Search
Total
201818 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2008-2728 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2726. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-2726. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2726 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2008-2737 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3558. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3558. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3558 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2008-2388 | 1 Opensuse | 1 Opensuse | 2008-09-11 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Multiple off-by-one errors in opensuse-updater in openSUSE 10.2 have unspecified impact and attack vectors. NOTE: the vendor states that these "can be considered no security problem." | |||||
| CVE-2008-2389 | 1 Opensuse | 1 Opensuse | 2008-09-11 | 4.9 MEDIUM | N/A |
| opensuse-updater in openSUSE 10.2 allows local users to access arbitrary files via a symlink attack. | |||||
| CVE-2008-2546 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-1805. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-1805. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-1805 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2008-1781 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its requester. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2008-0886 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0882. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-0882. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0882 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2008-0929 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2007-6590 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2809. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-2809. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2809 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2008-0188 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its requester. Further investigation showed that it was not a new security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2008-0189 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its requester. Further investigation showed that it was not a new security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2008-0238 | 1 Xine | 1 Xine-lib | 2008-09-11 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in the rmff_dump_cont function in input/libreal/rmff.c in xine-lib 1.1.9 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the SDP (1) Title, (2) Author, or (3) Copyright attribute, related to the rmff_dump_header function, different vectors than CVE-2008-0225. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5759 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6335. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6335. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6335 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5763 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0401. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-0401. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0401 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5908 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** Buffer overflow in the (1) sysfs_show_available_clocksources and (2) sysfs_show_current_clocksources functions in Linux kernel 2.6.23 and earlier might allow local users to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via crafted clock source names. NOTE: follow-on analysis by Linux developers states that "There is no way for unprivileged users (or really even the root user) to add new clocksources." | |||||
| CVE-2007-6034 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6062. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6062. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6062 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-6132 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5284 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5279. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5279. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5279 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5285 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5280. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5280. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5280 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5286 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5281. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5281. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5281 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5287 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5282. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5282. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5282 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5288 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5283. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5283. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5283 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5324 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2582. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2582. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2582 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5336 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5339. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-5339. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5339 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5421 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Cisco IOS 12.x and IOS XR allow attackers to execute arbitrary code, as demonstrated via the "Bind Shell", "Reverse Shell", and "Two byte rootshell (Tiny Shell)" attacks. NOTE: the vendor and researcher agree that this issue does not cross privilege boundaries, saying they do not "represent a vulnerability." The disclosure was intended to demonstrate techniques for exploitation, which is not covered by CVE. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5499 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5553 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4158. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-4158. It was based on a vague pre-advisory, so the duplicate was not detected until more details were provided. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4158 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5586 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5587. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5587. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5587 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5645 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-5645. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-5645, due to a typo. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-5645 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5670 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5956. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5956. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5956 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-4851 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5137. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5137. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5137 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-4989 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4568. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-4568. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4568 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5021 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4880. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-4880. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4880 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5049 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-3387. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-3387. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-3387 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5125 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-1171. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-1171. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-1171 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-4558 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4134. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-4134. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4134 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-4579 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2931. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-2931. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2931 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-4168 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-4168. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-4168. It was inadvertently used in a vendor advisory when the "2006" year was intended. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-4168 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-4274 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4275. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-4275. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4275 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-4015 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-0011. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-0011. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-0011 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-4019 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2930. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-2930. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2930 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-4044 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** The MS-RPC functionality in smbd in Samba 3 on SUSE Linux before 20070720 does not include "one character in the shell escape handling." NOTE: this issue was originally characterized as a shell metacharacter issue due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2007-2447, which was interpreted by CVE to be security relevant. However, SUSE and Red Hat have disputed the problem, stating that the only impact is that scripts will not be executed if they have a "c" in their name, but even this limitation might not exist. This does not have security implications, so should not be included in CVE. | |||||
| CVE-2007-4049 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2000-1205. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2000-1205. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2000-1205 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-3595 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-3399. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-3399. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-3399 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-3801 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-3699. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-3699. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-3699 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-3802 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-0447. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-0447. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-0447 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-3125 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-6772. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-6772. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-6772 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-3395 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2836. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2836. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2836 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-2653 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2438. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2438. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2438 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-2436 | 2008-09-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-1861. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-1861. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-1861 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||