Search
Total
3999 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-24487 | 1 Sanskruti | 1 St-daily-tip | 2022-07-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The St-Daily-Tip WordPress plugin through 4.7 does not have any CSRF check in place when saving its 'Default Text to Display if no tips' setting, and was also lacking sanitisation as well as escaping before outputting it the page. This could allow attacker to make logged in administrators set a malicious payload in it, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue | |||||
| CVE-2021-24730 | 1 Infornweb | 1 Logo Showcase With Slick Slider | 2022-07-29 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Logo Showcase with Slick Slider WordPress plugin before 1.2.5 does not have CSRF and authorisation checks in the lswss_save_attachment_data AJAX action, allowing any authenticated users, such as Subscriber, to change title, description, alt text, and URL of arbitrary uploaded media. | |||||
| CVE-2021-24543 | 1 Jquery-reply-to-comment Project | 1 Jquery-reply-to-comment | 2022-07-29 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| The jQuery Reply to Comment WordPress plugin through 1.31 does not have any CSRF check when saving its settings, nor sanitise or escape its 'Quote String' and 'Reply String' settings before outputting them in Comments, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue. | |||||
| CVE-2021-24581 | 1 Blue-admin Project | 1 Blue-admin | 2022-07-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The Blue Admin WordPress plugin through 21.06.01 does not sanitise or escape its "Logo Title" setting before outputting in a page, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue. Furthermore, the plugin does not have CSRF check in place when saving its settings, allowing the issue to be exploited via a CSRF attack. | |||||
| CVE-2021-24431 | 1 Language Bar Flags Project | 1 Language Bar Flags | 2022-07-29 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Language Bar Flags WordPress plugin through 1.0.8 does not have any CSRF in place when saving its settings and did not sanitise or escape them when generating the flag bar in the frontend. This could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change the settings, and set Cross-Site Scripting payload in them, which will be executed in the frontend for all users | |||||
| CVE-2021-24388 | 1 E4j | 1 Vikrentcar Car Rental Management System | 2022-07-29 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| In the VikRentCar Car Rental Management System WordPress plugin before 1.1.7, there is a custom filed option by which we can manage all the fields that the users will have to fill in before saving the order. However, the field name is not sanitised or escaped before being output back in the page, leading to a stored Cross-Site Scripting issue. There is also no CSRF check done before saving the setting, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin set arbitrary Custom Fields, including one with XSS payload in it. | |||||
| CVE-2021-24504 | 1 Wplearnmanager | 1 Wp Learn Manager | 2022-07-29 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| The WP LMS – Best WordPress LMS Plugin WordPress plugin through 1.1.2 does not properly sanitise or validate its User Field Titles, allowing XSS payload to be used in them. Furthermore, no CSRF and capability checks were in place, allowing such attack to be performed either via CSRF or as any user (including unauthenticated) | |||||
| CVE-2021-24584 | 1 Motopress | 1 Timetable And Event Schedule | 2022-07-29 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| The Timetable and Event Schedule WordPress plugin before 2.4.2 does not have proper access control when updating a timeslot, allowing any user with the edit_posts capability (contributor+) to update arbitrary timeslot from any events. Furthermore, no CSRF check is in place as well, allowing such attack to be perform via CSRF against a logged in with such capability. In versions before 2.3.19, the lack of sanitisation and escaping in some of the fields, like the descritption could also lead to Stored XSS issues | |||||
| CVE-2021-24586 | 1 Evona | 1 Per Page Add To Head | 2022-07-29 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Per page add to head WordPress plugin before 1.4.4 is lacking any CSRF check when saving its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them. Furthermore, as the plugin allows arbitrary HTML to be inserted in one of the setting (feature mentioned by the plugin), this could lead to Stored XSS issue which will be triggered either in the backend, frontend or both depending on the payload used. | |||||
| CVE-2021-24595 | 1 Wp Cookie Choice Project | 1 Wp Cookie Choice | 2022-07-29 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The Wp Cookie Choice WordPress plugin through 1.1.0 is lacking any CSRF check when saving its options, and do not escape them when outputting them in attributes. As a result, an attacker could make a logged in admin change them to arbitrary values including XSS payloads via a CSRF attack. | |||||
