Search
Total
86024 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-4036 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2023-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| Array index error in the tcm_vhost_make_tpg function in drivers/vhost/scsi.c in the Linux kernel before 4.0 might allow guest OS users to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted VHOST_SCSI_SET_ENDPOINT ioctl call. NOTE: the affected function was renamed to vhost_scsi_make_tpg before the vulnerability was announced. | |||||
| CVE-2023-46377 | 2023-11-21 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2023-44332 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 3 Photoshop, Macos, Windows | 2023-11-20 | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Photoshop versions 24.7.1 (and earlier) and 25.0 (and earlier) are affected by an out-of-bounds read vulnerability that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass mitigations such as ASLR. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | |||||
| CVE-2023-46590 | 1 Siemens | 1 Siemens Opc Ua Modeling Editor | 2023-11-20 | N/A | N/A |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Siemens OPC UA Modelling Editor (SiOME) (All versions < V2.8). Affected products suffer from a XML external entity (XXE) injection vulnerability. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to interfere with an application's processing of XML data and read arbitrary files in the system. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3487 | 2023-11-20 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: Non Security Issue. See the binutils security policy for more details, https://sourceware.org/cgit/binutils-gdb/tree/binutils/SECURITY.txt | |||||
| CVE-2014-9517 | 1 Dlink | 2 Dcs-2103, Dcs-2103 Firmware | 2023-11-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in D-link IP camera DCS-2103 with firmware before 1.20 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the QUERY_STRING to vb.htm. | |||||
| CVE-2023-47638 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: Confirm reference is not public. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6079 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: appears to be a duplicate of CVE-2023-40206 | |||||
| CVE-2022-43830 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43829 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43828 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43827 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43826 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43825 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43824 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43823 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43822 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43821 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43820 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43819 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43818 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43817 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43816 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43815 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43814 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43813 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43812 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43811 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43810 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43809 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43808 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43807 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43806 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43805 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43804 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43803 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43802 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43801 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43800 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43799 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43798 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43797 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43796 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43795 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43794 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43793 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43792 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43791 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43790 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43789 | 2023-11-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used. | |||||