Search
Total
201818 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-5576 | 2019-12-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5577 | 2019-12-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5578 | 2019-12-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5579 | 2019-12-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5580 | 2019-12-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5581 | 2019-12-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5582 | 2019-12-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5583 | 2019-12-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5584 | 2019-12-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2012-2312 | 1 Redhat | 2 Jboss Application Server, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2019-12-23 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An Elevated Privileges issue exists in JBoss AS 7 Community Release due to the improper implementation in the security context propagation, A threat gets reused from the thread pool that still retains the security context from the process last used, which lets a local user obtain elevated privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2012-2656 | 1 Talend | 1 Restlet | 2019-12-23 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An XML eXternal Entity (XXE) issue exists in Restlet 1.1.10 in an endpoint using XML transport, which lets a remote attacker obtain sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2019-19849 | 1 Typo3 | 1 Typo3 | 2019-12-23 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in TYPO3 before 8.7.30, 9.x before 9.5.12, and 10.x before 10.2.2. It has been discovered that the classes QueryGenerator and QueryView are vulnerable to insecure deserialization. One exploitable scenario requires having the system extension ext:lowlevel (Backend Module: DB Check) installed, with a valid backend user who has administrator privileges. The other exploitable scenario requires having the system extension ext:sys_action installed, with a valid backend user who has limited privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2019-15600 | 1 Http Server Project | 1 Http Server | 2019-12-23 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A Path traversal exists in http_server which allows an attacker to read arbitrary system files. | |||||
| CVE-2019-19848 | 1 Typo3 | 1 Typo3 | 2019-12-23 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in TYPO3 before 8.7.30, 9.x before 9.5.12, and 10.x before 10.2.2. It has been discovered that the extraction of manually uploaded ZIP archives in Extension Manager is vulnerable to directory traversal. Admin privileges are required in order to exploit this vulnerability. (In v9 LTS and later, System Maintainer privileges are also required.) | |||||
| CVE-2019-0134 | 1 Intel | 1 Dynamic Platform And Thermal Framework | 2019-12-23 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Improper permissions in the Intel(R) Dynamic Platform and Thermal Framework v8.3.10208.5643 and before may allow an authenticated user to potentially execute code at an elevated level of privilege. | |||||
| CVE-2019-8292 | 1 Online Store System Project | 1 Online Store System | 2019-12-23 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Online Store System v1.0 delete_product.php doesn't check to see if a user authtenticated or has administrative rights allowing arbitrary product deletion. | |||||
| CVE-2019-19731 | 1 Roxyfileman | 1 Roxy Fileman | 2019-12-23 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Roxy Fileman 1.4.5 for .NET is vulnerable to path traversal. A remote attacker can write uploaded files to arbitrary locations via the RENAMEFILE action. This can be leveraged for code execution by uploading a specially crafted Windows shortcut file and writing the file to the Startup folder (because an incomplete blacklist of file extensions allows Windows shortcut files to be uploaded). | |||||
| CVE-2019-8721 | 1 Apple | 1 Xcode | 2019-12-23 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Multiple issues in ld64 in the Xcode toolchains were addressed by updating to version ld64-507.4. This issue is fixed in Xcode 11.0. Compiling code without proper input validation could lead to arbitrary code execution with user privilege. | |||||
| CVE-2019-8722 | 1 Apple | 1 Xcode | 2019-12-23 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Multiple issues in ld64 in the Xcode toolchains were addressed by updating to version ld64-507.4. This issue is fixed in Xcode 11.0. Compiling code without proper input validation could lead to arbitrary code execution with user privilege. | |||||
| CVE-2019-19832 | 1 Xerox | 2 Altalink C8035, Altalink C8035 Firmware | 2019-12-23 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Xerox AltaLink C8035 printers allow CSRF. A request to add users is made in the Device User Database form field to the xerox.set URI. (The frmUserName value must have a unique name.) | |||||
