Search
Total
201818 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-2591 | 2 Fedoraproject, Redhat | 2 389 Directory Server, Enterprise Linux | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| 389-ds-base before version 1.3.6 is vulnerable to an improperly NULL terminated array in the uniqueness_entry_to_config() function in the "attribute uniqueness" plugin of 389 Directory Server. An authenticated, or possibly unauthenticated, attacker could use this flaw to force an out-of-bound heap memory read, possibly triggering a crash of the LDAP service. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2592 | 2 Canonical, Openstack | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Oslo.middleware | 2019-10-09 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| python-oslo-middleware before versions 3.8.1, 3.19.1, 3.23.1 is vulnerable to an information disclosure. Software using the CatchError class could include sensitive values in a traceback's error message. System users could exploit this flaw to obtain sensitive information from OpenStack component error logs (for example, keystone tokens). | |||||
| CVE-2017-2594 | 1 Hawt | 1 Hawtio | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| hawtio before versions 2.0-beta-1, 2.0-beta-2 2.0-m1, 2.0-m2, 2.0-m3, and 1.5 is vulnerable to a path traversal that leads to a NullPointerException with a full stacktrace. An attacker could use this flaw to gather undisclosed information from within hawtio's root. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2595 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| It was found that the log file viewer in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application 6 and 7 allows arbitrary file read to authenticated user via path traversal. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2598 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Jenkins | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Jenkins before versions 2.44, 2.32.2 uses AES ECB block cipher mode without IV for encrypting secrets which makes Jenkins and the stored secrets vulnerable to unnecessary risks (SECURITY-304). | |||||
| CVE-2017-2600 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Jenkins | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In jenkins before versions 2.44, 2.32.2 node monitor data could be viewed by low privilege users via the remote API. These included system configuration and runtime information of these nodes (SECURITY-343). | |||||
| CVE-2017-2602 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Jenkins | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| jenkins before versions 2.44, 2.32.2 is vulnerable to an improper blacklisting of the Pipeline metadata files in the agent-to-master security subsystem. This could allow metadata files to be written to by malicious agents (SECURITY-358). | |||||
| CVE-2017-2603 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Jenkins | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 3.5 LOW |
| Jenkins before versions 2.44, 2.32.2 is vulnerable to a user data leak in disconnected agents' config.xml API. This could leak sensitive data such as API tokens (SECURITY-362). | |||||
| CVE-2017-2604 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Jenkins | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In Jenkins before versions 2.44, 2.32.2 low privilege users were able to act on administrative monitors due to them not being consistently protected by permission checks (SECURITY-371). | |||||
| CVE-2017-2606 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Jenkins | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Jenkins before versions 2.44, 2.32.2 is vulnerable to an information exposure in the internal API that allows access to item names that should not be visible (SECURITY-380). This only affects anonymous users (other users legitimately have access) that were able to get a list of items via an UnprotectedRootAction. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2607 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Jenkins | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| jenkins before versions 2.44, 2.32.2 is vulnerable to a persisted cross-site scripting vulnerability in console notes (SECURITY-382). Jenkins allows plugins to annotate build logs, adding new content or changing the presentation of existing content while the build is running. Malicious Jenkins users, or users with SCM access, could configure jobs or modify build scripts such that they print serialized console notes that perform cross-site scripting attacks on Jenkins users viewing the build logs. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2608 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Jenkins | 2019-10-09 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Jenkins before versions 2.44, 2.32.2 is vulnerable to a remote code execution vulnerability involving the deserialization of various types in javax.imageio in XStream-based APIs (SECURITY-383). | |||||
| CVE-2017-2609 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Jenkins | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| jenkins before versions 2.44, 2.32.2 is vulnerable to an information disclosure vulnerability in search suggestions (SECURITY-385). The autocomplete feature on the search box discloses the names of the views in its suggestions, including the ones for which the current user does not have access to. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2610 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Jenkins | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| jenkins before versions 2.44, 2.32.2 is vulnerable to a persisted cross-site scripting in search suggestions due to improperly escaping users with less-than and greater-than characters in their names (SECURITY-388). | |||||
| CVE-2017-2612 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Jenkins | 2019-10-09 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| In Jenkins before versions 2.44, 2.32.2 low privilege users were able to override JDK download credentials (SECURITY-392), resulting in future builds possibly failing to download a JDK. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2613 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Jenkins | 2019-10-09 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| jenkins before versions 2.44, 2.32.2 is vulnerable to a user creation CSRF using GET by admins. While this user record was only retained until restart in most cases, administrators' web browsers could be manipulated to create a large number of user records (SECURITY-406). | |||||
| CVE-2017-2614 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Virtualization | 2019-10-09 | 2.1 LOW | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| When updating a password in the rhvm database the ovirt-aaa-jdbc-tool tools before 1.1.3 fail to correctly check for the current password if it is expired. This would allow access to an attacker with access to change the password on accounts with expired passwords, gaining access to those accounts. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2616 | 3 Debian, Redhat, Util-linux Project | 7 Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux Desktop, Enterprise Linux Server and 4 more | 2019-10-09 | 4.7 MEDIUM | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| A race condition was found in util-linux before 2.32.1 in the way su handled the management of child processes. A local authenticated attacker could use this flaw to kill other processes with root privileges under specific conditions. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2617 | 1 Hawt.io | 1 Hawtio | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| hawtio before version 1.5.5 is vulnerable to remote code execution via file upload. An attacker could use this vulnerability to upload a crafted file which could be executed on a target machine where hawtio is deployed. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2618 | 3 Debian, Linux, Redhat | 8 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2019-10-09 | 4.9 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's handling of clearing SELinux attributes on /proc/pid/attr files before 4.9.10. An empty (null) write to this file can crash the system by causing the system to attempt to access unmapped kernel memory. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2619 | 3 Debian, Redhat, Samba | 3 Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux, Samba | 2019-10-09 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Samba before versions 4.6.1, 4.5.7 and 4.4.11 are vulnerable to a malicious client using a symlink race to allow access to areas of the server file system not exported under the share definition. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2623 | 2 Redhat, Rpm-ostree | 3 Enterprise Linux, Rpm-ostree, Rpm-ostree-client | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| It was discovered that rpm-ostree and rpm-ostree-client before 2017.3 fail to properly check GPG signatures on packages when doing layering. Packages with unsigned or badly signed content could fail to be rejected as expected. This issue is partially mitigated on RHEL Atomic Host, where certificate pinning is used by default. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2624 | 2 Debian, X.org | 2 Debian Linux, Xorg-server | 2019-10-09 | 1.9 LOW | 7.0 HIGH |
