Search
Total
86024 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-1000041 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-7271. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-7271. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-7271 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8784 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-7263. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-7263. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-7263 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000360 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9847. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9847. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9847 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000361 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9848. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9848. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9848 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000362 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9849. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9849. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9849 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000363 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9850. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9850. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9850 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000364 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9851. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9851. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9851 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000365 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9852, CVE-2016-9853, CVE-2016-9854, CVE-2016-9855. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9852, CVE-2016-9853, CVE-2016-9854, and CVE-2016-9855. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9852, CVE-2016-9853, CVE-2016-9854, and/or CVE-2016-9855 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000366 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9856, CVE-2016-9857. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9856 and CVE-2016-9857. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9856 and/or CVE-2016-9857 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000367 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9858, CVE-2016-9859, CVE-2016-9860. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9858, CVE-2016-9859, and CVE-2016-9860. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9858, CVE-2016-9859, and/or CVE-2016-9860 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000368 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9861. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9861. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9861 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000369 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9862. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9862. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9862 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000370 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9863. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9863. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9863 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000371 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9864. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9864. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9864 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000372 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9865. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9865. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9865 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000373 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9866. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9866. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9866 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2017-5908 | 2017-05-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-3212. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-3212. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-3212 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2017-5917 | 2017-05-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-3213. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-3213. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-3213 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1298 | 2017-05-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-8106. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-8106. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-8106 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-1999-0232 | 1 Ncsa Httpd Project | 1 Ncsa Httpd | 2017-05-03 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in NCSA WebServer (version 1.5c) gives remote access. | |||||
| CVE-1999-0226 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Windows Nt | 2017-05-03 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Windows NT TCP/IP processes fragmented IP packets improperly, causing a denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-1999-1353 | 1 Nosque | 1 Msgcore | 2017-04-29 | 4.6 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Nosque MsgCore 2.14 stores passwords in cleartext: (1) the administrator password in the AdmPasswd registry key, and (2) user passwords in the Userbase.dbf data file, which could allow local users to gain privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2001-1329 | 1 Ibm | 1 Aix | 2017-04-29 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in rsh on AIX 4.2.0.0 may allow local users to gain root privileges via a long command line argument. | |||||
| CVE-2003-0766 | 1 Ftp Desktop | 1 Ftp Desktop | 2017-04-29 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in FTP Desktop client 3.5, and possibly earlier versions, allow remote malicious servers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a long FTP banner, (2) a long response to a USER command, or (3) a long response to a PASS command. | |||||
| CVE-2012-1633 | 2 Drupal, Erikwebb | 2 Drupal, Password Policy | 2017-04-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Password Policy module before 6.x-1.4 and 7.x-1.0 beta3 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrative users for requests that unblock a user. | |||||
| CVE-2013-5730 | 1 Dlink | 2 Dsl-2740b, Dsl-2740b Firmware | 2017-04-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in D-Link DSL-2740B Gateway with firmware EU_1.00 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) enable or disable Wireless MAC Address Filters via a wlFltMode action to wlmacflt.cmd, (2) enable or disable firewall protections via a request to scdmz.cmd, or (3) enable or disable remote management via a save action to scsrvcntr.cmd. | |||||
| CVE-2014-2522 | 2 Haxx, Microsoft | 3 Curl, Libcurl, Windows | 2017-04-29 | 4.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| curl and libcurl 7.27.0 through 7.35.0, when running on Windows and using the SChannel/Winssl TLS backend, does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate when accessing a URL that uses a numerical IP address, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via an arbitrary valid certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2017-5437 | 2017-04-25 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-10195, CVE-2016-10196, CVE-2016-10197. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2016-10195, CVE-2016-10196, and CVE-2016-10197. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-10195, CVE-2016-10196, and/or CVE-2016-10197 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5483 | 2017-04-25 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-3600. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-3600. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-3600 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7572 | 2017-04-24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-0237. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-0237. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-0237 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2014-9681 | 2017-04-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2012-5882 | 1 Yahoo | 1 Yui | 2017-04-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Flash component infrastructure in YUI 2.5.0 through 2.9.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors related to uploader.swf, a similar issue to CVE-2010-4208. | |||||
| CVE-2013-2002 | 1 X | 1 Libxt | 2017-04-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in X.org libXt 1.1.3 and earlier allows X servers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted length or index values to the _XtResourceConfigurationEH function. | |||||
| CVE-2013-2003 | 1 X | 1 Libxcursor | 2017-04-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Integer overflow in X.org libXcursor 1.1.13 and earlier allows X servers to trigger allocation of insufficient memory and a buffer overflow via vectors related to the _XcursorFileHeaderCreate function. | |||||
| CVE-2013-2005 | 1 X | 1 Libxt | 2017-04-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| X.org libXt 1.1.3 and earlier does not check the return value of the XGetWindowProperty function, which allows X servers to trigger use of an uninitialized pointer and memory corruption via vectors related to the (1) ReqCleanup, (2) HandleSelectionEvents, (3) ReqTimedOut, (4) HandleNormal, and (5) HandleSelectionReplies functions. | |||||
| CVE-2017-5181 | 2017-04-20 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-7692. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-7692. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-7692 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7874 | 2017-04-20 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3447 | 2017-04-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was associated with multiple vulnerabilities without being assigned by a CNA. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000258 | 2017-04-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-10325. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-10325. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-10325 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000259 | 2017-04-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-10326. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-10326. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-10326 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7286 | 2017-04-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8581 | 2017-04-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-0779. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2016-0779. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-0779 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7319 | 2017-04-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2553 | 2017-04-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7469 | 2017-04-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-7466. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-7466. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-7466 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2017-5338 | 2017-04-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-5339 | 2017-04-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000306 | 2017-04-06 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-1000307. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-1000307. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-1000307 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000268 | 2017-04-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-7510. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-7510. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-7510 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000349 | 2017-04-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-10209. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-10209. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-10209 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||