Search
Total
201818 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-7540 | 1 Imagemagick | 1 Imagemagick | 2017-05-08 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| coders/rgf.c in ImageMagick before 6.9.4-10 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure) by converting an image to rgf format. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7271 | 1 Yii Software | 1 Yii | 2017-05-08 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Reflected Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Yii Framework before 2.0.11, when development mode is used, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via crafted request data that is mishandled on the debug-mode exception screen. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000393 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-10220. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-10220. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-10220 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1000019 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-5938. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-5938. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-5938 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1000040 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-7853. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-7853. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-7853 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1000041 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-7271. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-7271. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-7271 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8784 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-7263. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-7263. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-7263 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000360 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9847. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9847. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9847 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000361 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9848. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9848. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9848 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000362 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9849. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9849. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9849 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000363 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9850. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9850. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9850 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000364 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9851. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9851. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9851 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000365 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9852, CVE-2016-9853, CVE-2016-9854, CVE-2016-9855. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9852, CVE-2016-9853, CVE-2016-9854, and CVE-2016-9855. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9852, CVE-2016-9853, CVE-2016-9854, and/or CVE-2016-9855 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000366 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9856, CVE-2016-9857. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9856 and CVE-2016-9857. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9856 and/or CVE-2016-9857 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000367 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9858, CVE-2016-9859, CVE-2016-9860. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9858, CVE-2016-9859, and CVE-2016-9860. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9858, CVE-2016-9859, and/or CVE-2016-9860 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000368 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9861. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9861. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9861 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000369 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9862. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9862. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9862 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000370 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9863. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9863. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9863 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000371 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9864. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9864. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9864 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000372 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9865. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9865. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9865 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1000373 | 2017-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9866. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9866. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9866 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6368 | 1 Cisco | 1 Firepower Management Center | 2017-05-06 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the detection engine parsing of Pragmatic General Multicast (PGM) protocol packets for Cisco Firepower System Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition due to the Snort process unexpectedly restarting. The vulnerability is due to improper input validation of the fields in the PGM protocol packet. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted PGM packet to the detection engine on the targeted device. An exploit could allow the attacker to cause a DoS condition if the Snort process restarts and traffic inspection is bypassed or traffic is dropped. This vulnerability affects Cisco Firepower System Software that has one or more file action policies configured and is running on any of the following Cisco products: Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) 5500-X Series with FirePOWER Services; Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) 5500-X Series Next-Generation Firewalls; Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Networks, 7000 Series Appliances; Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Networks, 8000 Series Appliances; Firepower 4100 Series Security Appliances; FirePOWER 7000 Series Appliances; FirePOWER 8000 Series Appliances; Firepower 9300 Series Security Appliances; FirePOWER Threat Defense for Integrated Services Routers (ISRs); Industrial Security Appliance 3000; Sourcefire 3D System Appliances; Virtual Next-Generation Intrusion Prevention System (NGIPSv) for VMware. Fixed versions: 5.4.0.10 5.4.1.9 6.0.1.3 6.1.0 6.2.0. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCuz00876. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2155 | 1 I.con Corporation | 1 Hoozin Viewer | 2017-05-06 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Buffer overflow in Hoozin Viewer 2, 3, 4.1.5.15 and earlier, 5.1.2.13 and earlier, and 6.0.3.09 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via specially crafted webpage. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2152 | 1 Buffalo Inc | 2 Wnc01wh, Wnc01wh Firmware | 2017-05-06 | 5.2 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| WNC01WH firmware 1.0.0.9 and earlier allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2140 | 1 Gaku | 1 Tablacus Explorer | 2017-05-06 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Tablacus Explorer 17.3.30 and earlier allows arbitrary scripts to be executed in the context of the application due to specially crafted directory. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2128 | 1 Information-technology Promotion Agency | 1 Introduction To Safe Website Operation | 2017-05-05 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Security guide for website operators allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via specially crafted saved data. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8109 | 1 Saltstack | 1 Salt | 2017-05-05 | 2.1 LOW | 7.8 HIGH |