| CVE-2019-5258 | 1 Huawei | 34 Ap2000, Ap2000 Firmware, Espace U1981 and 31 more | 2019-12-23 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Certain Huawei products (AP2000;IPS Module;NGFW Module;NIP6300;NIP6600;NIP6800;S5700;SVN5600;SVN5800;SVN5800-C;SeMG9811;Secospace AntiDDoS8000;Secospace USG6300;Secospace USG6500;Secospace USG6600;USG6000V;eSpace U1981) have a buffer overflow vulnerability. An attacker who logs in to the board may send crafted messages from the internal network port or tamper with inter-process message packets to exploit this vulnerability. Due to insufficient validation of the message, successful exploit may cause the affected board to be abnormal. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5235 | 1 Huawei | 100 Alp-al00b, Alp-al00b Firmware, Alp-tl00b and 97 more | 2019-12-23 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Some Huawei smart phones have a null pointer dereference vulnerability. An attacker crafts specific packets and sends to the affected product to exploit this vulnerability. Successful exploitation may cause the affected phone to be abnormal. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11992 | 1 Hp | 1 Oneview For Vmware Vcenter | 2019-12-23 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A security vulnerability in HPE OneView for VMware vCenter 9.5 could be exploited remotely to allow Cross-Site Scripting. | |||||
| CVE-2019-18830 | 1 Barco | 8 Clickshare Cs-100, Clickshare Cs-100 Firmware, Clickshare Cse-200 and 5 more | 2019-12-23 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Barco ClickShare Button R9861500D01 devices before 1.9.0 allow OS Command Injection. The embedded 'dongle_bridge' program used to expose the functionalities of the ClickShare Button to a USB host, is vulnerable to OS command injection vulnerabilities. These vulnerabilities could lead to code execution on the ClickShare Button with the privileges of the user 'nobody'. | |||||
| CVE-2019-8606 | 1 Apple | 1 Mac Os X | 2019-12-23 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| A validation issue existed in the handling of symlinks. This issue was addressed with improved validation of symlinks. This issue is fixed in macOS Mojave 10.14.5. A local user may be able to load unsigned kernel extensions. | |||||
| CVE-2019-8607 | 1 Apple | 7 Icloud, Iphone Os, Itunes and 4 more | 2019-12-23 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An out-of-bounds read was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 12.3, macOS Mojave 10.14.5, tvOS 12.3, watchOS 5.2.1, Safari 12.1.1, iTunes for Windows 12.9.5, iCloud for Windows 7.12. Processing maliciously crafted web content may result in the disclosure of process memory. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11399 | 1 Trendnet | 6 Tew-651br, Tew-651br Firmware, Tew-652brp and 3 more | 2019-12-23 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered on TRENDnet TEW-651BR 2.04B1, TEW-652BRP 3.04b01, and TEW-652BRU 1.00b12 devices. OS command injection occurs through the get_set.ccp lanHostCfg_HostName_1.1.1.0.0 parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11400 | 1 Trendnet | 6 Tew-651br, Tew-651br Firmware, Tew-652brp and 3 more | 2019-12-23 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered on TRENDnet TEW-651BR 2.04B1, TEW-652BRP 3.04b01, and TEW-652BRU 1.00b12 devices. A buffer overflow occurs through the get_set.ccp ccp_act parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2019-10537 | 1 Qualcomm | 30 Mdm9607, Mdm9607 Firmware, Nicobar and 27 more | 2019-12-23 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Improper validation of event buffer extracted from FW response can lead to integer overflow, which will allow to pass the length check and eventually will lead to buffer overwrite when event data is copied to context buffer in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music in MDM9607, Nicobar, QCA6574AU, QCN7605, QCS405, QCS605, SDM660, SDM845, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SM8250, SXR1130, SXR2130 | |||||
| CVE-2019-10564 | 1 Qualcomm | 52 Apq8009, Apq8009 Firmware, Apq8053 and 49 more | 2019-12-23 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Possible OOB issue in EEPROM due to lack of check while accessing memory map array at the time of reading operation in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables in APQ8009, APQ8053, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8953, Nicobar, QCS405, QCS605, QM215, SA6155P, SDA845, SDM429, SDM439, SDM450, SDM632, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SM8250, SXR1130, SXR2130 | |||||
| CVE-2019-10525 | 1 Qualcomm | 104 Apq8009, Apq8009 Firmware, Apq8017 and 101 more | 2019-12-23 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Buffer overflow during SIB read when network configures complete sib list along with first and last segment of other SIB in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8096, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, MDM9150, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9615, MDM9625, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9645, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8905, MSM8909, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8939, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, Nicobar, QCM2150, QCS605, QM215, SC8180X, SDA660, SDA845, SDM429, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDM850, SDX20, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SXR1130 | |||||
