Search
Total
271 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-13845 | 1 Sylabs | 1 Singularity | 2020-09-18 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Sylabs Singularity 3.0 through 3.5 has Improper Validation of an Integrity Check Value. Image integrity is not validated when an ECL policy is enforced. The fingerprint required by the ECL is compared against the signature object descriptor(s) in the SIF file, rather than to a cryptographically validated signature. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0114 | 1 Cisco | 1 Node-jose | 2020-09-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the Cisco node-jose open source library before 0.11.0 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to re-sign tokens using a key that is embedded within the token. The vulnerability is due to node-jose following the JSON Web Signature (JWS) standard for JSON Web Tokens (JWTs). This standard specifies that a JSON Web Key (JWK) representing a public key can be embedded within the header of a JWS. This public key is then trusted for verification. An attacker could exploit this by forging valid JWS objects by removing the original signature, adding a new public key to the header, and then signing the object using the (attacker-owned) private key associated with the public key embedded in that JWS header. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3465 | 3 Debian, Simplesamlphp, Xmlseclibs Project | 3 Debian Linux, Simplesamlphp, Xmlseclibs | 2020-08-24 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Rob Richards XmlSecLibs, all versions prior to v3.0.3, as used for example by SimpleSAMLphp, performed incorrect validation of cryptographic signatures in XML messages, allowing an authenticated attacker to impersonate others or elevate privileges by creating a crafted XML message. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6318 | 1 Hp | 286 Color Laserjet Cm4540 Mfp, Color Laserjet Cm4540 Mfp Firmware, Color Laserjet Enterprise Cp5525 and 283 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| HP LaserJet Enterprise printers, HP PageWide Enterprise printers, HP LaserJet Managed printers, HP Officejet Enterprise printers have an insufficient solution bundle signature validation that potentially allows execution of arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2019-15545 | 1 Libp2p | 1 Libp2p | 2020-08-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in the libp2p-core crate before 0.8.1 for Rust. Attackers can spoof ed25519 signatures. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1010263 | 1 Perl Crypt\ | 1 \ | 2020-08-24 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Perl Crypt::JWT prior to 0.023 is affected by: Incorrect Access Control. The impact is: allow attackers to bypass authentication by providing a token by crafting with hmac(). The component is: JWT.pm, line 614. The attack vector is: network connectivity. The fixed version is: after commit b98a59b42ded9f9e51b2560410106207c2152d6c. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11755 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Thunderbird | 2020-08-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A crafted S/MIME message consisting of an inner encryption layer and an outer SignedData layer was shown as having a valid digital signature, although the signer might have had no access to the contents of the encrypted message, and might have stripped a different signature from the encrypted message. Previous versions had only suppressed showing a digital signature for messages with an outer multipart/signed layer. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 68.1.1. | |||||
| CVE-2019-10575 | 1 Qualcomm | 6 Sda845, Sda845 Firmware, Sdm845 and 3 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Wlan binary which is not signed with OEMs RoT is working on secure device without authentication failure in Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile in SDA845, SDM845, SDM850 | |||||
| CVE-2019-5299 | 1 Huawei | 2 Hima-al00b, Hima-al00b Firmware | 2020-08-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Huawei mobile phones Hima-AL00Bhave with Versions earlier than HMA-AL00C00B175 have a signature verification bypass vulnerability. Attackers can induce users to install malicious applications. Due to a defect in the signature verification logic, the malicious applications can invoke specific interface to execute malicious code. A successful exploit may result in the execution of arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2019-2278 | 1 Qualcomm | 30 Mdm9607, Mdm9607 Firmware, Mdm9640 and 27 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| User keystore signature is ignored in boot and can lead to bypass boot image signature verification in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Mobile in MDM9607, MDM9640, SD 425, SD 427, SD 430, SD 435, SD 450, SD 625, SD 636, SD 712 / SD 710 / SD 670, SD 845 / SD 850, SDM660 | |||||
| CVE-2019-5592 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortios Ips Engine | 2020-08-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Multiple padding oracle vulnerabilities (Zombie POODLE, GOLDENDOODLE, OpenSSL 0-length) in the CBC padding implementation of FortiOS IPS engine version 5.000 to 5.006, 4.000 to 4.036, 4.200 to 4.219, 3.547 and below, when configured with SSL Deep Inspection policies and with the IPS sensor enabled, may allow an attacker to decipher TLS connections going through the FortiGate via monitoring the traffic in a Man-in-the-middle position. | |||||
| CVE-2018-4111 | 1 Apple | 1 Mac Os X | 2020-08-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in certain Apple products. macOS before 10.13.4 is affected. The issue involves the "Mail" component. It allows man-in-the-middle attackers to read S/MIME encrypted message content by sending HTML e-mail that references remote resources but lacks a valid S/MIME signature. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1010161 | 1 Perl-crypt-jwt Project | 1 Perl-crypt-jwt | 2020-08-24 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| perl-CRYPT-JWT 0.022 and earlier is affected by: Incorrect Access Control. The impact is: bypass authentication. The component is: JWT.pm for JWT security token, line 614 in _decode_jws(). The attack vector is: network connectivity(crafting user-controlled input to bypass authentication). The fixed version is: 0.023. | |||||
