Search
Total
267 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-9795 | 1 Mozilla | 3 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Thunderbird | 2020-08-24 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability where type-confusion in the IonMonkey just-in-time (JIT) compiler could potentially be used by malicious JavaScript to trigger a potentially exploitable crash. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 60.6, Firefox ESR < 60.6, and Firefox < 66. | |||||
| CVE-2019-7820 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc, Mac Os X and 1 more | 2020-08-24 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20100 and earlier, 2019.010.20099 and earlier, 2017.011.30140 and earlier, 2017.011.30138 and earlier, 2015.006.30495 and earlier, and 2015.006.30493 and earlier have a type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2019-7128 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc, Mac Os X and 1 more | 2020-08-24 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20098 and earlier, 2019.010.20098 and earlier, 2017.011.30127 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30482 and earlier have a type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution . | |||||
| CVE-2019-7087 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc, Mac Os X and 1 more | 2020-08-24 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have a type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution . | |||||
| CVE-2019-7086 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc, Mac Os X and 1 more | 2020-08-24 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have a type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution . | |||||
| CVE-2019-7069 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc, Mac Os X and 1 more | 2020-08-24 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have a type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution . | |||||
| CVE-2019-6215 | 3 Apple, Canonical, Microsoft | 8 Icloud, Iphone Os, Itunes and 5 more | 2020-08-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A type confusion issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in iOS 12.1.3, tvOS 12.1.2, Safari 12.0.3, iTunes 12.9.3 for Windows, iCloud for Windows 7.10. Processing maliciously crafted web content may lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6214 | 1 Apple | 4 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Tv Os and 1 more | 2020-08-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| A type confusion issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in iOS 12.1.3, macOS Mojave 10.14.3, tvOS 12.1.2, watchOS 5.1.3. A malicious application may be able to break out of its sandbox. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5791 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2020-08-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Inappropriate optimization in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to perform an out of bounds memory read via a crafted HTML page. | |||||
| CVE-2019-2130 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2020-08-24 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In CompilationJob::FinalizeJob of compiler.cc, there is a possible remote code execution due to type confusion. This could lead to escalation of privilege from a malicious proxy configuration with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Product: Android. Versions: Android-7.0 Android-7.1.1 Android-7.1.2 Android-8.0 Android-8.1 Android-9. Android ID: A-132073833. | |||||
| CVE-2019-14537 | 1 Yourls | 1 Yourls | 2020-08-24 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| YOURLS through 1.7.3 is affected by a type juggling vulnerability in the api component that can result in login bypass. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11750 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Firefox Esr | 2020-08-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A type confusion vulnerability exists in Spidermonkey, which results in a non-exploitable crash. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 69 and Firefox ESR < 68.1. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11707 | 1 Mozilla | 3 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Thunderbird | 2020-08-24 | 7.5 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A type confusion vulnerability can occur when manipulating JavaScript objects due to issues in Array.pop. This can allow for an exploitable crash. We are aware of targeted attacks in the wild abusing this flaw. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 60.7.1, Firefox < 67.0.3, and Thunderbird < 60.7.2. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11706 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Thunderbird | 2020-08-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A flaw in Thunderbird's implementation of iCal causes a type confusion in icaltimezone_get_vtimezone_properties when processing certain email messages, resulting in a crash. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 60.7.1. | |||||
| CVE-2019-10231 | 1 Teclib-edition | 1 Gestionnaire Libre De Parc Informatique | 2020-08-24 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Teclib GLPI before 9.4.1.1 is affected by a PHP type juggling vulnerability allowing bypass of authentication. This occurs in Auth::checkPassword() (inc/auth.class.php). | |||||
| CVE-2019-0988 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 6 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Internet Explorer, aka 'Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0920, CVE-2019-1005, CVE-2019-1055, CVE-2019-1080. | |||||
| CVE-2019-0920 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 6 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft browsers, aka 'Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0988, CVE-2019-1005, CVE-2019-1055, CVE-2019-1080. | |||||
| CVE-2019-0810 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Chakracore, Edge, Windows 10 and 2 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka 'Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0806, CVE-2019-0812, CVE-2019-0829, CVE-2019-0860, CVE-2019-0861. | |||||
| CVE-2019-0752 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 6 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Internet Explorer, aka 'Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0739, CVE-2019-0753, CVE-2019-0862. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8384 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Chakracore | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8266, CVE-2018-8380, CVE-2018-8381. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8298 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Chakracore | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the ChakraCore scripting engine handles objects in memory, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8242, CVE-2018-8283, CVE-2018-8287, CVE-2018-8288, CVE-2018-8291, CVE-2018-8296. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8291 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Chakracore, Edge, Internet Explorer and 7 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft browsers, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects ChakraCore, Internet Explorer 11, Microsoft Edge. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8242, CVE-2018-8283, CVE-2018-8287, CVE-2018-8288, CVE-2018-8296, CVE-2018-8298. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8279 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Chakracore, Edge, Windows 10 | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Microsoft Edge improperly accesses objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Edge Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8125, CVE-2018-8262, CVE-2018-8274, CVE-2018-8275, CVE-2018-8301. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8229 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Chakracore, Edge, Windows 10 and 1 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8227. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8133 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Chakracore, Edge | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0943, CVE-2018-8130, CVE-2018-8145, CVE-2018-8177. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15656 | 2 Mozilla, Opensuse | 4 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Thunderbird and 1 more | 2020-08-18 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| JIT optimizations involving the Javascript arguments object could confuse later optimizations. This risk was already mitigated by various precautions in the code, resulting in this bug rated at only moderate severity. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 78.1, Firefox < 79, and Thunderbird < 78.1. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17639 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Openj9 | 2020-08-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In Eclipse OpenJ9 prior to version 0.21 on Power platforms, calling the System.arraycopy method with a length longer than the length of the source or destination array can, in certain specially crafted code patterns, cause the current method to return prematurely with an undefined return value. This allows whatever value happens to be in the return register at that time to be used as if it matches the method's declared return type. | |||||
