Search
Total
205 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-14266 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the importDataObject method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6029. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14267 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the importTextData method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6030. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14268 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the mailForm method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6031. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14269 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the print method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6032. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14270 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the removeDataObject method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6033. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14271 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the removeField method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6034. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14272 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the removeIcon method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6035. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14273 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the removeTemplate method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6036. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14274 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the scroll method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6037. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14275 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the spawnPageFromTemplate method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6038. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14276 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the submitForm method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6039. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14277 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the mailDoc method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6059. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14278 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the getPageNumWords method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6058. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14279 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the resetForm method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6060. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14285 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the oneOfChild attribute. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5774. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14286 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of arguments passed to the mailDoc function. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5770. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14287 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of arguments passed to the instanceManager.nodes.append function. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5641. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14288 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of arguments passed to the setFocus function. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5642. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14311 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of XFA events. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6331. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14313 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6362. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14317 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 Foxit Reader, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.1.0.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6683. | |||||
| CVE-2018-11623 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the addAdLayer method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. The attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6003. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10495 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of PDF documents. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5586. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16582 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.2.25013. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the clearItems XFA method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5288. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16745 | 1 Deltaww | 1 Delta Industrial Automation Screen Editor | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| A Type Confusion issue was discovered in Delta Electronics Delta Industrial Automation Screen Editor, Version 2.00.23.00 or prior. An access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') vulnerability may allow an attacker to execute remote code when processing specially crafted .dpb files. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16571 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of references to the app object from FormCalc. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5072. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16572 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within FormCalc's closeDoc method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5073. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16578 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.2.25013. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the picture elements within XFA forms. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5216. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14826 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the formNodes method of XFA Node objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5018. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14827 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the append method of XFA Node objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5019. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14828 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the w method of XFA Layout objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5020. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14829 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the openList method of XFAScriptObject objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5021. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14823 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the signer method of XFA's Signature objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5015. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14830 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the setFocus method of XFAScriptObject objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5022. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14835 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the page method of XFA Layout objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5027. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14837 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the pageSpan method of XFA Layout objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5029. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14825 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the remove method of XFAScriptObject objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5017. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14824 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the insert method of XFAScriptObject objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5016. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7813 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Firefox | 2019-10-03 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 8.2 HIGH |
| Inside the JavaScript parser, a cast of an integer to a narrower type can result in data read from outside the buffer being parsed. This usually results in a non-exploitable crash, but can leak a limited amount of information from memory if it matches JavaScript identifier syntax. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 56. | |||||
| CVE-2017-0607 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2019-10-03 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.0 HIGH |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Qualcomm sound driver could enable a local malicious application to execute arbitrary code within the context of the kernel. This issue is rated as High because it first requires compromising a privileged process. Product: Android. Versions: Kernel-3.18. Android ID: A-35400551. References: QC-CR#1085928. | |||||
| CVE-2016-7398 | 1 Php | 1 Ext-http | 2019-09-20 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A type confusion vulnerability in the merge_param() function of php_http_params.c in PHP's pecl-http extension 3.1.0beta2 (PHP 7) and earlier as well as 2.6.0beta2 (PHP 5) and earlier allows attackers to crash PHP and possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted HTTP requests. | |||||
| CVE-2018-12793 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc, Mac Os X and 1 more | 2019-08-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Acrobat and Reader 2018.011.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30080 and earlier, and 2015.006.30418 and earlier versions have a Type Confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. | |||||
| CVE-2018-12876 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc, Mac Os X and 1 more | 2019-08-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2018.011.20063 and earlier, 2017.011.30102 and earlier, and 2015.006.30452 and earlier have a type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2018-12794 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc, Mac Os X and 1 more | 2019-08-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Adobe Acrobat and Reader 2018.011.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30080 and earlier, and 2015.006.30418 and earlier versions have a Type Confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. | |||||
| CVE-2018-4953 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc, Mac Os X and 1 more | 2019-08-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2018.011.20038 and earlier, 2017.011.30079 and earlier, and 2015.006.30417 and earlier have a Type Confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. | |||||
| CVE-2018-12835 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc, Mac Os X and 1 more | 2019-08-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2018.011.20063 and earlier, 2017.011.30102 and earlier, and 2015.006.30452 and earlier have a type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5057 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc, Mac Os X and 1 more | 2019-08-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Adobe Acrobat and Reader 2018.011.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30080 and earlier, and 2015.006.30418 and earlier versions have a Type Confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. | |||||
| CVE-2018-12812 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc, Mac Os X and 1 more | 2019-08-21 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Adobe Acrobat and Reader 2018.011.20038 and earlier, 2017.011.30079 and earlier, and 2015.006.30417 and earlier versions have a Type Confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. | |||||
| CVE-2018-12858 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc, Mac Os X and 1 more | 2019-08-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2018.011.20063 and earlier, 2017.011.30102 and earlier, and 2015.006.30452 and earlier have a type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6157 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2019-07-01 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Type confusion in WebRTC in Google Chrome prior to 68.0.3440.75 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted video file. | |||||