Search
Total
201818 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-10896 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.1.29511. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects in PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a heap-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-10192. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10894 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-30 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.3 LOW |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.1.29511. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects embedded in a PDF. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-10190. | |||||
| CVE-2011-4121 | 1 Ruby-lang | 1 Ruby | 2020-04-30 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The OpenSSL extension of Ruby (Git trunk) versions after 2011-09-01 up to 2011-11-03 always generated an exponent value of '1' to be used for private RSA key generation. A remote attacker could use this flaw to bypass or corrupt integrity of services, depending on strong private RSA keys generation mechanism. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5564 | 1 Cybozu | 1 Garoon | 2020-04-30 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting vulnerability in Cybozu Garoon 4.0.0 to 4.10.3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the application 'E-mail'. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10912 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the SetFieldValue command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9945. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10911 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the GetFieldValue command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9944. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10910 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the RotatePage command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9943. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10908 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the Export command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9865. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10909 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the AddWatermark command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9942. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10810 | 1 Hdfgroup | 1 Hdf5 | 2020-04-30 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in HDF5 through 1.12.0. A NULL pointer dereference exists in the function H5AC_unpin_entry() located in H5AC.c. It allows an attacker to cause Denial of Service. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10811 | 1 Hdfgroup | 1 Hdf5 | 2020-04-30 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in HDF5 through 1.12.0. A heap-based buffer over-read exists in the function H5O__layout_decode() located in H5Olayout.c. It allows an attacker to cause Denial of Service. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10812 | 1 Hdfgroup | 1 Hdf5 | 2020-04-30 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in HDF5 through 1.12.0. A NULL pointer dereference exists in the function H5F_get_nrefs() located in H5Fquery.c. It allows an attacker to cause Denial of Service. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10809 | 1 Hdfgroup | 1 Hdf5 | 2020-04-30 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in HDF5 through 1.12.0. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in the function Decompress() located in decompress.c. It can be triggered by sending a crafted file to the gif2h5 binary. It allows an attacker to cause Denial of Service. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10907 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.7.1.29511. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of widgets in XFA forms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-10650. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10906 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.7.1.29511. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the resetForm method. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-10614. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10904 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.1.29511. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects in PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-10464. | |||||
| CVE-2015-9541 | 2 Fedoraproject, Qt | 2 Fedora, Qt | 2020-04-30 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Qt through 5.14 allows an exponential XML entity expansion attack via a crafted SVG document that is mishandled in QXmlStreamReader, a related issue to CVE-2003-1564. | |||||
| CVE-2019-19105 | 2 Abb, Busch-jaeger | 4 Tg\/s3.2, Tg\/s3.2 Firmware, 6186\/11 and 1 more | 2020-04-29 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| The backup function in ABB Telephone Gateway TG/S 3.2 and Busch-Jaeger 6186/11 Telefon-Gateway saves the current settings and configuration of the application, including credentials of existing user accounts and other configuration's credentials in plaintext. | |||||
| CVE-2019-19108 | 1 Br-automation | 2 Automation Runtime, Automation Studio | 2020-04-29 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.4 CRITICAL |
| An authentication weakness in the SNMP service in B&R Automation Runtime versions 2.96, 3.00, 3.01, 3.06 to 3.10, 4.00 to 4.63, 4.72 and above allows unauthenticated users to modify the configuration of B&R products via SNMP. | |||||
| CVE-2014-9938 | 1 Git-scm | 1 Git | 2020-04-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh in Git before 1.9.3 does not sanitize branch names in the PS1 variable, allowing a malicious repository to cause code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2239 | 1 Marp | 1 Marp | 2020-04-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Marp versions v0.0.10 and earlier may allow an attacker to access local resources and files using JavaScript. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6512 | 3 Canonical, Debian, File\ | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, \ | 2020-04-29 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Race condition in the rmtree and remove_tree functions in the File-Path module before 2.13 for Perl allows attackers to set the mode on arbitrary files via vectors involving directory-permission loosening logic. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10903 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-29 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.3 LOW |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.1.29511. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects embedded in a PDF. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-10463. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10898 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.1.29511. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects in PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-10195. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10900 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.7.1.29511. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of AcroForms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-10142. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10899 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.7.1.29511. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of XFA templates. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-10132. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10895 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.1.29511. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects in PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-10191. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10892 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the communication API. The issue lies in the handling of the CombineFiles command, which allows an arbitrary file write with attacker controlled data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9830. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10891 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the Save command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9831. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10890 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the communication API. The issue lies in the handling of the ConvertToPDF command, which allows an arbitrary file write with attacker controlled data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9829. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10889 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the DuplicatePages command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9828. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11690 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Intellij Idea | 2020-04-29 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2020.1, the license server could be resolved to an untrusted host in some cases. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11890 | 1 Joomla | 1 Joomla\! | 2020-04-29 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Joomla! before 3.9.17. Improper input validations in the usergroup table class could lead to a broken ACL configuration. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11880 | 1 Kde | 1 Kmail | 2020-04-29 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in KDE KMail before 19.12.3. By using the proprietary (non-RFC6068) "mailto?attach=..." parameter, a website (or other source of mailto links) can make KMail attach local files to a composed email message without showing a warning to the user, as demonstrated by an attach=.bash_history value. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11878 | 1 Jitsi | 1 Meet | 2020-04-29 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The Jitsi Meet (aka docker-jitsi-meet) stack on Docker before stable-4384-1 uses default passwords (such as passw0rd) for system accounts. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8099 | 1 Bitdefender | 1 Antivirus 2020 | 2020-04-29 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the improper handling of junctions in Bitdefender Antivirus Free can allow an unprivileged user to substitute a quarantined file, and restore it to a privileged location. This issue affects: Bitdefender Antivirus Free versions prior to 1.0.17. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3261 | 1 Cisco | 34 6300 Series Access Points, 6300 Series Access Points Firmware, Aironet 1542d and 31 more | 2020-04-29 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Mobility Express Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user with an active session on an affected device to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions, including modifying the configuration, with the privilege level of the user. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9280 | 1 Silverstripe | 1 Silverstripe | 2020-04-29 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In SilverStripe through 4.5, files uploaded via Forms to folders migrated from Silverstripe CMS 3.x may be put to the default "/Uploads" folder instead. This affects installations which allowed upload folder protection via the optional silverstripe/secureassets module under 3.x. This module is installed and enabled by default on the Common Web Platform (CWP). The vulnerability only affects files uploaded after an upgrade to 4.x. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4786 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Pulse Connect Secure | 2020-04-29 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.2 before 8.2r1, 8.1 before 8.1r3, 8.0 before 8.0r11, and 7.4 before 7.4r13.4 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4787 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Pulse Connect Secure | 2020-04-29 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.2 before 8.2r1, 8.1 before 8.1r2, 8.0 before 8.0r10, and 7.4 before 7.4r13.4 allow remote attackers to read sensitive system authentication files in an unspecified directory via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4788 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Pulse Connect Secure | 2020-04-29 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.8 MEDIUM |
| Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.2 before 8.2r1, 8.1 before 8.1r2, 8.0 before 8.0r10, and 7.4 before 7.4r13.4 allow remote attackers to read an unspecified system file via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4789 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Pulse Connect Secure | 2020-04-29 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the system configuration section in the administrative user interface in Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.2 before 8.2r1, 8.1 before 8.1r2, 8.0 before 8.0r9, and 7.4 before 7.4r13.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4790 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Pulse Connect Secure | 2020-04-29 | 3.5 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the administrative user interface in Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.2 before 8.2r1, 8.1 before 8.1r2, 8.0 before 8.0r9, and 7.4 before 7.4r13.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4791 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Pulse Connect Secure | 2020-04-29 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| The administrative user interface in Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.2 before 8.2r1, 8.1 before 8.1r2, 8.0 before 8.0r9, and 7.4 before 7.4r13.4 allows remote administrators to enumerate files, read arbitrary files, and conduct server side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2020-12075 | 1 Supsystic | 1 Data Tables Generator | 2020-04-29 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The data-tables-generator-by-supsystic plugin before 1.9.92 for WordPress lacks capability checks for AJAX actions. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14366 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2020-04-29 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| download.cgi in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure 8.1RX before 8.1R13 and 8.3RX before 8.3R4 and Pulse Policy Secure through 5.2RX before 5.2R10 and 5.4RX before 5.4R4 have an Open Redirect Vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11213 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Secure Desktop Client | 2020-04-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Desktop Client and Network Connect, an attacker could access session tokens to replay and spoof sessions, and as a result, gain unauthorized access as an end user, a related issue to CVE-2019-1573. (The endpoint would need to be already compromised for exploitation to succeed.) This affects Pulse Desktop Client 5.x before Secure Desktop 5.3R7 and Pulse Desktop Client 9.x before Secure Desktop 9.0R3. It also affects (for Network Connect customers) Pulse Connect Secure 8.1 before 8.1R14, 8.3 before 8.3R7, and 9.0 before 9.0R3. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11543 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2020-04-29 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| XSS exists in the admin web console in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4, 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1, and 8.1RX before 8.1R15.1 and Pulse Policy Secure 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2, 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, and 5.2RX before 5.2R12.1. | |||||
| CVE-2017-11455 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2020-04-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| diag.cgi in Pulse Connect Secure 8.2R1 through 8.2R5, 8.1R1 through 8.1R10 and Pulse Policy Secure 5.3R1 through 5.3R5, 5.2R1 through 5.2R8, and 5.1R1 through 5.1R10 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests to start tcpdump, related to the lack of anti-CSRF tokens. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6320 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2020-04-29 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability has been discovered in login.cgi in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.1RX before 8.1R12 and 8.3RX before 8.3R2 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) 5.2RX before 5.2R9 and 5.4RX before 5.4R2 wherein an http(s) Host header received from the browser is trusted without validation. | |||||