Search
Total
23 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-29425 | 4 Apache, Debian, Netapp and 1 more | 53 Commons Io, Debian Linux, Active Iq Unified Manager and 50 more | 2022-07-25 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| In Apache Commons IO before 2.7, When invoking the method FileNameUtils.normalize with an improper input string, like "//../foo", or "\\..\foo", the result would be the same value, thus possibly providing access to files in the parent directory, but not further above (thus "limited" path traversal), if the calling code would use the result to construct a path value. | |||||
| CVE-2021-23337 | 3 Lodash, Netapp, Oracle | 20 Lodash, Active Iq Unified Manager, Cloud Manager and 17 more | 2022-07-25 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| Lodash versions prior to 4.17.21 are vulnerable to Command Injection via the template function. | |||||
| CVE-2020-28500 | 2 Lodash, Oracle | 16 Lodash, Banking Corporate Lending Process Management, Banking Credit Facilities Process Management and 13 more | 2022-07-25 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Lodash versions prior to 4.17.21 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the toNumber, trim and trimEnd functions. | |||||
| CVE-2021-23017 | 5 F5, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 2 more | 13 Nginx, Fedora, Ontap Select Deploy Administration Utility and 10 more | 2022-07-12 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 9.4 CRITICAL |
| A security issue in nginx resolver was identified, which might allow an attacker who is able to forge UDP packets from the DNS server to cause 1-byte memory overwrite, resulting in worker process crash or potential other impact. | |||||
| CVE-2019-10219 | 3 Netapp, Oracle, Redhat | 194 Active Iq Unified Manager, Element, Management Services For Element Software And Netapp Hci and 191 more | 2022-05-23 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was found in Hibernate-Validator. The SafeHtml validator annotation fails to properly sanitize payloads consisting of potentially malicious code in HTML comments and instructions. This vulnerability can result in an XSS attack. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8203 | 2 Lodash, Oracle | 18 Lodash, Banking Corporate Lending Process Management, Banking Credit Facilities Process Management and 15 more | 2022-05-12 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| Prototype pollution attack when using _.zipObjectDeep in lodash before 4.17.20. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11080 | 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Nghttp2 and 2 more | 9 Debian Linux, Fedora, Nghttp2 and 6 more | 2022-05-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In nghttp2 before version 1.41.0, the overly large HTTP/2 SETTINGS frame payload causes denial of service. The proof of concept attack involves a malicious client constructing a SETTINGS frame with a length of 14,400 bytes (2400 individual settings entries) over and over again. The attack causes the CPU to spike at 100%. nghttp2 v1.41.0 fixes this vulnerability. There is a workaround to this vulnerability. Implement nghttp2_on_frame_recv_callback callback, and if received frame is SETTINGS frame and the number of settings entries are large (e.g., > 32), then drop the connection. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1971 | 7 Debian, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 4 more | 45 Debian Linux, Fedora, Active Iq Unified Manager and 42 more | 2022-05-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName. OpenSSL provides a function GENERAL_NAME_cmp which compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not. This function behaves incorrectly when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer dereference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack. OpenSSL itself uses the GENERAL_NAME_cmp function for two purposes: 1) Comparing CRL distribution point names between an available CRL and a CRL distribution point embedded in an X509 certificate 2) When verifying that a timestamp response token signer matches the timestamp authority name (exposed via the API functions TS_RESP_verify_response and TS_RESP_verify_token) If an attacker can control both items being compared then that attacker could trigger a crash. For example if the attacker can trick a client or server into checking a malicious certificate against a malicious CRL then this may occur. Note that some applications automatically download CRLs based on a URL embedded in a certificate. This checking happens prior to the signatures on the certificate and CRL being verified. OpenSSL's s_server, s_client and verify tools have support for the "-crl_download" option which implements automatic CRL downloading and this attack has been demonstrated to work against those tools. Note that an unrelated bug means that affected versions of OpenSSL cannot parse or construct correct encodings of EDIPARTYNAME. However it is possible to construct a malformed EDIPARTYNAME that OpenSSL's parser will accept and hence trigger this attack. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 versions are affected by this issue. Other OpenSSL releases are out of support and have not been checked. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1i (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1h). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2x (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2w). | |||||
| CVE-2021-3711 | 5 Debian, Netapp, Openssl and 2 more | 31 Debian Linux, Active Iq Unified Manager, Clustered Data Ontap and 28 more | 2022-05-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Typically an application will call this function twice. The first time, on entry, the "out" parameter can be NULL and, on exit, the "outlen" parameter is populated with the buffer size required to hold the decrypted plaintext. The application can then allocate a sufficiently sized buffer and call EVP_PKEY_decrypt() again, but this time passing a non-NULL value for the "out" parameter. A bug in the implementation of the SM2 decryption code means that the calculation of the buffer size required to hold the plaintext returned by the first call to EVP_PKEY_decrypt() can be smaller than the actual size required by the second call. This can lead to a buffer overflow when EVP_PKEY_decrypt() is called by the application a second time with a buffer that is too small. A malicious attacker who is able present SM2 content for decryption to an application could cause attacker chosen data to overflow the buffer by up to a maximum of 62 bytes altering the contents of other data held after the buffer, possibly changing application behaviour or causing the application to crash. The location of the buffer is application dependent but is typically heap allocated. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). | |||||
