Search
Total
35 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-48308 | 1 Nextcloud | 1 Calendar | 2024-01-09 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Nextcloud/Cloud is a calendar app for Nextcloud. An attacker can gain access to stacktrace and internal paths of the server when generating an exception while editing a calendar appointment. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Calendar app is upgraded to 4.5.3 | |||||
| CVE-2023-41967 | 1 Gallagher | 2 Controller 6000, Controller 6000 Firmware | 2024-01-05 | N/A | 4.6 MEDIUM |
| Sensitive information uncleared after debug/power state transition in the Controller 6000 could be abused by an attacker with knowledge of the Controller's default diagnostic password and physical access to the Controller to view its configuration through the diagnostic web pages. This issue affects: Gallagher Controller 6000 8.70 prior to vCR8.70.231204a (distributed in 8.70.2375 (MR5)), v8.60 or earlier. | |||||
| CVE-2022-25187 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Support Core | 2023-11-30 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Jenkins Support Core Plugin 2.79 and earlier does not redact some sensitive information in the support bundle. | |||||
| CVE-2021-26341 | 1 Amd | 252 A10-9600p, A10-9600p Firmware, A10-9630p and 249 more | 2023-08-08 | 2.1 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Some AMD CPUs may transiently execute beyond unconditional direct branches, which may potentially result in data leakage. | |||||
| CVE-2022-33740 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Linux and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Fedora, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2023-08-08 | 3.6 LOW | 7.1 HIGH |
| Linux disk/nic frontends data leaks T[his CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] Linux Block and Network PV device frontends don't zero memory regions before sharing them with the backend (CVE-2022-26365, CVE-2022-33740). Additionally the granularity of the grant table doesn't allow sharing less than a 4K page, leading to unrelated data residing in the same 4K page as data shared with a backend being accessible by such backend (CVE-2022-33741, CVE-2022-33742). | |||||
| CVE-2022-3460 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2023-08-08 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for certain types of sensitive variables to inadvertently become unmasked when viewed in variable preview. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22779 | 3 Apple, Keybase, Microsoft | 3 Macos, Keybase, Windows | 2023-08-08 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| The Keybase Clients for macOS and Windows before version 5.9.0 fails to properly remove exploded messages initiated by a user. This can occur if the receiving user switches to a non-chat feature and places the host in a sleep state before the sending user explodes the messages. This could lead to disclosure of sensitive information which was meant to be deleted from a user’s filesystem. | |||||
| CVE-2021-28689 | 1 Xen | 1 Xen | 2023-08-08 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| x86: Speculative vulnerabilities with bare (non-shim) 32-bit PV guests 32-bit x86 PV guest kernels run in ring 1. At the time when Xen was developed, this area of the i386 architecture was rarely used, which is why Xen was able to use it to implement paravirtualisation, Xen's novel approach to virtualization. In AMD64, Xen had to use a different implementation approach, so Xen does not use ring 1 to support 64-bit guests. With the focus now being on 64-bit systems, and the availability of explicit hardware support for virtualization, fixing speculation issues in ring 1 is not a priority for processor companies. Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation (IBRS) is an architectural x86 extension put together to combat speculative execution sidechannel attacks, including Spectre v2. It was retrofitted in microcode to existing CPUs. For more details on Spectre v2, see: http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-254.html However, IBRS does not architecturally protect ring 0 from predictions learnt in ring 1. For more details, see: https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/deep-dives/deep-dive-indirect-branch-restricted-speculation Similar situations may exist with other mitigations for other kinds of speculative execution attacks. The situation is quite likely to be similar for speculative execution attacks which have yet to be discovered, disclosed, or mitigated. | |||||
| CVE-2022-0355 | 1 Simple-get Project | 1 Simple-get | 2023-08-02 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer in NPM simple-get prior to 4.0.1. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1650 | 2 Debian, Eventsource | 2 Debian Linux, Eventsource | 2023-08-02 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 9.3 CRITICAL |
| Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer in GitHub repository eventsource/eventsource prior to v2.0.2. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1893 | 1 Trudesk Project | 1 Trudesk | 2023-08-02 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer in GitHub repository polonel/trudesk prior to 1.2.3. | |||||
| CVE-2022-0536 | 1 Follow-redirects Project | 1 Follow-redirects | 2023-08-02 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer in NPM follow-redirects prior to 1.14.8. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2818 | 1 Agentejo | 1 Cockpit | 2023-08-02 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer in GitHub repository cockpit-hq/cockpit prior to 2.2.2. | |||||
| CVE-2021-33082 | 1 Intel | 14 Optane Memory H10 With Solid State Storage, Optane Memory H10 With Solid State Storage Firmware, Optane Memory H20 With Solid State Storage and 11 more | 2022-07-12 | 2.1 LOW | 4.6 MEDIUM |
