Search
Total
703 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-21973 | 1 Vmware | 2 Cloud Foundation, Vcenter Server | 2021-08-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The vSphere Client (HTML5) contains an SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) vulnerability due to improper validation of URLs in a vCenter Server plugin. A malicious actor with network access to port 443 may exploit this issue by sending a POST request to vCenter Server plugin leading to information disclosure. This affects: VMware vCenter Server (7.x before 7.0 U1c, 6.7 before 6.7 U3l and 6.5 before 6.5 U3n) and VMware Cloud Foundation (4.x before 4.2 and 3.x before 3.10.1.2). | |||||
| CVE-2021-32603 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortianalyzer, Fortimanager | 2021-08-12 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918) vulnerability in FortiManager and FortiAnalyser GUI 7.0.0, 6.4.5 and below, 6.2.7 and below, 6.0.11 and below, 5.6.11 and below may allow a remote and authenticated attacker to access unauthorized files and services on the system via specifically crafted web requests. | |||||
| CVE-2021-24371 | 1 Rsvpmaker Project | 1 Rsvpmaker | 2021-08-10 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 2.7 LOW |
| The Import feature of the RSVPMaker WordPress plugin before 8.7.3 (/wp-admin/tools.php?page=rsvpmaker_export_screen) takes an URL input and calls curl on it, without first validating it to ensure it's a remote one. As a result, a high privilege user could use that feature to scan the internal network via a SSRF attack. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20788 | 1 Groupsession | 3 Groupsession, Groupsession Bycloud, Groupsession Zion | 2021-08-06 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in GroupSession (GroupSession Free edition from ver2.2.0 to the version prior to ver5.1.0, GroupSession byCloud from ver3.0.3 to the version prior to ver5.1.0, and GroupSession ZION from ver3.0.3 to the version prior to ver5.1.0) allows a remote authenticated attacker to conduct a port scan from the product and/or obtain information from the internal Web server. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4974 | 1 Ibm | 9 Engineering Lifecycle Optimization - Engineering Insights, Engineering Requirements Quality Assistant On-premises, Engineering Test Management and 6 more | 2021-08-04 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Jazz Foundation products are vulnerable to server side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 192434. | |||||
| CVE-2021-29749 | 1 Ibm | 2 Secure External Authentication Server, Secure Proxy | 2021-07-31 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Secure External Authentication Server 6.0.2 and IBM Secure Proxy 6.0.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 201777. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31216 | 1 Siren | 1 Investigate | 2021-07-28 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Siren Investigate before 11.1.1 contains a server side request forgery (SSRF) defect in the built-in image proxy route (which is enabled by default). An attacker with access to the Investigate installation can specify an arbitrary URL in the parameters of the image proxy route and fetch external URLs as the Investigate process on the host. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22726 | 1 Schneider-electric | 12 Evlink City Evc1s22p4, Evlink City Evc1s22p4 Firmware, Evlink City Evc1s7p4 and 9 more | 2021-07-28 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| A CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in EVlink City (EVC1S22P4 / EVC1S7P4 all versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.1), EVlink Parking (EVW2 / EVF2 / EV.2 all versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.1), and EVlink Smart Wallbox (EVB1A all versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.1 ) that could allow an attacker to perform unintended actions or access to data when crafted malicious parameters are submitted to the charging station web server. | |||||
| CVE-2020-29166 | 1 Rainbowfishsoftware | 1 Pacsone Server | 2021-07-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| PacsOne Server (PACS Server In One Box) below 7.1.1 is affected by file read/manipulation, which can result in remote information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2020-24641 | 1 Arubanetworks | 1 Airwave Glass | 2021-07-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In Aruba AirWave Glass before 1.3.3, there is a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability through an unauthenticated endpoint that if successfully exploited can result in disclosure of sensitive information. This can be used to perform an authentication bypass and ultimately gain administrative access on the web administrative interface. | |||||
| CVE-2020-7749 | 1 Osm-static-maps Project | 1 Osm-static-maps | 2021-07-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.6 HIGH |
| This affects all versions of package osm-static-maps. User input given to the package is passed directly to a template without escaping ({{{ ... }}}). As such, it is possible for an attacker to inject arbitrary HTML/JS code and depending on the context. It will be outputted as an HTML on the page which gives opportunity for XSS or rendered on the server (puppeteer) which also gives opportunity for SSRF and Local File Read. | |||||
