Search
Total
6424 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-16290 | 1 Artifex | 1 Ghostscript | 2020-08-31 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability in jetp3852_print_page() in devices/gdev3852.c of Artifex Software GhostScript v9.50 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via a crafted PDF file. This is fixed in v9.51. | |||||
| CVE-2020-16289 | 1 Artifex | 1 Ghostscript | 2020-08-31 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability in cif_print_page() in devices/gdevcif.c of Artifex Software GhostScript v9.50 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via a crafted PDF file. This is fixed in v9.51. | |||||
| CVE-2020-16291 | 1 Artifex | 1 Ghostscript | 2020-08-31 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability in contrib/gdevdj9.c of Artifex Software GhostScript v9.50 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via a crafted PDF file. This is fixed in v9.51. | |||||
| CVE-2020-16292 | 1 Artifex | 1 Ghostscript | 2020-08-31 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability in mj_raster_cmd() in contrib/japanese/gdevmjc.c of Artifex Software GhostScript v9.50 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via a crafted PDF file. This is fixed in v9.51. | |||||
| CVE-2020-16287 | 1 Artifex | 1 Ghostscript | 2020-08-31 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability in lprn_is_black() in contrib/lips4/gdevlprn.c of Artifex Software GhostScript v9.50 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via a crafted PDF file. This is fixed in v9.51. | |||||
| CVE-2020-16300 | 1 Artifex | 1 Ghostscript | 2020-08-31 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability in tiff12_print_page() in devices/gdevtfnx.c of Artifex Software GhostScript v9.50 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via a crafted PDF file. This is fixed in v9.51. | |||||
| CVE-2020-16297 | 1 Artifex | 1 Ghostscript | 2020-08-31 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability in FloydSteinbergDitheringC() in contrib/gdevbjca.c of Artifex Software GhostScript v9.50 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via a crafted PDF file. This is fixed in v9.51. | |||||
| CVE-2020-16296 | 1 Artifex | 1 Ghostscript | 2020-08-31 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability in GetNumWrongData() in contrib/lips4/gdevlips.c of Artifex Software GhostScript v9.50 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via a crafted PDF file. This is fixed in v9.51. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10636 | 1 Deltaww | 2 Cncsoft, Screeneditor | 2020-08-31 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| CNCSoft Version 1.00.83 and prior with ScreenEditor Version 1.00.54 has multiple stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities that could cause the software to crash due to lacking user input validation before copying data from project files onto the stack. Which may allow an attacker to gain remote code execution with administrator privileges if exploited. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10620 | 1 Aveva | 2 Indusoft Web Studio, Intouch Machine 2017 | 2020-08-31 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| AVEVA InduSoft Web Studio v8.1 and v8.1SP1, and InTouch Machine Edition v2017 8.1 and v2017 8.1 SP1 a remote user could send a carefully crafted packet to exploit a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability during tag, alarm, or event related actions such as read and write, with potential for code to be executed. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1046 | 1 Powerdns | 1 Pdns | 2020-08-31 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| pdns before version 4.1.2 is vulnerable to a buffer overflow in dnsreplay. In the dnsreplay tool provided with PowerDNS Authoritative, replaying a specially crafted PCAP file can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow, leading to a crash and potentially arbitrary code execution. This buffer overflow only occurs when the -ecs-stamp option of dnsreplay is used. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13290 | 1 Artifex | 1 Mupdf | 2020-08-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Artifex MuPDF 1.15.0 has a heap-based buffer overflow in fz_append_display_node located at fitz/list-device.c, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted PDF file. This occurs with a large BDC property name that overflows the allocated size of a display list node. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14818 | 1 We-con | 2 Pi Studio, Pi Studio Hmi | 2020-08-28 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| WECON Technology Co., Ltd. PI Studio HMI versions 4.1.9 and prior and PI Studio versions 4.2.34 and prior have a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability which may allow remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14823 | 1 Fujielectric | 2 V-server, V-server Firmware | 2020-08-28 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Fuji Electric V-Server 4.0.3.0 and prior, A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability has been identified, which may allow remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14813 | 1 Fujielectric | 2 V-server, V-server Firmware | 2020-08-28 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Fuji Electric V-Server 4.0.3.0 and prior, A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability has been identified, which may allow remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14633 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Linux and 1 more | 8 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Linux Kernel and 5 more | 2020-08-28 | 8.3 HIGH | 7.0 HIGH |
| A security flaw was found in the chap_server_compute_md5() function in the ISCSI target code in the Linux kernel in a way an authentication request from an ISCSI initiator is processed. An unauthenticated remote attacker can cause a stack buffer overflow and smash up to 17 bytes of the stack. The attack requires the iSCSI target to be enabled on the victim host. Depending on how the target's code was built (i.e. depending on a compiler, compile flags and hardware architecture) an attack may lead to a system crash and thus to a denial-of-service or possibly to a non-authorized access to data exported by an iSCSI target. Due to the nature of the flaw, privilege escalation cannot be fully ruled out, although we believe it is highly unlikely. Kernel versions 4.18.x, 4.14.x and 3.10.x are believed to be vulnerable. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14816 | 1 Advantech | 1 Webaccess | 2020-08-28 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Advantech WebAccess 8.3.1 and earlier has several stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities that have been identified, which may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1171 | 2 Joyent, Oracle | 2 Smartos, Solaris | 2020-08-28 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on vulnerable installations of Joyent SmartOS release-20170803-20170803T064301Z. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the DTrace DOF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the host OS. Was ZDI-CAN-5106. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10840 | 3 Canonical, Linux, Redhat | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux | 2020-08-28 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.6 MEDIUM |
