Search
Total
1927 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-3456 | 1 Cisco | 17 Firepower 4110, Firepower 4112, Firepower 4115 and 14 more | 2020-10-28 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the Cisco Firepower Chassis Manager (FCM) of Cisco FXOS Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack against a user of an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the FCM interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a targeted user to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send arbitrary requests that could take unauthorized actions on behalf of the targeted user. | |||||
| CVE-2020-18129 | 1 Eyoucms | 1 Eyoucms | 2020-10-27 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A CSRF vulnerability in Eyoucms v1.2.7 allows an attacker to add an admin account via login.php. | |||||
| CVE-2016-3029 | 1 Ibm | 5 Security Access Manager 9.0 Firmware, Security Access Manager For Mobile 8.0 Firmware, Security Access Manager For Mobile Appliance and 2 more | 2020-10-27 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Security Access Manager for Web is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. | |||||
| CVE-2020-25263 | 1 Pyrocms | 1 Pyrocms | 2020-10-19 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.1 HIGH |
| PyroCMS 3.7 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) via the admin/addons/uninstall/anomaly.module.blocks URI: an arbitrary plugin will be deleted. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13760 | 1 Joomla | 1 Joomla\! | 2020-10-19 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| In Joomla! before 3.9.19, missing token checks in com_postinstall lead to CSRF. | |||||
| CVE-2020-26522 | 1 Garfield Petshop Project | 1 Garfield Petshop | 2020-10-16 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in mod/user/act_user.php in Garfield Petshop through 2020-10-01 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create new administrative accounts. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5642 | 1 Onwebchat | 1 Live Chat - Live Support | 2020-10-16 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Live Chat - Live support version 3.1.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2020-26912 | 1 Netgear | 28 D6200, D6200 Firmware, D7000 and 25 more | 2020-10-16 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by CSRF. This affects D6200 before 1.1.00.38, D7000 before 1.0.1.78, JR6150 before 1.0.1.24, R6020 before 1.0.0.42, R6050 before 1.0.1.24, R6080 before 1.0.0.42, R6120 before 1.0.0.66, R6220 before 1.1.0.100, R6260 before 1.1.0.64, R6700v2 before 1.2.0.62, R6800 before 1.2.0.62, R6900v2 before 1.2.0.62, R7450 before 1.2.0.62, and WNR2020 before 1.1.0.62. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13658 | 1 Lansweeper | 1 Lansweeper | 2020-10-15 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 8.0 HIGH |
| In Lansweeper 8.0.130.17, the web console is vulnerable to a CSRF attack that would allow a low-level Lansweeper user to elevate their privileges within the application. | |||||
| CVE-2020-26802 | 1 Formalms | 1 Formalms | 2020-10-15 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| forma.lms 2.3.0.2 is affected by Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in formalms/appCore/index.php?r=lms/profile/show&ap=saveinfo via a GET request to change the admin email address in order to accomplish an account takeover. | |||||
| CVE-2020-23837 | 1 Multi User Project | 1 Multi User | 2020-10-08 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Multi User plugin 1.8.2 for GetSimple CMS allows remote attackers to add admin (or other) users after an authenticated admin visits a third-party site or clicks on a URL. | |||||
| CVE-2020-12123 | 1 Wavlink | 2 Wn530h4, Wn530h4 Firmware | 2020-10-08 | 7.8 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| CSRF vulnerabilities in the /cgi-bin/ directory of the WAVLINK WN530H4 M30H4.V5030.190403 allow an attacker to remotely access router endpoints, because these endpoints do not contain CSRF tokens. If a user is authenticated in the router portal, then this attack will work. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5786 | 1 Teltonika-networks | 2 Trb245, Trb245 Firmware | 2020-10-01 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cross-site request forgery in Teltonika firmware TRB2_R_00.02.04.3 allows a remote attacker to perform sensitive application actions by tricking legitimate users into clicking a crafted link. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3655 | 1 Arubanetworks | 1 Clearpass | 2020-10-01 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Aruba Networks ClearPass Policy Manager before 6.4.7 and 6.5.x before 6.5.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators by leveraging improper enforcement of the anti-CSRF token. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3135 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unified Communications Manager | 2020-09-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (UCM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the targeted user. | |||||
| CVE-2020-2280 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Warnings | 2020-09-28 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Warnings Plugin 5.0.1 and earlier allows attackers to execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2019-16009 | 1 Cisco | 2 Ios, Ios Xe | 2020-09-28 | 7.6 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the web UI of Cisco IOS and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web UI on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the targeted user. If the user has administrative privileges, the attacker could alter the configuration, execute commands, or reload an affected device. | |||||
