Search
Total
86024 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-8160 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2013-4559 | 3 Debian, Lighttpd, Opensuse | 3 Debian Linux, Lighttpd, Opensuse | 2021-02-26 | 7.6 HIGH | N/A |
| lighttpd before 1.4.33 does not check the return value of the (1) setuid, (2) setgid, or (3) setgroups functions, which might cause lighttpd to run as root if it is restarted and allows remote attackers to gain privileges, as demonstrated by multiple calls to the clone function that cause setuid to fail when the user process limit is reached. | |||||
| CVE-2018-3633 | 2021-02-25 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2011-0009 | 1 Bestpractical | 1 Rt | 2021-02-25 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Best Practical Solutions RT 3.x before 3.8.9rc2 and 4.x before 4.0.0rc4 uses the MD5 algorithm for password hashes, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to determine cleartext passwords via a brute-force attack on the database. | |||||
| CVE-2011-1007 | 1 Bestpractical | 1 Rt | 2021-02-25 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
| Best Practical Solutions RT before 3.8.9 does not perform certain redirect actions upon a login, which allows physically proximate attackers to obtain credentials by resubmitting the login form via the back button of a web browser on an unattended workstation after an RT logout. | |||||
| CVE-2011-1008 | 1 Bestpractical | 1 Rt | 2021-02-25 | 4.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Scrips_Overlay.pm in Best Practical Solutions RT before 3.8.9 does not properly restrict access to a TicketObj in a Scrip after a CurrentUser change, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors, as demonstrated by custom-field value information, related to SQL logging. | |||||
| CVE-2011-2085 | 1 Bestpractical | 1 Rt | 2021-02-25 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Best Practical Solutions RT before 3.8.12 and 4.x before 4.0.6 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9051 | 2021-02-24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9052 | 2021-02-24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9053 | 2021-02-24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2014-2324 | 5 Contec, Debian, Lighttpd and 2 more | 7 Sv-cpt-mc310, Sv-cpt-mc310 Firmware, Debian Linux and 4 more | 2021-02-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in (1) mod_evhost and (2) mod_simple_vhost in lighttpd before 1.4.35 allow remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the host name, related to request_check_hostname. | |||||
| CVE-2003-0264 | 1 Seattle Lab Software | 1 Slmail | 2021-02-24 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Multiple buffer overflows in SLMail 5.1.0.4420 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a long EHLO argument to slmail.exe, (2) a long XTRN argument to slmail.exe, (3) a long string to POPPASSWD, or (4) a long password to the POP3 server. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0364 | 1 Igniterealtime | 1 Smack | 2021-02-23 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The ParseRoster component in the Ignite Realtime Smack XMPP API before 4.0.0-rc1 does not verify the from attribute of a roster-query IQ stanza, which allows remote attackers to spoof IQ responses via a crafted attribute. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0363 | 1 Igniterealtime | 1 Smack | 2021-02-23 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The ServerTrustManager component in the Ignite Realtime Smack XMPP API before 4.0.0-rc1 does not verify basicConstraints and nameConstraints in X.509 certificate chains from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate chain. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20242 | 2021-02-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2021-20176. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2021-20176. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-20176 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2020-27785 | 2021-02-19 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-29074. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2020-29074. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-29074 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1966 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1969 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1970 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1972 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1973 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1974 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35617 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35618 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35619 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35620 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35621 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3813 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3814 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3815 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3816 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3817 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3818 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3819 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3820 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3821 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3822 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3823 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3824 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35500 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-28476 | 2021-02-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2021-23336. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2021-23336. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-23336 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2009-1903 | 2 Fedoraproject, Trustwave | 2 Fedora, Modsecurity | 2021-02-14 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The PDF XSS protection feature in ModSecurity before 2.5.8 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (Apache httpd crash) via a request for a PDF file that does not use the GET method. | |||||
| CVE-2012-4528 | 3 Fedoraproject, Opensuse, Trustwave | 3 Fedora, Opensuse, Modsecurity | 2021-02-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The mod_security2 module before 2.7.0 for the Apache HTTP Server allows remote attackers to bypass rules, and deliver arbitrary POST data to a PHP application, via a multipart request in which an invalid part precedes the crafted data. | |||||
| CVE-2013-1915 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Opensuse and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Fedora, Opensuse and 1 more | 2021-02-12 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| ModSecurity before 2.7.3 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files, send HTTP requests to intranet servers, or cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) via an XML external entity declaration in conjunction with an entity reference, aka an XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2013-5705 | 2 Debian, Trustwave | 2 Debian Linux, Modsecurity | 2021-02-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| apache2/modsecurity.c in ModSecurity before 2.7.6 allows remote attackers to bypass rules by using chunked transfer coding with a capitalized Chunked value in the Transfer-Encoding HTTP header. | |||||
| CVE-2009-5031 | 2 Opensuse, Trustwave | 2 Opensuse, Modsecurity | 2021-02-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| ModSecurity before 2.5.11 treats request parameter values containing single quotes as files, which allows remote attackers to bypass filtering rules and perform other attacks such as cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via a single quote in a request parameter in the Content-Disposition field of a request with a multipart/form-data Content-Type header. | |||||
| CVE-2012-2751 | 4 Debian, Opensuse, Oracle and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Opensuse, Http Server and 1 more | 2021-02-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| ModSecurity before 2.6.6, when used with PHP, does not properly handle single quotes not at the beginning of a request parameter value in the Content-Disposition field of a request with a multipart/form-data Content-Type header, which allows remote attackers to bypass filtering rules and perform other attacks such as cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2009-5031. | |||||
| CVE-2009-1902 | 2 Fedoraproject, Trustwave | 2 Fedora, Modsecurity | 2021-02-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The multipart processor in ModSecurity before 2.5.9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a multipart form datapost request with a missing part header name, which triggers a NULL pointer dereference. | |||||
| CVE-2021-26959 | 2021-02-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2021-21299. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2021-21299. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-21299 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2011-4862 | 8 Debian, Fedoraproject, Freebsd and 5 more | 10 Debian Linux, Fedora, Freebsd and 7 more | 2021-02-09 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in libtelnet/encrypt.c in telnetd in FreeBSD 7.3 through 9.0, MIT Kerberos Version 5 Applications (aka krb5-appl) 1.0.2 and earlier, Heimdal 1.5.1 and earlier, GNU inetutils, and possibly other products allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long encryption key, as exploited in the wild in December 2011. | |||||