| Linux kernel is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow in the fs/ext4/xattr.c:ext4_xattr_set_entry() function. An attacker could exploit this by operating on a mounted crafted ext4 image. | |||||
| CVE-2012-3957 | 5 Canonical, Mozilla, Opensuse and 2 more | 15 Ubuntu Linux, Firefox, Firefox Esr and 12 more | 2020-08-28 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in the nsBlockFrame::MarkLineDirty function in Mozilla Firefox before 15.0, Firefox ESR 10.x before 10.0.7, Thunderbird before 15.0, Thunderbird ESR 10.x before 10.0.7, and SeaMonkey before 2.12 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10606 | 1 We-con | 1 Levistudiou | 2020-08-28 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| WECON LeviStudio Versions 1.8.29 and 1.8.44 have multiple heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities that can be exploited when the application processes specially crafted project files. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10602 | 1 We-con | 1 Levistudiou | 2020-08-28 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| WECON LeviStudio Versions 1.8.29 and 1.8.44 have multiple stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities that can be exploited when the application processes specially crafted project files. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13952 | 1 Gdnsd | 1 Gdnsd | 2020-08-27 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The set_ipv6() function in zscan_rfc1035.rl in gdnsd before 2.4.3 and 3.x before 3.2.1 has a stack-based buffer overflow via a long and malformed IPv6 address in zone data. | |||||
| CVE-2020-24055 | 1 Verint | 4 4320, 4320 Firmware, 5620ptz and 1 more | 2020-08-27 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Verint 5620PTZ Verint_FW_0_42 and Verint 4320 V4320_FW_0_23, and V4320_FW_0_31 units feature an autodiscovery service implemented in the binary executable '/usr/sbin/DM' that listens on port TCP 6666. The service is vulnerable to a stack buffer overflow. It is worth noting that this service does not require any authentication. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4587 | 1 Ibm | 2 Connect\, Sterling Connect\ | 2020-08-27 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| IBM Sterling Connect:Direct for UNIX 4.2.0, 4.3.0, 6.0.0, and 6.1.0 is vulnerable to a stack based buffer ovreflow, caused by improper bounds checking. A local attacker could manipulate CD UNIX to obtain root provileges. IBM X-Force ID: 184578. | |||||
| CVE-2020-14934 | 1 Contiki-ng | 1 Contiki-ng | 2020-08-25 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Buffer overflows were discovered in Contiki-NG 4.4 through 4.5, in the SNMP agent. The function parsing the received SNMP request does not verify the input message's requested variables against the capacity of the internal SNMP engine buffer. If the number of variables in the request exceeds the allocated buffer, a memory write out of the buffer boundaries occurs. This write operation provides a possibility to overwrite other variables allocated in the .bss section by the application. Because the sender of the frame is in control of the content that will be written beyond the buffer limits, and there is no strict process memory separation, this issue may allow overwriting of sensitive memory areas of an IoT device. | |||||
| CVE-2020-14935 | 1 Contiki-ng | 1 Contiki-ng | 2020-08-25 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Buffer overflows were discovered in Contiki-NG 4.4 through 4.5, in the SNMP bulk get request response encoding function. The function parsing the received SNMP request does not verify the input message's requested variables against the capacity of the internal SNMP engine buffer. When a bulk get request response is assembled, a stack buffer dedicated for OIDs (with a limited capacity) is allocated in snmp_engine_get_bulk(). When snmp_engine_get_bulk() is populating the stack buffer, an overflow condition may occur due to lack of input length validation. This makes it possible to overwrite stack regions beyond the allocated buffer, including the return address from the function. As a result, the code execution path may be redirected to an address provided in the SNMP bulk get payload. If the target architecture uses common addressing space for program and data memory, it may also be possible to supply code in the SNMP request payload, and redirect the execution path to the remotely injected code, by modifying the function's return address. | |||||
| CVE-2020-14936 | 1 Contiki-ng | 1 Contiki-ng | 2020-08-25 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Buffer overflows were discovered in Contiki-NG 4.4 through 4.5, in the SNMP agent. Functions parsing the OIDs in SNMP requests lack sufficient allocated target-buffer capacity verification when writing parsed OID values. The function snmp_oid_decode_oid() may overwrite memory areas beyond the provided target buffer, when called from snmp_message_decode() upon an SNMP request reception. Because the content of the write operations is externally provided in the SNMP requests, it enables a remote overwrite of an IoT device's memory regions beyond the allocated buffer. This overflow may allow remote overwrite of stack and statically allocated variables memory regions by sending a crafted SNMP request. | |||||
| CVE-2020-14937 | 1 Contiki-ng | 1 Contiki-ng | 2020-08-25 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Memory access out of buffer boundaries issues was discovered in Contiki-NG 4.4 through 4.5, in the SNMP BER encoder/decoder. The length of provided input/output buffers is insufficiently verified during the encoding and decoding of data. This may lead to out-of-bounds buffer read or write access in BER decoding and encoding functions. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15629 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 Foxit Studio Photo, Windows | 2020-08-25 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Studio Photo 3.6.6.922. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of TIF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-10764. | |||||