| Sensitive information in resource not removed before reuse in firmware for some Intel(R) SSD and Intel(R) Optane(TM) SSD Products may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via physical access. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36476 | 2 Arm, Debian | 2 Mbed Tls, Debian Linux | 2022-07-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.24.0 (and before 2.16.8 LTS and before 2.7.17 LTS). There is missing zeroization of plaintext buffers in mbedtls_ssl_read to erase unused application data from memory. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39891 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2022-07-12 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| In all versions of GitLab CE/EE since version 8.0, access tokens created as part of admin's impersonation of a user are not cleared at the end of impersonation which may lead to unnecessary sensitive info disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2021-33080 | 1 Intel | 14 Optane Memory H10 With Solid State Storage, Optane Memory H10 With Solid State Storage Firmware, Optane Memory H20 With Solid State Storage and 11 more | 2022-07-12 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| Exposure of sensitive system information due to uncleared debug information in firmware for some Intel(R) SSD DC, Intel(R) Optane(TM) SSD and Intel(R) Optane(TM) SSD DC Products may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure or escalation of privilege via physical access. | |||||
| CVE-2021-46813 | 1 Huawei | 2 Emui, Magic Ui | 2022-06-27 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Vulnerability of residual files not being deleted after an update in the ChinaDRM module. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect availability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-30618 | 1 Strapi | 1 Strapi | 2022-06-06 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An authenticated user with access to the Strapi admin panel can view private and sensitive data, such as email and password reset tokens, for API users if content types accessible to the authenticated user contain relationships to API users (from:users-permissions). There are many scenarios in which such details from API users can leak in the JSON response within the admin panel, either through a direct or indirect relationship. Access to this information enables a user to compromise these users’ accounts if the password reset API endpoints have been enabled. In a worst-case scenario, a low-privileged user could get access to a high-privileged API account, and could read and modify any data as well as block access to both the admin panel and API by revoking privileges for all other users. | |||||
| CVE-2022-30617 | 1 Strapi | 1 Strapi | 2022-06-06 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| An authenticated user with access to the Strapi admin panel can view private and sensitive data, such as email and password reset tokens, for other admin panel users that have a relationship (e.g., created by, updated by) with content accessible to the authenticated user. For example, a low-privileged “author” role account can view these details in the JSON response for an “editor” or “super admin” that has updated one of the author’s blog posts. There are also many other scenarios where such details from other users can leak in the JSON response, either through a direct or indirect relationship. Access to this information enables a user to compromise other users’ accounts by successfully invoking the password reset workflow. In a worst-case scenario, a low-privileged user could get access to a “super admin” account with full control over the Strapi instance, and could read and modify any data as well as block access to both the admin panel and API by revoking privileges for all other users. | |||||
| CVE-2020-14301 | 2 Netapp, Redhat | 13 Ontap Select Deploy Administration Utility, Codeready Linux Builder, Enterprise Linux and 10 more | 2022-05-13 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An information disclosure vulnerability was found in libvirt in versions before 6.3.0. HTTP cookies used to access network-based disks were saved in the XML dump of the guest domain. This flaw allows an attacker to access potentially sensitive information in the domain configuration via the `dumpxml` command. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11740 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Opensuse and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Fedora, Leap and 1 more | 2022-05-03 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in xenoprof in Xen through 4.13.x, allowing guest OS users (without active profiling) to obtain sensitive information about other guests. Unprivileged guests can request to map xenoprof buffers, even if profiling has not been enabled for those guests. These buffers were not scrubbed. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23605 | 1 Wire | 1 Wire-webapp | 2022-02-11 | 2.1 LOW | 2.3 LOW |