| CVE-2020-16229 | 1 Advantech | 1 Webaccess\/hmi Designer | 2020-08-10 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Advantech WebAccess HMI Designer, Versions 2.1.9.31 and prior. Processing specially crafted project files lacking proper validation of user supplied data may cause a type confusion condition, which may allow remote code execution, disclosure/modification of information, or cause the application to crash. | |||||
| CVE-2010-2299 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2020-08-05 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| The Clipboard::DispatchObject function in app/clipboard/clipboard.cc in Google Chrome before 5.0.375.70 does not properly handle CBF_SMBITMAP objects in a ViewHostMsg_ClipboardWriteObjectsAsync message, which might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors involving crafted data from the renderer process, related to a "Type Confusion" issue. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1421 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 10, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019 | 2020-07-23 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Windows that could allow remote code execution if a .LNK file is processed.An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the local user, aka 'LNK Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9261 | 1 Huawei | 2 Mate 30, Mate 30 Firmware | 2020-07-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| HUAWEI Mate 30 with versions earlier than 10.1.0.150(C00E136R5P3) have a type confusion vulnerability. The system does not properly check and transform the type of certain variable, the attacker tricks the user into installing then running a crafted application, successful exploit could cause code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10913 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2020-07-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the OCRAndExportToExcel command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9946. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5754 | 1 Webroot | 1 Endpoint Agents | 2020-06-22 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Webroot endpoint agents prior to version v9.0.28.48 allows remote attackers to trigger a type confusion vulnerability over its listening TCP port, resulting in crashing or reading memory contents of the Webroot endpoint agent. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9800 | 1 Apple | 7 Icloud, Ipad Os, Iphone Os and 4 more | 2020-06-11 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A type confusion issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in iOS 13.5 and iPadOS 13.5, tvOS 13.4.5, watchOS 6.2.5, Safari 13.1.1, iTunes 12.10.7 for Windows, iCloud for Windows 11.2, iCloud for Windows 7.19. Processing maliciously crafted web content may lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2011-2875 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2020-05-08 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Google V8, as used in Google Chrome before 14.0.835.163, does not properly perform object sealing, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact via vectors that leverage "type confusion." | |||||
| CVE-2019-15792 | 2 Canonical, Linux | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Linux Kernel | 2020-05-01 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| In shiftfs, a non-upstream patch to the Linux kernel included in the Ubuntu 5.0 and 5.3 kernel series, shiftfs_btrfs_ioctl_fd_replace() calls fdget(oldfd), then without further checks passes the resulting file* into shiftfs_real_fdget(), which casts file->private_data, a void* that points to a filesystem-dependent type, to a "struct shiftfs_file_info *". As the private_data is not required to be a pointer, an attacker can use this to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10912 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the SetFieldValue command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9945. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10911 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the GetFieldValue command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9944. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10910 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the RotatePage command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9943. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10909 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the AddWatermark command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9942. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10908 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the Export command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9865. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10891 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the Save command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9831. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10889 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the DuplicatePages command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9828. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10611 | 1 Trianglemicroworks | 1 Scada Data Gateway | 2020-04-22 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Triangle MicroWorks SCADA Data Gateway 3.02.0697 through 4.0.122, 2.41.0213 through 4.0.122 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code due to the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. Only applicable to installations using DNP3 Data Sets. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11603 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2020-04-09 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with P(9.0) and Q(10.0) (incorporating TEEGRIS) software. Type confusion in the MLDAP Trustlet allows arbitrary code execution. The Samsung ID is SVE-2020-16599 (April 2020). | |||||
| CVE-2019-20588 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2020-03-30 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with O(8.x) and P(9.0) (with TEEGRIS) software. There is type confusion in the SEM Trustlet, leading to arbitrary code execution. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-14891 (August 2019). | |||||
| CVE-2019-20589 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2020-03-30 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with O(8.x) and P(9.0) (with TEEGRIS) software. There is type confusion in the SKPM Trustlet, leading to arbitrary code execution. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-14892 (August 2019). | |||||
| CVE-2019-20587 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2020-03-27 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with O(8.1) and P(9.0) (with TEEGRIS) software. There is type confusion in the MLDAP Trustlet, leading to arbitrary code execution. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-14867 (August 2019). | |||||
| CVE-2019-20586 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2020-03-27 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with O(8.1) and P(9.0) (with TEEGRIS) software. There is type confusion in the FINGERPRINT Trustlet, leading to arbitrary code execution. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-14864 (August 2019). | |||||
| CVE-2019-20585 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2020-03-27 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with O(8.x) and P(9.0) (with TEEGRIS) software. There is type confusion in the SEC_FR Trustlet, leading to arbitrary code execution. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-14851 (August 2019). | |||||