| CVE-2020-24142 | 1 Ninjateam | 1 Video Downloader For Tiktok | 2021-07-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Server-side request forgery in the Video Downloader for TikTok (aka downloader-tiktok) plugin 1.3 for WordPress lets an attacker send crafted requests from the back-end server of a vulnerable web application via the njt-tk-download-video parameter. It can help identify open ports, local network hosts and execute command on services | |||||
| CVE-2020-24148 | 1 Mooveagency | 1 Import Xml And Rss Feeds | 2021-07-10 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the Import XML and RSS Feeds (import-xml-feed) plugin 2.0.1 for WordPress via the data parameter in a moove_read_xml action. | |||||
| CVE-2021-32639 | 1 Nsa | 1 Emissary | 2021-07-06 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| Emissary is a P2P-based, data-driven workflow engine. Emissary version 6.4.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). In particular, the `RegisterPeerAction` endpoint and the `AddChildDirectoryAction` endpoint are vulnerable to SSRF. This vulnerability may lead to credential leaks. Emissary version 7.0 contains a patch. As a workaround, disable network access to Emissary from untrusted sources. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31531 | 1 Zohocorp | 1 Manageengine Servicedesk Plus Msp | 2021-07-02 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Zoho ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus MSP before 10521 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). | |||||
| CVE-2020-21788 | 1 Crmeb | 1 Crmeb | 2021-07-01 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In CRMEB 3.1.0+ strict domain name filtering leads to SSRF(Server-Side Request Forgery). The vulnerable code is in file /crmeb/app/admin/controller/store/CopyTaobao.php. | |||||
| CVE-2021-32698 | 1 Elabftw | 1 Elabftw | 2021-06-28 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| eLabFTW is an open source electronic lab notebook for research labs. This vulnerability allows an attacker to make GET requests on behalf of the server. It is "blind" because the attacker cannot see the result of the request. Issue has been patched in eLabFTW 4.0.0. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21311 | 2 Adminer, Debian | 2 Adminer, Debian Linux | 2021-06-24 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| Adminer is an open-source database management in a single PHP file. In adminer from version 4.0.0 and before 4.7.9 there is a server-side request forgery vulnerability. Users of Adminer versions bundling all drivers (e.g. `adminer.php`) are affected. This is fixed in version 4.7.9. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34808 | 1 Synology | 1 Media Server | 2021-06-23 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in cgi component in Synology Media Server before 1.8.3-2881 allows remote attackers to access intranet resources via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34811 | 1 Synology | 1 Download Station | 2021-06-23 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in task management component in Synology Download Station before 3.8.16-3566 allows remote authenticated users to access intranet resources via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22175 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-06-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| When requests to the internal network for webhooks are enabled, a server-side request forgery vulnerability in GitLab affecting all versions starting from 10.5 was possible to exploit for an unauthenticated attacker even on a GitLab instance where registration is disabled | |||||
| CVE-2021-20483 | 4 Ibm, Linux, Microsoft and 1 more | 5 Aix, Security Identity Manager, Linux Kernel and 2 more | 2021-06-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Identity Manager 6.0.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). By sending a specially crafted request, a remote authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive data. IBM X-Force ID: 197591. | |||||
| CVE-2020-26811 | 1 Sap | 1 Commerce Cloud \(accelerator Payment Mock\) | 2021-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| SAP Commerce Cloud (Accelerator Payment Mock), versions - 1808, 1811, 1905, 2005, allows an unauthenticated attacker to submit a crafted request over a network to a particular SAP Commerce module URL which will be processed without further interaction, the crafted request leads to Server Side Request Forgery attack which could lead to retrieval of limited pieces of information about the service with no impact on integrity or availability. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22214 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2021-06-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| When requests to the internal network for webhooks are enabled, a server-side request forgery vulnerability in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 10.5 was possible to exploit for an unauthenticated attacker even on a GitLab instance where registration is limited | |||||
| CVE-2020-15377 | 1 Broadcom | 1 Sannav | 2021-06-11 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Webtools in Brocade SANnav before version 2.1.1 allows unauthenticated users to make requests to arbitrary hosts due to a misconfiguration; this is commonly referred to as Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). | |||||
