Search
Total
86024 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-29558 | 2022-07-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Realtek rtl819x-SDK before v3.6.1 allows command injection over the web interface. | |||||
| CVE-2022-29360 | 2022-07-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| The Email Viewer in RainLoop through 1.6.0 allows XSS via a crafted email message. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41556 | 2022-07-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| sqclass.cpp in Squirrel through 2.2.5 and 3.x through 3.1 allows an out-of-bounds read (in the core interpreter) that can lead to Code Execution. If a victim executes an attacker-controlled squirrel script, it is possible for the attacker to break out of the squirrel script sandbox even if all dangerous functionality such as File System functions has been disabled. An attacker might abuse this bug to target (for example) Cloud services that allow customization via SquirrelScripts, or distribute malware through video games that embed a Squirrel Engine. | |||||
| CVE-2022-34593 | 2022-07-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| DPTech VPN v8.1.28.0 was discovered to contain an arbitrary file read vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-34578 | 2022-07-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Open Source Point of Sale v3.3.7 was discovered to contain an arbitrary file upload vulnerability via the Update Branding Settings page. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2564 | 2022-07-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Prototype Pollution in GitHub repository automattic/mongoose prior to 6.4.6. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3601 | 2022-07-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. OpenSSL does not class this issue as a security vulnerability. The trusted CA store should not contain anything that the user does not trust to issue other certificates. Notes: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/5236#issuecomment-1196460611 | |||||
| CVE-2022-22684 | 2022-07-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in task management component in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 6.2.4-25553 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4991 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Input passed to the Pdf() function is shell escaped and passed to child_process.exec() during PDF rendering. However, the shell escape does not properly encode all special characters, namely, semicolon and curly braces. This can be abused to achieve command execution. This problem affects nodepdf 1.3.0. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4427 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| In zulip before 1.3.12, deactivated users could access messages if SSO was enabled. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4426 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| In zulip before 1.3.12, bot API keys were accessible to other users in the same realm. | |||||
| CVE-2016-3709 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Possible cross-site scripting vulnerability in libxml after commit 960f0e2. | |||||
| CVE-2016-0796 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| WordPress Plugin mb.miniAudioPlayer-an HTML5 audio player for your mp3 files is prone to multiple vulnerabilities, including open proxy and security bypass vulnerabilities because it fails to properly verify user-supplied input. An attacker may leverage these issues to hide attacks directed at a target site from behind vulnerable website or to perform otherwise restricted actions and subsequently download files with the extension mp3, mp4a, wav and ogg from anywhere the web server application has read access to the system. WordPress Plugin mb.miniAudioPlayer-an HTML5 audio player for your mp3 files version 1.7.6 is vulnerable; prior versions may also be affected. | |||||
| CVE-2022-30320 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Saia Burgess Controls (SBC) PCD through 2022-05-06 uses a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm. According to FSCT-2022-0063, there is a Saia Burgess Controls (SBC) PCD S-Bus weak credential hashing scheme issue. The affected components are characterized as: S-Bus (5050/UDP) authentication. The potential impact is: Authentication bypass. The Saia Burgess Controls (SBC) PCD controllers utilize the S-Bus protocol (5050/UDP) for a variety of engineering purposes. It is possible to configure a password in order to restrict access to sensitive engineering functionality. Authentication is done by using the S-Bus 'write byte' message to a specific address and supplying a hashed version of the password. The hashing algorithm used is based on CRC-16 and as such not cryptographically secure. An insecure hashing algorithm is used. An attacker capable of passively observing traffic can intercept the hashed credentials and trivially find collisions allowing for authentication without having to bruteforce a keyspace defined by the actual strength of the password. This allows the attacker access to sensitive engineering functionality such as uploading/downloading control logic and manipulating controller configuration. | |||||
| CVE-2022-30316 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager 5.02 has Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity. According to FSCT-2022-0054, there is a Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager unauthenticated firmware update issue. The affected components are characterized as: Firmware update functionality. The potential impact is: Firmware manipulation. The Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager utilizes the DCOM-232/485 communication FTA serial interface and Enea POLO bootloader for firmware management purposes. An engineering workstation running the Safety Builder software communicates via serial or serial-over-ethernet link with the DCOM-232/485 interface. Firmware images were found to have no authentication (in the form of firmware signing) and only relied on insecure checksums for regular integrity checks. Firmware images are unsigned. An attacker with access to the serial interface (either through physical access, a compromised EWS or an exposed serial-to-ethernet gateway) can utilize hardcoded credentials (see FSCT-2022-0052) for the POLO bootloader to control the boot process and push malicious firmware images to the controller allowing for firmware manipulation, remote code execution and denial of service impacts. A mitigating factor is that in order for a firmware update to be initiated, the Safety Manager has to be rebooted which is typically done by means of physical controls on the Safety Manager itself. As such, an attacker would have to either lay dormant until a legitimate reboot occurs or possibly attempt to force a reboot through a secondary vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-30314 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager 5.02 uses Hard-coded Credentials. According to FSCT-2022-0052, there is a Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager hardcoded credentials issue. The affected components are characterized as: POLO bootloader. The potential impact is: Manipulate firmware. The Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager utilizes the DCOM-232/485 serial interface for firmware management purposes. When booting, the Safety Manager exposes the Enea POLO bootloader via this interface. Access to the boot configuration is controlled by means of credentials hardcoded in the Safety Manager firmware. The credentials for the bootloader are hardcoded in the firmware. An attacker with access to the serial interface (either through physical access, a compromised EWS or an exposed serial-to-ethernet gateway) can utilize these credentials to control the boot process and manipulate the unauthenticated firmware image (see FSCT-2022-0054). | |||||
