Search
Total
201818 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-3210 | 4 Fujitsu, Hp, Philips and 1 more | 6 Displayview Click, Displayview Click Suite, Display Assistant and 3 more | 2019-10-09 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Applications developed using the Portrait Display SDK, versions 2.30 through 2.34, default to insecure configurations which allow arbitrary code execution. A number of applications developed using the Portrait Displays SDK do not use secure permissions when running. These applications run the component pdiservice.exe with NT AUTHORITY/SYSTEM permissions. This component is also read/writable by all Authenticated Users. This allows local authenticated attackers to run arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges. The following applications have been identified by Portrait Displays as affected: Fujitsu DisplayView Click: Version 6.0 and 6.01. The issue was fixed in Version 6.3. Fujitsu DisplayView Click Suite: Version 5. The issue is addressed by patch in Version 5.9. HP Display Assistant: Version 2.1. The issue was fixed in Version 2.11. HP My Display: Version 2.0. The issue was fixed in Version 2.1. Philips Smart Control Premium: Versions 2.23, 2.25. The issue was fixed in Version 2.26. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3215 | 1 Milwaukee | 1 One-key | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The Milwaukee ONE-KEY Android mobile application uses bearer tokens with an expiration of one year. This bearer token, in combination with a user_id can be used to perform user actions. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3216 | 5 Greenpacket, Huawei, Mada and 2 more | 28 Ox350, Ox350 Firmware, Bm2022 and 25 more | 2019-10-09 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| WiMAX routers based on the MediaTek SDK (libmtk) that use a custom httpd plugin are vulnerable to an authentication bypass allowing a remote, unauthenticated attacker to gain administrator access to the device by performing an administrator password change on the device via a crafted POST request. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3217 | 1 Calamp | 6 Lmu 3030 Cdma, Lmu 3030 Cdma Firmware, Lmu 3030 Gsm and 3 more | 2019-10-09 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| CalAmp LMU 3030 series OBD-II CDMA and GSM devices has an SMS (text message) interface that can be deployed where no password is configured for this interface by the integrator / reseller. This interface must be password protected, otherwise, the attacker only needs to know the phone number of the device (via an IMSI Catcher, for example) to send administrative commands to the device. These commands can be used to provide ongoing, real-time access to the device and can configure parameters such as IP addresses, firewall rules, and passwords. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3218 | 1 Samsung | 1 Magician | 2019-10-09 | 8.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Samsung Magician 5.0 fails to validate TLS certificates for HTTPS software update traffic. Prior to version 5.0, Samsung Magician uses HTTP for software updates. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3219 | 1 Acronis | 1 True Image | 2019-10-09 | 8.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Acronis True Image up to and including version 2017 Build 8053 performs software updates using HTTP. Downloaded updates are only verified using a server-provided MD5 hash. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3223 | 1 Dahuasecurity | 2 Ip Camera, Ip Camera Firmware | 2019-10-09 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Dahua IP camera products using firmware versions prior to V2.400.0000.14.R.20170713 include a version of the Sonia web interface that may be vulnerable to a stack buffer overflow. Dahua IP camera products include an application known as Sonia (/usr/bin/sonia) that provides the web interface and other services for controlling the IP camera remotely. Versions of Sonia included in firmware versions prior to DH_IPC-Consumer-Zi-Themis_Eng_P_V2.408.0000.11.R.20170621 do not validate input data length for the 'password' field of the web interface. A remote, unauthenticated attacker may submit a crafted POST request to the IP camera's Sonia web interface that may lead to out-of-bounds memory operations and loss of availability or remote code execution. The issue was originally identified by the researcher in firmware version DH_IPC-HX1X2X-Themis_EngSpnFrn_N_V2.400.0000.30.R.20160803. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3224 | 3 Quagga, Redhat, Suse | 4 Quagga, Package Manager, Opensuse and 1 more | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 8.2 HIGH |
| Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) protocol implementations may improperly determine Link State Advertisement (LSA) recency for LSAs with MaxSequenceNumber. According to RFC 2328 section 13.1, for two instances of the same LSA, recency is determined by first comparing sequence numbers, then checksums, and finally MaxAge. In a case where the sequence numbers are the same, the LSA with the larger checksum is considered more recent, and will not be flushed from the Link State Database (LSDB). Since the RFC does not explicitly state that the values of links carried by a LSA must be the same when prematurely aging a self-originating LSA with MaxSequenceNumber, it is possible in vulnerable OSPF implementations for an attacker to craft a LSA with MaxSequenceNumber and invalid links that will result in a larger checksum and thus a 'newer' LSA that will not be flushed from the LSDB. Propagation of the crafted LSA can result in the erasure or alteration of the routing tables of routers within the routing domain, creating a denial of service condition or the re-routing of traffic on the network. CVE-2017-3224 has been reserved for Quagga and downstream implementations (SUSE, openSUSE, and Red Hat packages). | |||||
| CVE-2017-3225 | 1 Denx | 1 U-boot | 2019-10-09 | 2.1 LOW | 4.6 MEDIUM |