| It was found that xorg-x11-server before 1.19.0 including uses memcmp() to check the received MIT cookie against a series of valid cookies. If the cookie is correct, it is allowed to attach to the Xorg session. Since most memcmp() implementations return after an invalid byte is seen, this causes a time difference between a valid and invalid byte, which could allow an efficient brute force attack. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2625 | 2 Redhat, X.org | 7 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Desktop, Enterprise Linux Server and 4 more | 2019-10-09 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| It was discovered that libXdmcp before 1.1.2 including used weak entropy to generate session keys. On a multi-user system using xdmcp, a local attacker could potentially use information available from the process list to brute force the key, allowing them to hijack other users' sessions. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2628 | 2 Haxx, Redhat | 4 Curl, Enterprise Linux Desktop, Enterprise Linux Server and 1 more | 2019-10-09 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| curl, as shipped in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 before version 7.19.7-53, did not correctly backport the fix for CVE-2015-3148 because it did not reflect the fact that the HAVE_GSSAPI define was meanwhile substituted by USE_HTTP_NEGOTIATE. This issue was introduced in RHEL 6.7 and affects RHEL 6 curl only. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2629 | 1 Haxx | 1 Curl | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| curl before 7.53.0 has an incorrect TLS Certificate Status Request extension feature that asks for a fresh proof of the server's certificate's validity in the code that checks for a test success or failure. It ends up always thinking there's valid proof, even when there is none or if the server doesn't support the TLS extension in question. This could lead to users not detecting when a server's certificate goes invalid or otherwise be mislead that the server is in a better shape than it is in reality. This flaw also exists in the command line tool (--cert-status). | |||||
| CVE-2017-2632 | 1 Redhat | 2 Cloudforms, Cloudforms Management Engine | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| A logic error in valid_role() in CloudForms role validation before 5.7.1.3 could allow a tenant administrator to create groups with a higher privilege level than the tenant administrator should have. This would allow an attacker with tenant administration access to elevate privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2633 | 2 Qemu, Redhat | 6 Qemu, Enterprise Linux Desktop, Enterprise Linux Server and 3 more | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An out-of-bounds memory access issue was found in Quick Emulator (QEMU) before 1.7.2 in the VNC display driver. This flaw could occur while refreshing the VNC display surface area in the 'vnc_refresh_server_surface'. A user inside a guest could use this flaw to crash the QEMU process. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2634 | 2 Linux, Redhat | 5 Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux Desktop, Enterprise Linux Server and 2 more | 2019-10-09 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| It was found that the Linux kernel's Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) implementation before 2.6.22.17 used the IPv4-only inet_sk_rebuild_header() function for both IPv4 and IPv6 DCCP connections, which could result in memory corruptions. A remote attacker could use this flaw to crash the system. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2635 | 1 Redhat | 1 Libvirt | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A NULL pointer deference flaw was found in the way libvirt from 2.5.0 to 3.0.0 handled empty drives. A remote authenticated attacker could use this flaw to crash libvirtd daemon resulting in denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16571 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of references to the app object from FormCalc. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5072. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16572 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within FormCalc's closeDoc method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5073. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16573 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of LZWDecode filters. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5078. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16574 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of Image filters. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5079. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16575 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the XFA's bind element. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5091. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16576 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within XFA's field element. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5092. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16577 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the alignment attribute of Field objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5094. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16578 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.2.25013. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the picture elements within XFA forms. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5216. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16579 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.2.25013. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of JPEG2000 images. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5244. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16580 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.2.25013. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the ImageField node of XFA forms. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5281. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16581 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.2.25013. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the author attribute of the Document object. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5282. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16582 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.2.25013. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the clearItems XFA method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5288. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16583 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.2.25013. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the datasets element of XFA forms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5289. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16584 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.2.25013. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within util.printf. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5290. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16585 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.2.25013. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the app.response method. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5294. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16586 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.2.25013. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the addAnnot method. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5295. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16587 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.2.25013. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the removeField method. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5296. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16588 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of SOT markers. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-4976. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16589 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of the yTsiz member of SIZ markers. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-4977. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16590 | 1 Netgain-systems | 1 Enterprise Manager | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on vulnerable installations of NetGain Systems Enterprise Manager 7.2.699 build 1001. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the MainFilter servlet. The issue results from the lack of proper string matching inside the doFilter method. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary code in the context of Administrator. Was ZDI-CAN-5099. | |||||