| CVE-2021-25640 | 1 Apache | 1 Dubbo | 2021-06-10 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| In Apache Dubbo prior to 2.6.9 and 2.7.9, the usage of parseURL method will lead to the bypass of white host check which can cause open redirect or SSRF vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2021-33181 | 1 Synology | 1 Video Station | 2021-06-10 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in webapi component in Synology Video Station before 2.4.10-1632 allows remote authenticated users to send arbitrary request to intranet resources via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2021-33184 | 1 Synology | 1 Download Station | 2021-06-10 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 7.7 HIGH |
| Server-Side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in task management component in Synology Download Station before 3.8.15-3563 allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35970 | 1 Yzmcms | 1 Yzmcms | 2021-06-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in YzmCMS 5.8. There is a SSRF vulnerability in the background collection management that allows arbitrary file read. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20348 | 1 Ibm | 9 Collaborative Lifecycle Management, Engineering Lifecycle Management, Engineering Lifecycle Optimization - Engineering Insights and 6 more | 2021-06-07 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Jazz Foundation and IBM Engineering products are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-ForceID: 194597. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20346 | 1 Ibm | 9 Collaborative Lifecycle Management, Engineering Lifecycle Management, Engineering Lifecycle Optimization - Engineering Insights and 6 more | 2021-06-07 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Jazz Foundation and IBM Engineering products are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 194595. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20345 | 1 Ibm | 9 Collaborative Lifecycle Management, Engineering Lifecycle Management, Engineering Lifecycle Optimization - Engineering Insights and 6 more | 2021-06-07 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Jazz Foundation and IBM Engineering products are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 194594. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20347 | 1 Ibm | 9 Collaborative Lifecycle Management, Engineering Lifecycle Management, Engineering Lifecycle Optimization - Engineering Insights and 6 more | 2021-06-07 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Jazz Foundation and IBM Engineering products are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 194596. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20343 | 1 Ibm | 9 Collaborative Lifecycle Management, Engineering Lifecycle Management, Engineering Lifecycle Optimization - Engineering Insights and 6 more | 2021-06-07 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Jazz Foundation and IBM Engineering products are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 194593. | |||||
| CVE-2020-14327 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Tower | 2021-06-07 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A Server-side request forgery (SSRF) flaw was found in Ansible Tower in versions before 3.6.5 and before 3.7.2. Functionality on the Tower server is abused by supplying a URL that could lead to the server processing it. This flaw leads to the connection to internal services or the exposure of additional internal services by abusing the test feature of lookup credentials to forge HTTP/HTTPS requests from the server and retrieving the results of the response. | |||||
| CVE-2020-14328 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Tower | 2021-06-07 | 2.1 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| A flaw was found in Ansible Tower in versions before 3.7.2. A Server Side Request Forgery flaw can be abused by supplying a URL which could lead to the server processing it connecting to internal services or exposing additional internal services and more particularly retrieving full details in case of error. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality. | |||||
| CVE-2021-30108 | 1 Feehi | 1 Feehi Cms | 2021-05-28 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Feehi CMS 2.1.1 is affected by a Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. When the user modifies the HTTP Referer header to any url, the server can make a request to it. | |||||
| CVE-2017-17674 | 1 Bmc | 1 Remedy Mid-tier | 2021-05-25 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| BMC Remedy Mid Tier 9.1SP3 is affected by remote and local file inclusion. Due to the lack of restrictions on what can be targeted, the system can be vulnerable to attacks such as system fingerprinting, internal port scanning, Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF), or remote code execution (RCE). | |||||
| CVE-2021-33511 | 1 Plone | 1 Plone | 2021-05-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Plone though 5.2.4 allows SSRF via the lxml parser. This affects Diazo themes, Dexterity TTW schemas, and modeleditors in plone.app.theming, plone.app.dexterity, and plone.supermodel. | |||||
