Search
Total
86024 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-1000351 | 2017-04-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-10226. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-10226. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-10226 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000348 | 2017-04-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-10211. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-10211. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-10211 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000350 | 2017-04-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-10222. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-10222. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-10222 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6006 | 2017-03-31 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2655 | 2017-03-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9571 | 2017-03-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9606. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2016-9606. Reason: this ID was intended for one issue, but was associated with two issues. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9606 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2015-6607 | 2 Google, Sqlite | 2 Android, Sqlite | 2017-03-25 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| SQLite before 3.8.9, as used in Android before 5.1.1 LMY48T, allows attackers to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka internal bug 20099586. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7259 | 2017-03-25 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2577 | 2017-03-24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2012-1574 | 2 Apache, Cloudera | 3 Hadoop, Cloudera Cdh, Hadoop | 2017-03-24 | 6.5 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The Kerberos/MapReduce security functionality in Apache Hadoop 0.20.203.0 through 0.20.205.0, 0.23.x before 0.23.2, and 1.0.x before 1.0.2, as used in Cloudera CDH CDH3u0 through CDH3u2, Cloudera hadoop-0.20-sbin before 0.20.2+923.197, and other products, allows remote authenticated users to impersonate arbitrary cluster user accounts via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2012-3376 | 1 Apache | 1 Hadoop | 2017-03-24 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| DataNodes in Apache Hadoop 2.0.0 alpha does not check the BlockTokens of clients when Kerberos is enabled and the DataNode has checked out the same BlockPool twice from a NodeName, which might allow remote clients to read arbitrary blocks, write to blocks to which they only have read access, and have other unspecified impacts. | |||||
| CVE-2013-2192 | 1 Apache | 1 Hadoop | 2017-03-24 | 3.2 LOW | N/A |
| The RPC protocol implementation in Apache Hadoop 2.x before 2.0.6-alpha, 0.23.x before 0.23.9, and 1.x before 1.2.1, when the Kerberos security features are enabled, allows man-in-the-middle attackers to disable bidirectional authentication and obtain sensitive information by forcing a downgrade to simple authentication. | |||||
| CVE-2013-2193 | 1 Apache | 1 Hbase | 2017-03-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache HBase 0.92.x before 0.92.3 and 0.94.x before 0.94.9, when the Kerberos features are enabled, allows man-in-the-middle attackers to disable bidirectional authentication and obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0757 | 1 Cisco | 1 Identity Services Engine Software | 2017-03-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The web framework in Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) 1.2(1.901) and 1.3(0.722) does not properly implement session handlers, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by reading web pages, as demonstrated by MnT reports, aka Bug ID CSCuq23140. | |||||
| CVE-2015-2050 | 1 D-link | 2 Dap-1320, Dap-1320 Firmware | 2017-03-24 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| D-Link DAP-1320 Rev Ax with firmware before 1.21b05 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7799 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2017-03-24 | 4.9 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The slhc_init function in drivers/net/slip/slhc.c in the Linux kernel through 4.2.3 does not ensure that certain slot numbers are valid, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and system crash) via a crafted PPPIOCSMAXCID ioctl call. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2656 | 2017-03-18 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-6320. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-6320. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-6320 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6804 | 2017-03-18 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6902 | 2017-03-18 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-9999 | 2017-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was used as an example and was not assigned for a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0983 | 2017-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3941 | 2017-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3944 | 2017-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3945 | 2017-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3975 | 2017-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-6455 | 2017-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-6487 | 2017-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7920 | 2017-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7922 | 2017-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8582 | 2017-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8583 | 2017-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8584 | 2017-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8585 | 2017-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8586 | 2017-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8587 | 2017-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8588 | 2017-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8589 | 2017-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8590 | 2017-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8591 | 2017-03-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6453 | 2017-03-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6454 | 2017-03-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6456 | 2017-03-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6457 | 2017-03-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6461 | 2017-03-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2012-3027 | 2017-03-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2012. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2012-3029 | 2017-03-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2012. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2012-3033 | 2017-03-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2012. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2012-3036 | 2017-03-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2012. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2012-3042 | 2017-03-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2012. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2012-4692 | 2017-03-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2012. Notes: none. | |||||