Search
Total
302 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-16143 | 1 Blake2 | 1 Blake2-rust | 2020-08-31 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in the blake2 crate before 0.8.1 for Rust. The BLAKE2b and BLAKE2s algorithms, when used with HMAC, produce incorrect results because the block sizes are half of the required sizes. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4174 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium Insights | 2020-08-28 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium Insights 2.0.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 174683. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4169 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium Insights | 2020-08-27 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium Insights 2.0.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 174405. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6402 | 1 Ecobee | 2 Ecobee4, Ecobee4 Firmware | 2020-08-24 | 2.9 LOW | 7.5 HIGH |
| Ecobee Ecobee4 4.2.0.171 devices can be forced to deauthenticate and connect to an unencrypted Wi-Fi network with the same SSID, even if the device settings specify use of encryption such as WPA2, as long as the competing network has a stronger signal. An attacker must be able to set up a nearby SSID, similar to an "Evil Twin" attack. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4609 | 1 Ibm | 1 Api Connect | 2020-08-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM API Connect 2018.4.1.7 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 168510. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4553 | 1 Ibm | 1 Api Connect | 2020-08-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM API Connect V5.0.0.0 through 5.0.8.7iFix3 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 165958. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4156 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Access Manager | 2020-08-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Access Manager 9.0.1 through 9.0.6 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 158572. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5719 | 2 Debian, Wireshark | 2 Debian Linux, Wireshark | 2020-08-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In Wireshark 2.6.0 to 2.6.5 and 2.4.0 to 2.4.11, the ISAKMP dissector could crash. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-isakmp.c by properly handling the case of a missing decryption data block. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6485 | 1 Citrix | 4 Netscaler Application Delivery Controller, Netscaler Application Delivery Controller Firmware, Netscaler Gateway and 1 more | 2020-08-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Citrix NetScaler Gateway 12.1 before build 50.31, 12.0 before build 60.9, 11.1 before build 60.14, 11.0 before build 72.17, and 10.5 before build 69.5 and Application Delivery Controller (ADC) 12.1 before build 50.31, 12.0 before build 60.9, 11.1 before build 60.14, 11.0 before build 72.17, and 10.5 before build 69.5 allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive plaintext information because of a TLS Padding Oracle Vulnerability when CBC-based cipher suites are enabled. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9013 | 1 Codesys | 12 Control For Beaglebone Sl, Control For Empc-a\/imx6 Sl, Control For Iot2000 Sl and 9 more | 2020-08-24 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in 3S-Smart CODESYS V3 products. The application may utilize non-TLS based encryption, which results in user credentials being insufficiently protected during transport. All variants of the following CODESYS V3 products in all versions containing the CmpUserMgr component are affected regardless of the CPU type or operating system: CODESYS Control for BeagleBone, CODESYS Control for emPC-A/iMX6, CODESYS Control for IOT2000, CODESYS Control for Linux, CODESYS Control for PFC100, CODESYS Control for PFC200, CODESYS Control for Raspberry Pi, CODESYS Control RTE V3, CODESYS Control RTE V3 (for Beckhoff CX), CODESYS Control Win V3 (also part of the CODESYS Development System setup), CODESYS V3 Simulation Runtime (part of the CODESYS Development System), CODESYS Control V3 Runtime System Toolkit, CODESYS HMI V3. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13604 | 1 Assaabloy | 2 Hid Digitalpersona 4500, Hid Digitalpersona 4500 Firmware | 2020-08-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| There is a short key vulnerability in HID Global DigitalPersona (formerly Crossmatch) U.are.U 4500 Fingerprint Reader v24. The key for obfuscating the fingerprint image is vulnerable to brute-force attacks. This allows an attacker to recover the key and decrypt that image using the key. Successful exploitation causes a sensitive biometric information leak. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13052 | 1 Logitech | 2 Unifying Receiver, Unifying Receiver Firmware | 2020-08-24 | 3.3 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Logitech Unifying devices allow live decryption if the pairing of a keyboard to a receiver is sniffed. | |||||
