Search
Total
46623 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-15718 | 1 Rosariosis | 1 Rosariosis | 2020-07-22 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| RosarioSIS 6.7.2 is vulnerable to XSS, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input by the PrintSchedules.php script. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability using the include_inactive parameter in a crafted URL. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15716 | 1 Rosariosis | 1 Rosariosis | 2020-07-22 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| RosarioSIS 6.7.2 is vulnerable to XSS, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input by the Preferences.php script. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability using the tab parameter in a crafted URL. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15717 | 1 Rosariosis | 1 Rosariosis | 2020-07-22 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| RosarioSIS 6.7.2 is vulnerable to XSS, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input by the Search.inc.php script. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability using the advanced parameter in a crafted URL. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4361 | 1 Ibm | 1 Planning Analytics | 2020-07-22 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information by disclosing private IP addresses in HTTP responses. IBM X-Force ID: 178766. | |||||
| CVE-2020-2227 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Deployer Framework | 2020-07-22 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Jenkins Deployer Framework Plugin 1.2 and earlier does not escape the URL displayed in the build home page, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-2226 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Matrix Authorization Strategy | 2020-07-22 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Jenkins Matrix Authorization Strategy Plugin 2.6.1 and earlier does not escape user names shown in the configuration, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4100 | 1 Hcltechsw | 1 Hcl Verse | 2020-07-22 | 2.1 LOW | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| "HCL Verse for Android was found to employ dynamic code loading. This mechanism allows a developer to specify which components of the application should not be loaded by default when the application is started. Typically, core components and additional dependencies are loaded natively at runtime; however, dynamically loaded components are only loaded as they are specifically requested. While this can have a positive impact on performance, or grant additional functionality (for example, a non-invasive update feature), it can also open the application to loading unintended code if not implemented properly." | |||||
| CVE-2020-3348 | 1 Cisco | 1 Data Center Network Manager | 2020-07-22 | 3.5 LOW | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface on an affected device. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by persuading a user of the interface to click a customized link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the interface or access sensitive browser-based information. | |||||
| CVE-2019-18860 | 1 Squid-cache | 1 Squid | 2020-07-22 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Squid before 4.9, when certain web browsers are used, mishandles HTML in the host (aka hostname) parameter to cachemgr.cgi. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9311 | 1 Silverstripe | 1 Silverstripe | 2020-07-22 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| In SilverStripe through 4.5, malicious users with a valid Silverstripe CMS login (usually CMS access) can craft profile information which can lead to XSS for other users through specially crafted login form URLs. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5130 | 1 Sonicwall | 1 Sonicos | 2020-07-22 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| SonicOS SSLVPN LDAP login request allows remote attackers to cause external service interaction (DNS) due to improper validation of the request. This vulnerability impact SonicOS version 6.5.4.4-44n and earlier. | |||||
| CVE-2020-0122 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2020-07-22 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| In the permission declaration for com.google.android.providers.gsf.permission.WRITE_GSERVICES in AndroidManifest.xml, there is a possible permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-8.0 Android-8.1 Android-9 Android-10Android ID: A-147247775 | |||||
| CVE-2020-15107 | 1 Openenclave | 1 Openenclave | 2020-07-22 | 1.2 LOW | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In openenclave before 0.10.0, enclaves that use x87 FPU operations are vulnerable to tampering by a malicious host application. By violating the Linux System V Application Binary Interface (ABI) for such operations, a host app can compromise the execution integrity of some x87 FPU operations in an enclave. Depending on the FPU control configuration of the enclave app and whether the operations are used in secret-dependent execution paths, this vulnerability may also be used to mount a side-channel attack on the enclave. This has been fixed in 0.10.0 and the current master branch. Users will need to recompile their applications against the patched libraries to be protected from this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8024 | 1 Opensuse | 2 Hylafax\+, Leap | 2020-07-22 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A Incorrect Default Permissions vulnerability in the packaging of hylafax+ of openSUSE Leap 15.2, openSUSE Leap 15.1, openSUSE Factory allows local attackers to escalate from user uucp to users calling hylafax binaries. This issue affects: openSUSE Leap 15.2 hylafax+ versions prior to 7.0.2-lp152.2.1. openSUSE Leap 15.1 hylafax+ version 5.6.1-lp151.3.7 and prior versions. openSUSE Factory hylafax+ versions prior to 7.0.2-2.1. | |||||