| CVE-2020-12282 | 1 Gogogate | 2 Ismartgate Pro, Ismartgate Pro Firmware | 2020-09-27 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| iSmartgate PRO 1.5.9 is vulnerable to CSRF via the busca parameter in the form used for searching for users, accessible via /index.php. (This can be combined with reflected XSS.) | |||||
| CVE-2020-14025 | 1 Ozeki | 1 Ozeki Ng Sms Gateway | 2020-09-26 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Ozeki NG SMS Gateway through 4.17.6 has multiple CSRF vulnerabilities. For example, an administrator, by following a link, can be tricked into making unwanted changes such as installing new modules or changing a password. | |||||
| CVE-2020-12781 | 1 Combodo | 1 Itop | 2020-09-25 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Combodo iTop contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability, attackers can execute specific commands via malicious site request forgery. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13259 | 1 Rad | 2 Secflow-1v, Secflow-1v Firmware | 2020-09-22 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of RAD SecFlow-1v os-image SF_0290_2.3.01.26 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web UI on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user. This could be exploited in conjunction with CVE-2020-13260. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4617 | 1 Ibm | 1 Data Risk Manager | 2020-09-22 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| IBM Data Risk Manager (iDNA) 2.0.6 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 184930. | |||||
| CVE-2020-23451 | 1 Spiceworks | 1 Spiceworks | 2020-09-18 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Spiceworks Version <= 7.5.00107 is affected by CSRF which can lead to privilege escalation via "/settings/v1/users" function. | |||||
| CVE-2020-23824 | 1 Argosoft | 1 Mail Server | 2020-09-18 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| ArGo Soft Mail Server 1.8.8.9 is affected by Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) for perform remote arbitrary code execution. The component is the Administration dashboard. When using admin/user credentials, if the admin/user admin opens a website with the malicious page that will run the CSRF. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10229 | 1 Vtenext | 1 Vtenext | 2020-09-18 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A CSRF issue in vtecrm vtenext 19 CE allows attackers to carry out unwanted actions on an administrator's behalf, such as uploading files, adding users, and deleting accounts. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15789 | 1 Siemens | 1 Polarion Subversion Webclient | 2020-09-14 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Polarion Subversion Webclient (All versions). The web interface could allow a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack if an unsuspecting user is tricked into accessing a malicious link. Successful exploitation requires user interaction by a legitimate user, who must be authenticated to the web interface. A successful attack could allow an attacker to trigger actions via the web interface that the legitimate user is allowed to perform. This could allow the attacker to read or modify contents of the web application. | |||||
| CVE-2020-23830 | 1 Stock Management System Project | 1 Stock Management System | 2020-09-10 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.1 HIGH |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in changeUsername.php in SourceCodester Stock Management System v1.0 allows remote attackers to deny future logins by changing an authenticated victim's username when they visit a third-party site. | |||||
| CVE-2020-23836 | 1 Oswapp | 1 Warehouse Inventory System | 2020-09-08 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in edit_user.php in OSWAPP Warehouse Inventory System (aka OSWA-INV) through 2020-08-10 allows remote attackers to change the admin's password after an authenticated admin visits a third-party site. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5776 | 1 Magmi Project | 1 Magmi | 2020-09-08 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Currently, all versions of MAGMI are vulnerable to CSRF due to the lack of CSRF tokens. RCE (via phpcli command) is possible in the event that a CSRF is leveraged against an existing admin session for MAGMI. | |||||
| CVE-2020-16208 | 1 Redlion | 4 N-tron 702-w, N-tron 702-w Firmware, N-tron 702m12-w and 1 more | 2020-09-08 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| The affected product is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery, which may allow an attacker to modify different configurations of a device by luring an authenticated user to click on a crafted link on the N-Tron 702-W / 702M12-W (all versions). | |||||
| CVE-2018-12540 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Vert.x | 2020-09-08 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| In version from 3.0.0 to 3.5.2 of Eclipse Vert.x, the CSRFHandler do not assert that the XSRF Cookie matches the returned XSRF header/form parameter. This allows replay attacks with previously issued tokens which are not expired yet. | |||||
| CVE-2020-25070 | 1 Usvn | 1 Usvn | 2020-09-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| USVN (aka User-friendly SVN) before 1.0.10 allows CSRF, related to the lack of the SameSite Strict feature. | |||||
| CVE-2020-2240 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Database | 2020-09-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins database Plugin 1.6 and earlier allows attackers to execute arbitrary SQL scripts. | |||||