| Das U-Boot is a device bootloader that can read its configuration from an AES encrypted file. For devices utilizing this environment encryption mode, U-Boot's use of a zero initialization vector may allow attacks against the underlying cryptographic implementation and allow an attacker to decrypt the data. Das U-Boot's AES-CBC encryption feature uses a zero (0) initialization vector. This allows an attacker to perform dictionary attacks on encrypted data produced by Das U-Boot to learn information about the encrypted data. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3226 | 1 Denx | 1 U-boot | 2019-10-09 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 6.4 MEDIUM |
| Das U-Boot is a device bootloader that can read its configuration from an AES encrypted file. Devices that make use of Das U-Boot's AES-CBC encryption feature using environment encryption (i.e., setting the configuration parameter CONFIG_ENV_AES=y) read environment variables from disk as the encrypted disk image is processed. An attacker with physical access to the device can manipulate the encrypted environment data to include a crafted two-byte sequence which triggers an error in environment variable parsing. This error condition is improperly handled by Das U-Boot, resulting in an immediate process termination with a debugging message. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3791 | 1 Cisco | 1 Cisco Prime Home | 2019-10-09 | 10.0 HIGH | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability in the web-based GUI of Cisco Prime Home could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication and execute actions with administrator privileges. The vulnerability is due to a processing error in the role-based access control (RBAC) of URLs. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending API commands via HTTP to a particular URL without prior authentication. An exploit could allow the attacker to perform any actions in Cisco Prime Home with administrator privileges. This vulnerability affects Cisco Prime Home versions from 6.3.0.0 to the first fixed release 6.5.0.1. Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvb49837. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3831 | 1 Cisco | 8 Aironet 1810, Aironet 1810w, Aironet 1815i and 5 more | 2019-10-09 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability in the web-based GUI of Cisco Mobility Express 1800 Series Access Points could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication. The attacker could be granted full administrator privileges. The vulnerability is due to improper implementation of authentication for accessing certain web pages using the GUI interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the web interface of the affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass authentication and perform unauthorized configuration changes or issue control commands to the affected device. This vulnerability affects Cisco Mobility Express 1800 Series Access Points running a software version prior to 8.2.110.0. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCuy68219. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3850 | 1 Cisco | 2 Ios, Ios Xe | 2019-10-09 | 7.1 HIGH | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the Autonomic Networking Infrastructure (ANI) feature of Cisco IOS Software (15.4 through 15.6) and Cisco IOS XE Software (3.7 through 3.18, and 16) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to incomplete input validation on certain crafted packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted IPv6 packet to a device that is running a Cisco IOS Software or Cisco IOS XE Software release that supports the ANI feature. A device must meet two conditions to be affected by this vulnerability: (1) the device must be running a version of Cisco IOS Software or Cisco IOS XE Software that supports ANI (regardless of whether ANI is configured); and (2) the device must have a reachable IPv6 interface. An exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to reload. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvc42729. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3907 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Mcafee Threat Intelligence Exchange | 2019-10-09 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Code Injection vulnerability in the ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO) extension in McAfee Threat Intelligence Exchange (TIE) Server 2.1.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary HTML code to be reflected in the response web page via unspecified vector. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3912 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Application And Change Control | 2019-10-09 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Bypassing password security vulnerability in McAfee Application and Change Control (MACC) 7.0.1 and 6.2.0 allows authenticated users to perform arbitrary command execution via a command-line utility. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3936 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Epolicy Orchestrator | 2019-10-09 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| OS Command Injection vulnerability in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO) 5.9.0, 5.3.2, 5.3.1, 5.1.3, 5.1.2, 5.1.1, and 5.1.0 allows attackers to run arbitrary OS commands with limited privileges via not sanitizing the user input data before exporting it into a CSV format output. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3960 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Network Security Manager | 2019-10-09 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Exploitation of Authorization vulnerability in the web interface in McAfee Network Security Management (NSM) before 8.2.7.42.2 allows authenticated users to gain elevated privileges via a crafted HTTP request parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3961 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Network Security Manager | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the web interface in McAfee Network Security Management (NSM) before 8.2.7.42.2 allows authenticated users to allow arbitrary HTML code to be reflected in the response web page via crafted user input of attributes. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3962 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Network Security Manager | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Password recovery exploitation vulnerability in the non-certificate-based authentication mechanism in McAfee Network Security Management (NSM) before 8.2.7.42.2 allows attackers to crack user passwords via unsalted hashes. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3964 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Network Security Manager | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Reflective Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the web interface in McAfee Network Security Management (NSM) before 8.2.7.42.2 allows attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a URL parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3965 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Network Security Manager | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) (aka Session Riding) vulnerability in the web interface in McAfee Network Security Management (NSM) before 8.2.7.42.2 allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized tasks such as retrieving internal system information or manipulating the database via specially crafted URLs. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3966 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Network Security Manager | 2019-10-09 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| Exploitation of session variables, resource IDs and other trusted credentials vulnerability in the web interface in McAfee Network Security Management (NSM) before 8.2.7.42.2 allows remote attackers to exploit or harm a user's browser via reusing the exposed session token in the application URL. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3967 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Network Security Manager | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Target influence via framing vulnerability in the web interface in McAfee Network Security Management (NSM) before 8.2.7.42.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via application pages inability to break out of 3rd party HTML frames. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3968 | 1 Mcafee | 2 Network Data Loss Prevention, Network Security Manager | 2019-10-09 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Session fixation vulnerability in the web interface in McAfee Network Security Manager (NSM) before 8.2.7.42.2 and McAfee Network Data Loss Prevention (NDLP) before 9.3.4.1.5 allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information or manipulate the database via a crafted authentication cookie. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3969 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Network Security Manager | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Abuse of communication channels vulnerability in the server in McAfee Network Security Management (NSM) before 8.2.7.42.2 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to decrypt messages via an inadequate implementation of SSL. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3971 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Network Security Manager | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Cryptanalysis vulnerability in the web interface in McAfee Network Security Management (NSM) before 8.2.7.42.2 allows attackers to view confidential information via insecure use of RC4 encryption cyphers. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3972 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Network Security Manager | 2019-10-09 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Infrastructure-based foot printing vulnerability in the web interface in McAfee Network Security Management (NSM) before 8.2.7.42.2 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via the server banner leaking potentially sensitive or security relevant information. | |||||
| CVE-2017-4028 | 2 Mcafee, Microsoft | 7 Anti-virus Plus, Endpoint Security, Host Intrusion Prevention and 4 more | 2019-10-09 | 2.1 LOW | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| Maliciously misconfigured registry vulnerability in all Microsoft Windows products in McAfee consumer and corporate products allows an administrator to inject arbitrary code into a debugged McAfee process via manipulation of registry parameters. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1081 | 1 Freebsd | 1 Freebsd | 2019-10-09 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| In FreeBSD before 11.0-STABLE, 11.0-RELEASE-p10, 10.3-STABLE, and 10.3-RELEASE-p19, ipfilter using "keep state" or "keep frags" options can cause a kernel panic when fed specially crafted packet fragments due to incorrect memory handling. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1114 | 1 Ibm | 1 Campaign | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Campaign 9.1, 9.1.2, and 10 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 121152. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1115 | 1 Ibm | 1 Campaign | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Campaign 9.1, 9.1.2, and 10 is vulnerable to HTML injection. A remote attacker could inject malicious HTML code, which when viewed, would be executed in the victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting site. IBM X-Force ID: 121153. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1119 | 1 Ibm | 1 Marketing Operations | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Marketing Operations 9.1.0, 9.1.2, and 10.1 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information. An attacker could send a specially-crafted request to cause an error message to be returned containing the full root path. An attacker could use this information to launch further attacks against the affected system. IBM X-Force ID: 121171. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1177 | 1 Ibm | 1 Bigfix Compliance | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM BigFix Compliance 1.7 through 1.9.91 discloses sensitive information to unauthorized users. The information can be used to mount further attacks on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 123429. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1198 | 1 Ibm | 1 Bigfix Compliance | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM BigFix Compliance 1.7 through 1.9.91 (TEMA SUAv1 SCA SCM) stores sensitive information in URL parameters. This may lead to information disclosure if unauthorized parties have access to the URLs via server logs, referrer header or browser history. IBM X-Force ID: 123673. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1200 | 1 Ibm | 1 Bigfix Compliance | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| IBM BigFix Compliance 1.7 through 1.9.91 (TEMA SUAv1 SCA SCM) does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.This weakness might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. The software might connect to a malicious host while believing it is a trusted host, or the software might be deceived into accepting spoofed data that appears to originate from a trusted host. IBM X-Force ID: 123675. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1202 | 1 Ibm | 1 Bigfix Compliance | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM BigFix Compliance 1.7 through 1.9.91 (TEMA SUAv1 SCA SCM) is vulnerable to HTML injection. A remote attacker could inject malicious HTML code, which when viewed, would be executed in the victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting site. IBM X-Force ID: 123677. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1231 | 1 Ibm | 1 Bigfix Platform | 2019-10-09 | 2.1 LOW | 7.8 HIGH |
| IBM BigFix Platform 9.5 - 9.5.9 stores user credentials in plain in clear text which can be read by a local user. IBM X-Force ID: 123910. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1237 | 1 Ibm | 7 Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management, Rational Doors Next Generation, Rational Engineering Lifecycle Manager and 4 more | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Jazz based applications are vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 124355. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1238 | 1 Ibm | 2 Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management, Rational Quality Manager | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Quality Manager (RQM) 5.0.x and 6.0 through 6.0.5 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 124356. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1239 | 1 Ibm | 2 Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management, Rational Quality Manager | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Quality Manager (RQM) 5.0.x and 6.0 through 6.0.5 could reveal sensitive information in HTTP 500 Internal Server Error responses. IBM X-Force ID: 124357. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1242 | 1 Ibm | 2 Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management, Rational Quality Manager | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Quality Manager (RQM) 5.0.x and 6.0 through 6.0.5 are vulnerable to HTML injection. A remote attacker could inject malicious HTML code, which when viewed, would be executed in the victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting site. IBM X-Force ID: 124524. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1248 | 1 Ibm | 2 Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management, Rational Quality Manager | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| IBM Quality Manager (RQM) 5.0.x and 6.0 through 6.0.5 are vulnerable to HTML injection. A remote attacker could inject malicious HTML code, which when viewed, would be executed in the victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting site. IBM X-Force ID: 124628. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1250 | 1 Ibm | 2 Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management, Rational Quality Manager | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Rational Quality Manager and IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management 5.0 through 5.0.2 and 6.0 through 6.0.5 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force 124630. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1265 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0, 10.0.1, 10.1, 10.1.2, 10.1.3, 10.1.4, and 10.5 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate. This weakness might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 124740. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1268 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2019-10-09 | 2.1 LOW | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10 and 10.5 uses a one-way cryptographic hash against an input that should not be reversible, such as a password, but the software does not also use a salt as part of the input. IBM X-Force ID: 124743. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1272 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.5 stores sensitive information in URL parameters. This may lead to information disclosure if unauthorized parties have access to the URLs via server logs, referrer header or browser history. IBM X-Force ID: 124747. IBM X-Force ID: 124747. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1275 | 1 Ibm | 2 Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management, Rational Quality Manager | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Rational Quality Manager and IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management 5.0 through 5.0.2 and 6.0 through 6.0.5 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 124750. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1277 | 1 Ibm | 2 Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management, Rational Quality Manager | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Rational Quality Manager and IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management 5.0 through 5.0.2 and 6.0 through 6.0.5 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 124752. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1280 | 1 Ibm | 2 Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management, Rational Quality Manager | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Rational Quality Manager and IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management 5.0 through 5.0.2 and 6.0 through 6.0.5 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 124758. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1281 | 1 Ibm | 2 Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management, Rational Quality Manager | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Rational Quality Manager and IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management 5.0 through 5.0.2 and 6.0 through 6.0.5 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 124759. | |||||