| CVE-2017-17168 | 1 Huawei | 2 Dp300, Dp300 Firmware | 2019-12-23 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The CIDAM Protocol on some Huawei Products has multiple input validation vulnerabilities due to insufficient validation of specific messages when the protocol is implemented. An authenticated remote attacker could send a malicious message to a target system. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to tamper with business and make the system abnormal. Affected Huawei Products are: DP300 versions V500R002C00, V500R002C00B010, V500R002C00B011, V500R002C00B012, V500R002C00B013, V500R002C00B014, V500R002C00B017, V500R002C00B018, V500R002C00SPC100, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC300, V500R002C00SPC400, V500R002C00SPC500, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC800, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCa00; RP200 versions V500R002C00SPC200, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE30 versions V100R001C10SPC300, V100R001C10SPC500, V100R001C10SPC600, V100R001C10SPC700B010, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC500, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE40 versions V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE50 versions V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE60 versions V100R001C10, V100R001C10B001, V100R001C10B002, V100R001C10B010, V100R001C10B011, V100R001C10B012, V100R001C10B013, V100R001C10B014, V100R001C10B016, V100R001C10B017, V100R001C10B018, V100R001C10B019, V100R001C10SPC400, V100R001C10SPC500, V100R001C10SPC600, V100R001C10SPC700, V100R001C10SPC800B011, V100R001C10SPC900, V500R002C00, V500R002C00B010, V500R002C00B011, V500R002C00SPC100, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC300, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC800, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCa00, V500R002C00SPCb00, V500R002C00SPCd00, V500R002C00SPCe00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC100, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; eSpace U1981 version V200R003C20SPC900. | |||||
| CVE-2017-17169 | 1 Huawei | 2 Dp300, Dp300 Firmware | 2019-12-23 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The CIDAM Protocol on some Huawei Products has multiple input validation vulnerabilities due to insufficient validation of specific messages when the protocol is implemented. An authenticated remote attacker could send a malicious message to a target system. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to tamper with business and make the system abnormal. Affected Huawei Products are: DP300 versions V500R002C00, V500R002C00B010, V500R002C00B011, V500R002C00B012, V500R002C00B013, V500R002C00B014, V500R002C00B017, V500R002C00B018, V500R002C00SPC100, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC300, V500R002C00SPC400, V500R002C00SPC500, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC800, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCa00; RP200 versions V500R002C00SPC200, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE30 versions V100R001C10SPC300, V100R001C10SPC500, V100R001C10SPC600, V100R001C10SPC700B010, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC500, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE40 versions V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE50 versions V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE60 versions V100R001C10, V100R001C10B001, V100R001C10B002, V100R001C10B010, V100R001C10B011, V100R001C10B012, V100R001C10B013, V100R001C10B014, V100R001C10B016, V100R001C10B017, V100R001C10B018, V100R001C10B019, V100R001C10SPC400, V100R001C10SPC500, V100R001C10SPC600, V100R001C10SPC700, V100R001C10SPC800B011, V100R001C10SPC900, V500R002C00, V500R002C00B010, V500R002C00B011, V500R002C00SPC100, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC300, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC800, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCa00, V500R002C00SPCb00, V500R002C00SPCd00, V500R002C00SPCe00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC100, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; eSpace U1981 version V200R003C20SPC900. | |||||
| CVE-2017-17170 | 1 Huawei | 2 Dp300, Dp300 Firmware | 2019-12-23 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The CIDAM Protocol on some Huawei Products has multiple input validation vulnerabilities due to insufficient validation of specific messages when the protocol is implemented. An authenticated remote attacker could send a malicious message to a target system. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to tamper with business and make the system abnormal. Affected Huawei Products are: DP300 versions V500R002C00, V500R002C00B010, V500R002C00B011, V500R002C00B012, V500R002C00B013, V500R002C00B014, V500R002C00B017, V500R002C00B018, V500R002C00SPC100, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC300, V500R002C00SPC400, V500R002C00SPC500, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC800, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCa00; RP200 versions V500R002C00SPC200, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE30 versions V100R001C10SPC300, V100R001C10SPC500, V100R001C10SPC600, V100R001C10SPC700B010, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC500, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE40 versions V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE50 versions V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE60 versions V100R001C10, V100R001C10B001, V100R001C10B002, V100R001C10B010, V100R001C10B011, V100R001C10B012, V100R001C10B013, V100R001C10B014, V100R001C10B016, V100R001C10B017, V100R001C10B018, V100R001C10B019, V100R001C10SPC400, V100R001C10SPC500, V100R001C10SPC600, V100R001C10SPC700, V100R001C10SPC800B011, V100R001C10SPC900, V500R002C00, V500R002C00B010, V500R002C00B011, V500R002C00SPC100, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC300, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC800, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCa00, V500R002C00SPCb00, V500R002C00SPCd00, V500R002C00SPCe00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC100, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; eSpace U1981 version V200R003C20SPC900. | |||||
