Search
Total
201818 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2009-3606 | 4 Foolabs, Glyphandcog, Kde and 1 more | 4 Xpdf, Xpdfreader, Kpdf and 1 more | 2019-03-06 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
| Integer overflow in the PSOutputDev::doImageL1Sep function in Xpdf before 3.02pl4, and Poppler 0.x, as used in kdegraphics KPDF, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted PDF document that triggers a heap-based buffer overflow. | |||||
| CVE-2009-3608 | 7 Foolabs, Glyph And Cog, Glyphandcog and 4 more | 7 Xpdf, Pdftops, Xpdfreader and 4 more | 2019-03-06 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
| Integer overflow in the ObjectStream::ObjectStream function in XRef.cc in Xpdf 3.x before 3.02pl4 and Poppler before 0.12.1, as used in GPdf, kdegraphics KPDF, CUPS pdftops, and teTeX, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted PDF document that triggers a heap-based buffer overflow. | |||||
| CVE-2009-3609 | 6 Foolabs, Glyph And Cog, Glyphandcog and 3 more | 6 Xpdf, Pdftops, Xpdfreader and 3 more | 2019-03-06 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Integer overflow in the ImageStream::ImageStream function in Stream.cc in Xpdf before 3.02pl4 and Poppler before 0.12.1, as used in GPdf, kdegraphics KPDF, and CUPS pdftops, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted PDF document that triggers a NULL pointer dereference or buffer over-read. | |||||
| CVE-2010-3704 | 4 Foolabs, Glyphandcog, Kde and 1 more | 4 Xpdf, Xpdfreader, Kdegraphics and 1 more | 2019-03-06 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The FoFiType1::parse function in fofi/FoFiType1.cc in the PDF parser in xpdf before 3.02pl5, poppler 0.8.7 and possibly other versions up to 0.15.1, kdegraphics, and possibly other products allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a PDF file with a crafted PostScript Type1 font that contains a negative array index, which bypasses input validation and triggers memory corruption. | |||||
| CVE-2011-0764 | 3 Foolabs, Glyphandcog, T1lib | 3 Xpdf, Xpdfreader, T1lib | 2019-03-06 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| t1lib 5.1.2 and earlier, as used in Xpdf before 3.02pl6, teTeX, and other products, uses an invalid pointer in conjunction with a dereference operation, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Type 1 font in a PDF document, as demonstrated by testz.2184122398.pdf. | |||||
| CVE-2011-1552 | 3 Foolabs, Glyphandcog, T1lib | 3 Xpdf, Xpdfreader, T1lib | 2019-03-06 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| t1lib 5.1.2 and earlier, as used in Xpdf before 3.02pl6, teTeX, and other products, reads from invalid memory locations, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted Type 1 font in a PDF document, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-0764. | |||||
| CVE-2011-1553 | 3 Foolabs, Glyphandcog, T1lib | 3 Xpdf, Xpdfreader, T1lib | 2019-03-06 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Use-after-free vulnerability in t1lib 5.1.2 and earlier, as used in Xpdf before 3.02pl6, teTeX, and other products, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a PDF document containing a crafted Type 1 font that triggers an invalid memory write, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-0764. | |||||
| CVE-2011-1554 | 3 Foolabs, Glyphandcog, T1lib | 3 Xpdf, Xpdfreader, T1lib | 2019-03-06 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Off-by-one error in t1lib 5.1.2 and earlier, as used in Xpdf before 3.02pl6, teTeX, and other products, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a PDF document containing a crafted Type 1 font that triggers an invalid memory read, integer overflow, and invalid pointer dereference, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-0764. | |||||
| CVE-2019-0613 | 1 Microsoft | 10 .net Framework, Visual Studio 2017, Windows 10 and 7 more | 2019-03-06 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in .NET Framework and Visual Studio software when the software fails to check the source markup of a file.An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could run arbitrary code in the context of the current user, aka '.NET Framework and Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6713 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2019-03-06 | 7.1 HIGH | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A remote denial of service vulnerability in Mediaserver in Android 6.x before 2016-11-01 and 7.0 before 2016-11-01 could enable an attacker to use a specially crafted file to cause a device hang or reboot. This issue is rated as High due to the possibility of remote denial of service. Android ID: A-30822755. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6714 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2019-03-06 | 7.1 HIGH | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A remote denial of service vulnerability in Mediaserver in Android 6.x before 2016-11-01 and 7.0 before 2016-11-01 could enable an attacker to use a specially crafted file to cause a device hang or reboot. This issue is rated as High due to the possibility of remote denial of service. Android ID: A-31092462. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6224 | 1 Apple | 4 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Tv Os and 1 more | 2019-03-06 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A buffer overflow issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in iOS 12.1.3, macOS Mojave 10.14.3, tvOS 12.1.2, watchOS 5.1.3. A remote attacker may be able to initiate a FaceTime call causing arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6228 | 1 Apple | 2 Iphone Os, Safari | 2019-03-06 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A cross-site scripting issue existed in Safari. This issue was addressed with improved URL validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 12.1.3, Safari 12.0.3. Processing maliciously crafted web content may lead to a cross site scripting attack. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6213 | 1 Apple | 4 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Tv Os and 1 more | 2019-03-06 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| A buffer overflow was addressed with improved bounds checking. This issue is fixed in iOS 12.1.3, macOS Mojave 10.14.3, tvOS 12.1.2, watchOS 5.1.3. An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6209 | 1 Apple | 4 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Tv Os and 1 more | 2019-03-06 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An out-of-bounds read issue existed that led to the disclosure of kernel memory. This was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 12.1.3, macOS Mojave 10.14.3, tvOS 12.1.2, watchOS 5.1.3. A malicious application may be able to determine kernel memory layout. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6221 | 2 Apple, Microsoft | 4 Iphone Os, Itunes, Mac Os X and 1 more | 2019-03-06 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An out-of-bounds read was addressed with improved bounds checking. This issue is fixed in iOS 12.1.3, macOS Mojave 10.14.3, iTunes 12.9.3 for Windows. A malicious application may be able to elevate privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6202 | 1 Apple | 3 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Watchos | 2019-03-06 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An out-of-bounds read was addressed with improved bounds checking. This issue is fixed in iOS 12.1.3, macOS Mojave 10.14.3, watchOS 5.1.3. A malicious application may be able to elevate privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6200 | 1 Apple | 2 Iphone Os, Mac Os X | 2019-03-06 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| An out-of-bounds read was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 12.1.3, macOS Mojave 10.14.3. An attacker in a privileged network position may be able to execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9575 | 1 Quizandsurveymaster | 1 Quiz And Survey Master | 2019-03-06 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| The Quiz And Survey Master plugin 6.0.4 for WordPress allows wp-admin/admin.php?page=mlw_quiz_results quiz_id XSS. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10119 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Libreoffice and 1 more | 6 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Libreoffice and 3 more | 2019-03-05 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| sot/source/sdstor/stgstrms.cxx in LibreOffice before 5.4.5.1 and 6.x before 6.0.1.1 uses an incorrect integer data type in the StgSmallStrm class, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (use-after-free with write access) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted document that uses the structured storage ole2 wrapper file format. | |||||
| CVE-2010-3651 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7646 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7947 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7948 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7949 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7950 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7951 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7952 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7953 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7954 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7955 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8054 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8114 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8115 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8116 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8117 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8118 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8119 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8120 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8121 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8122 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8123 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-10352 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-10353 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-10354 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-10355 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-10356 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-10357 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-10358 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-10359 | 2019-03-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||