| CVE-2020-19891 | 1 Dbhcms Project | 1 Dbhcms | 2020-08-25 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| DBHcms v1.2.0 has an Arbitrary file write vulnerability in dbhcms\mod\mod.editor.php $_POST['updatefile'] is filename and $_POST['tinymce_content'] is file content, there is no filter function for security. A remote authenticated admin user can exploit this vulnerability to get a webshell. | |||||
| CVE-2019-0993 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Chakracore, Edge, Windows 10 and 2 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka 'Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0989, CVE-2019-0991, CVE-2019-0992, CVE-2019-1002, CVE-2019-1003, CVE-2019-1024, CVE-2019-1051, CVE-2019-1052. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1001 | 1 Microsoft | 11 Chakracore, Edge, Internet Explorer and 8 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft browsers, aka 'Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1004, CVE-2019-1056, CVE-2019-1059. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1002 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka 'Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0989, CVE-2019-0991, CVE-2019-0992, CVE-2019-0993, CVE-2019-1003, CVE-2019-1024, CVE-2019-1051, CVE-2019-1052. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1003 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Chakracore, Edge, Windows 10 and 2 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka 'Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0989, CVE-2019-0991, CVE-2019-0992, CVE-2019-0993, CVE-2019-1002, CVE-2019-1024, CVE-2019-1051, CVE-2019-1052. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1004 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 6 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Internet Explorer, aka 'Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1001, CVE-2019-1056, CVE-2019-1059. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1005 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 6 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft browsers, aka 'Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0920, CVE-2019-0988, CVE-2019-1055, CVE-2019-1080. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1010006 | 1 Gnome | 1 Evince | 2020-08-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Evince 3.26.0 is affected by buffer overflow. The impact is: DOS / Possible code execution. The component is: backend/tiff/tiff-document.c. The attack vector is: Victim must open a crafted PDF file. The issue occurs because of an incorrect integer overflow protection mechanism in tiff_document_render and tiff_document_get_thumbnail. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1010293 | 1 Linaro | 1 Op-tee | 2020-08-24 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Linaro/OP-TEE OP-TEE 3.3.0 and earlier is affected by: Boundary crossing. The impact is: Memory corruption of the TEE itself. The component is: optee_os. The fixed version is: 3.4.0 and later. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1024 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Chakracore, Edge, Windows 10 and 1 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka 'Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0989, CVE-2019-0991, CVE-2019-0992, CVE-2019-0993, CVE-2019-1002, CVE-2019-1003, CVE-2019-1051, CVE-2019-1052. | |||||
| CVE-2019-10269 | 1 Burrow-wheeler Aligner Project | 1 Burrow-wheeler Aligner | 2020-08-24 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| BWA (aka Burrow-Wheeler Aligner) before 2019-01-23 has a stack-based buffer overflow in the bns_restore function in bntseq.c via a long sequence name in a .alt file. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1038 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Edge, Internet Explorer, Windows 10 and 7 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft browsers access objects in memory, aka 'Microsoft Browser Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1051 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Chakracore, Edge, Windows 10 and 2 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka 'Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0989, CVE-2019-0991, CVE-2019-0992, CVE-2019-0993, CVE-2019-1002, CVE-2019-1003, CVE-2019-1024, CVE-2019-1052. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1052 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Chakracore, Edge, Windows 10 and 2 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka 'Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0989, CVE-2019-0991, CVE-2019-0992, CVE-2019-0993, CVE-2019-1002, CVE-2019-1003, CVE-2019-1024, CVE-2019-1051. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1055 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 6 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft browsers, aka 'Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0920, CVE-2019-0988, CVE-2019-1005, CVE-2019-1080. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1056 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 5 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Internet Explorer, aka 'Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1001, CVE-2019-1004, CVE-2019-1059. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1059 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 6 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Internet Explorer, aka 'Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1001, CVE-2019-1004, CVE-2019-1056. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1062 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Chakracore, Edge, Windows 10 and 2 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka 'Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1092, CVE-2019-1103, CVE-2019-1106, CVE-2019-1107. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1063 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 6 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Internet Explorer improperly accesses objects in memory, aka 'Internet Explorer Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1080 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 6 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft browsers, aka 'Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0920, CVE-2019-0988, CVE-2019-1005, CVE-2019-1055. | |||||