| CVE-2021-24555 | 1 Roosty | 1 Diary-availability-calendar | 2022-07-29 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The daac_delete_booking_callback function, hooked to the daac_delete_booking AJAX action, takes the id POST parameter which is passed into the SQL statement without proper sanitisation, validation or escaping, leading to a SQL Injection issue. Furthermore, the ajax action is lacking any CSRF and capability check, making it available to any authenticated user. | |||||
| CVE-2021-24683 | 1 Awplife | 1 Weather Effect | 2022-07-29 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| The Weather Effect WordPress plugin before 1.3.4 does not have any CSRF checks in place when saving its settings, and do not validate or escape them, which could lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue. | |||||
| CVE-2021-24615 | 1 Wechat Reward Project | 1 Wechat Reward | 2022-07-29 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| The Wechat Reward WordPress plugin through 1.7 does not sanitise or escape its QR settings, nor has any CSRF check in place, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin change the settings and perform Cross-Site Scripting attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2021-24685 | 1 Flat Preloader Project | 1 Flat Preloader | 2022-07-29 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| The Flat Preloader WordPress plugin before 1.5.4 does not enforce nonce checks when saving its settings, as well as does not sanitise and escape them, which could allow attackers to a make logged in admin change them with a Cross-Site Scripting payload (triggered either in the frontend or backend depending on the payload) | |||||
| CVE-2021-24467 | 1 Leaflet Map Project | 1 Leaflet Map | 2022-07-29 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The Leaflet Map WordPress plugin before 3.0.0 does not verify the CSRF nonce when saving its settings, which allows attackers to make a logged in admin update the settings via a Cross-Site Request Forgery attack. This could lead to Cross-Site Scripting issues by either changing the URL of the JavaScript library being used, or using malicious attributions which will be executed in all page with an embed map from the plugin | |||||
| CVE-2021-24434 | 1 Codeblab | 1 Glass | 2022-07-29 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| The Glass WordPress plugin through 1.3.2 does not sanitise or escape its "Glass Pages" setting before outputting in a page, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue. Furthermore, the plugin did not have CSRF check in place when saving its settings, allowing the issue to be exploited via a CSRF attack. | |||||
| CVE-2021-24626 | 1 Chameleon Css Project | 1 Chameleon Css | 2022-07-29 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The Chameleon CSS WordPress plugin through 1.2 does not have any CSRF and capability checks in all its AJAX calls, allowing any authenticated user, such as subscriber to call them and perform unauthorised actions. One of AJAX call, remove_css, also does not sanitise or escape the css_id POST parameter before using it in a SQL statement, leading to a SQL Injection | |||||
| CVE-2021-24642 | 1 Scroll Banner Project | 1 Scroll Banner | 2022-07-29 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The Scroll Baner WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have CSRF check in place when saving its settings, nor perform any sanitisation, escaping or validation on them. This could allow attackers to make logged in admin change them and could lead to RCE (via a file upload) as well as XSS | |||||
| CVE-2021-24618 | 1 Wbolt | 1 Donate With Qrcode | 2022-07-29 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| The Donate With QRCode WordPress plugin before 1.4.5 does not sanitise or escape its QRCode Image setting, which result into a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). Furthermore, the plugin also does not have any CSRF and capability checks in place when saving such setting, allowing any authenticated user (as low as subscriber), or unauthenticated user via a CSRF vector to update them and perform such attack. | |||||
| CVE-2021-24639 | 1 Ffw | 1 Omgf | 2022-07-29 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| The OMGF WordPress plugin before 4.5.4 does not enforce path validation, authorisation and CSRF checks in the omgf_ajax_empty_dir AJAX action, which allows any authenticated users to delete arbitrary files or folders on the server. | |||||
| CVE-2021-24570 | 1 Wpplugin | 1 Accept Donations With Paypal | 2022-07-29 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Accept Donations with PayPal WordPress plugin before 1.3.1 offers a function to create donation buttons, which internally are posts. The process to create a new button is lacking a CSRF check. An attacker could use this to make an authenticated admin create a new button. Furthermore, one of the Button field is not escaped before being output in an attribute when editing a Button, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue as well. | |||||