| CVE-2019-12587 | 1 Espressif | 2 Esp-idf, Esp8266 Nonos Sdk | 2020-08-24 | 4.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| The EAP peer implementation in Espressif ESP-IDF 2.0.0 through 4.0.0 and ESP8266_NONOS_SDK 2.2.0 through 3.1.0 allows the installation of a zero Pairwise Master Key (PMK) after the completion of any EAP authentication method, which allows attackers in radio range to replay, decrypt, or spoof frames via a rogue access point. | |||||
| CVE-2019-0688 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows Rt 8.1 and 3 more | 2020-08-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows TCP/IP stack improperly handles fragmented IP packets, aka 'Windows TCP/IP Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | |||||
| CVE-2019-0187 | 1 Apache | 1 Jmeter | 2020-08-24 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Unauthenticated RCE is possible when JMeter is used in distributed mode (-r or -R command line options). Attacker can establish a RMI connection to a jmeter-server using RemoteJMeterEngine and proceed with an attack using untrusted data deserialization. This only affect tests running in Distributed mode. Note that versions before 4.0 are not able to encrypt traffic between the nodes, nor authenticate the participating nodes so upgrade to JMeter 5.1 is also advised. | |||||
| CVE-2018-7211 | 1 Idashboards | 1 Idashboards | 2020-08-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in iDashboards 9.6b. The SSO implementation is affected by a weak obfuscation library, allowing man-in-the-middle attackers to discover credentials. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1996 | 1 Ibm | 1 Websphere Application Server | 2020-08-24 | 3.5 LOW | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 could provide weaker than expected security, caused by the improper TLS configuration. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 154650. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1720 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sterling B2b Integrator | 2020-08-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator Standard Edition 5.2.0.1, 5.2.6.3_6, 6.0.0.0, and 6.0.0.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 147294. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0735 | 6 Canonical, Debian, Netapp and 3 more | 23 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Cloud Backup and 20 more | 2020-08-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The OpenSSL ECDSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1). | |||||
| CVE-2018-0734 | 6 Canonical, Debian, Netapp and 3 more | 20 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Cloud Backup and 17 more | 2020-08-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The OpenSSL DSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2q (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2p). | |||||
| CVE-2020-8911 | 1 Amazon | 1 Aws S3 Crypto Sdk | 2020-08-18 | 2.1 LOW | 5.6 MEDIUM |
| A padding oracle vulnerability exists in the AWS S3 Crypto SDK for GoLang versions prior to V2. The SDK allows users to encrypt files with AES-CBC without computing a Message Authentication Code (MAC), which then allows an attacker who has write access to the target's S3 bucket and can observe whether or not an endpoint with access to the key can decrypt a file, they can reconstruct the plaintext with (on average) 128*length (plaintext) queries to the endpoint, by exploiting CBC's ability to manipulate the bytes of the next block and PKCS5 padding errors. It is recommended to update your SDK to V2 or later, and re-encrypt your files. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9528 | 1 Hichip | 1 Shenzhen Hichip Vision Technology Firmware | 2020-08-18 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Firmware developed by Shenzhen Hichip Vision Technology (V6 through V20), as used by many different vendors in millions of Internet of Things devices, suffers from cryptographic issues that allow remote attackers to access user session data, as demonstrated by eavesdropping on user video/audio streams, capturing credentials, and compromising devices. This affects products marketed under the following brand names: Accfly, Alptop, Anlink, Besdersec, BOAVISION, COOAU, CPVAN, Ctronics, D3D Security, Dericam, Elex System, Elite Security, ENSTER, ePGes, Escam, FLOUREON, GENBOLT, Hongjingtian (HJT), ICAMI, Iegeek, Jecurity, Jennov, KKMoon, LEFTEK, Loosafe, Luowice, Nesuniq, Nettoly, ProElite, QZT, Royallite, SDETER, SV3C, SY2L, Tenvis, ThinkValue, TOMLOV, TPTEK, WGCC, and ZILINK. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8912 | 1 Amazon | 1 Aws S3 Crypto Sdk | 2020-08-17 | 2.1 LOW | 2.5 LOW |
| A vulnerability in the in-band key negotiation exists in the AWS S3 Crypto SDK for GoLang versions prior to V2. An attacker with write access to the targeted bucket can change the encryption algorithm of an object in the bucket, which can then allow them to change AES-GCM to AES-CTR. Using this in combination with a decryption oracle can reveal the authentication key used by AES-GCM as decrypting the GMAC tag leaves the authentication key recoverable as an algebraic equation. It is recommended to update your SDK to V2 or later, and re-encrypt your files. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3681 | 1 Qualcomm | 1 - | 2020-08-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Authenticated and encrypted payload MMEs can be forged and remotely sent to any HPAV2 system using a jailbreak key recoverable from code. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4185 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2020-08-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.5, 10.6, and 11.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 174803. | |||||
