Search
Total
86024 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-1836 | 2022-06-19 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2022-33981. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2022-33981. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2022-33981 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2008-4918 | 1 Sonicwall | 4 Pro 2040, Sonicos Enhanced, Tz 180 and 1 more | 2022-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in SonicWALL SonicOS Enhanced before 4.0.1.1, as used in SonicWALL Pro 2040 and TZ 180 and 190, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML into arbitrary web sites via a URL to a site that is blocked based on content filtering, which is not properly handled in the CFS block page, aka "universal website hijacking." | |||||
| CVE-2014-2589 | 1 Sonicwall | 1 Nsa 2400 | 2022-06-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Dashboard Backend service (stats/dashboard.jsp) in SonicWall Network Security Appliance (NSA) 2400 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the sn parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2009-3732 | 2 Microsoft, Vmware | 5 Windows, Ace, Player and 2 more | 2022-06-15 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Format string vulnerability in vmware-vmrc.exe build 158248 in VMware Remote Console (aka VMrc) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2022-30294 | 2022-06-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2022-30293. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2022-30293. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2022-30293 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2022-28066 | 2022-06-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2022-26280. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2022-26280. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2022-26280 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41454 | 2022-06-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41453 | 2022-06-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41452 | 2022-06-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41448 | 2022-06-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41447 | 2022-06-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41446 | 2022-06-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41439 | 2022-06-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41438 | 2022-06-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2022-27427 | 2022-06-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2021-38745. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2021-38745. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-38745 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2022-25029 | 2022-06-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2022-25096. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2022-25096. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2022-25096 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44577 | 2022-06-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2021-3200 Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2021-3200. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-3200 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44576 | 2022-06-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2021-3200 Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2021-3200. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-3200 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44575 | 2022-06-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2021-3200 Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2021-3200. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-3200 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44574 | 2022-06-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2021-3200 Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2021-3200. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-3200 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44573 | 2022-06-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2021-3200 Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2021-3200. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-3200 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44571 | 2022-06-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2021-3200 Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2021-3200. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-3200 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44570 | 2022-06-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2021-3200 Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2021-3200. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-3200 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44569 | 2022-06-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2021-3200 Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2021-3200. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-3200 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39795 | 2022-06-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: Pulled from Android ASB#2022-04 publication (https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2022-04-01) due to a functional regression. We will re-release this CVE at a future date, in a future publication that is currently TBD | |||||
| CVE-2022-1550 | 2022-06-06 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2010-4176 | 3 Dracut Project, Fedoraproject, Udev Project | 3 Dracut, Fedora, Udev | 2022-06-03 | 4.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| plymouth-pretrigger.sh in dracut and udev, when running on Fedora 13 and 14, sets weak permissions for the /dev/systty device file, which allows remote authenticated users to read terminal data from tty0 for local users. | |||||
| CVE-2011-0640 | 1 Udev Project | 1 Udev | 2022-06-03 | 6.9 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The default configuration of udev on Linux does not warn the user before enabling additional Human Interface Device (HID) functionality over USB, which allows user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary programs via crafted USB data, as demonstrated by keyboard and mouse data sent by malware on a smartphone that the user connected to the computer. | |||||
| CVE-2009-1186 | 6 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more | 8 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 5 more | 2022-06-03 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the util_path_encode function in udev/lib/libudev-util.c in udev before 1.4.1 allows local users to cause a denial of service (service outage) via vectors that trigger a call with crafted arguments. | |||||
| CVE-2009-1185 | 7 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 4 more | 9 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 6 more | 2022-06-03 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| udev before 1.4.1 does not verify whether a NETLINK message originates from kernel space, which allows local users to gain privileges by sending a NETLINK message from user space. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1979 | 2022-06-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Product Show Room Site 1.0. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects p=contact. The manipulation of the Message textbox with the input <script>alert(1)</script> leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely but requires authentication. Exploit details have been disclosed to the public. | |||||
