Search
Total
86024 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-1526 | 2020-01-24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1527 | 2020-01-24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1528 | 2020-01-24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1529 | 2020-01-24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1530 | 2020-01-24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1531 | 2020-01-24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1532 | 2020-01-24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1533 | 2020-01-24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1534 | 2020-01-24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-1999-0144 | 1 Qmail Project | 1 Qmail | 2020-01-23 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
| Denial of service in Qmail by specifying a large number of recipients with the RCPT command. | |||||
| CVE-2014-3606 | 2020-01-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2010-3295 | 2020-01-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2005-4154 | 1 Php | 1 Pear | 2020-01-23 | 5.1 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in PEAR installer 1.4.2 and earlier allows user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted package that can execute code when the pear command is executed or when the Web/Gtk frontend is loaded. | |||||
| CVE-2011-1072 | 1 Php | 1 Pear | 2020-01-23 | 3.3 LOW | N/A |
| The installer in PEAR before 1.9.2 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on the package.xml file, related to the (1) download_dir, (2) cache_dir, (3) tmp_dir, and (4) pear-build-download directories, a different vulnerability than CVE-2007-2519. | |||||
| CVE-2011-1144 | 1 Php | 1 Pear | 2020-01-23 | 3.3 LOW | N/A |
| The installer in PEAR 1.9.2 and earlier allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on the package.xml file, related to the (1) download_dir, (2) cache_dir, (3) tmp_dir, and (4) pear-build-download directories. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2011-1072. | |||||
| CVE-2019-18583 | 2020-01-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-18584 | 2020-01-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-18585 | 2020-01-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-18586 | 2020-01-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2012-6369 | 1 1password | 1 1password | 2020-01-22 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Troubleshooting Reporting System feature in AgileBits 1Password 3.9.9 might allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted User-Agent HTTP header that is not properly handled in a View Troubleshooting Report action. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5498 | 2020-01-21 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5703 | 2020-01-21 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5704 | 2020-01-21 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5705 | 2020-01-21 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5706 | 2020-01-21 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5707 | 2020-01-21 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5708 | 2020-01-21 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5709 | 2020-01-21 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5710 | 2020-01-21 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5711 | 2020-01-21 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5712 | 2020-01-21 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5713 | 2020-01-21 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5714 | 2020-01-21 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-1861 | 2020-01-21 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2002-1235 | 3 Debian, Kth, Mit | 4 Debian Linux, Kth Kerberos 4, Kth Kerberos 5 and 1 more | 2020-01-21 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| The kadm_ser_in function in (1) the Kerberos v4compatibility administration daemon (kadmind4) in the MIT Kerberos 5 (krb5) krb5-1.2.6 and earlier, (2) kadmind in KTH Kerberos 4 (eBones) before 1.2.1, and (3) kadmind in KTH Kerberos 5 (Heimdal) before 0.5.1 when compiled with Kerberos 4 support, does not properly verify the length field of a request, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a buffer overflow attack. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0389 | 3 Cygnus, Mit, Redhat | 5 Cygnus Network Security, Kerbnet, Kerberos and 2 more | 2020-01-21 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in krb_rd_req function in Kerberos 4 and 5 allows remote attackers to gain root privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0390 | 3 Cygnus, Mit, Redhat | 5 Cygnus Network Security, Kerbnet, Kerberos and 2 more | 2020-01-21 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in krb425_conv_principal function in Kerberos 5 allows remote attackers to gain root privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0391 | 3 Cygnus, Mit, Redhat | 5 Cygnus Network Security, Kerbnet, Kerberos and 2 more | 2020-01-21 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in krshd in Kerberos 5 allows remote attackers to gain root privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0392 | 3 Cygnus, Mit, Redhat | 5 Cygnus Network Security, Kerbnet, Kerberos and 2 more | 2020-01-21 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in ksu in Kerberos 5 allows local users to gain root privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0514 | 1 Mit | 1 Kerberos 5 | 2020-01-21 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| GSSFTP FTP daemon in Kerberos 5 1.1.x does not properly restrict access to some FTP commands, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service, and local users to gain root privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0549 | 2 Cygnus, Mit | 4 Cygnus Network Security, Kerbnet, Kerberos and 1 more | 2020-01-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Kerberos 4 KDC program does not properly check for null termination of AUTH_MSG_KDC_REQUEST requests, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a malformed request. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0550 | 2 Cygnus, Mit | 4 Cygnus Network Security, Kerbnet, Kerberos and 1 more | 2020-01-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Kerberos 4 KDC program improperly frees memory twice (aka "double-free"), which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2001-0247 | 5 Freebsd, Mit, Netbsd and 2 more | 5 Freebsd, Kerberos 5, Netbsd and 2 more | 2020-01-21 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Buffer overflows in BSD-based FTP servers allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a long pattern string containing a {} sequence, as seen in (1) g_opendir, (2) g_lstat, (3) g_stat, and (4) the glob0 buffer as used in the glob functions glob2 and glob3. | |||||
| CVE-2003-0072 | 1 Mit | 2 Kerberos, Kerberos 5 | 2020-01-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The Key Distribution Center (KDC) in Kerberos 5 (krb5) 1.2.7 and earlier allows remote, authenticated attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) on KDCs within the same realm using a certain protocol request that causes an out-of-bounds read of an array (aka "array overrun"). | |||||
| CVE-2003-0082 | 1 Mit | 2 Kerberos, Kerberos 5 | 2020-01-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The Key Distribution Center (KDC) in Kerberos 5 (krb5) 1.2.7 and earlier allows remote, authenticated attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) on KDCs within the same realm using a certain protocol request that causes the KDC to corrupt its heap (aka "buffer underrun"). | |||||
| CVE-2004-0523 | 4 Mit, Sgi, Sun and 1 more | 7 Kerberos, Kerberos 5, Propack and 4 more | 2020-01-21 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Multiple buffer overflows in krb5_aname_to_localname for MIT Kerberos 5 (krb5) 1.3.3 and earlier allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code as root. | |||||
| CVE-2004-0772 | 1 Mit | 2 Kerberos, Kerberos 5 | 2020-01-21 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Double free vulnerabilities in error handling code in krb524d for MIT Kerberos 5 (krb5) 1.2.8 and earlier may allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2009-0846 | 1 Mit | 2 Kerberos, Kerberos 5 | 2020-01-21 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| The asn1_decode_generaltime function in lib/krb5/asn.1/asn1_decode.c in the ASN.1 GeneralizedTime decoder in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.6.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via vectors involving an invalid DER encoding that triggers a free of an uninitialized pointer. | |||||
| CVE-2015-2698 | 1 Mit | 1 Kerberos 5 | 2020-01-21 | 8.5 HIGH | N/A |
| The iakerb_gss_export_sec_context function in lib/gssapi/krb5/iakerb.c in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.14 pre-release 2015-09-14 improperly accesses a certain pointer, which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact by interacting with an application that calls the gss_export_sec_context function. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2015-2696. | |||||
| CVE-2010-1322 | 1 Mit | 1 Kerberos 5 | 2020-01-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The merge_authdata function in kdc_authdata.c in the Key Distribution Center (KDC) in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.8.x before 1.8.4 does not properly manage an index into an authorization-data list, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash), or possibly obtain sensitive information, spoof authorization, or execute arbitrary code, via a TGS request that triggers an uninitialized pointer dereference, as demonstrated by a request from a Windows Active Directory client. | |||||