Search
Total
86024 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-2062 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2063 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2064 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2065 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2066 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2067 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2068 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2069 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2070 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2071 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2072 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2073 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2074 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2075 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2076 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2077 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2078 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2079 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2080 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2081 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2082 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2083 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2084 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2085 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2086 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2087 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2088 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2089 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5191 | 2018-01-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-1000479. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-1000479. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-1000479 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2015-1593 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2018-01-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The stack randomization feature in the Linux kernel before 3.19.1 on 64-bit platforms uses incorrect data types for the results of bitwise left-shift operations, which makes it easier for attackers to bypass the ASLR protection mechanism by predicting the address of the top of the stack, related to the randomize_stack_top function in fs/binfmt_elf.c and the stack_maxrandom_size function in arch/x86/mm/mmap.c. | |||||
| CVE-2015-1798 | 1 Ntp | 1 Ntp | 2018-01-05 | 1.8 LOW | N/A |
| The symmetric-key feature in the receive function in ntp_proto.c in ntpd in NTP 4.x before 4.2.8p2 requires a correct MAC only if the MAC field has a nonzero length, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof packets by omitting the MAC. | |||||
| CVE-2015-1799 | 1 Ntp | 1 Ntp | 2018-01-05 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The symmetric-key feature in the receive function in ntp_proto.c in ntpd in NTP 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.8p2 performs state-variable updates upon receiving certain invalid packets, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to cause a denial of service (synchronization loss) by spoofing the source IP address of a peer. | |||||
| CVE-2015-1805 | 2 Google, Linux | 2 Android, Linux Kernel | 2018-01-05 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| The (1) pipe_read and (2) pipe_write implementations in fs/pipe.c in the Linux kernel before 3.16 do not properly consider the side effects of failed __copy_to_user_inatomic and __copy_from_user_inatomic calls, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (system crash) or possibly gain privileges via a crafted application, aka an "I/O vector array overrun." | |||||
| CVE-2015-1818 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Bpm Suite | 2018-01-05 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the dashbuilder import facility (DocumentBuilders in org.jboss.dashboard.export.ImportManagerImpl) in Red Hat JBoss BPM Suite before 6.1.2 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files, conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks, and have other unspecified impact via a crafted XML document. | |||||
| CVE-2015-1856 | 2 Canonical, Openstack | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Swift | 2018-01-05 | 5.5 MEDIUM | N/A |
| OpenStack Object Storage (Swift) before 2.3.0, when allow_version is configured, allows remote authenticated users to delete the latest version of an object by leveraging listing access to the x-versions-location container. | |||||
| CVE-2015-2327 | 1 Pcre | 1 Perl Compatible Regular Expression Library | 2018-01-05 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| PCRE before 8.36 mishandles the /(((a\2)|(a*)\g<-1>))*/ pattern and related patterns with certain internal recursive back references, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted regular expression, as demonstrated by a JavaScript RegExp object encountered by Konqueror. | |||||
| CVE-2015-2611 | 2 Canonical, Oracle | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Mysql | 2018-01-05 | 4.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle MySQL Server 5.6.24 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to affect availability via vectors related to DML. | |||||
| CVE-2015-2617 | 2 Canonical, Oracle | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Mysql | 2018-01-05 | 6.5 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle MySQL Server 5.6.24 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Partition. | |||||
| CVE-2015-2639 | 2 Canonical, Oracle | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Mysql | 2018-01-05 | 3.5 LOW | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle MySQL Server 5.6.24 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Server : Security : Firewall. | |||||
| CVE-2015-2641 | 2 Canonical, Oracle | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Mysql | 2018-01-05 | 3.5 LOW | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle MySQL Server 5.6.24 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to affect availability via unknown vectors related to Server : Security : Privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2015-2661 | 2 Canonical, Oracle | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Mysql | 2018-01-05 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle MySQL Server 5.6.24 and earlier allows local users to affect availability via unknown vectors related to Client. | |||||
| CVE-2015-2721 | 5 Canonical, Debian, Mozilla and 2 more | 11 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Firefox and 8 more | 2018-01-05 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) before 3.19, as used in Mozilla Firefox before 39.0, Firefox ESR 31.x before 31.8 and 38.x before 38.1, Thunderbird before 38.1, and other products, does not properly determine state transitions for the TLS state machine, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by blocking messages, as demonstrated by removing a forward-secrecy property by blocking a ServerKeyExchange message, aka a "SMACK SKIP-TLS" issue. | |||||
| CVE-2015-2806 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 1 more | 2018-01-05 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in asn1_der_decoding in libtasn1 before 4.4 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2015-2830 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Linux | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Linux Kernel | 2018-01-05 | 1.9 LOW | N/A |
| arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S in the Linux kernel before 3.19.2 does not prevent the TS_COMPAT flag from reaching a user-mode task, which might allow local users to bypass the seccomp or audit protection mechanism via a crafted application that uses the (1) fork or (2) close system call, as demonstrated by an attack against seccomp before 3.16. | |||||
| CVE-2015-2922 | 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Linux and 2 more | 6 Debian Linux, Fedora, Linux Kernel and 3 more | 2018-01-05 | 3.3 LOW | N/A |
| The ndisc_router_discovery function in net/ipv6/ndisc.c in the Neighbor Discovery (ND) protocol implementation in the IPv6 stack in the Linux kernel before 3.19.6 allows remote attackers to reconfigure a hop-limit setting via a small hop_limit value in a Router Advertisement (RA) message. | |||||
| CVE-2015-2925 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2018-01-05 | 6.9 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The prepend_path function in fs/dcache.c in the Linux kernel before 4.2.4 does not properly handle rename actions inside a bind mount, which allows local users to bypass an intended container protection mechanism by renaming a directory, related to a "double-chroot attack." | |||||
| CVE-2015-3143 | 5 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 2 more | 6 Mac Os X, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 3 more | 2018-01-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| cURL and libcurl 7.10.6 through 7.41.0 does not properly re-use NTLM connections, which allows remote attackers to connect as other users via an unauthenticated request, a similar issue to CVE-2014-0015. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3165 | 4 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 1 more | 4 Mac Os X Server, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 1 more | 2018-01-05 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Double free vulnerability in PostgreSQL before 9.0.20, 9.1.x before 9.1.16, 9.2.x before 9.2.11, 9.3.x before 9.3.7, and 9.4.x before 9.4.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) by closing an SSL session at a time when the authentication timeout will expire during the session shutdown sequence. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3216 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 2 Openssl, Enterprise Linux | 2018-01-05 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Race condition in a certain Red Hat patch to the PRNG lock implementation in the ssleay_rand_bytes function in OpenSSL, as distributed in openssl-1.0.1e-25.el7 in Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 7 and other products, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) by establishing many TLS sessions to a multithreaded server, leading to use of a negative value for a certain length field. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3331 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2018-01-05 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
| The __driver_rfc4106_decrypt function in arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c in the Linux kernel before 3.19.3 does not properly determine the memory locations used for encrypted data, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (buffer overflow and system crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code by triggering a crypto API call, as demonstrated by use of a libkcapi test program with an AF_ALG(aead) socket. | |||||