| CVE-2021-45982 | 2022-06-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NetScout nGeniusONE 6.3.2 allows Arbitrary File Upload by a privileged user. | |||||
| CVE-2011-3279 | 1 Cisco | 2 Ios, Ios Xe | 2022-06-02 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| The provider-edge MPLS NAT implementation in Cisco IOS 12.1 through 12.4 and 15.0 through 15.1, and IOS XE 3.1.xSG, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via a malformed SIP packet to UDP port 5060, aka Bug ID CSCti98219. | |||||
| CVE-2011-0946 | 1 Cisco | 2 Ios, Ios Xe | 2022-06-02 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| The NAT implementation in Cisco IOS 12.1 through 12.4 and 15.0 through 15.1, and IOS XE 3.1.xSG, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload or hang) via malformed NetMeeting Directory (aka Internet Locator Service or ILS) LDAP traffic, aka Bug ID CSCtd10712. | |||||
| CVE-2009-2862 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2022-06-02 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The Object Groups for Access Control Lists (ACLs) feature in Cisco IOS 12.2XNB, 12.2XNC, 12.2XND, 12.4MD, 12.4T, 12.4XZ, and 12.4YA allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via crafted requests, aka Bug IDs CSCsx07114, CSCsu70214, CSCsw47076, CSCsv48603, CSCsy54122, and CSCsu50252. | |||||
| CVE-2008-3813 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2022-06-02 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Cisco IOS 12.2 and 12.4, when the L2TP mgmt daemon process is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via a crafted L2TP packet. | |||||
| CVE-2008-3812 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2022-06-02 | 7.1 HIGH | N/A |
| Cisco IOS 12.4, when IOS firewall Application Inspection Control (AIC) with HTTP Deep Packet Inspection is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via a malformed HTTP transit packet. | |||||
| CVE-2008-3809 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2022-06-02 | 7.1 HIGH | N/A |
| Cisco IOS 12.0 through 12.4 on Gigabit Switch Router (GSR) devices (aka 12000 Series routers) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device crash) via a malformed Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) packet. | |||||
| CVE-2008-3808 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2022-06-02 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Cisco IOS 12.0 through 12.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via a crafted Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) packet. | |||||
| CVE-2008-3807 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2022-06-02 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
| Cisco IOS 12.2 and 12.3 on Cisco uBR10012 series devices, when linecard redundancy is configured, enables a read/write SNMP service with "private" as the community, which allows remote attackers to obtain administrative access by guessing this community and sending SNMP requests. | |||||
| CVE-2008-3806 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2022-06-02 | 8.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Cisco IOS 12.0 through 12.4 on Cisco 10000, uBR10012 and uBR7200 series devices handles external UDP packets that are sent to 127.0.0.0/8 addresses intended for IPC communication within the device, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device or linecard reload) via crafted UDP packets, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-3805. | |||||
| CVE-2008-3805 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2022-06-02 | 8.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Cisco IOS 12.0 through 12.4 on Cisco 10000, uBR10012 and uBR7200 series devices handles external UDP packets that are sent to 127.0.0.0/8 addresses intended for IPC communication within the device, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device or linecard reload) via crafted UDP packets, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-3806. | |||||
| CVE-2008-3803 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2022-06-02 | 5.1 MEDIUM | N/A |
| A "logic error" in Cisco IOS 12.0 through 12.4, when a Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) VPN with extended communities is configured, sometimes causes a corrupted route target (RT) to be used, which allows remote attackers to read traffic from other VPNs in opportunistic circumstances. | |||||
| CVE-2008-3802 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2022-06-02 | 7.1 HIGH | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) implementation in Cisco IOS 12.2 through 12.4, when VoIP is configured, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via unspecified valid SIP messages, aka Cisco bug ID CSCsk42759, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-3800 and CVE-2008-3801. | |||||
| CVE-2008-3801 | 1 Cisco | 3 Ios, Unified Callmanager, Unified Communications Manager | 2022-06-02 | 7.1 HIGH | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) implementation in Cisco IOS 12.2 through 12.4 and Unified Communications Manager 4.1 through 6.1, when VoIP is configured, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device or process reload) via unspecified valid SIP messages, aka Cisco Bug ID CSCsm46064, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-3800 and CVE-2008-3802. | |||||
| CVE-2008-3800 | 1 Cisco | 3 Ios, Unified Callmanager, Unified Communications Manager | 2022-06-02 | 7.1 HIGH | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) implementation in Cisco IOS 12.2 through 12.4 and Unified Communications Manager 4.1 through 6.1, when VoIP is configured, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device or process reload) via unspecified valid SIP messages, aka Cisco Bug ID CSCsu38644, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-3801 and CVE-2008-3802. | |||||
| CVE-2008-3799 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2022-06-02 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| Memory leak in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) implementation in Cisco IOS 12.2 through 12.4, when VoIP is configured, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and voice-service outage) via unspecified valid SIP messages. | |||||
| CVE-2008-3798 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2022-06-02 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| Cisco IOS 12.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device crash) via a normal, properly formed SSL packet that occurs during termination of an SSL session. | |||||
| CVE-2008-2739 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2022-06-02 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| The SERVICE.DNS signature engine in the Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) in Cisco IOS 12.3 and 12.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device crash or hang) via network traffic that triggers unspecified IPS signatures, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-1447. | |||||
| CVE-2007-0918 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2022-06-02 | 7.1 HIGH | N/A |
| The ATOMIC.TCP signature engine in the Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) feature for Cisco IOS 12.4XA, 12.3YA, 12.3T, and other trains allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (IPS crash and traffic loss) via unspecified manipulations that are not properly handled by the regular expression feature, as demonstrated using the 3123.0 (Netbus Pro Traffic) signature. | |||||