Search
Total
86024 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-14507 | 2020-03-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** Unused CVE for 2019. | |||||
| CVE-2019-14508 | 2020-03-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** Unused CVE for 2019. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10020 | 2020-03-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** Number assigned to issue that does not qualify for a CVE. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0250 | 2 Freerdp, Opensuse | 2 Freerdp, Opensuse | 2020-03-06 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Multiple integer overflows in client/X11/xf_graphics.c in FreeRDP allow remote attackers to have an unspecified impact via the width and height to the (1) xf_Pointer_New or (2) xf_Bitmap_Decompress function, which causes an incorrect amount of memory to be allocated. | |||||
| CVE-2020-7975 | 2020-03-06 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2012-6459 | 2 Intel, Linux | 2 Connman, Tizen | 2020-03-05 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| ConnMan 1.3 on Tizen continues to list the bluetooth service after offline mode has been enabled, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via Bluetooth packets. | |||||
| CVE-2019-8401 | 2020-03-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-12915 | 2020-03-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-12916 | 2020-03-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20347 | 2020-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2018-18479 | 2020-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19284 | 2020-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2018-11675 | 2020-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-6764 | 2020-03-02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2010-2246 | 1 Feh Project | 1 Feh | 2020-02-27 | 5.1 MEDIUM | N/A |
| feh before 1.8, when the --wget-timestamp option is enabled, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in a URL. | |||||
| CVE-2011-0702 | 1 Feh Project | 1 Feh | 2020-02-27 | 3.3 LOW | N/A |
| The feh_unique_filename function in utils.c in feh before 1.11.2 might allow local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a /tmp/feh_ temporary file. | |||||
| CVE-2011-1031 | 1 Feh Project | 1 Feh | 2020-02-27 | 3.3 LOW | N/A |
| The feh_unique_filename function in utils.c in feh 1.11.2 and earlier might allow local users to create arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a /tmp/feh_ temporary file, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-0702. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19668 | 2020-02-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-17963. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2018-17963. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2018-17963 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2019-12882 | 2020-02-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-5861 | 2020-02-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-1000020. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-1000020. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-1000020 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2012-5556 | 2 Drupal, Restful Web Services Project | 2 Drupal, Restful Web Services | 2020-02-26 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the RESTful Web Services (RESTWS) module 7.x-1.x before 7.x-1.1 and 7.x-2.x before 7.x-2.0-alpha3 for Drupal allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2013-1946 | 2 Drupal, Restful Web Services Project | 2 Drupal, Restful Web Services | 2020-02-26 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The RESTful Web Services (RESTWS) module 7.x-1.x before 7.x-1.3 and 7.x-2.x before 7.x-2.0-alpha5 for Drupal, when page caching is enabled and anonymous users are assigned RESTWS permissions, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a GET request with an HTTP Accept header set to a non-HTML type, which can "interfere with Drupal's page cache." | |||||
| CVE-2019-17027 | 2020-02-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17028 | 2020-02-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17029 | 2020-02-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17030 | 2020-02-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17031 | 2020-02-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17032 | 2020-02-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17033 | 2020-02-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17034 | 2020-02-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17035 | 2020-02-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17036 | 2020-02-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17037 | 2020-02-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17038 | 2020-02-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17039 | 2020-02-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3796 | 2020-02-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2013-0722 | 1 Ettercap-project | 1 Ettercap | 2020-02-26 | 4.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in the scan_load_hosts function in ec_scan.c in Ettercap 0.7.5.1 and earlier might allow local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse hosts list containing a long line. | |||||
| CVE-2014-6395 | 1 Ettercap-project | 1 Ettercap | 2020-02-26 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in the dissector_postgresql function in dissectors/ec_postgresql.c in Ettercap before 0.8.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted password length value that is inconsistent with the actual length of the password. | |||||
| CVE-2014-6396 | 1 Ettercap-project | 1 Ettercap | 2020-02-26 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| The dissector_postgresql function in dissectors/ec_postgresql.c in Ettercap before 0.8.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted password length, which triggers a 0 character to be written to an arbitrary memory location. | |||||
| CVE-2014-9376 | 1 Ettercap-project | 1 Ettercap | 2020-02-26 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Integer underflow in Ettercap 0.8.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a small (1) size variable value in the dissector_dhcp function in dissectors/ec_dhcp.c, (2) length value to the dissector_gg function in dissectors/ec_gg.c, or (3) string length to the get_decode_len function in ec_utils.c or a request without a (4) username or (5) password to the dissector_TN3270 function in dissectors/ec_TN3270.c. | |||||
| CVE-2014-9377 | 1 Ettercap-project | 1 Ettercap | 2020-02-26 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in the nbns_spoof function in plug-ins/nbns_spoof/nbns_spoof.c in Ettercap 0.8.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code via a large netbios packet. | |||||
| CVE-2014-9378 | 1 Ettercap-project | 1 Ettercap | 2020-02-26 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Ettercap 0.8.1 does not validate certain return values, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted (1) name to the parse_line function in mdns_spoof/mdns_spoof.c or (2) base64 encoded password to the dissector_imap function in dissectors/ec_imap.c. | |||||
| CVE-2014-9379 | 1 Ettercap-project | 1 Ettercap | 2020-02-26 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| The radius_get_attribute function in dissectors/ec_radius.c in Ettercap 0.8.1 performs an incorrect cast, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, which triggers a stack-based buffer overflow. | |||||
| CVE-2014-9380 | 1 Ettercap-project | 1 Ettercap | 2020-02-26 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The dissector_cvs function in dissectors/ec_cvs.c in Ettercap 0.8.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read) via a packet containing only a CVS_LOGIN signature. | |||||
| CVE-2014-9381 | 1 Ettercap-project | 1 Ettercap | 2020-02-26 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Integer signedness error in the dissector_cvs function in dissectors/ec_cvs.c in Ettercap 0.8.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted password, which triggers a large memory allocation. | |||||
| CVE-2012-2747 | 1 Joomla | 1 Joomla\! | 2020-02-25 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Joomla! 2.5.x before 2.5.5 allows remote attackers to gain privileges via unknown attack vectors related to "Inadequate checking." | |||||
| CVE-2004-1002 | 1 Point-to-point Protocol Project | 1 Point-to-point Protocol | 2020-02-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Integer underflow in pppd in cbcp.c for ppp 2.4.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a CBCP packet with an invalid length value that causes pppd to access an incorrect memory location. | |||||
| CVE-2004-2695 | 2 Jelsoft, Point-to-point Protocol Project | 2 Vbulletin, Point-to-point Protocol | 2020-02-24 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| SQL injection vulnerability in the Authorize.net callback code (subscriptions/authorize.php) in Jelsoft vBulletin 3.0 through 3.0.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL statements via the x_invoice_num parameter. NOTE: this issue might be related to CVE-2006-4267. | |||||
| CVE-2006-2194 | 1 Point-to-point Protocol Project | 1 Point-to-point Protocol | 2020-02-24 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| The winbind plugin in pppd for ppp 2.4.4 and earlier does not check the return code from the setuid function call, which might allow local users to gain privileges by causing setuid to fail, such as exceeding PAM limits for the maximum number of user processes, which prevents the winbind NTLM authentication helper from dropping privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2014-3158 | 1 Point-to-point Protocol Project | 1 Point-to-point Protocol | 2020-02-24 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Integer overflow in the getword function in options.c in pppd in Paul's PPP Package (ppp) before 2.4.7 allows attackers to "access privileged options" via a long word in an options file, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow that "[corrupts] security-relevant variables." | |||||