| CVE-2020-7514 | 1 Schneider-electric | 1 Easergy Builder | 2020-07-27 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| A CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm vulnerability exists in Easergy Builder (Version 1.4.7.2 and older) which could allow an attacker access to the authorization credentials for a device and gain full access. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13777 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 1 more | 2020-06-19 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| GnuTLS 3.6.x before 3.6.14 uses incorrect cryptography for encrypting a session ticket (a loss of confidentiality in TLS 1.2, and an authentication bypass in TLS 1.3). The earliest affected version is 3.6.4 (2018-09-24) because of an error in a 2018-09-18 commit. Until the first key rotation, the TLS server always uses wrong data in place of an encryption key derived from an application. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4191 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Security Guardium, Linux Kernel | 2020-06-05 | 2.1 LOW | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 11.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 174852. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4367 | 1 Ibm | 1 Planning Analytics Local | 2020-06-02 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Planning Analytics Local 2.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 179001. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4349 | 1 Ibm | 1 Spectrum Scale | 2020-05-27 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Spectrum Scale 5.0.0.0 through 5.0.4.4 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 178423. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4350 | 1 Ibm | 1 Spectrum Scale | 2020-05-27 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Spectrum Scale 5.0.0.0 through 5.0.4.4 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 178424. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4379 | 1 Ibm | 1 Spectrum Scale | 2020-05-27 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Spectrum Scale 5.0.0.0 through 5.0.4.4 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 179158. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11005 | 1 Windowshello Project | 1 Windowshello | 2020-04-22 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| The WindowsHello open source library (NuGet HaemmerElectronics.SeppPenner.WindowsHello), before version 1.0.4, has a vulnerability where encrypted data could potentially be decrypted without needing authentication. If the library is used to encrypt text and write the output to a txt file, another executable could be able to decrypt the text using the static method NCryptDecrypt from this same library without the need to use Windows Hello Authentication again. This has been patched in version 1.0.4. | |||||
| CVE-2019-14001 | 1 Qualcomm | 46 Apq8009, Apq8009 Firmware, Apq8017 and 43 more | 2020-04-22 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Wrong public key usage from existing oem_keystore for hash generation in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8096AU, MDM9206, MDM9207C, MDM9607, MDM9650, MSM8905, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8953, MSM8996AU, QM215, SDM429, SDM429W, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDX20 | |||||
| CVE-2018-21058 | 2 Google, Samsung | 4 Android, Exynos 7420, Exynos 8890 and 1 more | 2020-04-09 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with N(7.0), O(8.0) (exynos7420 or Exynos 8890/8996 chipsets) software. Cache attacks can occur against the Keymaster AES-GCM implementation because T-Tables are used; the Cryptography Extension (CE) is not used. The Samsung ID is SVE-2018-12761 (September 2018). | |||||
| CVE-2019-15795 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Ubuntu | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Python-apt, Python-apt | 2020-04-08 | 2.6 LOW | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| python-apt only checks the MD5 sums of downloaded files in `Version.fetch_binary()` and `Version.fetch_source()` of apt/package.py in version 1.9.0ubuntu1 and earlier. This allows a man-in-the-middle attack which could potentially be used to install altered packages and has been fixed in versions 1.9.0ubuntu1.2, 1.6.5ubuntu0.1, 1.1.0~beta1ubuntu0.16.04.7, 0.9.3.5ubuntu3+esm2, and 0.8.3ubuntu7.5. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11500 | 1 Zoom | 1 Meetings | 2020-04-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Zoom Client for Meetings through 4.6.9 uses the ECB mode of AES for video and audio encryption. Within a meeting, all participants use a single 128-bit key. | |||||
| CVE-1999-0007 | 5 C2net, Hp, Microsoft and 2 more | 13 Stonghold Web Server, Open Market Secure Webserver, Exchange Server and 10 more | 2020-04-02 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Information from SSL-encrypted sessions via PKCS #1. | |||||