| The salt-ssh minion code in SaltStack Salt 2016.11 before 2016.11.4 copied over configuration from the Salt Master without adjusting permissions, which might leak credentials to local attackers on configured minions (clients). | |||||
| CVE-2017-8115 | 1 Modx | 1 Modx Revolution | 2017-05-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Directory traversal in setup/processors/url_search.php (aka the search page of an unused processor) in MODX Revolution 2.5.7 might allow remote attackers to obtain system directory information. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2148 | 1 Iodata | 2 Wn-ac1167gr, Wn-ac1167gr Firmware | 2017-05-05 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting vulnerability in WN-AC1167GR firmware version 1.04 and earlier allows remote authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2141 | 1 Iodata | 2 Wn-g300r3, Wn-g300r3 Firmware | 2017-05-05 | 9.0 HIGH | 7.2 HIGH |
| WN-G300R3 firmware 1.03 and earlier allows attackers with administrator rights to execute arbitrary OS commands via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2142 | 1 Iodata | 2 Wn-g300r3, Wn-g300r3 Firmware | 2017-05-05 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Buffer overflow in WN-G300R3 firmware Ver.1.03 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2017-5625 | 1 Oneplus | 3 Oneplus 3, Oneplus 3t, Oxygenos | 2017-05-05 | 2.1 LOW | 4.6 MEDIUM |
| In OxygenOS before 4.0.3 on OnePlus 3 and 3T devices, an unauthorized attacker can cause a locked bootloader to partially dump the ciphertext content of an arbitrary partition (except 'keystore') by issuing the 'fastboot oem dump <partition>' fastboot command. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2150 | 1 Booking Calendar Project | 1 Booking Calendar | 2017-05-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in Booking Calendar version 7.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via specially crafted captcha_chalange parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2151 | 1 Booking Calendar Project | 1 Booking Calendar | 2017-05-05 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting vulnerability in Booking Calendar version 7.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2136 | 1 Wp Statistics | 1 Wp Statistics | 2017-05-05 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting vulnerability in WP Statistics version 12.0.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via specially crafted HTTP Referer headers. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2127 | 1 Yourownprogrammer | 1 Yop Poll | 2017-05-05 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting vulnerability in YOP Poll versions prior to 5.8.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8223 | 1 Wificam | 2 Wireless Ip Camera \(p2p\), Wireless Ip Camera \(p2p\) Firmware | 2017-05-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| On Wireless IP Camera (P2P) WIFICAM devices, an attacker can use the RTSP server on port 10554/tcp to watch the streaming without authentication via tcp/av0_1 or tcp/av0_0. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8224 | 1 Wificam | 2 Wireless Ip Camera \(p2p\), Wireless Ip Camera \(p2p\) Firmware | 2017-05-05 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Wireless IP Camera (P2P) WIFICAM devices have a backdoor root account that can be accessed with TELNET. | |||||
| CVE-2016-7841 | 1 Olive Design | 1 Olive Diary Dx | 2017-05-05 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting vulnerability in Olive Diary DX allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the page parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2016-7839 | 1 Olive Design | 1 Olive Blog | 2017-05-05 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting vulnerability in Olive Blog allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the search parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2101 | 1 Ipa | 1 Appgoat | 2017-05-05 | 7.5 HIGH | 7.3 HIGH |
| Hands-on Vulnerability Learning Tool "AppGoat" for Web Application V3.0.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass authentication to perform arbitrary operations via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2117 | 1 Cubecart | 1 Cubecart | 2017-05-05 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in CubeCart versions prior to 6.1.5 allows attacker with administrator rights to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2090 | 1 Cubecart | 1 Cubecart | 2017-05-05 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in CubeCart versions prior to 6.1.4 allows remote authenticated attackers to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2102 | 1 Ipa | 1 Appgoat | 2017-05-05 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Hands-on Vulnerability Learning Tool "AppGoat" for Web Application V3.0.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1149 | 1 Ibm | 1 Urbancode Deploy | 2017-05-05 | 7.5 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 6.0, 6.1, and 6.2 is vulnerable to a denial of service, caused by an XML External Entity Injection (XXE) error when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose highly sensitive information or consume all available memory resources. IBM X-Force ID: 122202. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8106 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2017-05-05 | 4.9 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| The handle_invept function in arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c in the Linux kernel 3.12 through 3.15 allows privileged KVM guest OS users to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and host OS crash) via a single-context INVEPT instruction with a NULL EPT pointer. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2098 | 1 Cubecart | 1 Cubecart | 2017-05-05 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in CubeCart versions prior to 6.1.4 allows remote authenticated attackers to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2100 | 1 Ipa | 1 Appgoat | 2017-05-05 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| Hands-on Vulnerability Learning Tool "AppGoat" for Web Application V3.0.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to conduct DNS rebinding attacks via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2123 | 1 Onethird | 1 Onethird Cms | 2017-05-05 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting vulnerability in OneThird CMS v1.73 Heaven's Door and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via language.php. | |||||
| CVE-2017-5908 | 2017-05-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-3212. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-3212. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-3212 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||