Search
Total
201818 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-11276 | 1 Qualcomm | 1028 Apq8009, Apq8009 Firmware, Apq8017 and 1025 more | 2021-03-02 | 9.4 HIGH | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Possible buffer over read while processing P2P IE and NOA attribute of beacon and probe response frames due to improper validation of P2P IE and NOA attribute lengths in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking | |||||
| CVE-2020-35269 | 1 Nagios | 1 Nagios Core | 2021-03-02 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Nagios Core application version 4.2.4 is vulnerable to Site-Wide Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in many functions, like adding – deleting for hosts or servers. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6621 | 2 Debian, Ffmpeg | 2 Debian Linux, Ffmpeg | 2021-03-02 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The decode_frame function in libavcodec/utvideodec.c in FFmpeg through 3.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out of array read) via a crafted AVI file. | |||||
| CVE-2020-27221 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Openj9 | 2021-03-02 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Eclipse OpenJ9 up to and including version 0.23, there is potential for a stack-based buffer overflow when the virtual machine or JNI natives are converting from UTF-8 characters to platform encoding. | |||||
| CVE-2021-25177 | 2 Opendesign, Siemens | 3 Drawings Software Development Kit, Jt2go, Teamcenter Visualization | 2021-03-02 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Open Design Alliance Drawings SDK before 2021.11. A Type Confusion issue exists when rendering malformed .DXF and .DWG files. This can allow attackers to cause a crash, potentially enabling a denial of service attack (Crash, Exit, or Restart). | |||||
| CVE-2020-36232 | 1 Atlassian | 3 Atlassian-gadgets, Data Center, Jira | 2021-03-02 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 5.0 MEDIUM |
| The MessageBundleWhiteList class of atlassian-gadgets before version 4.2.37, from version 4.3.0 before 4.3.14, from version 4.3.2.0 before 4.3.2.4, from version 4.4.0 before 4.4.12, and from version 5.0.0 before 5.0.1 allowed unexpected DNS lookups and requests to arbitrary services as it incorrectly obtained application base url information from the executing http request which could be attacker controlled. | |||||
| CVE-2020-29453 | 1 Atlassian | 2 Data Center, Jira | 2021-03-02 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The CachingResourceDownloadRewriteRule class in Jira Server and Jira Data Center before version 8.5.11, from 8.6.0 before 8.13.3, and from 8.14.0 before 8.15.0 allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files within WEB-INF and META-INF directories via an incorrect path access check. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11278 | 1 Qualcomm | 754 Aqt1000, Aqt1000 Firmware, Ar8031 and 751 more | 2021-03-02 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Possible denial of service while handling host WMI command due to improper validation in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking | |||||
| CVE-2020-11270 | 1 Qualcomm | 830 Aqt1000, Aqt1000 Firmware, Ar7420 and 827 more | 2021-03-02 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Possible denial of service due to RTT responder consistently rejects all FTMR by transmitting FTM1 with failure status in the FTM parameter IE in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking | |||||
| CVE-2021-3273 | 1 Nagios | 1 Nagios Xi | 2021-03-02 | 9.0 HIGH | 7.2 HIGH |
| Nagios XI below 5.7 is affected by code injection in the /nagiosxi/admin/graphtemplates.php component. To exploit this vulnerability, someone must have an admin user account in Nagios XI's web system. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11280 | 1 Qualcomm | 824 Aqt1000, Aqt1000 Firmware, Ar7420 and 821 more | 2021-03-02 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Denial of service while processing fine timing measurement request (FTMR) frame with reserved bits set in the FTM parameter IE due to improper error handling in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking | |||||
| CVE-2020-11281 | 1 Qualcomm | 694 Aqt1000, Aqt1000 Firmware, Ar8031 and 691 more | 2021-03-02 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Allowing RTT frames to be linked with non randomized MAC address by comparing the sequence numbers can lead to information disclosure. in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking | |||||
| CVE-2020-11297 | 1 Qualcomm | 526 Apq8096au, Apq8096au Firmware, Aqt1000 and 523 more | 2021-03-02 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Denial of service in WLAN module due to improper check of subtypes in logic where excessive frames are dropped in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music | |||||
| CVE-2020-3664 | 1 Qualcomm | 630 Aqt1000, Aqt1000 Firmware, Ar8031 and 627 more | 2021-03-02 | 3.6 LOW | 6.0 MEDIUM |
| Out of bound read access in hypervisor due to an invalid read access attempt by passing invalid addresses in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking | |||||
| CVE-2021-22113 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Cloud Netflix Zuul | 2021-03-02 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Applications using the “Sensitive Headers” functionality in Spring Cloud Netflix Zuul 2.2.6.RELEASE and below may be vulnerable to bypassing the “Sensitive Headers” restriction when executing requests with specially constructed URLs. Applications that use Spring Security's StrictHttpFirewall (enabled by default for all URLs) are not affected by the vulnerability, as they reject requests that allow bypassing. | |||||