| CVE-2014-1498 | 5 Mozilla, Opensuse, Opensuse Project and 2 more | 8 Firefox, Seamonkey, Opensuse and 5 more | 2020-08-14 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The crypto.generateCRMFRequest method in Mozilla Firefox before 28.0 and SeaMonkey before 2.25 does not properly validate a certain key type, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via vectors that trigger generation of a key that supports the Elliptic Curve ec-dual-use algorithm. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15827 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Toolbox | 2020-08-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In JetBrains ToolBox version 1.17 before 1.17.6856, the set of signature verifications omitted the jetbrains-toolbox.exe file. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15957 | 1 Dp3t-backend-software Development Kit Project | 1 Dp3t-backend-software Development Kit | 2020-08-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in DP3T-Backend-SDK before 1.1.1 for Decentralised Privacy-Preserving Proximity Tracing (DP3T). When it is configured to check JWT before uploading/publishing keys, it is possible to skip the signature check by providing a JWT token with alg=none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10608 | 1 Osisoft | 9 Pi Api, Pi Buffer Subsystem, Pi Connector and 6 more | 2020-08-05 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| In OSIsoft PI System multiple products and versions, a local attacker can plant a binary and bypass a code integrity check for loading PI System libraries. This exploitation can target another local user of PI System software on the computer to escalate privilege and result in unauthorized information disclosure, deletion, or modification. | |||||
| CVE-2020-14966 | 1 Jsrsasign Project | 1 Jsrsasign | 2020-07-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in the jsrsasign package through 8.0.18 for Node.js. It allows a malleability in ECDSA signatures by not checking overflows in the length of a sequence and '0' characters appended or prepended to an integer. The modified signatures are verified as valid. This could have a security-relevant impact if an application relied on a single canonical signature. | |||||
| CVE-2016-7064 | 1 Pritunl | 1 Pritunl-client | 2020-07-23 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in pritunl-client before version 1.0.1116.6. A lack of signature verification leads to sensitive information leakage | |||||
| CVE-2020-9226 | 1 Huawei | 2 P30, P30 Firmware | 2020-07-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| HUAWEI P30 with versions earlier than 10.1.0.135(C00E135R2P11) have an improper signature verification vulnerability. The system does not improper check signature of specific software package, an attacker may exploit this vulnerability to load a crafted software package to the device. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15091 | 1 Tendermint | 1 Tendermint | 2020-07-08 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| TenderMint from version 0.33.0 and before version 0.33.6 allows block proposers to include signatures for the wrong block. This may happen naturally if you start a network, have it run for some time and restart it (**without changing chainID**). A malicious block proposer (even with a minimal amount of stake) can use this vulnerability to completely halt the network. This issue is fixed in Tendermint 0.33.6 which checks all the signatures are for the block with 2/3+ majority before creating a commit. | |||||
| CVE-2020-2021 | 1 Paloaltonetworks | 1 Pan-os | 2020-07-06 | 9.3 HIGH | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| When Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) authentication is enabled and the 'Validate Identity Provider Certificate' option is disabled (unchecked), improper verification of signatures in PAN-OS SAML authentication enables an unauthenticated network-based attacker to access protected resources. The attacker must have network access to the vulnerable server to exploit this vulnerability. This issue affects PAN-OS 9.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 9.1.3; PAN-OS 9.0 versions earlier than PAN-OS 9.0.9; PAN-OS 8.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 8.1.15, and all versions of PAN-OS 8.0 (EOL). This issue does not affect PAN-OS 7.1. This issue cannot be exploited if SAML is not used for authentication. This issue cannot be exploited if the 'Validate Identity Provider Certificate' option is enabled (checked) in the SAML Identity Provider Server Profile. Resources that can be protected by SAML-based single sign-on (SSO) authentication are: GlobalProtect Gateway, GlobalProtect Portal, GlobalProtect Clientless VPN, Authentication and Captive Portal, PAN-OS next-generation firewalls (PA-Series, VM-Series) and Panorama web interfaces, Prisma Access In the case of GlobalProtect Gateways, GlobalProtect Portal, Clientless VPN, Captive Portal, and Prisma Access, an unauthenticated attacker with network access to the affected servers can gain access to protected resources if allowed by configured authentication and Security policies. There is no impact on the integrity and availability of the gateway, portal or VPN server. An attacker cannot inspect or tamper with sessions of regular users. In the worst case, this is a critical severity vulnerability with a CVSS Base Score of 10.0 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N). In the case of PAN-OS and Panorama web interfaces, this issue allows an unauthenticated attacker with network access to the PAN-OS or Panorama web interfaces to log in as an administrator and perform administrative actions. In the worst-case scenario, this is a critical severity vulnerability with a CVSS Base Score of 10.0 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). If the web interfaces are only accessible to a restricted management network, then the issue is lowered to a CVSS Base Score of 9.6 (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). Palo Alto Networks is not aware of any malicious attempts to exploit this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-14199 | 1 Satoshilabs | 4 Trezor Model T, Trezor Model T Firmware, Trezor One and 1 more | 2020-06-23 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| BIP-143 in the Bitcoin protocol specification mishandles the signing of a Segwit transaction, which allows attackers to trick a user into making two signatures in certain cases, potentially leading to a huge transaction fee. NOTE: this affects all hardware wallets. It was fixed in 1.9.1 for the Trezor One and 2.3.1 for the Trezor Model T. