Search
Total
3 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-13946 | 1 Siemens | 101 Dk Standard Ethernet Controller, Ek-ertec 200, Ek-ertec 200 Firmware and 98 more | 2022-02-09 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Development/Evaluation Kits for PROFINET IO: DK Standard Ethernet Controller, Development/Evaluation Kits for PROFINET IO: EK-ERTEC 200, Development/Evaluation Kits for PROFINET IO: EK-ERTEC 200P, PROFINET Driver for Controller, RUGGEDCOM RM1224, SCALANCE M-800, SCALANCE S615, SCALANCE W-700 IEEE 802.11n family, SCALANCE X-200 switch family (incl. SIPLUS NET variants), SCALANCE X-200IRT (incl. SIPLUS NET variants), SCALANCE X-300 (incl. X408 and SIPLUS NET variants), SCALANCE XB-200, SCALANCE XC-200, SCALANCE XF-200BA, SCALANCE XM-400, SCALANCE XP-200, SCALANCE XR-300WG, SCALANCE XR-500, SIMATIC CP 1616 and CP 1604, SIMATIC CP 343-1, SIMATIC CP 343-1 Advanced, SIMATIC CP 343-1 ERPC, SIMATIC CP 343-1 Lean, SIMATIC CP 443-1, SIMATIC CP 443-1 Advanced, SIMATIC CP 443-1 OPC UA, SIMATIC ET200AL IM 157-1 PN, SIMATIC ET200M IM153-4 PN IO HF (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200M IM153-4 PN IO ST (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200MP IM155-5 PN HF (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200MP IM155-5 PN ST (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200S (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200SP IM155-6 PN Basic (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200SP IM155-6 PN HF (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200SP IM155-6 PN ST (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 16DI, DC24V, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 16DO DC24V/1,3A, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 4AO U/I 4xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8 DIO, DC24V/1,3A, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8 DO, DC24V/2A, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8AI RTD/TC 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8AI; 4 U/I; 4 RTD/TC 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DI, DC24V, 4xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DI, DC24V, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DO, DC24V/0,5A, 4xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DO, DC24V/1,3A, 4xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DO, DC24V/1,3A, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN: IO-Link Master, SIMATIC ET200pro, IM 154-3 PN HF, SIMATIC ET200pro, IM 154-4 PN HF, SIMATIC IPC Support, Package for VxWorks, SIMATIC MV400, SIMATIC PN/PN Coupler 6ES7158-3AD01-0XA0 (incl. SIPLUS NET variant), SIMATIC RF180C, SIMATIC RF182C, SIMATIC RF600, SIMOTION C, SIMOTION D (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMOTION P, SINAMICS DCP, SIPLUS NET CP 343-1, SIPLUS NET CP 343-1 Advanced, SIPLUS NET CP 343-1 Lean, SIPLUS NET CP 443-1, SIPLUS NET CP 443-1 Advanced, SOFTNET-IE PNIO. Profinet-IO (PNIO) stack versions prior V06.00 do not properly limit internal resource allocation when multiple legitimate diagnostic package requests are sent to the DCE-RPC interface. This could lead to a denial of service condition due to lack of memory for devices that include a vulnerable version of the stack. The security vulnerability could be exploited by an attacker with network access to an affected device. Successful exploitation requires no system privileges and no user interaction. An attacker could use the vulnerability to compromise the availability of the device. | |||||
| CVE-2020-28393 | 1 Siemens | 22 Scalance Xm-400, Scalance Xm-400 Firmware, Scalance Xm408-4c and 19 more | 2021-05-21 | 7.1 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker could create a permanent denial-of-service condition by sending specially crafted OSPF packets. Successful exploitation requires OSPF to be enabled on an affected device on the SCALANCE XM-400, XR-500 (All versions prior to v6.4). | |||||
| CVE-2017-12736 | 1 Siemens | 15 Ruggedcom, Ruggedcom Ros, Ruggedcom Rsl910 and 12 more | 2019-10-03 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROS for RSL910 devices (All versions < ROS V5.0.1), RUGGEDCOM ROS for all other devices (All versions < ROS V4.3.4), SCALANCE XB-200/XC-200/XP-200/XR300-WG (All versions between V3.0 (including) and V3.0.2 (excluding)), SCALANCE XR-500/XM-400 (All versions between V6.1 (including) and V6.1.1 (excluding)). After initial configuration, the Ruggedcom Discovery Protocol (RCDP) is still able to writeto the device under certain conditions, potentially allowing users located in the adjacentnetwork of the targeted device to perform unauthorized administrative actions. | |||||