| CVE-2021-24565 | 1 Contact Form 7 Captcha Project | 1 Contact Form 7 Captcha | 2022-07-28 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The Contact Form 7 Captcha WordPress plugin before 0.0.9 does not have any CSRF check in place when saving its settings, allowing attacker to make a logged in user with the manage_options change them. Furthermore, the settings are not escaped when output in attributes, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue. | |||||
| CVE-2022-34367 | 1 Dell | 1 Emc Data Protection Central | 2022-07-27 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Dell EMC Data Protection Central versions 19.1, 19.2, 19.3, 19.4, 19.5, 19.6, contain(s) a Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability. A(n) remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to processing of unintended server operations. | |||||
| CVE-2022-20861 | 1 Cisco | 1 Nexus Dashboard | 2022-07-27 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Nexus Dashboard could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands, read or upload container image files, or perform a cross-site request forgery attack. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. | |||||
| CVE-2022-36908 | 2022-07-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins OpenShift Deployer Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier allows attackers to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system and to upload a SSH key file from the Jenkins controller file system to an attacker-specified URL. | |||||
| CVE-2022-36906 | 2022-07-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins OpenShift Deployer Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified username and password. | |||||
| CVE-2022-36920 | 2022-07-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Coverity Plugin 1.11.4 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins. | |||||
| CVE-2022-36916 | 2022-07-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Google Cloud Backup Plugin 0.6 and earlier allows attackers to request a manual backup. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22359 | 1 Ibm | 2 Partner Engagement Manager, Partner Engagement Manager On Cloud\/saas | 2022-07-27 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Sterling Partner Engagement Manager 6.1.2, 6.2, and Cloud/SasS 22.2 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 220652. | |||||
| CVE-2022-29495 | 1 Sygnoos | 1 Popup Builder | 2022-07-26 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sygnoos Popup Builder plugin <= 4.1.11 at WordPress allows an attacker to update plugin settings. | |||||
| CVE-2022-29454 | 1 Wordplus | 1 Better Messages | 2022-07-26 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPlus Better Messages plugin <= 1.9.9.148 at WordPress allows attackers to upload files. File attachment to messages must be activated. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22686 | 2022-07-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webapi component in Synology Calendar before 2.3.4-0631 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32320 | 2 Ferdium, Getferdi | 2 Ferdium, Ferdi | 2022-07-25 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Ferdi through 5.8.1 and Ferdium through 6.0.0-nightly.98 allows attackers to read files via an uploaded file such as a settings/preferences file. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5397 | 2 Oracle, Vmware | 27 Application Testing Suite, Communications Brm - Elastic Charging Engine, Communications Diameter Signaling Router and 24 more | 2022-07-25 | 2.6 LOW | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3 are vulnerable to CSRF attacks through CORS preflight requests that target Spring MVC (spring-webmvc module) or Spring WebFlux (spring-webflux module) endpoints. Only non-authenticated endpoints are vulnerable because preflight requests should not include credentials and therefore requests should fail authentication. However a notable exception to this are Chrome based browsers when using client certificates for authentication since Chrome sends TLS client certificates in CORS preflight requests in violation of spec requirements. No HTTP body can be sent or received as a result of this attack. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17495 | 2 Oracle, Smartbear | 6 Banking Apis, Banking Digital Experience, Banking Platform and 3 more | 2022-07-25 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) injection vulnerability in Swagger UI before 3.23.11 allows attackers to use the Relative Path Overwrite (RPO) technique to perform CSS-based input field value exfiltration, such as exfiltration of a CSRF token value. In other words, this product intentionally allows the embedding of untrusted JSON data from remote servers, but it was not previously known that <style>@import within the JSON data was a functional attack method. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2001 | 1 Devrix | 1 Dx Share Selection | 2022-07-25 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| The DX Share Selection plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including 1.4. This is due to missing nonce protection on the dxss_admin_page() function found in the ~/dx-share-selection.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts into the page, granted they can trick a site's administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2223 | 1 Ghozylab | 1 Image Slider | 2022-07-25 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The WordPress plugin Image Slider is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including 1.1.121 due to failure to properly check for the existence of a nonce in the function ewic_duplicate_slider. This make it possible for unauthenticated attackers to duplicate existing posts or pages granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2435 | 1 Anymind | 1 Anymind Widget | 2022-07-25 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| The AnyMind Widget plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including 1.1. This is due to missing nonce protection on the createDOMStructure() function found in the ~/anymind-widget-id.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts into the page, granted they can trick a site’s administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38868 | 1 Ibm | 1 Engineering Requirements Quality Assistant On-premises | 2022-07-25 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Engineering Requirements Quality Assistant On-Premises (All versions) is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force Id: 208310. | |||||
| CVE-2022-30337 | 1 Joomunited | 1 Wp Meta Seo | 2022-07-25 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in JoomUnited WP Meta SEO plugin <= 4.4.8 at WordPress allows an attacker to update the social settings. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32289 | 1 Sygnoos | 1 Popup Builder | 2022-07-25 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sygnoos Popup Builder plugin <= 4.1.0 at WordPress leading to popup status change. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1912 | 1 Smartsoft | 1 Button Widget Smartsoft | 2022-07-25 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| The Button Widget Smartsoft plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the smartsoftbutton_settings page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugins settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1672 | 1 Insights From Google Pagespeed Project | 1 Insights From Google Pagespeed | 2022-07-18 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The Insights from Google PageSpeed WordPress plugin before 4.0.7 does not verify for CSRF before doing various actions such as deleting Custom URLs, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin perform such actions via CSRF attacks | |||||
| CVE-2022-2091 | 1 Cache Images Project | 1 Cache Images | 2022-07-18 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The Cache Images WordPress plugin before 3.2.1 does not implement nonce checks, which could allow attackers to make any logged user upload images via a CSRF attack. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2144 | 1 Jquery Validation For Contact Form 7 Project | 1 Jquery Validation For Contact Form 7 | 2022-07-18 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Jquery Validation For Contact Form 7 WordPress plugin before 5.3 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change Blog options like default_role, users_can_register via a CSRF attack | |||||
| CVE-2020-35773 | 1 Freehtmldesigns | 1 Site Offline | 2022-07-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The site-offline plugin before 1.4.4 for WordPress lacks certain wp_create_nonce and wp_verify_nonce calls, aka CSRF. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2123 | 1 Wp Opt-in Project | 1 Wp Opt-in | 2022-07-15 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The WP Opt-in WordPress plugin through 1.4.1 is vulnerable to CSRF which allows changed plugin settings and can be used for sending spam emails. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1957 | 1 Comment License Project | 1 Comment License | 2022-07-15 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Comment License WordPress plugin before 1.4.0 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack | |||||
| CVE-2022-1956 | 1 Shortcut Macros Project | 1 Shortcut Macros | 2022-07-15 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The Shortcut Macros WordPress plugin through 1.3 does not have authorisation and CSRF checks in place when updating its settings, which could allow any authenticated users, such as subscriber, to update them. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1757 | 1 Pagebar Project | 1 Pagebar | 2022-07-15 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| The Pagebar WordPress plugin through 2.65 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack. Furthermore, due to the lack of sanitisation in some of them, it could also lead to Stored XSS issues | |||||