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13895 | 1 P5-crypt-perl Project | 1 P5-crypt-perl | 2020-06-15 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Crypt::Perl::ECDSA in the Crypt::Perl (aka p5-Crypt-Perl) module before 0.32 for Perl fails to verify correct ECDSA signatures when r and s are small and when s = 1. This happens when using the curve secp256r1 (prime256v1). This could conceivably have a security-relevant impact if an attacker wishes to use public r and s values when guessing whether signature verification will fail. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3209 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios Xe | 2020-06-10 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in software image verification in Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, physical attacker to install and boot a malicious software image or execute unsigned binaries on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to an improper check on the area of code that manages the verification of the digital signatures of system image files during the initial boot process. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by loading unsigned software on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to install and boot a malicious software image or execute unsigned binaries on the targeted device. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20834 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Phantompdf | 2020-06-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF before 8.3.10. It allows signature validation bypass via a modified file or a file with non-standard signatures. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13810 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2020-06-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 9.7.2. It allows signature validation bypass via a modified file or a file with non-standard signatures. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13803 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2020-06-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF Mac and Foxit Reader for Mac before 4.0. It allows signature validation bypass via a modified file or a file with non-standard signatures. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20837 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2020-06-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 9.5. It allows signature validation bypass via a modified file or a file with non-standard signatures. | |||||
| CVE-2020-12607 | 1 Fastecdsa Project | 1 Fastecdsa | 2020-06-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in fastecdsa before 2.1.2. When using the NIST P-256 curve in the ECDSA implementation, the point at infinity is mishandled. This means that for an extreme value in k and s^-1, the signature verification fails even if the signature is correct. This behavior is not solely a usability problem. There are some threat models where an attacker can benefit by successfully guessing users for whom signature verification will fail. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13415 | 1 Aviatrix | 1 Controller | 2020-05-26 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller through 5.1. An attacker with any signed SAML assertion from the Identity Provider can establish a connection (even if that SAML assertion has expired or is from a user who is not authorized to access Aviatrix), aka XML Signature Wrapping. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9753 | 1 Naver | 1 Whale Browser Installer | 2020-05-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Whale Browser Installer before 1.2.0.5 versions don't support signature verification for Flash installer. | |||||
| CVE-2020-12046 | 1 Opto22 | 1 Softpac Project | 2020-05-18 | 3.5 LOW | 5.7 MEDIUM |
| Opto 22 SoftPAC Project Version 9.6 and prior. SoftPAC’s firmware files’ signatures are not verified upon firmware update. This allows an attacker to replace legitimate firmware files with malicious files. | |||||
| CVE-2020-12042 | 1 Opto22 | 1 Softpac Project | 2020-05-18 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Opto 22 SoftPAC Project Version 9.6 and prior. Paths specified within the zip files used to update the SoftPAC firmware are not sanitized. As a result, an attacker with user privileges can gain arbitrary file write access with system access. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3308 | 1 Cisco | 2 Firepower Management Center, Firepower Threat Defense | 2020-05-12 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the Image Signature Verification feature of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with administrator-level credentials to install a malicious software patch on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper verification of digital signatures for patch images. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting an unsigned software patch to bypass signature checks and loading it on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to boot a malicious software patch image. | |||||
