Search
Total
205 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-8076 | 1 Zenmate | 1 Zenmate | 2020-05-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| ZenMate 1.5.4 for macOS suffers from a type confusion vulnerability within the com.zenmate.chron-xpc LaunchDaemon component. The LaunchDaemon implements an XPC service that uses an insecure XPC API for accessing data from an inbound XPC message. This could potentially result in an XPC object of the wrong type being passed as the first argument to the xpc_connection_create_from_endpoint function if controlled by an attacker. In recent versions of macOS and OS X, Apple has implemented an internal check to prevent such XPC API abuse from occurring, thus making this vulnerability only result in a denial of service if exploited by an attacker. | |||||
| CVE-2011-3027 | 2 Apple, Google | 4 Iphone Os, Itunes, Safari and 1 more | 2020-04-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Google Chrome before 17.0.963.56 does not properly perform a cast of an unspecified variable during handling of columns, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unknown other impact via a crafted document. | |||||
| CVE-2011-3036 | 3 Apple, Google, Opensuse | 5 Iphone Os, Itunes, Safari and 2 more | 2020-04-16 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Google Chrome before 17.0.963.65 does not properly perform a cast of an unspecified variable during handling of line boxes, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unknown other impact via a crafted document. | |||||
| CVE-2011-3037 | 3 Apple, Google, Opensuse | 5 Iphone Os, Itunes, Safari and 2 more | 2020-04-16 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Google Chrome before 17.0.963.65 does not properly perform casts of unspecified variables during the splitting of anonymous blocks, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unknown other impact via a crafted document. | |||||
| CVE-2014-9627 | 1 Videolan | 1 Vlc Media Player | 2020-01-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| The MP4_ReadBox_String function in modules/demux/mp4/libmp4.c in VideoLAN VLC media player before 2.1.6 performs an incorrect cast operation from a 64-bit integer to a 32-bit integer, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact via a large box size. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5263 | 2 Mozilla, Oracle | 3 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Linux | 2019-12-27 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The nsDisplayList::HitTest function in Mozilla Firefox before 48.0 and Firefox ESR 45.x before 45.3 mishandles rendering display transformation, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted web site that leverages "type confusion." | |||||
| CVE-2018-14403 | 1 Techsmith | 1 Mp4v2 | 2019-11-17 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| MP4NameFirstMatches in mp4util.cpp in MP4v2 2.0.0 mishandles substrings of atom names, leading to use of an inappropriate data type for associated atoms. The resulting type confusion can cause out-of-bounds memory access. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14379 | 1 Techsmith | 1 Mp4v2 | 2019-11-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| MP4Atom::factory in mp4atom.cpp in MP4v2 2.0.0 incorrectly uses the MP4ItemAtom data type in a certain case where MP4DataAtom is required, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted MP4 file, because access to the data structure has different expectations about layout as a result of this type confusion. | |||||
| CVE-2011-2337 | 1 Google | 1 Blink | 2019-11-13 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A wrong type is used for a return value from strlen in WebKit in Google Chrome before Blink M12 on 64-bit platforms. | |||||
| CVE-2011-1460 | 1 Google | 1 Blink | 2019-11-13 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| WebKit in Google Chrome before Blink M11 contains a bad cast to RenderBlock when anonymous blocks are renderblocks. | |||||
| CVE-2018-16513 | 4 Artifex, Canonical, Debian and 1 more | 5 Ghostscript, Gpl Ghostscript, Ubuntu Linux and 2 more | 2019-11-05 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| In Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files could use a type confusion in the setcolor function to crash the interpreter or possibly have unspecified other impact. | |||||
| CVE-2018-15910 | 5 Artifex, Canonical, Debian and 2 more | 9 Ghostscript, Gpl Ghostscript, Ubuntu Linux and 6 more | 2019-11-05 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| In Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files could use a type confusion in the LockDistillerParams parameter to crash the interpreter or execute code. | |||||
| CVE-2018-15909 | 5 Artifex, Canonical, Debian and 2 more | 11 Ghostscript, Gpl Ghostscript, Ubuntu Linux and 8 more | 2019-10-16 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| In Artifex Ghostscript 9.23 before 2018-08-24, a type confusion using the .shfill operator could be used by attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files to crash the interpreter or potentially execute code. | |||||
| CVE-2018-9943 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the openList method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5377. | |||||
| CVE-2018-9936 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of field elements. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5370. | |||||
| CVE-2018-9941 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the record append method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5375. | |||||
| CVE-2018-9937 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of subform elements. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5371. | |||||
| CVE-2018-9938 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the absPageSpan method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5372. | |||||
| CVE-2018-9939 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of layout elements. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5373. | |||||
| CVE-2018-9942 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the record remove method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5376. | |||||
| CVE-2018-9940 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the layout sheet attribute. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5374. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17913 | 1 Omron | 1 Cx-supervisor | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| A type confusion vulnerability exists when processing project files in Omron CX-Supervisor Versions 3.4.1.0 and prior, which may allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the application. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19019 | 1 Omron | 1 Cx-supervisor | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.3 HIGH |
| A type confusion vulnerability exists when processing project files in CX-Supervisor (Versions 3.42 and prior). An attacker could use a specially crafted project file to exploit and execute code under the privileges of the application. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19027 | 1 Omron | 2 Cx-one, Cx-protocol | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Three type confusion vulnerabilities exist in CX-One Versions 4.50 and prior and CX-Protocol Versions 2.0 and prior when processing project files. An attacker could use a specially crafted project file to exploit and execute code under the privileges of the application. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17685 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.2.0.9297. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6819. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14273 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the removeTemplate method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6036. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14274 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the scroll method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6037. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14287 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of arguments passed to the instanceManager.nodes.append function. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5641. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14285 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the oneOfChild attribute. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5774. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14286 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of arguments passed to the mailDoc function. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5770. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14277 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the mailDoc method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6059. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14279 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the resetForm method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6060. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14267 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the importTextData method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6030. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14278 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the getPageNumWords method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6058. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14265 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the importAnXFDX method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6028. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14264 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the importAnFDF method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6027. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14263 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the getVersionID method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6026. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14262 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the getURL method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6025. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14261 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the getTemplate method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6024. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14260 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the getPageRotation method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6023. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14259 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the getPageNthWordQuads method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6022. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14268 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the mailForm method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6031. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14258 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the getPageNthWord method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6021. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14257 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the getPageBox method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6020. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14269 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the print method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6032. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14275 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the spawnPageFromTemplate method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6038. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14256 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the getOCGs method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6019. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14255 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the getNthFieldName method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6018. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14272 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the removeIcon method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6035. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14254 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the getLinks method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6017. | |||||