| CVE-2020-6987 | 1 Moxa | 110 Pt-7528-12msc-12tx-4gsfp-hv, Pt-7528-12msc-12tx-4gsfp-hv-hv, Pt-7528-12msc-12tx-4gsfp-hv-hv Firmware and 107 more | 2020-03-26 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In Moxa PT-7528 series firmware, Version 4.0 or lower, and PT-7828 series firmware, Version 3.9 or lower, the affected products use a weak cryptographic algorithm, which may allow confidential information to be disclosed. | |||||
| CVE-2020-7001 | 1 Moxa | 4 Eds-510e, Eds-510e Firmware, Eds-g516e and 1 more | 2020-03-26 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In Moxa EDS-G516E Series firmware, Version 5.2 or lower, the affected products use a weak cryptographic algorithm, which may allow confidential information to be disclosed. | |||||
| CVE-2020-6984 | 1 Rockwellautomation | 6 Micrologix 1100, Micrologix 1100 Firmware, Micrologix 1400 and 3 more | 2020-03-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Rockwell Automation MicroLogix 1400 Controllers Series B v21.001 and prior, Series A, all versions, MicroLogix 1100 Controller, all versions, RSLogix 500 Software v12.001 and prior, The cryptographic function utilized to protect the password in MicroLogix is discoverable. | |||||
| CVE-2012-5623 | 1 Squirrelmail | 1 Change Passwd | 2020-03-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Squirrelmail 4.0 uses the outdated MD5 hash algorithm for passwords. | |||||
| CVE-2013-2213 | 1 Kde | 1 Paste Applet | 2020-02-24 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| The KRandom::random function in KDE Paste Applet after 4.10.5 in kdeplasma-addons uses the GNU C Library rand function's linear congruential generator, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by predicting the generator output. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4427 | 2 Ibm, Microsoft | 2 Cloud Cli, Windows | 2020-02-14 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Cloud CLI 0.6.0 through 0.16.1 windows installers are signed using SHA1 certificate. An attacker might be able to exploit the weak algorithm to generate a installer with malicious software inside. IBM X-Force ID: 162773. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5229 | 1 Apereo | 1 Opencast | 2020-02-05 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Opencast before 8.1 stores passwords using the rather outdated and cryptographically insecure MD5 hash algorithm. Furthermore, the hashes are salted using the username instead of a random salt, causing hashes for users with the same username and password to collide which is problematic especially for popular users like the default `admin` user. This essentially means that for an attacker, it might be feasible to reconstruct a user's password given access to these hashes. Note that attackers needing access to the hashes means that they must gain access to the database in which these are stored first to be able to start cracking the passwords. The problem is addressed in Opencast 8.1 which now uses the modern and much stronger bcrypt password hashing algorithm for storing passwords. Note, that old hashes remain MD5 until the password is updated. For a list of users whose password hashes are stored using MD5, take a look at the `/user-utils/users/md5.json` REST endpoint. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3700 | 1 Suse | 1 Yast2-security | 2020-02-05 | 2.1 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| yast2-security didn't use secure defaults to protect passwords. This became a problem on 2019-10-07 when configuration files that set secure settings were moved to a different location. As of the 20191022 snapshot the insecure default settings were used until yast2-security switched to stronger defaults in 4.2.6 and used the new configuration file locations. Password created during this time used DES password encryption and are not properly protected against attackers that are able to access the password hashes. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4540 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Directory Server | 2020-02-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Directory Server 6.4.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 165813. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4639 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Secret Server | 2020-01-30 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Secret Server 10.7 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 170045. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1810 | 1 Huawei | 6 Cloudengine 12800, Cloudengine 12800 Firmware, S5700 and 3 more | 2020-01-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| There is a weak algorithm vulnerability in some Huawei products. The affected products use the RSA algorithm in the SSL key exchange algorithm which have been considered as a weak algorithm. Attackers may exploit this vulnerability to leak some information. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6829 | 1 Gnupg | 1 Libgcrypt | 2020-01-15 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| cipher/elgamal.c in Libgcrypt through 1.8.2, when used to encrypt messages directly, improperly encodes plaintexts, which allows attackers to obtain sensitive information by reading ciphertext data (i.e., it does not have semantic security in face of a ciphertext-only attack). The Decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) assumption does not hold for Libgcrypt's ElGamal implementation. | |||||