks. An account lockdown feature was considered, but rejected to avoid introducing service disruptions to regular users during such attacks. A random delay has instead been introduced as a countermeasure in case of password failures, along with a system to discourage parallel brute forcing. These systems will effectively allow the valid users to log in to the adserver, even while an attack is in progress. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9125 | 1 Revive-adserver | 1 Revive Adserver | 2019-10-09 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Revive Adserver before 3.2.3 suffers from session fixation, by allowing arbitrary session identifiers to be forced and, at the same time, by not invalidating the existing session upon a successful authentication. Under some circumstances, that could have been an opportunity for an attacker to steal an authenticated session. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9126 | 1 Revive-adserver | 1 Revive Adserver | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Revive Adserver before 3.2.3 suffers from persistent XSS. Usernames are not properly escaped when displayed in the audit trail widget of the dashboard upon login, allowing persistent XSS attacks. An authenticated user with enough privileges to create other users could exploit the vulnerability to access the administrator account. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9127 | 1 Revive-adserver | 1 Revive Adserver | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Revive Adserver before 3.2.3 suffers from Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The password recovery form in Revive Adserver is vulnerable to CSRF attacks. This vulnerability could be exploited to send a large number of password recovery emails to the registered users, especially in conjunction with a bug that caused recovery emails to be sent to all the users at once. Both issues have been fixed. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9128 | 1 Revive-adserver | 1 Revive Adserver | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Revive Adserver before 3.2.3 suffers from reflected XSS. The affiliate-preview.php script in www/admin is vulnerable to a reflected XSS attack. This vulnerability could be used by an attacker to steal the session ID of an authenticated user, by tricking them into visiting a specifically crafted URL. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9129 | 1 Revive-adserver | 1 Revive Adserver | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Revive Adserver before 3.2.3 suffers from Information Exposure Through Discrepancy. It is possible to check whether or not an email address was associated to one or more user accounts on a target Revive Adserver instance by examining the message printed by the password recovery system. Such information cannot however be used directly to log in to the system, which requires a username. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9130 | 1 Revive-adserver | 1 Revive Adserver | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Revive Adserver before 3.2.3 suffers from Persistent XSS. A vector for persistent XSS attacks via the Revive Adserver user interface exists, requiring a trusted (non-admin) account. The website name wasn't properly escaped when displayed in the campaign-zone.php script. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9154 | 1 Siemens | 12 Desigo Web Module Pxa30-w0, Desigo Web Module Pxa30-w0 Firmware, Desigo Web Module Pxa30-w1 and 9 more | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Siemens Desigo PX Web modules PXA40-W0, PXA40-W1, PXA40-W2 for Desigo PX automation controllers PXC00-E.D, PXC50-E.D, PXC100-E.D, PXC200-E.D (All firmware versions < V6.00.046) and Desigo PX Web modules PXA30-W0, PXA30-W1, PXA30-W2 for Desigo PX automation controllers PXC00-U, PXC64-U, PXC128-U (All firmware versions < V6.00.046) use a pseudo random number generator with insufficient entropy to generate certificates for HTTPS, potentially allowing remote attackers to reconstruct the corresponding private key. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9225 | 1 Cisco | 1 Asa Cx Context-aware Security Software | 2019-10-09 | 7.8 HIGH | 8.6 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the data plane IP fragment handler of the Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) CX Context-Aware Security module could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the CX module to be unable to process further traffic, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to improper handling of IP fragments. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted fragmented IP traffic across the CX module. An exploit could allow the attacker to exhaust free packet buffers in shared memory (SHM), causing the CX module to be unable to process further traffic, resulting in a DoS condition. This vulnerability affects all versions of the ASA CX Context-Aware Security module. Cisco has not released and will not release software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCva62946. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9335 | 1 Redlion | 4 Sixnet-managed Industrial Switches, Sixnet-managed Industrial Switches Firmware, Stride-managed Ethernet Switches and 1 more | 2019-10-09 | 10.0 HIGH | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| A hard-coded cryptographic key vulnerability was identified in Red Lion Controls Sixnet-Managed Industrial Switches running firmware Version 5.0.196 and Stride-Managed Ethernet Switches running firmware Version 5.0.190. Vulnerable versions of Stride-Managed Ethernet switches and Sixnet-Managed Industrial switches use hard-coded HTTP SSL/SSH keys for secure communication. Because these keys cannot be regenerated by users, all products use the same key. The attacker could disrupt communication or compromise the system. CVSS v3 base score: 10, CVSS vector string: (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). Red Lion Controls recommends updating to SLX firmware Version 5.3.174. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9358 | 1 Marel | 44 A320, A320 Firmware, A325 and 41 more | 2019-10-09 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A Hard-Coded Passwords issue was discovered in Marel Food Processing Systems M3000 terminal associated with the following systems: A320, A325, A371, A520 Master, A520 Slave, A530, A542, A571, Check Bin Grader, FlowlineQC T376, IPM3 Dual Cam v132, IPM3 Dual Cam v139, IPM3 Single Cam v132, P520, P574, SensorX13 QC flow line, SensorX23 QC Master, SensorX23 QC Slave, Speed Batcher, T374, T377, V36, V36B, and V36C; M3210 terminal associated with the same systems as the M3000 terminal identified above; M3000 desktop software associated with the same systems as the M3000 terminal identified above; MAC4 controller associated with the same systems as the M3000 terminal identified above; SensorX23 X-ray machine; SensorX25 X-ray machine; and MWS2 weighing system. The end user does not have the ability to change system passwords. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9368 | 1 Eaton | 1 Xcomfort Ethernet Communication Interface | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Eaton xComfort Ethernet Communication Interface (ECI) Versions 1.07 and prior. By accessing a specific uniform resource locator (URL) on the webserver, a malicious user may be able to access files without authenticating. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9459 | 2 Nextcloud, Owncloud | 2 Nextcloud Server, Owncloud | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Nextcloud Server before 9.0.52 & ownCloud Server before 9.0.4 are vulnerable to a log pollution vulnerability potentially leading to a local XSS. The download log functionality in the admin screen is delivering the log in JSON format to the end-user. The file was delivered with an attachment disposition forcing the browser to download the document. However, Firefox running on Microsoft Windows would offer the user to open the data in the browser as an HTML document. Thus any injected data in the log would be executed. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9461 | 2 Nextcloud, Owncloud | 2 Nextcloud Server, Owncloud | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Nextcloud Server before 9.0.52 & ownCloud Server before 9.0.4 are not properly verifying edit check permissions on WebDAV copy actions. The WebDAV endpoint was not properly checking the permission on a WebDAV COPY action. This allowed an authenticated attacker with access to a read-only share to put new files in there. It was not possible to modify existing files. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9462 | 2 Nextcloud, Owncloud | 2 Nextcloud Server, Owncloud | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Nextcloud Server before 9.0.52 & ownCloud Server before 9.0.4 are not properly verifying restore privileges when restoring a file. The restore capability of Nextcloud/ownCloud was not verifying whether a user has only read-only access to a share. Thus a user with read-only access was able to restore old versions. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9463 | 2 Nextcloud, Owncloud | 2 Nextcloud Server, Owncloud | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Nextcloud Server before 9.0.54 and 10.0.1 & ownCloud Server before 9.1.2, 9.0.6, and 8.2.9 suffer from SMB User Authentication Bypass. Nextcloud/ownCloud include an optional and not by default enabled SMB authentication component that allows authenticating users against an SMB server. This backend is implemented in a way that tries to connect to a SMB server and if that succeeded consider the user logged-in. The backend did not properly take into account SMB servers that have any kind of anonymous auth configured. This is the default on SMB servers nowadays and allows an unauthenticated attacker to gain access to an account without valid credentials. Note: The SMB backend is disabled by default and requires manual configuration in the Nextcloud/ownCloud config file. If you have not configured the SMB backend then you're not affected by this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9464 | 1 Nextcloud | 1 Nextcloud Server | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Nextcloud Server before 9.0.54 and 10.0.0 suffers from an improper authorization check on removing shares. The Sharing Backend as implemented in Nextcloud does differentiate between shares to users and groups. In case of a received group share, users should be able to unshare the file to themselves but not to the whole group. The previous API implementation simply unshared the file to all users in the group. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9465 | 2 Nextcloud, Owncloud | 2 Nextcloud Server, Owncloud | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Nextcloud Server before 10.0.1 & ownCloud Server before 9.0.6 and 9.1.2 suffer from Stored XSS in CardDAV image export. The CardDAV image export functionality as implemented in Nextcloud/ownCloud allows the download of images stored within a vCard. Due to not performing any kind of verification on the image content this is prone to a stored Cross-Site Scripting attack. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9466 | 2 Nextcloud, Owncloud | 2 Nextcloud Server, Owncloud | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Nextcloud Server before 10.0.1 & ownCloud Server before 9.0.6 and 9.1.2 suffer from Reflected XSS in the Gallery application. The gallery app was not properly sanitizing exception messages from the Nextcloud/ownCloud server. Due to an endpoint where an attacker could influence the error message, this led to a reflected Cross-Site-Scripting vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9467 | 2 Nextcloud, Owncloud | 2 Nextcloud Server, Owncloud | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Nextcloud Server before 9.0.54 and 10.0.1 & ownCloud Server before 9.0.6 and 9.1.2 suffer from content spoofing in the files app. The location bar in the files app was not verifying the passed parameters. An attacker could craft an invalid link to a fake directory structure and use this to display an attacker-controlled error message to the user. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9468 | 2 Nextcloud, Owncloud | 2 Nextcloud Server, Owncloud | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Nextcloud Server before 9.0.54 and 10.0.1 & ownCloud Server before 9.0.6 and 9.1.2 suffer from content spoofing in the dav app. The exception message displayed on the DAV endpoints contained partially user-controllable input leading to a potential misrepresentation of information. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9469 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 8.2 HIGH |
| Multiple versions of GitLab expose a dangerous method to any authenticated user that could lead to the deletion of all Issue and MergeRequest objects on a GitLab instance. For GitLab instances with publicly available projects this vulnerability could be exploited by an unauthenticated user. A fix was included in versions 8.14.3, 8.13.8, and 8.12.11, which were released on December 5th 2016 at 3:59 PST. The GitLab versions vulnerable to this are 8.13.0, 8.13.0-ee, 8.13.1, 8.13.1-ee, 8.13.2, 8.13.2-ee, 8.13.3, 8.13.3-ee, 8.13.4, 8.13.4-ee, 8.13.5, 8.13.5-ee, 8.13.6, 8.13.6-ee, 8.13.7, 8.14.0, 8.14.0-ee, 8.14.1, 8.14.2, and 8.14.2-ee. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9470 | 1 Revive-adserver | 1 Revive Adserver | 2019-10-09 | 9.3 HIGH | 9.0 CRITICAL |
| Revive Adserver before 3.2.5 and 4.0.0 suffers from Reflected File Download. `www/delivery/asyncspc.php` was vulnerable to the fairly new Reflected File Download (RFD) web attack vector that enables attackers to gain complete control over a victim's machine by virtually downloading a file from a trusted domain. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9471 | 1 Revive-adserver | 1 Revive Adserver | 2019-10-09 | 2.1 LOW | 3.1 LOW |
| Revive Adserver before 3.2.5 and 4.0.0 suffers from Special Element Injection. Usernames weren't properly sanitised when creating users on a Revive Adserver instance. Especially, control characters were not filtered, allowing apparently identical usernames to co-exist in the system, due to the fact that such characters are normally ignored when an HTML page is displayed in a browser. The issue could have therefore been exploited for user spoofing, although elevated privileges are required to create users within Revive Adserver. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9472 | 1 Revive-adserver | 1 Revive Adserver | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Revive Adserver before 3.2.5 and 4.0.0 suffers from Reflected XSS. The Revive Adserver web installer scripts were vulnerable to a reflected XSS attack via the dbHost, dbUser, and possibly other parameters. It has to be noted that the window for such attack vectors to be possible is extremely narrow and it is very unlikely that such an attack could be actually effective. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9482 | 1 Jqueryform | 1 Php Formmail Generator | 2019-10-09 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Code generated by PHP FormMail Generator may allow a remote unauthenticated user to bypass authentication in the to access the administrator panel by navigating directly to /admin.php?mod=admin&func=panel | |||||
| CVE-2016-9483 | 1 Jqueryform | 1 Php Formmail Generator | 2019-10-09 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The PHP form code generated by PHP FormMail Generator deserializes untrusted input as part of the phpfmg_filman_download() function. A remote unauthenticated attacker may be able to use this vulnerability to inject PHP code, or along with CVE-2016-9484 to perform local file inclusion attacks and obtain files from the server. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9484 | 1 Jqueryform | 1 Php Formmail Generator | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The generated PHP form code does not properly validate user input folder directories, allowing a remote unauthenticated attacker to perform a path traversal and access arbitrary files on the server. The PHP FormMail Generator website does not use version numbers and is updated continuously. Any PHP form code generated by this website prior to 2016-12-06 may be vulnerable. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9485 | 1 Forescout | 1 Secureconnector | 2019-10-09 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| On Windows endpoints, the SecureConnector agent must run under the local SYSTEM account or another administrator account in order to enable full functionality of the agent. The typical configuration is for the agent to run as a Windows service under the local SYSTEM account. The SecureConnector agent runs various plugin scripts and executables on the endpoint in order to gather and report information about the host to the CounterACT management appliance. The SecureConnector agent downloads these scripts and executables as needed from the CounterACT management appliance and runs them on the endpoint. The SecureConnector agent fails to set any permissions on downloaded file objects. This allows a malicious user to take ownership of any of these files and make modifications to it, regardless of where the files are saved. These files are then executed under SYSTEM privileges. A malicious unprivileged user can overwrite these executable files with malicious code before the SecureConnector agent executes them, causing the malicious code to be run under the SYSTEM account. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9486 | 1 Forescout | 1 Secureconnector | 2019-10-09 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| On Windows endpoints, the SecureConnector agent must run under the local SYSTEM account or another administrator account in order to enable full functionality of the agent. The typical configuration is for the agent to run as a Windows service under the local SYSTEM account. The SecureConnector agent runs various plugin scripts and executables on the endpoint in order to gather and report information about the host to the CounterACT management appliance. The SecureConnector agent downloads these scripts and executables as needed from the CounterACT management appliance and runs them on the endpoint. By default, these executable files are downloaded to and run from the %TEMP% directory of the currently logged on user, despite the fact that the SecureConnector agent is running as SYSTEM. Aside from the downloaded scripts, the SecureConnector agent runs a batch file with SYSTEM privileges from the temp directory of the currently logged on user. If the naming convention of this script can be derived, which is made possible by placing it in a directory to which the user has read access, it may be possible overwrite the legitimate batch file with a malicious one before SecureConnector executes it. It is possible to change this directory by setting the the configuration property config.script_run_folder.value in the local.properties configuration file on the CounterACT management appliance, however the batch file which is run does not follow this property. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9487 | 1 W3 | 1 Epubcheck | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| EpubCheck 4.0.1 does not properly restrict resolving external entities when parsing XML in EPUB files during validation. An attacker who supplies a specially crafted EPUB file may be able to exploit this behavior to read arbitrary files, or have the victim execute arbitrary requests on his behalf, abusing the victim's trust relationship with other entities. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9489 | 1 Zohocorp | 1 Manageengine Applications Manager | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| In ManageEngine Applications Manager 12 and 13 before build 13200, an authenticated user is able to alter all of their own properties, including own group, i.e. changing their group to one with higher privileges like "ADMIN". A user is also able to change properties of another user, e.g. change another user's password. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9491 | 1 Zohocorp | 1 Manageengine Applications Manager | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| ManageEngine Applications Manager 12 and 13 before build 13690 allows an authenticated user, who is able to access /register.do page (most likely limited to administrator), to browse the filesystem and read the system files, including Applications Manager configuration, stored private keys, etc. By default Application Manager is running with administrative privileges, therefore it is possible to access every directory on the underlying operating system. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9492 | 1 Jqueryform | 1 Php Formmail Generator | 2019-10-09 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The code generated by PHP FormMail Generator prior to 17 December 2016 is vulnerable to unrestricted upload of dangerous file types. In the generated form.lib.php file, upload file types are checked against a hard-coded list of dangerous extensions. This list does not include all variations of PHP files, which may lead to execution of the contained PHP code if the attacker can guess the uploaded filename. The form by default appends a short random string to the end of the filename. