Search
Total
201818 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-14831 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the author attribute of Circle Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5023. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14832 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the style attribute of Caret Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5024. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14833 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the style attribute of Text Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5025. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14834 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the style attribute of FileAttachment annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5026. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14835 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the page method of XFA Layout objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5027. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14836 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the modDate attribute of Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5028. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14837 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the pageSpan method of XFA Layout objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5029. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15085 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Gluster Storage | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| It was discovered that the fix for CVE-2017-12150 was not properly shipped in erratum RHSA-2017:2858 for Red Hat Gluster Storage 3.3 for RHEL 6. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15086 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Gluster Storage | 2019-10-09 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| It was discovered that the fix for CVE-2017-12151 was not properly shipped in erratum RHSA-2017:2858 for Red Hat Gluster Storage 3.3 for RHEL 6. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15087 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Gluster Storage | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| It was discovered that the fix for CVE-2017-12163 was not properly shipped in erratum RHSA-2017:2858 for Red Hat Gluster Storage 3.3 for RHEL 6. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15090 | 1 Powerdns | 1 Recursor | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An issue has been found in the DNSSEC validation component of PowerDNS Recursor from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6, where the signatures might have been accepted as valid even if the signed data was not in bailiwick of the DNSKEY used to sign it. This allows an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of records by issuing a valid signature for the crafted records. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15091 | 1 Powerdns | 1 Authoritative | 2019-10-09 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 7.1 HIGH |
| An issue has been found in the API component of PowerDNS Authoritative 4.x up to and including 4.0.4 and 3.x up to and including 3.4.11, where some operations that have an impact on the state of the server are still allowed even though the API has been configured as read-only via the api-readonly keyword. This missing check allows an attacker with valid API credentials to flush the cache, trigger a zone transfer or send a NOTIFY. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15092 | 1 Powerdns | 1 Recursor | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A cross-site scripting issue has been found in the web interface of PowerDNS Recursor from 4.0.0 up to and including 4.0.6, where the qname of DNS queries was displayed without any escaping, allowing a remote attacker to inject HTML and Javascript code into the web interface, altering the content. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15093 | 1 Powerdns | 1 Recursor | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| When api-config-dir is set to a non-empty value, which is not the case by default, the API in PowerDNS Recursor 4.x up to and including 4.0.6 and 3.x up to and including 3.7.4 allows an authorized user to update the Recursor's ACL by adding and removing netmasks, and to configure forward zones. It was discovered that the new netmask and IP addresses of forwarded zones were not sufficiently validated, allowing an authenticated user to inject new configuration directives into the Recursor's configuration. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15094 | 1 Powerdns | 1 Recursor | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An issue has been found in the DNSSEC parsing code of PowerDNS Recursor from 4.0.0 up to and including 4.0.6 leading to a memory leak when parsing specially crafted DNSSEC ECDSA keys. These keys are only parsed when validation is enabled by setting dnssec to a value other than off or process-no-validate (default). | |||||
| CVE-2017-15097 | 1 Redhat | 5 Enterprise Linux Desktop, Enterprise Linux Server, Enterprise Linux Server Aus and 2 more | 2019-10-09 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| Privilege escalation flaws were found in the Red Hat initialization scripts of PostgreSQL. An attacker with access to the postgres user account could use these flaws to obtain root access on the server machine. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15101 | 2 Liblouis, Redhat | 6 Liblouis, Enterprise Linux Desktop, Enterprise Linux Server and 3 more | 2019-10-09 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A missing patch for a stack-based buffer overflow in findTable() was found in Red Hat version of liblouis before 2.5.4. An attacker could cause a denial of service condition or potentially even arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15103 | 2 Heketi Project, Redhat | 2 Heketi, Enterprise Linux | 2019-10-09 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A security-check flaw was found in the way the Heketi 5 server API handled user requests. An authenticated Heketi user could send specially crafted requests to the Heketi server, resulting in remote command execution as the user running Heketi server and possibly privilege escalation. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15105 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Nlnetlabs | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Unbound | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in the way unbound before 1.6.8 validated wildcard-synthesized NSEC records. An improperly validated wildcard NSEC record could be used to prove the non-existence (NXDOMAIN answer) of an existing wildcard record, or trick unbound into accepting a NODATA proof. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15107 | 1 Thekelleys | 1 Dnsmasq | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability was found in the implementation of DNSSEC in Dnsmasq up to and including 2.78. Wildcard synthesized NSEC records could be improperly interpreted to prove the non-existence of hostnames that actually exist. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15113 | 2 Ovirt, Redhat | 2 Ovirt, Virtualization | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 6.6 MEDIUM |
| ovirt-engine before version 4.1.7.6 with log level set to DEBUG includes passwords in the log file without masking. Only administrators can change the log level and only administrators can access the logs. This presents a risk when debug-level logs are shared with vendors or other parties to troubleshoot issues. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15118 | 3 Canonical, Qemu, Redhat | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Qemu, Enterprise Linux | 2019-10-09 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability was found in NBD server implementation in qemu before 2.11 allowing a client to request an export name of size up to 4096 bytes, which in fact should be limited to 256 bytes, causing an out-of-bounds stack write in the qemu process. If NBD server requires TLS, the attacker cannot trigger the buffer overflow without first successfully negotiating TLS. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15119 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Qemu and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Qemu and 1 more | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| The Network Block Device (NBD) server in Quick Emulator (QEMU) before 2.11 is vulnerable to a denial of service issue. It could occur if a client sent large option requests, making the server waste CPU time on reading up to 4GB per request. A client could use this flaw to keep the NBD server from serving other requests, resulting in DoS. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15120 | 2 Debian, Powerdns | 2 Debian Linux, Recursor | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue has been found in the parsing of authoritative answers in PowerDNS Recursor before 4.0.8, leading to a NULL pointer dereference when parsing a specially crafted answer containing a CNAME of a different class than IN. An unauthenticated remote attacker could cause a denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15125 | 1 Redhat | 1 Cloudforms Management Engine | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in CloudForms before 5.9.0.22 in the self-service UI snapshot feature where the name field is not properly sanitized for HTML and JavaScript input. An attacker could use this flaw to execute a stored XSS attack on an application administrator using CloudForms. Please note that CSP (Content Security Policy) prevents exploitation of this XSS however not all browsers support CSP. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15128 | 2 Linux, Redhat | 3 Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Mrg | 2019-10-09 | 4.9 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in the hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte function in mm/hugetlb.c in the Linux kernel before 4.13.12. A lack of size check could cause a denial of service (BUG). | |||||
| CVE-2017-15132 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Dovecot | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Dovecot | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in dovecot 2.0 up to 2.2.33 and 2.3.0. An abort of SASL authentication results in a memory leak in dovecot's auth client used by login processes. The leak has impact in high performance configuration where same login processes are reused and can cause the process to crash due to memory exhaustion. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15133 | 1 Miekg-dns Prject | 1 Miekg-dns | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A denial of service flaw was found in miekg-dns before 1.0.4. A remote attacker could use carefully timed TCP packets to block the DNS server from accepting new connections. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15136 | 1 Redhat | 1 Satellite | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 2.7 LOW |
| When registering and activating a new system with Red Hat Satellite 6 if the new systems hostname is then reset to the hostname of a previously registered system the previously registered system will lose access to updates including security updates. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15137 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The OpenShift image import whitelist failed to enforce restrictions correctly when running commands such as "oc tag", for example. This could allow a user with access to OpenShift to run images from registries that should not be allowed. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15138 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift Container Platform | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 5.0 MEDIUM |