| CVE-2022-30313 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager through 2022-05-06 has Missing Authentication for a Critical Function. According to FSCT-2022-0051, there is a Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager multiple proprietary protocols with unauthenticated functionality issue. The affected components are characterized as: Honeywell Experion TCP (51000/TCP), Safety Builder (51010/TCP). The potential impact is: Manipulate controller state, Manipulate controller configuration, Manipulate controller logic, Manipulate controller files, Manipulate IO. The Honeywell Experion PKS Distributed Control System (DCS) Safety Manager utilizes several proprietary protocols for a wide variety of functionality, including process data acquisition, controller steering and configuration management. These protocols include: Experion TCP (51000/TCP) and Safety Builder (51010/TCP). None of these protocols have any authentication features, allowing any attacker capable of communicating with the ports in question to invoke (a subset of) desired functionality. There is no authentication functionality on the protocols in question. An attacker capable of invoking the protocols' functionalities could achieve a wide range of adverse impacts, including (but not limited to), the following: for Experion TCP (51000/TCP): Issue IO manipulation commands, Issue file read/write commands; and for Safety Builder (51010/TCP): Issue controller start/stop commands, Issue logic download/upload commands, Issue file read commands, Issue system time change commands. A mitigating factor with regards to some, but not all, of the above functionality is that these require the Safety Manager physical keyswitch to be in the right position. | |||||
| CVE-2016-7049 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-7029 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6326 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6324 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6315 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6314 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5428 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5415 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5413 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4458 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4452 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-3730 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-3701 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-3700 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-3692 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2122 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2101 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-0786 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2022-35882 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Authenticated (author or higher user role) Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in GS Plugins GS Testimonial Slider plugin <= 1.9.1 at WordPress. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1948 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| An issue has been discovered in GitLab affecting all versions starting from 15.0 before 15.0.1. Missing validation of input used in quick actions allowed an attacker to exploit XSS by injecting HTML in contact details. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1805 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| When connecting to Amazon Workspaces, the SHA256 presented by AWS connection provisioner is not fully verified by Zero Clients. The issue could be exploited by an adversary that places a MITM (Man in the Middle) between a zero client and AWS session provisioner in the network. This issue is only applicable when connecting to an Amazon Workspace from a PCoIP Zero Client. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22650 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| An attacker may use TWinSoft and a malicious source project file (TPG) to extract files on machine executing Ovarro TWinSoft, which could lead to code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22648 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Ovarro TBox proprietary Modbus file access functions allow attackers to read, alter, or delete the configuration file. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22646 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| The “ipk” package containing the configuration created by TWinSoft can be uploaded, extracted, and executed in Ovarro TBox, allowing malicious code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22644 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Ovarro TBox TWinSoft uses the custom hardcoded user “TWinSoft” with a hardcoded key. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22642 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| An attacker could use specially crafted invalid Modbus frames to crash the Ovarro TBox system. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2139 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| In kippo-graph before version 1.5.1, there is a cross-site scripting vulnerability in $file_link in class/KippoInput.class.php. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2138 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| In kippo-graph before version 1.5.1, there is a cross-site scripting vulnerability in xss_clean() in class/KippoInput.class.php. | |||||
| CVE-2022-27509 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Unauthenticated redirection to a malicious website | |||||
| CVE-2012-2135 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Python | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Python | 2022-07-28 | 6.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The utf-16 decoder in Python 3.1 through 3.3 does not update the aligned_end variable after calling the unicode_decode_call_errorhandler function, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information (process memory) or cause a denial of service (memory corruption and crash) via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2022-36364 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Apache Calcite Avatica JDBC driver creates HTTP client instances based on class names provided via `httpclient_impl` connection property; however, the driver does not verify if the class implements the expected interface before instantiating it, which can lead to code execution loaded via arbitrary classes and in rare cases remote code execution. To exploit the vulnerability: 1) the attacker needs to have privileges to control JDBC connection parameters; 2) and there should be a vulnerable class (constructor with URL parameter and ability to execute code) in the classpath. From Apache Calcite Avatica 1.22.0 onwards, it will be verified that the class implements the expected interface before invoking its constructor. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2164 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Inappropriate implementation in Extensions API in Google Chrome prior to 103.0.5060.53 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to bypass discretionary access control via a crafted HTML page. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2162 | 2022-07-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Insufficient policy enforcement in File System API in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 103.0.5060.53 allowed a remote attacker to bypass file system access via a crafted HTML page. | |||||