| CVE-2019-18280 | 1 Online Grading System Project | 1 Online Grading System | 2020-09-03 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Sourcecodester Online Grading System 1.0 is affected by a Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability due to a lack of CSRF protection. This could lead to an attacker tricking the administrator into executing arbitrary code via a crafted HTML page, as demonstrated by a Create User action at the admin/modules/user/controller.php?action=add URI. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5922 | 1 F5 | 14 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Advanced Web Application Firewall and 11 more | 2020-09-02 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| In BIG-IP versions 15.0.0-15.1.0.4, 14.1.0-14.1.2.6, 13.1.0-13.1.3.3, 12.1.0-12.1.5.1, and 11.6.1-11.6.5.2, iControl REST does not implement Cross Site Request Forgery protections for users which make use of Basic Authentication in a web browser. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15156 | 1 Nodebb | 1 Blog Comments | 2020-09-01 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| In nodebb-plugin-blog-comments before version 0.7.0, a logged in user is vulnerable to an XSS attack which could allow a third party to post on their behalf on the forum. This is due to lack of CSRF validation. | |||||
| CVE-2019-12636 | 1 Cisco | 216 Sf200-24, Sf200-24 Firmware, Sf200-24fp and 213 more | 2020-09-01 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business Smart and Managed Switches could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the targeted user. If the user has administrative privileges, the attacker could alter the configuration, execute commands, or cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. | |||||
| CVE-2020-19889 | 1 Dbhcms Project | 1 Dbhcms | 2020-08-26 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| DBHcms v1.2.0 has no CSRF protection mechanism,as demonstrated by CSRF for index.php?dbhcms_pid=-70 can add a user. | |||||
| CVE-2020-19886 | 1 Dbhcms Project | 1 Dbhcms | 2020-08-25 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| DBHcms v1.2.0 has no CSRF protection mechanism,as demonstrated by CSRF for an /index.php?dbhcms_pid=-80&deletemenu=9 can delete any menu. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8979 | 1 Open-audit | 1 Open-audit | 2020-08-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Open-AudIT Professional 2.1 has CSRF, as demonstrated by modifying a user account or inserting XSS sequences via the credentials URI. | |||||
| CVE-2019-12095 | 1 Horde | 1 Groupware | 2020-08-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Horde Trean, as used in Horde Groupware Webmail Edition through 5.2.22 and other products, allows CSRF, as demonstrated by the treanBookmarkTags parameter to the trean/ URI on a webmail server. NOTE: treanBookmarkTags could, for example, be a stored XSS payload. | |||||
| CVE-2019-12239 | 1 Wpbookingsystem | 1 Wp Booking System | 2020-08-24 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| The WP Booking System plugin 1.5.1 for WordPress has no CSRF protection, which allows attackers to reach certain SQL injection issues that require administrative access. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5361 | 1 Wpglobus | 1 Wpglobus | 2020-08-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The WPGlobus plugin 1.9.6 for WordPress has CSRF via wp-admin/options.php. | |||||
| CVE-2018-7831 | 1 Schneider-electric | 8 Modicom Bmxnor0200h, Modicom Bmxnor0200h Firmware, Modicom M340 and 5 more | 2020-08-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| An Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) vulnerability exists in the embedded web servers in all Modicon M340, Premium, Quantum PLCs and BMXNOR0200 allowing an attacker to send a specially crafted URL to a currently authenticated web server user to execute a password change on the web server. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6357 | 1 Acurax | 1 Social Media Widget | 2020-08-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The acx_asmw_saveorder_callback function in function.php in the acurax-social-media-widget plugin before 3.2.6 for WordPress has CSRF via the recordsArray parameter to wp-admin/admin-ajax.php, with resultant social_widget_icon_array_order XSS. | |||||
| CVE-2019-19979 | 1 Wp Maintenance Project | 1 Wp Maintenance | 2020-08-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A flaw in the WordPress plugin, WP Maintenance before 5.0.6, allowed attackers to enable a vulnerable site's maintenance mode and inject malicious code affecting site visitors. There was CSRF with resultant XSS. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11590 | 1 10web | 1 Form Maker | 2020-08-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The 10Web Form Maker plugin before 1.13.5 for WordPress allows CSRF via the wp-admin/admin-ajax.php action parameter, with resultant local file inclusion via directory traversal, because there can be a discrepancy between the $_POST['action'] value and the $_GET['action'] value, and the latter is unsanitized. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17642 | 1 Centreon | 1 Centreon | 2020-08-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Centreon before 18.10.8, 19.10.1, and 19.04.2. It allows CSRF with resultant remote command execution via shell metacharacters in a POST to centreon-autodiscovery-server/views/scan/ajax/call.php in the Autodiscovery plugin. | |||||
| CVE-2019-16068 | 1 Netsas | 1 Enigma Network Management Solution | 2020-08-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A CSRF vulnerability exists in NETSAS ENIGMA NMS version 65.0.0 and prior that could allow an attacker to be able to trick a victim into submitting a malicious manage_files.cgi request. This can be triggered via XSS or an IFRAME tag included within the site. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6496 | 1 Microfocus | 1 Universal Cmbd Browser | 2020-08-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Remote Cross-site Request forgery (CSRF) potential has been identified in UCMBD Browser version 4.10, 4.11, 4.12, 4.13, 4.14, 4.15, 4.15.1 which could allow for remote unsafe deserialization and cross-site request forgery (CSRF). | |||||