| CVE-2021-33510 | 1 Plone | 1 Plone | 2021-05-24 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Plone through 5.2.4 allows remote authenticated managers to conduct SSRF attacks via an event ical URL, to read one line of a file. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20535 | 1 Ibm | 1 Jazz Reporting Service | 2021-05-20 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Jazz Reporting Service 6.0.6.1, 7.0, 7.0.1, and 7.0.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 198834. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31828 | 1 Amazon | 1 Open Distro | 2021-05-18 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 7.1 HIGH |
| An SSRF issue in Open Distro for Elasticsearch (ODFE) before 1.13.1.0 allows an existing privileged user to enumerate listening services or interact with configured resources via HTTP requests exceeding the Alerting plugin's intended scope. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31910 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Teamcity | 2021-05-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In JetBrains TeamCity before 2020.2.3, information disclosure via SSRF was possible. | |||||
| CVE-2021-29475 | 1 Hedgedoc | 1 Hedgedoc | 2021-05-14 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| HedgeDoc (formerly known as CodiMD) is an open-source collaborative markdown editor. An attacker is able to receive arbitrary files from the file system when exporting a note to PDF. Since the code injection has to take place as note content, there fore this exploit requires the attackers ability to modify a note. This will affect all instances, which have pdf export enabled. This issue has been fixed by https://github.com/hedgedoc/hedgedoc/commit/c1789474020a6d668d616464cb2da5e90e123f65 and is available in version 1.5.0. Starting the CodiMD/HedgeDoc instance with `CMD_ALLOW_PDF_EXPORT=false` or set `"allowPDFExport": false` in config.json can mitigate this issue for those who cannot upgrade. This exploit works because while PhantomJS doesn't actually render the `file:///` references to the PDF file itself, it still uses them internally, and exfiltration is possible, and easy through JavaScript rendering. The impact is pretty bad, as the attacker is able to read the CodiMD/HedgeDoc `config.json` file as well any other files on the filesystem. Even though the suggested Docker deploy option doesn't have many interesting files itself, the `config.json` still often contains sensitive information, database credentials, and maybe OAuth secrets among other things. | |||||
| CVE-2021-29490 | 1 Jellyfin | 1 Jellyfin | 2021-05-13 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.8 MEDIUM |
| Jellyfin is a free software media system that provides media from a dedicated server to end-user devices via multiple apps. Verions prior to 10.7.3 vulnerable to unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks via the imageUrl parameter. This issue potentially exposes both internal and external HTTP servers or other resources available via HTTP `GET` that are visible from the Jellyfin server. The vulnerability is patched in version 10.7.3. As a workaround, disable external access to the API endpoints `/Items/*/RemoteImages/Download`, `/Items/RemoteSearch/Image` and `/Images/Remote` via reverse proxy, or limit to known-friendly IPs. | |||||
| CVE-2021-29145 | 1 Arubanetworks | 1 Clearpass | 2021-05-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A remote server side request forgery (SSRF) remote code execution vulnerability was discovered in Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager version(s) prior to 6.9.5, 6.8.9, 6.7.14-HF1. Aruba has released patches for Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager that address this security vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31779 | 1 Yoast | 1 Yoast Seo | 2021-05-07 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 6.4 MEDIUM |
| The yoast_seo (aka Yoast SEO) extension before 7.2.1 for TYPO3 allows SSRF via a backend user account. | |||||
| CVE-2020-28943 | 1 Open-xchange | 1 Open-xchange Appsuite | 2021-05-07 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| OX App Suite 7.10.4 and earlier allows SSRF via a snippet. | |||||
| CVE-2020-22002 | 1 Inim | 12 Smartliving 10100l, Smartliving 10100l Firmware, Smartliving 10100lg3 and 9 more | 2021-05-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An Unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Inim Electronics Smartliving SmartLAN/G/SI <=6.x within the GetImage functionality. The application parses user supplied data in the GET parameter 'host' to construct an image request to the service through onvif.cgi. Since no validation is carried out on the parameter, an attacker can specify an external domain and force the application to make an HTTP request to an arbitrary destination host. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15152 | 1 Ftp-srv Project | 1 Ftp-srv | 2021-05-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| ftp-srv is an npm package which is a modern and extensible FTP server designed to be simple yet configurable. In ftp-srv before versions 2.19.6, 3.1.2, and 4.3.4 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery. The PORT command allows arbitrary IPs which can be used to cause the server to make a connection elsewhere. A possible workaround is blocking the PORT through the configuration. This issue is fixed in version2 2.19.6, 3.1.2, and 4.3.4. More information can be found on the linked advisory. | |||||