| The OpenShift Enterprise cluster-read can access webhook tokens which would allow an attacker with sufficient privileges to view confidential webhook tokens. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15886 | 1 Synology | 1 Chat | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Link Preview in Synology Chat before 2.0.0-1124 allows remote authenticated users to download arbitrary local files via a crafted URI. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15887 | 1 Synology | 1 Carddav Server | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts vulnerability in /principals in Synology CardDAV Server before 6.0.7-0085 allows remote attackers to obtain user credentials via a brute-force attack. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15888 | 1 Synology | 1 Audio Station | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Custom Internet Radio List in Synology Audio Station before 6.3.0-3260 allows remote authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the NAME parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15890 | 1 Synology | 1 Mailplus Server | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Disclaimer in Synology MailPlus Server before 1.4.0-0415 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the NAME parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15891 | 1 Synology | 1 Calendar | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Improper access control vulnerability in SYNO.Cal.EventBase in Synology Calendar before 2.0.1-0242 allows remote authenticated users to modify calendar event via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15892 | 1 Synology | 1 Chat | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Slash Command Creator in Synology Chat before 2.0.0-1124 allow remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via (1) COMMAND, (2) COMMANDS INSTRUCTION, or (3) DESCRIPTION parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15893 | 1 Synology | 1 File Station | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in the SYNO.FileStation.Extract in Synology File Station before 1.1.1-0099 allows remote authenticated users to write arbitrary files via the dest_folder_path parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15894 | 1 Synology | 1 Diskstation Manager | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in the SYNO.FileStation.Extract in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) 6.0.x before 6.0.3-8754-3 and before 5.2-5967-6 allows remote authenticated users to write arbitrary files via the dest_folder_path parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15895 | 1 Synology | 1 Router Manager | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in the SYNO.FileStation.Extract in Synology Router Manager (SRM) before 1.1.5-6542-4 allows remote authenticated users to write arbitrary files via the dest_folder_path parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16003 | 1 Windows-build-tools Project | 1 Windows-build-tools | 2019-10-09 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| windows-build-tools is a module for installing C++ Build Tools for Windows using npm. windows-build-tools versions below 1.0.0 download resources over HTTP, which leaves it vulnerable to MITM attacks. It may be possible to cause remote code execution (RCE) by swapping out the requested resources with an attacker controlled copy if the attacker is on the network or positioned in between the user and the remote server. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16005 | 1 Joyent | 1 Http-signature | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Http-signature is a "Reference implementation of Joyent's HTTP Signature Scheme". In versions <=0.9.11, http-signature signs only the header values, but not the header names. This makes http-signature vulnerable to header forgery. Thus, if an attacker can intercept a request, he can swap header names and change the meaning of the request without changing the signature. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16006 | 1 Remarkable Project | 1 Remarkable | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Remarkable is a markdown parser. In versions 1.6.2 and lower, remarkable allows the use of `data:` URIs in links and can therefore execute javascript. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16007 | 1 Cisco | 1 Node-jose | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| node-jose is a JavaScript implementation of the JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE) for current web browsers and node.js-based servers. node-jose earlier than version 0.9.3 is vulnerable to an invalid curve attack. This allows an attacker to recover the private secret key when JWE with Key Agreement with Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral Static (ECDH-ES) is used. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16008 | 1 I18next | 1 I18next | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| i18next is a language translation framework. Because of how the interpolation is implemented, making replacements from the dictionary one at a time, untrusted user input can use the name of one of the dictionary keys to inject script into the browser. This affects i18next <=1.10.2. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16009 | 2 Ag-grid, Angularjs | 2 Ag-grid, Angularjs | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| ag-grid is an advanced data grid that is library agnostic. ag-grid is vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via Angular Expressions, if AngularJS is used in combination with ag-grid. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16010 | 1 I18next | 1 I18next | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| i18next is a language translation framework. When using the .init method, passing interpolation options without passing an escapeValue will default to undefined rather than the assumed true. This can result in a cross-site scripting vulnerability because user input is assumed to be escaped, but is not. This vulnerability affects i18next 2.0.0 and later. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16013 | 1 Hapijs | 1 Hapi | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| hapi is a web and services application framework. When hapi >= 15.0.0 <= 16.1.0 encounters a malformed `accept-encoding` header an uncaught exception is thrown. This may cause hapi to crash or to hang the client connection until the timeout period is reached. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16014 | 1 Http-proxy Project | 1 Http-proxy | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Http-proxy is a proxying library. Because of the way errors are handled in versions before 0.7.0, an attacker that forces an error can crash the server, causing a denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16015 | 1 Forms Project | 1 Forms | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Forms is a library for easily creating HTML forms. Versions before 1.3.0 did not have proper html escaping. This means that if the application did not sanitize html on behalf of forms, use of forms may be vulnerable to cross site scripting | |||||