Search
Total
86024 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-0745 | 1 Cisco | 2 Headend Digital Broadband Delivery System, Headend System Release | 2017-01-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cisco Headend System Release allows remote attackers to read temporary script files or archive files, and consequently obtain sensitive information, via a crafted header in an HTTP request, aka Bug ID CSCus44909. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0747 | 1 Cisco | 3 Headend Digital Broadband Delivery System, Headend System Release, Videoscape Conductor | 2017-01-04 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cisco Conductor for Videoscape 3.0 and Cisco Headend System Release allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary cookies via a crafted HTTP request, aka Bug ID CSCuh25408. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0751 | 1 Cisco | 2 Ip Phone 7861, Unified Communications Manager | 2017-01-04 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| Cisco IP Phone 7861, when firmware from Cisco Unified Communications Manager 10.3(1) is used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted packets, aka Bug ID CSCus81800. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0752 | 1 Cisco | 1 Telepresence Video Communication Server | 2017-01-04 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) X8.5.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL, aka Bug ID CSCut27635. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0753 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unified Web And E-mail Interaction Manager | 2017-01-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| SQL injection vulnerability in Cisco Unified Email Interaction Manager (EIM) and Unified Web Interaction Manager (WIM) 9.0(2) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors, aka Bug ID CSCuu30028. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0754 | 1 Cisco | 1 Finesse | 2017-01-04 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Cisco Finesse 10.5(1) allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information or cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) via a crafted XML document, aka Bug ID CSCut95810. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0755 | 1 Cisco | 1 Anyconnect Secure Mobility Client | 2017-01-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The Posture module for Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE), as distributed in Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client 4.0(64), allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified commands, aka Bug ID CSCut05797. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0756 | 1 Cisco | 1 Wireless Lan Controller | 2017-01-04 | 6.1 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cisco Wireless LAN Controller (WLC) devices with software 7.4(1.1) allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (wireless-networking outage) via crafted TCP traffic on the local network, aka Bug ID CSCug67104. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0737 | 1 Cisco | 1 Firesight System Software | 2017-01-04 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Cisco FireSIGHT System Software 5.3.1.1 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted (1) GET or (2) POST parameter, aka Bug ID CSCuu11099. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0733 | 1 Cisco | 1 Headend Digital Broadband Delivery System | 2017-01-04 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in the HTTP Header Handler in Digital Broadband Delivery System in Cisco Headend System Release allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers, and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks or cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, via a crafted request, aka Bug ID CSCur25580. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0758 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unified Meetingplace | 2017-01-04 | 4.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The web-based user interface in Cisco Unified MeetingPlace 8.6(1.9) allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via an XML document containing an external entity declaration in conjunction with an entity reference, related to an XML External Entity (XXE) issue, aka Bug ID CSCus97452. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0759 | 1 Cisco | 1 Headend Digital Broadband Delivery System | 2017-01-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cisco Headend Digital Broadband Delivery System allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0761 | 1 Cisco | 1 Anyconnect Secure Mobility Client | 2017-01-04 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client before 3.1(8009) and 4.x before 4.0(2052) on Linux does not properly implement unspecified internal functions, which allows local users to obtain root privileges via crafted vpnagent options, aka Bug ID CSCus86790. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0762 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unified Meetingplace | 2017-01-04 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the management interface in Cisco Unified MeetingPlace 8.6(1.2) and 8.6(1.9) for Microsoft Outlook allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted value in a URL, aka Bug ID CSCuu51400. | |||||
| CVE-2013-5528 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unified Communications Manager | 2017-01-04 | 4.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in the Tomcat administrative web interface in Cisco Unified Communications Manager allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via directory traversal sequences in an unspecified input string, aka Bug ID CSCui78815. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0763 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unified Meetingplace | 2017-01-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cisco Unified MeetingPlace 8.6(1.2) does not properly validate session IDs in http URLs, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive session information via a crafted URL, aka Bug ID CSCuu60338. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0764 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unified Meetingplace | 2017-01-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cisco Unified MeetingPlace 8.6(1.9) allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a crafted resource request, aka Bug ID CSCus95603. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8828 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8829 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8830 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8831 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8832 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8833 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8834 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8835 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8836 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8837 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8838 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8839 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8840 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8841 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8842 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8843 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8844 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8845 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8846 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8847 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8848 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8849 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8850 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8851 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8852 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8853 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8854 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3047 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat, Acrobat Reader, Mac Os X and 1 more | 2017-01-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.14 and 11.x before 11.0.11 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference) via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3049 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat, Acrobat Reader, Mac Os X and 1 more | 2017-01-03 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.14 and 11.x before 11.0.11 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-9161, CVE-2015-3046, CVE-2015-3050, CVE-2015-3051, CVE-2015-3052, CVE-2015-3056, CVE-2015-3057, CVE-2015-3070, and CVE-2015-3076. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3051 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat, Acrobat Reader, Mac Os X and 1 more | 2017-01-03 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.14 and 11.x before 11.0.11 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-9161, CVE-2015-3046, CVE-2015-3049, CVE-2015-3050, CVE-2015-3052, CVE-2015-3056, CVE-2015-3057, CVE-2015-3070, and CVE-2015-3076. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3052 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat, Acrobat Reader, Mac Os X and 1 more | 2017-01-03 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.14 and 11.x before 11.0.11 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-9161, CVE-2015-3046, CVE-2015-3049, CVE-2015-3050, CVE-2015-3051, CVE-2015-3056, CVE-2015-3057, CVE-2015-3070, and CVE-2015-3076. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3050 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat, Acrobat Reader, Mac Os X and 1 more | 2017-01-03 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.14 and 11.x before 11.0.11 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-9161, CVE-2015-3046, CVE-2015-3049, CVE-2015-3051, CVE-2015-3052, CVE-2015-3056, CVE-2015-3057, CVE-2015-3070, and CVE-2015-3076. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3057 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat, Acrobat Reader, Mac Os X and 1 more | 2017-01-03 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.14 and 11.x before 11.0.11 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-9161, CVE-2015-3046, CVE-2015-3049, CVE-2015-3050, CVE-2015-3051, CVE-2015-3052, CVE-2015-3056, CVE-2015-3070, and CVE-2015-3076. | |||||