| CVE-2020-0531 | 1 Intel | 1 Active Management Technology Firmware | 2020-07-22 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Improper input validation in Intel(R) AMT versions before 11.8.77, 11.12.77, 11.22.77 and 12.0.64 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via network access. | |||||
| CVE-2020-0535 | 1 Intel | 1 Active Management Technology Firmware | 2020-07-22 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Improper input validation in Intel(R) AMT versions before 11.8.76, 11.12.77, 11.22.77 and 12.0.64 may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via network access. | |||||
| CVE-2020-0537 | 1 Intel | 1 Active Management Technology Firmware | 2020-07-22 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| Improper input validation in subsystem for Intel(R) AMT versions before 11.8.77, 11.12.77, 11.22.77 and 12.0.64 may allow a privileged user to potentially enable denial of service via network access. | |||||
| CVE-2020-0539 | 1 Intel | 2 Converged Security Management Engine Firmware, Trusted Execution Engine Firmware | 2020-07-22 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Path traversal in subsystem for Intel(R) DAL software for Intel(R) CSME versions before 11.8.77, 11.12.77, 11.22.77, 12.0.64, 13.0.32, 14.0.33 and Intel(R) TXE versions before 3.1.75, 4.0.25 may allow an unprivileged user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. | |||||
| CVE-2020-0541 | 1 Intel | 1 Converged Security Management Engine Firmware | 2020-07-22 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| Out-of-bounds write in subsystem for Intel(R) CSME versions before 12.0.64, 13.0.32, 14.0.33 and 14.5.12 may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | |||||
| CVE-2020-0545 | 1 Intel | 3 Converged Security Management Engine Firmware, Server Platform Services, Trusted Execution Engine | 2020-07-22 | 2.1 LOW | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| Integer overflow in subsystem for Intel(R) CSME versions before 11.8.77, 11.12.77, 11.22.77 and Intel(R) TXE versions before 3.1.75, 4.0.25 and Intel(R) Server Platform Services (SPS) versions before SPS_E5_04.01.04.380.0, SPS_SoC-X_04.00.04.128.0, SPS_SoC-A_04.00.04.211.0, SPS_E3_04.01.04.109.0, SPS_E3_04.08.04.070.0 may allow a privileged user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. | |||||
| CVE-2020-7592 | 1 Siemens | 9 Simatic Hmi Basic Panels 1st Generation, Simatic Hmi Basic Panels 2nd Generation, Simatic Hmi Comfort Panels and 6 more | 2020-07-22 | 3.3 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC HMI Basic Panels 1st Generation (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC HMI Basic Panels 2nd Generation (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC HMI Comfort Panels (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC HMI KTP700F Mobile Arctic (All versions), SIMATIC HMI Mobile Panels 2nd Generation (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Advanced (All versions). Unencrypted communication between the configuration software and the respective device could allow an attacker to capture potential plain text communication and have access to sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15721 | 1 Rosariosis | 1 Rosariosis | 2020-07-22 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| RosarioSIS through 6.8-beta allows modules/Custom/NotifyParents.php XSS because of the href attributes for AddStudents.php and User.php. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11903 | 1 Treck | 1 Tcp\/ip | 2020-07-22 | 3.3 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The Treck TCP/IP stack before 6.0.1.28 has a DHCP Out-of-bounds Read. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11905 | 1 Treck | 1 Tcp\/ip | 2020-07-22 | 3.3 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The Treck TCP/IP stack before 6.0.1.66 has a DHCPv6 Out-of-bounds Read. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11906 | 1 Treck | 1 Tcp\/ip | 2020-07-22 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| The Treck TCP/IP stack before 6.0.1.66 has an Ethernet Link Layer Integer Underflow. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11907 | 1 Treck | 1 Tcp\/ip | 2020-07-22 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| The Treck TCP/IP stack before 6.0.1.66 improperly handles a Length Parameter Inconsistency in TCP. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11908 | 1 Treck | 1 Tcp\/ip | 2020-07-22 | 3.3 LOW | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Treck TCP/IP stack before 4.7.1.27 mishandles '\0' termination in DHCP. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11909 | 1 Treck | 1 Tcp\/ip | 2020-07-22 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The Treck TCP/IP stack before 6.0.1.66 has an IPv4 Integer Underflow. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11910 | 1 Treck | 1 Tcp\/ip | 2020-07-22 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The Treck TCP/IP stack before 6.0.1.66 has an ICMPv4 Out-of-bounds Read. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11912 | 1 Treck | 1 Tcp\/ip | 2020-07-22 | 3.3 LOW | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The Treck TCP/IP stack before 6.0.1.66 has a TCP Out-of-bounds Read. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11913 | 1 Treck | 1 Tcp\/ip | 2020-07-22 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The Treck TCP/IP stack before 6.0.1.66 has an IPv6 Out-of-bounds Read. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11914 | 1 Treck | 1 Tcp\/ip | 2020-07-22 | 3.3 LOW | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Treck TCP/IP stack before 6.0.1.66 has an ARP Out-of-bounds Read. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4748 | 1 Ibm | 10 Collaborative Lifecycle Management, Doors Next, Engineering Lifecycle Manager and 7 more | 2020-07-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Jazz Team Server based Applications are vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 173174. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5768 | 1 Icegram | 1 Email Subscribers \& Newsletters | 2020-07-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in Icegram Email Subscribers & Newsletters Plugin for WordPress v4.4.8 allows a remote, authenticated attacker to determine the value of database fields. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5767 | 1 Icegram | 1 Email Subscribers \& Newsletters | 2020-07-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site request forgery in Icegram Email Subscribers & Newsletters Plugin for WordPress v4.4.8 allows a remote attacker to send forged emails by tricking legitimate users into clicking a crafted link. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11983 | 1 Apache | 1 Airflow | 2020-07-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| An issue was found in Apache Airflow versions 1.10.10 and below. It was discovered that many of the admin management screens in the new/RBAC UI handled escaping incorrectly, allowing authenticated users with appropriate permissions to create stored XSS attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9485 | 1 Apache | 1 Airflow | 2020-07-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| An issue was found in Apache Airflow versions 1.10.10 and below. A stored XSS vulnerability was discovered in the Chart pages of the the "classic" UI. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1451 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Sharepoint Enterprise Server, Sharepoint Server | 2020-07-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| A cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists when Microsoft SharePoint Server does not properly sanitize a specially crafted web request to an affected SharePoint server, aka 'Microsoft Office SharePoint XSS Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1450, CVE-2020-1456. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1442 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Office Online Server, Office Web Apps | 2020-07-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A spoofing vulnerability exists when an Office Web Apps server does not properly sanitize a specially crafted request, aka 'Office Web Apps XSS Vulnerability'. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1450 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Sharepoint Enterprise Server, Sharepoint Server | 2020-07-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| A cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists when Microsoft SharePoint Server does not properly sanitize a specially crafted web request to an affected SharePoint server, aka 'Microsoft Office SharePoint XSS Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1451, CVE-2020-1456. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15105 | 1 Django Two-factor Authentication Project | 1 Django Two-factor Authentication | 2020-07-21 | 3.6 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Django Two-Factor Authentication before 1.12, stores the user's password in clear text in the user session (base64-encoded). The password is stored in the session when the user submits their username and password, and is removed once they complete authentication by entering a two-factor authentication code. This means that the password is stored in clear text in the session for an arbitrary amount of time, and potentially forever if the user begins the login process by entering their username and password and then leaves before entering their two-factor authentication code. The severity of this issue depends on which type of session storage you have configured: in the worst case, if you're using Django's default database session storage, then users' passwords are stored in clear text in your database. In the best case, if you're using Django's