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9493 | 1 Jqueryform | 1 Php Formmail Generator | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| The code generated by PHP FormMail Generator prior to 17 December 2016 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. In the generated form.lib.php file, upload file types are checked against a hard-coded list of dangerous extensions. This list does not include all variations of PHP files, which may lead to execution of the contained PHP code if the attacker can guess the uploaded filename. The form by default appends a short random string to the end of the filename. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9494 | 1 Hughes | 8 Dw7000, Dw7000 Firmware, Hn7000s and 5 more | 2019-10-09 | 3.3 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Hughes high-performance broadband satellite modems, models HN7740S DW7000 HN7000S/SM, are potentially vulnerable to improper input validation. The device's advanced status web page that is linked to from the basic status web page does not appear to properly parse malformed GET requests. This may lead to a denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9495 | 1 Hughes | 8 Dw7000, Dw7000 Firmware, Hn7000s and 5 more | 2019-10-09 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Hughes high-performance broadband satellite modems, models HN7740S DW7000 HN7000S/SM, uses hard coded credentials. Access to the device's default telnet port (23) can be obtained through using one of a few default credentials shared among all devices. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9496 | 1 Hughes | 8 Dw7000, Dw7000 Firmware, Hn7000s and 5 more | 2019-10-09 | 6.1 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Hughes high-performance broadband satellite modems, models HN7740S DW7000 HN7000S/SM, lacks authentication. An unauthenticated user may send an HTTP GET request to http://[ip]/com/gatewayreset or http://[ip]/cgi/reboot.bin to cause the modem to reboot. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9497 | 1 Hughes | 8 Dw7000, Dw7000 Firmware, Hn7000s and 5 more | 2019-10-09 | 8.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Hughes high-performance broadband satellite modems, models HN7740S DW7000 HN7000S/SM, is vulnerable to an authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel. By default, port 1953 is accessible via telnet and does not require authentication. An unauthenticated remote user can access many administrative commands via this interface, including rebooting the modem. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9498 | 1 Zohocorp | 1 Manageengine Applications Manager | 2019-10-09 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| ManageEngine Applications Manager 12 and 13 before build 13200, allows unserialization of unsafe Java objects. The vulnerability can be exploited by remote user without authentication and it allows to execute remote code compromising the application as well as the operating system. As Application Manager's RMI registry is running with privileges of system administrator, by exploiting this vulnerability an attacker gains highest privileges on the underlying operating system. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9499 | 1 Accellion | 1 Ftp Server | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Accellion FTP server prior to version FTA_9_12_220 only returns the username in the server response if the username is invalid. An attacker may use this information to determine valid user accounts and enumerate them. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9500 | 1 Accellion | 1 Ftp Server | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Accellion FTP server prior to version FTA_9_12_220 uses the Accusoft Prizm Content flash component, which contains multiple parameters (customTabCategoryName, customButton1Image) that are vulnerable to cross-site scripting. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9574 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Network Security Services | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| nss before version 3.30 is vulnerable to a remote denial of service during the session handshake when using SessionTicket extension and ECDHE-ECDSA. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9575 | 1 Freeipa | 1 Freeipa | 2019-10-09 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| Ipa versions 4.2.x, 4.3.x before 4.3.3 and 4.4.x before 4.4.3 did not properly check the user's permissions while modifying certificate profiles in IdM's certprofile-mod command. An authenticated, unprivileged attacker could use this flaw to modify profiles to issue certificates with arbitrary naming or key usage information and subsequently use such certificates for other attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9577 | 3 Debian, Redhat, Spice Project | 7 Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux Desktop, Enterprise Linux Server and 4 more | 2019-10-09 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability was discovered in SPICE before 0.13.90 in the server's protocol handling. An authenticated attacker could send crafted messages to the SPICE server causing a heap overflow leading to a crash or possible code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9578 | 3 Debian, Redhat, Spice Project | 7 Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux Desktop, Enterprise Linux Server and 4 more | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability was discovered in SPICE before 0.13.90 in the server's protocol handling. An attacker able to connect to the SPICE server could send crafted messages which would cause the process to crash. | |||||