| CVE-2011-3965 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2020-04-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Google Chrome before 17.0.963.46 does not properly check signatures, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2016-11044 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2020-04-07 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with L(5.0/5.1) and M(6.0) (with Fingerprint support) software. The check of an application's signature can be bypassed during installation. The Samsung ID is SVE-2016-5923 (June 2016). | |||||
| CVE-2015-7336 | 1 Lenovo | 1 System Update | 2020-04-01 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| MITRE is populating this ID because it was assigned prior to Lenovo becoming a CNA. A vulnerability was reported (fixed and publicly disclosed in 2015) in Lenovo System Update version 5.07.0008 and prior that could allow the signature check of an update to be bypassed. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6459 | 1 Strongswan | 1 Strongswan | 2020-03-30 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The rsa_pss_params_parse function in libstrongswan/credentials/keys/signature_params.c in strongSwan 5.6.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted RSASSA-PSS signature that lacks a mask generation function parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2020-2146 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Mac | 2020-03-09 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| Jenkins Mac Plugin 1.1.0 and earlier does not validate SSH host keys when connecting agents created by the plugin, enabling man-in-the-middle attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3138 | 1 Cisco | 1 Enterprise Network Function Virtualization Infrastructure | 2020-02-24 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the upgrade component of Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software (NFVIS) could allow an authenticated, local attacker to install a malicious file when upgrading. The vulnerability is due to insufficient signature validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by providing a crafted upgrade file. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to upload crafted code to the affected device. | |||||
| CVE-2020-6174 | 1 Linuxfoundation | 1 The Update Framework | 2020-02-07 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| TUF (aka The Update Framework) through 0.12.1 has Improper Verification of a Cryptographic Signature. | |||||
| CVE-2020-7906 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Rider | 2020-02-01 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In JetBrains Rider versions 2019.3 EAP2 through 2019.3 EAP7, there were unsigned binaries provided by the Windows installer. This issue was fixed in release version 2019.3. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5390 | 1 Pysaml2 Project | 1 Pysaml2 | 2020-01-27 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| PySAML2 before 5.0.0 does not check that the signature in a SAML document is enveloped and thus signature wrapping is effective, i.e., it is affected by XML Signature Wrapping (XSW). The signature information and the node/object that is signed can be in different places and thus the signature verification will succeed, but the wrong data will be used. This specifically affects the verification of assertion that have been signed. | |||||
| CVE-2019-16753 | 2 Decentralized Anonymous Payment System Project, Pivx | 2 Decentralized Anonymous Payment System, Private Instant Verified Transactions | 2019-12-27 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Decentralized Anonymous Payment System (DAPS) through 2019-08-26. The content to be signed is composed of a representation of strings, rather than being composed of their binary representations. This is a weak signature scheme design that would allow the reuse of signatures in some cases (or even the reuse of signatures, intended for one type of message, for another type). This also affects Private Instant Verified Transactions (PIVX) through 3.4.0. | |||||
| CVE-2012-2092 | 1 Canonical | 1 Ubuntu Cobbler | 2019-12-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| A Security Bypass vulnerability exists in Ubuntu Cobbler before 2,2,2 in the cobbler-ubuntu-import script due to an error when verifying the GPG signature. | |||||
| CVE-2018-16151 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Strongswan | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Strongswan | 2019-12-01 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In verify_emsa_pkcs1_signature() in gmp_rsa_public_key.c in the gmp plugin in strongSwan 4.x and 5.x before 5.7.0, the RSA implementation based on GMP does not reject excess data after the encoded algorithm OID during PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification. Similar to the flaw in the same version of strongSwan regarding digestAlgorithm.parameters, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation when only an RSA signature is used for IKEv2 authentication. | |||||
| CVE-2018-16152 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Strongswan | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Strongswan | 2019-12-01 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In verify_emsa_pkcs1_signature() in gmp_rsa_public_key.c in the gmp plugin in strongSwan 4.x and 5.x before 5.7.0, the RSA implementation based on GMP does not reject excess data in the digestAlgorithm.parameters field during PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation when only an RSA signature is used for IKEv2 authentication. This is a variant of CVE-2006-4790 and CVE-2014-1568. | |||||
| CVE-2014-3585 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Redhat-upgrade-tool | 2019-11-25 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| redhat-upgrade-tool: Does not check GPG signatures when upgrading versions | |||||
| CVE-2017-12974 | 1 Connect2id | 1 Nimbus Jose\+jwt | 2019-11-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Nimbus JOSE+JWT before 4.36 proceeds with ECKey construction without ensuring that the public x and y coordinates are on the specified curve, which allows attackers to conduct an Invalid Curve Attack in environments where the JCE provider lacks the applicable curve validation. | |||||