signed cookie session, then users' passwords are only stored in clear text within their browser's cookie store. In the common case of using Django's cache session store, the users' passwords are stored in clear text in whatever cache storage you have configured (typically Memcached or Redis). This has been fixed in 1.12. After upgrading, users should be sure to delete any clear text passwords that have been stored. For example, if you're using the database session backend, you'll likely want to delete any session record from the database and purge that data from any database backups or replicas. In addition, affected organizations who have suffered a database breach while using an affected version should inform their users that their clear text passwords have been compromised. All organizations should encourage users whose passwords were insecurely stored to change these passwords on any sites where they were used. As a workaround, wwitching Django's session storage to use signed cookies instead of the database or cache lessens the impact of this issue, but should not be done without a thorough understanding of the security tradeoffs of using signed cookies rather than a server-side session storage. There is no way to fully mitigate the issue without upgrading. | |||||
| CVE-2019-19338 | 2 Linux, Redhat | 2 Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux | 2020-07-21 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in the fix for CVE-2019-11135, in the Linux upstream kernel versions before 5.5 where, the way Intel CPUs handle speculative execution of instructions when a TSX Asynchronous Abort (TAA) error occurs. When a guest is running on a host CPU affected by the TAA flaw (TAA_NO=0), but is not affected by the MDS issue (MDS_NO=1), the guest was to clear the affected buffers by using a VERW instruction mechanism. But when the MDS_NO=1 bit was exported to the guests, the guests did not use the VERW mechanism to clear the affected buffers. This issue affects guests running on Cascade Lake CPUs and requires that host has 'TSX' enabled. Confidentiality of data is the highest threat associated with this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2017-9505 | 1 Atlassian | 1 Confluence | 2020-07-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Atlassian Confluence starting with 4.3.0 before 6.2.1 did not check if a user had permission to view a page when creating a workbox notification about new comments. An attacker who can login to Confluence could receive workbox notifications, which contain the content of comments, for comments added to a page after they started watching it even if they do not have permission to view the page itself. | |||||
| CVE-2020-2221 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Jenkins | 2020-07-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Jenkins 2.244 and earlier, LTS 2.235.1 and earlier does not escape the upstream job's display name shown as part of a build cause, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-2220 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Jenkins | 2020-07-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Jenkins 2.244 and earlier, LTS 2.235.1 and earlier does not escape the agent name in the build time trend page, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-2222 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Jenkins | 2020-07-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Jenkins 2.244 and earlier, LTS 2.235.1 and earlier does not escape the job name in the 'Keep this build forever' badge tooltip, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-2223 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Jenkins | 2020-07-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Jenkins 2.244 and earlier, LTS 2.235.1 and earlier does not escape correctly the 'href' attribute of links to downstream jobs displayed in the build console page, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-2224 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Matrix Project | 2020-07-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Jenkins Matrix Project Plugin 1.16 and earlier does not escape the node names shown in tooltips on the overview page of builds with a single axis, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-2225 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Matrix Project | 2020-07-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Jenkins Matrix Project Plugin 1.16 and earlier does not escape the axis names shown in tooltips on the overview page of builds with multiple axes, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15000 | 1 Yubico | 2 Yubikey 5 Nfc, Yubikey 5 Nfc Firmware | 2020-07-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| A PIN management problem was discovered on Yubico YubiKey 5 devices 5.2.0 to 5.2.6. OpenPGP has three passwords: Admin PIN, Reset Code, and User PIN. The Reset Code is used to reset the User PIN, but it is disabled by default. A flaw in the implementation of OpenPGP sets the Reset Code to a known value upon initialization. If the retry counter for the Reset Code is set to non-zero without changing the Reset Code, this known value can be used to reset the User PIN. To set the retry counters, the Admin PIN is required. | |||||