Search
Total
86024 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-3853 | 2021-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3898 | 2021-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3903 | 2021-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35220 | 2021-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-35801. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2020-35801. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-35801 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35222 | 2021-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-35783. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2020-35783. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-35783 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35232 | 2021-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-35782. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2020-35782. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-35782 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2006-6576 | 1 Goldenftpserver | 1 Golden Ftp Server | 2021-03-16 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Golden FTP Server (goldenftpd) 1.92 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long PASS command. NOTE: it was later reported that 4.70 is also affected. NOTE: the USER vector is already covered by CVE-2005-0634. | |||||
| CVE-2013-1888 | 2 Fedoraproject, Pypa | 2 Fedora, Pip | 2021-03-15 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
| pip before 1.3 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a file in the /tmp/pip-build temporary directory. | |||||
| CVE-2013-1629 | 1 Pypa | 1 Pip | 2021-03-15 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| pip before 1.3 uses HTTP to retrieve packages from the PyPI repository, and does not perform integrity checks on package contents, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted response to a "pip install" operation. | |||||
| CVE-2014-8991 | 2 Oracle, Pypa | 2 Solaris, Pip | 2021-03-15 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
| pip 1.3 through 1.5.6 allows local users to cause a denial of service (prevention of package installation) by creating a /tmp/pip-build-* file for another user. | |||||
| CVE-2002-0824 | 1 Freebsd | 1 Point-to-point Protocol Daemon | 2021-03-11 | 6.9 MEDIUM | N/A |
| BSD pppd allows local users to change the permissions of arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a file that is specified as a tty device. | |||||
| CVE-2013-0800 | 5 Canonical, Debian, Mozilla and 2 more | 11 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Firefox and 8 more | 2021-03-11 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Integer signedness error in the pixman_fill_sse2 function in pixman-sse2.c in Pixman, as distributed with Cairo and used in Mozilla Firefox before 20.0, Firefox ESR 17.x before 17.0.5, Thunderbird before 17.0.5, Thunderbird ESR 17.x before 17.0.5, SeaMonkey before 2.17, and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted values that trigger attempted use of a (1) negative box boundary or (2) negative box size, leading to an out-of-bounds write operation. | |||||
| CVE-2015-6420 | 1 Apache | 1 Commons Collections | 2021-03-10 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Serialized-object interfaces in certain Cisco Collaboration and Social Media; Endpoint Clients and Client Software; Network Application, Service, and Acceleration; Network and Content Security Devices; Network Management and Provisioning; Routing and Switching - Enterprise and Service Provider; Unified Computing; Voice and Unified Communications Devices; Video, Streaming, TelePresence, and Transcoding Devices; Wireless; and Cisco Hosted Services products allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object, related to the Apache Commons Collections (ACC) library. | |||||
| CVE-2014-8578 | 1 Openstack | 1 Horizon | 2021-03-09 | 3.5 LOW | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Groups panel in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) before 2013.2.4, 2014.1 before 2014.1.2, and Juno before Juno-2 allows remote administrators to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a user email address, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-3475. | |||||
| CVE-2014-8124 | 4 Fedoraproject, Openstack, Opensuse and 1 more | 4 Fedora, Horizon, Opensuse and 1 more | 2021-03-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) before 2014.1.3 and 2014.2.x before 2014.2.1 does not properly handle session records when using a db or memcached session engine, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a large number of requests to the login page. | |||||
| CVE-2014-3594 | 2 Openstack, Opensuse | 2 Horizon, Opensuse | 2021-03-09 | 3.5 LOW | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Host Aggregates interface in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) before 2013.2.4, 2014.1 before 2014.1.2, and Juno before Juno-3 allows remote administrators to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a new host aggregate name. | |||||
| CVE-2014-3475 | 2 Openstack, Opensuse | 2 Horizon, Opensuse | 2021-03-09 | 3.5 LOW | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Users panel (admin/users/) in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) before 2013.2.4, 2014.1 before 2014.1.2, and Juno before Juno-2 allows remote administrators to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a user email address, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-8578. | |||||
| CVE-2014-3474 | 2 Openstack, Opensuse | 2 Horizon, Opensuse | 2021-03-09 | 3.5 LOW | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in horizon/static/horizon/js/horizon.instances.js in the Launch Instance menu in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) before 2013.2.4, 2014.1 before 2014.1.2, and Juno before Juno-2 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a network name. | |||||
| CVE-2014-3473 | 2 Openstack, Opensuse | 2 Horizon, Opensuse | 2021-03-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Orchestration/Stack section in the Horizon Orchestration dashboard in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) before 2013.2.4, 2014.1 before 2014.1.2, and Juno before Juno-2, when used with Heat, allows remote Orchestration template owners or catalogs to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted template. | |||||
| CVE-2013-6858 | 3 Canonical, Openstack, Opensuse | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Horizon, Opensuse | 2021-03-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) 2013.2 and earlier allow local users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via an instance name to (1) "Volumes" or (2) "Network Topology" page. | |||||
| CVE-2013-4471 | 1 Openstack | 1 Horizon | 2021-03-09 | 5.5 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The Identity v3 API in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) before 2013.2 does not require the current password when changing passwords for user accounts, which makes it easier for remote attackers to change a user password by leveraging the authentication token for that user. | |||||
| CVE-2020-27817 | 2021-03-08 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. | |||||
| CVE-2019-25008 | 2021-03-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-25574. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-25574. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-25574 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2012-0392 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2021-03-05 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The CookieInterceptor component in Apache Struts before 2.3.1.1 does not use the parameter-name whitelist, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted HTTP Cookie header that triggers Java code execution through a static method. | |||||
| CVE-2014-9323 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Firebirdsql and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Firebird and 1 more | 2021-03-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The xdr_status_vector function in Firebird before 2.1.7 and 2.5.x before 2.5.3 SU1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference, segmentation fault, and crash) via an op_response action with a non-empty status. | |||||
| CVE-2008-6714 | 1 Xecms Project | 1 Xecms | 2021-03-05 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| admin.php in xeCMS 1.0.0 RC2 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and access the admin panel by setting the xecms_username cookie. | |||||
| CVE-2011-0762 | 6 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more | 6 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 3 more | 2021-03-04 | 4.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The vsf_filename_passes_filter function in ls.c in vsftpd before 2.3.3 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption and process slot exhaustion) via crafted glob expressions in STAT commands in multiple FTP sessions, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-2632. | |||||
| CVE-2011-4362 | 2 Debian, Lighttpd | 2 Debian Linux, Lighttpd | 2021-03-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Integer signedness error in the base64_decode function in the HTTP authentication functionality (http_auth.c) in lighttpd 1.4 before 1.4.30 and 1.5 before SVN revision 2806 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via crafted base64 input that triggers an out-of-bounds read with a negative index. | |||||
| CVE-2013-4560 | 3 Debian, Lighttpd, Opensuse | 3 Debian Linux, Lighttpd, Opensuse | 2021-03-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Use-after-free vulnerability in lighttpd before 1.4.33 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault and crash) via unspecified vectors that trigger FAMMonitorDirectory failures. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3419 | 2021-03-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8001 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8003 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8004 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8013 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8014 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8015 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8028 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8040 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8041 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8042 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8043 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8044 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8045 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8046 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8047 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8048 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8049 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8107 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8108 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8109 | 2021-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||