Search
Total
86024 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-9248 | 2018-07-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9254 | 2018-07-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9255 | 2018-07-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9258 | 2018-07-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6146 | 2018-07-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA due to an erroneous publication. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6149 | 2018-07-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6170 | 2018-07-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6171 | 2018-07-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6172 | 2018-07-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6173 | 2018-07-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6174 | 2018-07-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6175 | 2018-07-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6176 | 2018-07-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6177 | 2018-07-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10886 | 2018-07-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: this candidate is not about any specific product, protocol, or design, that falls into the scope of the assigning CNA. Notes: None. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5013 | 2018-07-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-5103. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2018-5103. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2018-5103 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0204 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2018-07-19 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The ssl3_get_key_exchange function in s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k allows remote SSL servers to conduct RSA-to-EXPORT_RSA downgrade attacks and facilitate brute-force decryption by offering a weak ephemeral RSA key in a noncompliant role, related to the "FREAK" issue. NOTE: the scope of this CVE is only client code based on OpenSSL, not EXPORT_RSA issues associated with servers or other TLS implementations. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3414 | 4 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 1 more | 5 Mac Os X, Watchos, Ubuntu Linux and 2 more | 2018-07-19 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| SQLite before 3.8.9 does not properly implement the dequoting of collation-sequence names, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (uninitialized memory access and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted COLLATE clause, as demonstrated by COLLATE"""""""" at the end of a SELECT statement. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3415 | 4 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 1 more | 5 Mac Os X, Watchos, Ubuntu Linux and 2 more | 2018-07-19 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| The sqlite3VdbeExec function in vdbe.c in SQLite before 3.8.9 does not properly implement comparison operators, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (invalid free operation) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted CHECK clause, as demonstrated by CHECK(0&O>O) in a CREATE TABLE statement. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3416 | 4 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 1 more | 5 Mac Os X, Watchos, Ubuntu Linux and 2 more | 2018-07-19 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| The sqlite3VXPrintf function in printf.c in SQLite before 3.8.9 does not properly handle precision and width values during floating-point conversions, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (integer overflow and stack-based buffer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact via large integers in a crafted printf function call in a SELECT statement. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3218 | 1 Polkit Project | 1 Polkit | 2018-07-18 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
| The authentication_agent_new function in polkitbackend/polkitbackendinteractiveauthority.c in PolicyKit (aka polkit) before 0.113 allows local users to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and polkitd daemon crash) by calling RegisterAuthenticationAgent with an invalid object path. | |||||
| CVE-2011-4891 | 2018-07-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2011. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2011-4892 | 2018-07-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2011. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2011-4893 | 2018-07-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2011. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2012-0721 | 2018-07-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2012. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2013-0516 | 2018-07-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2013. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2013-0528 | 2018-07-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2013. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2013-0550 | 2018-07-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2013. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2013-2971 | 2018-07-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2013. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2013-2973 | 2018-07-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2013. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2013-2986 | 2018-07-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2013. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2013-2990 | 2018-07-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2013. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2013-2991 | 2018-07-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2013. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2013-3022 | 2018-07-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2013. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0154 | 2018-07-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0155 | 2018-07-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0163 | 2018-07-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-1990 | 2018-07-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-1991 | 2018-07-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-4968 | 2018-07-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2012-6662 | 2 Jqueryui, Redhat | 5 Jquery Ui, Enterprise Linux Desktop, Enterprise Linux Hpc Node and 2 more | 2018-07-14 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the default content option in jquery.ui.tooltip.js in the Tooltip widget in jQuery UI before 1.10.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the title attribute, which is not properly handled in the autocomplete combo box demo. | |||||
| CVE-2013-0595 | 1 Ibm | 2 Lotus Domino, Lotus Inotes | 2018-07-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in iNotes 8.5.x in IBM Lotus Domino 8.5 before 8.5.3 FP5 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors, aka SPR PTHN95XNR3. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6620 | 2018-07-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2018-7775 | 2018-07-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-9960. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2017-9960. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-9960 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0230 | 2018-07-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2015. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4466 | 2018-07-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5015 | 2018-07-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000612 | 2018-07-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-12230. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2018-12230. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2018-12230 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-10545 | 2018-07-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2018-12938 | 2018-07-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-17833. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2017-17833. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-17833 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||