| CVE-2021-1388 | 1 Cisco | 2 Aci Multi-site Orchestrator, Application Policy Infrastructure Controller | 2021-03-02 | 9.3 HIGH | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability in an API endpoint of Cisco ACI Multi-Site Orchestrator (MSO) installed on the Application Services Engine could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper token validation on a specific API endpoint. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to the affected API. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to receive a token with administrator-level privileges that could be used to authenticate to the API on affected MSO and managed Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) devices. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8297 | 1 Nextcloud | 1 Deck | 2021-03-02 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Nextcloud Deck before 1.0.2 suffers from an insecure direct object reference (IDOR) vulnerability that permits users with a duplicate user identifier to access deck data of a previous deleted user. | |||||
| CVE-2020-7836 | 1 Voiceye Wsactivebridgees Project | 1 Voiceye Wsactivebridges | 2021-03-02 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| VOICEYE WSActiveBridgeES versions prior to 2.1.0.3 contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability caused by improper bound checking parameter given by attack. It finally leads to a stack-based buffer overflow via access to crafted web page. | |||||
| CVE-2021-1393 | 1 Cisco | 2 Application Policy Infrastructure Controller, Application Services Engine | 2021-03-02 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Application Services Engine could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain privileged access to host-level operations or to learn device-specific information, create diagnostic files, and make limited configuration changes. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. | |||||
| CVE-2021-1396 | 1 Cisco | 2 Application Policy Infrastructure Controller, Application Services Engine | 2021-03-02 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Application Services Engine could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain privileged access to host-level operations or to learn device-specific information, create diagnostic files, and make limited configuration changes. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. | |||||
| CVE-2021-27671 | 1 Comrak Project | 1 Comrak | 2021-03-02 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in the comrak crate before 0.9.1 for Rust. XSS can occur because the protection mechanism for data: and javascript: URIs is case-sensitive, allowing (for example) Data: to be used in an attack. | |||||
| CVE-2021-27670 | 1 Appspace | 1 Appspace | 2021-03-02 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Appspace 6.2.4 allows SSRF via the api/v1/core/proxy/jsonprequest url parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2021-0405 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2021-03-02 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| In performance driver, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Product: Android; Versions: Android-10, Android-11; Patch ID: ALPS05466547. | |||||
| CVE-2021-0402 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2021-03-02 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| In jpeg, there is a possible out of bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Product: Android; Versions: Android-11; Patch ID: ALPS05433311. | |||||
| CVE-2021-0366 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2021-03-02 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 6.4 MEDIUM |
| In vpu, there is a possible memory corruption due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Product: Android; Versions: Android-10, Android-11; Patch ID: ALPS05371580; Issue ID: ALPS05379093. | |||||
| CVE-2021-0367 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2021-03-02 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 6.4 MEDIUM |
| In vpu, there is a possible memory corruption due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Product: Android; Versions: Android-10, Android-11; Patch ID: ALPS05371580; Issue ID: ALPS05379085. | |||||
| CVE-2021-0401 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2021-03-02 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 6.4 MEDIUM |
| In vow, there is a possible memory corruption due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. Product: Android; Versions: Android-10, Android-11; Patch ID: ALPS05418265. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8001 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8003 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8004 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8013 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8014 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8015 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8028 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8040 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8041 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8042 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8043 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8044 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8045 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8046 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8047 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8048 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8049 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8107 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8108 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8109 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8110 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8111 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8112 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||