| Wire webapp is a web client for the wire messaging protocol. In versions prior to 2022-01-27-production.0 expired ephemeral messages were not reliably removed from local chat history of Wire Webapp. In versions before 2022-01-27-production.0 ephemeral messages and assets might still be accessible through the local search functionality. Any attempt to view one of these message in the chat view will then trigger the deletion. This issue only affects locally stored messages. On premise instances of wire-webapp need to be updated to 2022-01-27-production.0, so that their users are no longer affected. There are no known workarounds for this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2020-14370 | 3 Fedoraproject, Podman Project, Redhat | 4 Fedora, Podman, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2021-11-04 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An information disclosure vulnerability was found in containers/podman in versions before 2.0.5. When using the deprecated Varlink API or the Docker-compatible REST API, if multiple containers are created in a short duration, the environment variables from the first container will get leaked into subsequent containers. An attacker who has control over the subsequent containers could use this flaw to gain access to sensitive information stored in such variables. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13179 | 1 Teradici | 2 Graphics Agent, Pcoip Standard Agent | 2021-11-04 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Broker Protocol messages in Teradici PCoIP Standard Agent for Windows and Graphics Agent for Windows prior to 20.04.1 are not cleaned up in server memory, which may allow an attacker to read confidential information from a memory dump via forcing a crashing during the single sign-on procedure. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38554 | 1 Hashicorp | 1 Vault | 2021-08-25 | 3.5 LOW | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise’s UI erroneously cached and exposed user-viewed secrets between sessions in a single shared browser. Fixed in 1.8.0 and pending 1.7.4 / 1.6.6 releases. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8696 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Intel and 1 more | 502 Debian Linux, Fedora, Celeron 3855u and 499 more | 2021-07-02 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Improper removal of sensitive information before storage or transfer in some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31780 | 1 Misp | 1 Misp | 2021-05-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In app/Model/MispObject.php in MISP 2.4.141, an incorrect sharing group association could lead to information disclosure on an event edit. When an object has a sharing group associated with an event edit, the sharing group object is ignored and instead the passed local ID is reused. | |||||
| CVE-2021-0340 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2021-02-12 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| In parseNextBox of IsoInterface.java, there is a possible leak of unredacted location information due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10Android ID: A-134155286 | |||||
| CVE-2020-26965 | 1 Mozilla | 3 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Thunderbird | 2020-12-10 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Some websites have a feature "Show Password" where clicking a button will change a password field into a textbook field, revealing the typed password. If, when using a software keyboard that remembers user input, a user typed their password and used that feature, the type of the password field was changed, resulting in a keyboard layout change and the possibility for the software keyboard to remember the typed password. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 83, Firefox ESR < 78.5, and Thunderbird < 78.5. | |||||
| CVE-2020-25635 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible | 2020-10-08 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in Ansible Base when using the aws_ssm connection plugin as garbage collector is not happening after playbook run is completed. Files would remain in the bucket exposing the data. This issue affects directly data confidentiality. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11243 | 2 Kubernetes, Netapp | 2 Kubernetes, Trident | 2020-10-02 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| In Kubernetes v1.12.0-v1.12.4 and v1.13.0, the rest.AnonymousClientConfig() method returns a copy of the provided config, with credentials removed (bearer token, username/password, and client certificate/key data). In the affected versions, rest.AnonymousClientConfig() did not effectively clear service account credentials loaded using rest.InClusterConfig() | |||||
| CVE-2020-15094 | 1 Sensiolabs | 2 Httpclient, Symfony | 2020-09-25 | 7.5 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| In Symfony before versions 4.4.13 and 5.1.5, the CachingHttpClient class from the HttpClient Symfony component relies on the HttpCache class to handle requests. HttpCache uses internal headers like X-Body-Eval and X-Body-File to control the restoration of cached responses. The class was initially written with surrogate caching and ESI support in mind (all HTTP calls come from a trusted backend in that scenario). But when used by CachingHttpClient and if an attacker can control the response for a request being made by the CachingHttpClient, remote code execution is possible. This has been fixed in versions 4.4.13 and 5.1.5. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13402 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fcm-mb40, Fcm-mb40 Firmware | 2020-08-24 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| /usr/sbin/default.sh and /usr/apache/htdocs/cgi-bin/admin/hardfactorydefault.cgi on Dynacolor FCM-MB40 v1.2.0.0 devices implement an incomplete factory-reset process. A backdoor can persist because neither system accounts nor the set of services is reset. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1062 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ovirt-engine | 2020-02-18 | 3.5 LOW | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was discovered in oVirt 4.1.x before 4.1.9, where the combination of Enable Discard and Wipe After Delete flags for VM disks managed by oVirt, could cause a disk to be incompletely zeroed when removed from a VM. If the same storage blocks happen to be later allocated to a new disk attached to another VM, potentially sensitive data could be revealed to privileged users of that VM. | |||||