| CVE-2017-17304 | 1 Huawei | 2 Dp300, Dp300 Firmware | 2019-12-23 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The CIDAM Protocol on some Huawei Products has multiple input validation vulnerabilities due to insufficient validation of specific messages when the protocol is implemented. An authenticated remote attacker could send a malicious message to a target system. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to tamper with business and make the system abnormal. Affected Huawei Products are: DP300 versions V500R002C00, V500R002C00B010, V500R002C00B011, V500R002C00B012, V500R002C00B013, V500R002C00B014, V500R002C00B017, V500R002C00B018, V500R002C00SPC100, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC300, V500R002C00SPC400, V500R002C00SPC500, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC800, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCa00; RP200 versions V500R002C00SPC200, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE30 versions V100R001C10SPC300, V100R001C10SPC500, V100R001C10SPC600, V100R001C10SPC700B010, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC500, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE40 versions V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE50 versions V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE60 versions V100R001C10, V100R001C10B001, V100R001C10B002, V100R001C10B010, V100R001C10B011, V100R001C10B012, V100R001C10B013, V100R001C10B014, V100R001C10B016, V100R001C10B017, V100R001C10B018, V100R001C10B019, V100R001C10SPC400, V100R001C10SPC500, V100R001C10SPC600, V100R001C10SPC700, V100R001C10SPC800B011, V100R001C10SPC900, V500R002C00, V500R002C00B010, V500R002C00B011, V500R002C00SPC100, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC300, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC800, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCa00, V500R002C00SPCb00, V500R002C00SPCd00, V500R002C00SPCe00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC100, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; eSpace U1981 version V200R003C20SPC900. | |||||
| CVE-2019-10481 | 1 Qualcomm | 26 Apq8096au, Apq8096au Firmware, Ipq4019 and 23 more | 2019-12-23 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Out of bound access occurs while handling the WMI FW event due to lack of check of buffer argument which comes directly from the WLAN FW in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in APQ8096AU, IPQ4019, IPQ8064, IPQ8074, MDM9607, MSM8996AU, QCA6574AU, QCA8081, QCN7605, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150 | |||||
| CVE-2019-10487 | 1 Qualcomm | 106 Apq8009, Apq8009 Firmware, Apq8017 and 103 more | 2019-12-23 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Buffer over read can happen while parsing SMS OTA messages at transport layer if network sends un-intended values in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8096, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, MDM9150, MDM9205, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9615, MDM9625, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9645, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8905, MSM8909, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8939, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, Nicobar, QCM2150, QCS605, QM215, SC8180X, SDA660, SDA845, SDM429, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDM850, SDX20, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SXR1130 | |||||
| CVE-2019-10500 | 1 Qualcomm | 104 Apq8009, Apq8009 Firmware, Apq8017 and 101 more | 2019-12-23 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| While processing MT Secondary PDP request, Buffer overflow will happen due to incorrect calculation of buffer size in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8096, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, MDM9150, MDM9205, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9625, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9645, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8905, MSM8909, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8939, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, Nicobar, QCM2150, QCS605, QM215, SC8180X, SDA660, SDA845, SDM429, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDM850, SDX20, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SXR1130 | |||||
| CVE-2019-10513 | 1 Qualcomm | 98 Apq8009, Apq8009 Firmware, Apq8017 and 95 more | 2019-12-23 | 4.9 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Possibility of Null pointer access if the SPDM commands are executed in the non-standard way in Trustzone in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8096, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, IPQ8074, MDM9150, MDM9205, MDM9206, MDM9207C, MDM9607, MDM9650, MSM8905, MSM8909, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, Nicobar, QCA8081, QCS404, QCS605, QM215, SDA660, SDA845, SDM429, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDM850, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SXR1130, SXR2130 | |||||
| CVE-2019-4736 | 1 Ibm | 1 Financial Transaction Manager For Multiplatform | 2019-12-23 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 172706. | |||||