| CVE-2019-9513 | 11 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 8 more | 21 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 18 more | 2022-02-22 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9511 | 11 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 8 more | 21 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 18 more | 2022-02-22 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | |||||
| CVE-2018-16865 | 5 Canonical, Debian, Oracle and 2 more | 11 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Communications Session Border Controller and 8 more | 2022-01-31 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An allocation of memory without limits, that could result in the stack clashing with another memory region, was discovered in systemd-journald when many entries are sent to the journal socket. A local attacker, or a remote one if systemd-journal-remote is used, may use this flaw to crash systemd-journald or execute code with journald privileges. Versions through v240 are vulnerable. | |||||
| CVE-2018-16864 | 5 Canonical, Debian, Oracle and 2 more | 11 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Communications Session Border Controller and 8 more | 2022-01-31 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An allocation of memory without limits, that could result in the stack clashing with another memory region, was discovered in systemd-journald when a program with long command line arguments calls syslog. A local attacker may use this flaw to crash systemd-journald or escalate his privileges. Versions through v240 are vulnerable. | |||||
| CVE-2018-11237 | 4 Gnu, Netapp, Oracle and 1 more | 9 Glibc, Data Ontap Edge, Element Software Management and 6 more | 2020-08-24 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An AVX-512-optimized implementation of the mempcpy function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.27 and earlier may write data beyond the target buffer, leading to a buffer overflow in __mempcpy_avx512_no_vzeroupper. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6485 | 4 Gnu, Netapp, Oracle and 1 more | 15 Glibc, Cloud Backup, Data Ontap Edge and 12 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An integer overflow in the implementation of the posix_memalign in memalign functions in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.26 and earlier could cause these functions to return a pointer to a heap area that is too small, potentially leading to heap corruption. | |||||
| CVE-2018-11236 | 4 Gnu, Netapp, Oracle and 1 more | 9 Glibc, Data Ontap Edge, Element Software Management and 6 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| stdlib/canonicalize.c in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.27 and earlier, when processing very long pathname arguments to the realpath function, could encounter an integer overflow on 32-bit architectures, leading to a stack-based buffer overflow and, potentially, arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2020-14563 | 1 Oracle | 1 Enterprise Communications Broker | 2020-07-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Enterprise Communications Broker product of Oracle Communications Applications (component: WebGUI). Supported versions that are affected are 3.0.0-3.2.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Enterprise Communications Broker. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Enterprise Communications Broker, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Enterprise Communications Broker accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Enterprise Communications Broker accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). | |||||
| CVE-2020-14721 | 1 Oracle | 1 Enterprise Communications Broker | 2020-07-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Enterprise Communications Broker product of Oracle Communications Applications (component: WebGUI). Supported versions that are affected are 3.0.0-3.2.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Enterprise Communications Broker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Enterprise Communications Broker accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Enterprise Communications Broker accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Enterprise Communications Broker. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.3 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L). | |||||
| CVE-2020-14722 | 1 Oracle | 1 Enterprise Communications Broker | 2020-07-21 | 5.1 MEDIUM | 5.8 MEDIUM |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Enterprise Communications Broker product of Oracle Communications Applications (component: WebGUI). Supported versions that are affected are 3.0.0-3.2.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Enterprise Communications Broker. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Enterprise Communications Broker, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Enterprise Communications Broker accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Enterprise Communications Broker accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Enterprise Communications Broker. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L). | |||||
| CVE-2014-9708 | 2 Embedthis, Oracle | 2 Appweb, Enterprise Communications Broker | 2018-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Embedthis Appweb before 4.6.6 and 5.x before 5.2.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference) via a Range header with an empty value, as demonstrated by "Range: x=,". | |||||
| CVE-2016-3516 | 1 Oracle | 1 Enterprise Communications Broker | 2017-09-01 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 3.1 LOW |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Enterprise Communications Broker component in Oracle Communications Applications before PCz 2.0.0m4p1 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality via vectors related to GUI, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-3514. | |||||
| CVE-2016-3515 | 1 Oracle | 1 Enterprise Communications Broker | 2017-09-01 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Enterprise Communications Broker component in Oracle Communications Applications before PCz 2.0.0m4p1 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2016-3514 | 1 Oracle | 1 Enterprise Communications Broker | 2017-09-01 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Enterprise Communications Broker component in Oracle Communications Applications before PCz 2.0.0m4p1 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality via vectors related to GUI, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-3516. | |||||