| CVE-2019-10516 | 1 Qualcomm | 104 Apq8009, Apq8009 Firmware, Apq8017 and 101 more | 2019-12-23 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Multiple read overflows in MM while decoding service accept,service reject,attach reject and MT detach in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8096, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, MDM9150, MDM9205, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9625, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9645, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8905, MSM8909, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8939, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, Nicobar, QCM2150, QCS605, QM215, SC8180X, SDA660, SDA845, SDM429, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDM850, SDX20, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SXR1130 | |||||
| CVE-2019-10517 | 1 Qualcomm | 66 Apq8009, Apq8009 Firmware, Apq8017 and 63 more | 2019-12-23 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Memory is being freed up twice when two concurrent threads are executing in parallel in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8096, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, MDM9206, MDM9207C, MDM9607, MDM9650, MSM8909, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8939, MSM8940, MSM8996AU, QCS405, QCS605, SDA660, SDA845, SDM630, SDM636, SDM660, SDM845, SDX20, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SM8250, SXR1130, SXR2130 | |||||
| CVE-2019-10518 | 1 Qualcomm | 98 Apq8009, Apq8009 Firmware, Apq8017 and 95 more | 2019-12-23 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Use after free of a pointer in iWLAN scenario during netmgr state transition to CONNECT in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8064, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, IPQ4019, IPQ8064, IPQ8074, MDM9150, MDM9206, MDM9207C, MDM9607, MDM9640, MDM9650, MSM8905, MSM8909, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8939, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, QCA6574AU, QCS405, QCS605, SDA660, SDA845, SDM429, SDM439, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDX20, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SM8250, SXR1130, SXR2130 | |||||
| CVE-2019-10536 | 1 Qualcomm | 94 Apq8009, Apq8009 Firmware, Apq8017 and 91 more | 2019-12-23 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Potential double free scenario if driver receives another DIAG_EVENT_LOG_SUPPORTED event from firmware as the pointer is not set to NULL on first call in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, IPQ4019, IPQ8064, IPQ8074, MDM9206, MDM9207C, MDM9607, MDM9640, MDM9650, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, Nicobar, QCA6174A, QCA6574AU, QCA8081, QCA9377, QCA9379, QCN7605, QCS405, QCS605, SDA660, SDA845, SDM450, SDM630, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDX20, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SM8250, SXR1130, SXR2130 | |||||
| CVE-2019-8755 | 1 Apple | 1 Mac Os X | 2019-12-23 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| A logic issue was addressed with improved restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Catalina 10.15. A malicious application may be able to determine kernel memory layout. | |||||
| CVE-2019-10544 | 1 Qualcomm | 92 Apq8009, Apq8009 Firmware, Apq8017 and 89 more | 2019-12-23 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Improper length check on source buffer to handle userspace data received can lead to out-of-bound access in diag handlers in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, MDM9206, MDM9207C, MDM9607, MDM9640, MDM9650, MSM8905, MSM8909, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8939, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, QCN7605, QCS405, QCS605, QM215, SDA660, SDA845, SDM429, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDX20, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SM8250, SXR1130, SXR2130 | |||||
| CVE-2019-10572 | 1 Qualcomm | 86 Apq8009, Apq8009 Firmware, Apq8017 and 83 more | 2019-12-23 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Improper check in video driver while processing data from video firmware can lead to integer overflow and then buffer overflow in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, MDM9206, MDM9207C, MDM9607, MDM9640, MDM9650, MSM8905, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, Nicobar, QCS405, QCS605, QM215, SA6155P, SDA660, SDA845, SDM429, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDX20, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SXR1130 | |||||
| CVE-2019-8792 | 2 Apple, Google | 3 Iphone Os, Shazam, Android | 2019-12-23 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| An injection issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in Shazam Android App Version 9.25.0, Shazam iOS App Version 12.11.0. Processing a maliciously crafted URL may lead to arbitrary javascript code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4742 | 1 Ibm | 1 Financial Transaction Manager For Multiplatform | 2019-12-23 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.0 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim. IBM X-Force ID: 172877. | |||||
| CVE-2019-10557 | 1 Qualcomm | 46 Apq8009, Apq8009 Firmware, Apq8017 and 43 more | 2019-12-23 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Out-of-bound read in the wireless driver in the Linux kernel due to lack of check of buffer length. in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8096AU, MDM9206, MDM9207C, MDM9607, MDM9650, MSM8996AU, QCA6174A, QCA6574AU, QCA9377, QCA9379, QCN7605, QCS605, SDA660, SDA845, SDM630, SDM636, SDM660, SDX20, SDX55, SXR1130 | |||||