Search
Total
86024 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-15452 | 2021-05-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15451 | 2021-05-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15450 | 2021-05-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15449 | 2021-05-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15448 | 2021-05-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15447 | 2021-05-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15446 | 2021-05-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15445 | 2021-05-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15444 | 2021-05-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15443 | 2021-05-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15442 | 2021-05-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15441 | 2021-05-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15440 | 2021-05-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15439 | 2021-05-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15438 | 2021-05-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2008-5509 | 2021-05-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs:CVE-2008-5508. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-5508. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-5508 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2008-5085 | 2021-05-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. | |||||
| CVE-2008-5084 | 2021-05-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. | |||||
| CVE-2008-3523 | 2021-05-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3306 | 1 Proftpd | 1 Proftpd | 2021-05-26 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| The mod_copy module in ProFTPD 1.3.5 allows remote attackers to read and write to arbitrary files via the site cpfr and site cpto commands. | |||||
| CVE-2014-3808 | 2 Barracudadrive, Realtimelogic | 2 Barracudadrive, Barracudadrive | 2021-05-26 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in BarracudaDrive before 6.7.2 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) role parameter to roles.lsp, (2) name parameter to user.lsp, (3) path parameter to wizard/setuser.lsp, (4) host parameter to tunnelconstr.lsp, or (5) newpath parameter to wfsconstr.lsp in rtl/protected/admin/. | |||||
| CVE-2012-2677 | 1 Boost | 1 Pool | 2021-05-26 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Integer overflow in the ordered_malloc function in boost/pool/pool.hpp in Boost Pool before 3.9 makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to perform memory-related attacks such as buffer overflows via a large memory chunk size value, which causes less memory to be allocated than expected. | |||||
| CVE-2008-4211 | 1 Apple | 3 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Mac Os X Server | 2021-05-23 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Integer signedness error in (1) QuickLook in Apple Mac OS X 10.5.5 and (2) Office Viewer in Apple iPhone OS 1.0 through 2.1 and iPhone OS for iPod touch 1.1 through 2.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application termination) and execute arbitrary code via a crafted Microsoft Excel file that triggers an out-of-bounds memory access, related to "handling of columns." | |||||
| CVE-2005-2535 | 1 Broadcom | 4 Arcserve Backup 2000, Brightstor Arcserve Backup, Brightstor Arcserve Backup Hp and 1 more | 2021-05-20 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the Discovery Service in BrightStor ARCserve Backup 9.0 through 11.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a large packet to TCP port 41523, a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-0260. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7984 | 2 Debian, Horde | 3 Debian Linux, Groupware, Horde Application Framework | 2021-05-19 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Horde before 5.2.8, Horde Groupware before 5.2.11, and Horde Groupware Webmail Edition before 5.2.11 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute arbitrary (1) commands via the cmd parameter to admin/cmdshell.php, (2) SQL queries via the sql parameter to admin/sqlshell.php, or (3) PHP code via the php parameter to admin/phpshell.php. | |||||
| CVE-2007-4476 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Gnu | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Tar | 2021-05-17 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the safer_name_suffix function in GNU tar has unspecified attack vectors and impact, resulting in a "crashing stack." | |||||
| CVE-2013-3893 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Internet Explorer | 2021-05-17 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
| Use-after-free vulnerability in the SetMouseCapture implementation in mshtml.dll in Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 through 11 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted JavaScript strings, as demonstrated by use of an ms-help: URL that triggers loading of hxds.dll. | |||||
| CVE-2014-7208 | 1 Gparted | 1 Gparted | 2021-05-14 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| GParted before 0.15.0 allows local users to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges via shell metacharacters in a crafted filesystem label. | |||||
| CVE-2008-4539 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Kvm Qumranet and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Kvm and 1 more | 2021-05-14 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in the Cirrus VGA implementation in (1) KVM before kvm-82 and (2) QEMU on Debian GNU/Linux and Ubuntu might allow local users to gain privileges by using the VNC console for a connection, aka the LGD-54XX "bitblt" heap overflow. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2007-1320. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0997 | 2 Aveva, Schneider-electric | 2 Aveva Edge, Wonderware Intouch 2014 | 2021-05-14 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Schneider Electric InduSoft Web Studio before 7.1.3.4 SP3 Patch 4 and InTouch Machine Edition 2014 before 7.1.3.4 SP3 Patch 4 provide an HMI user interface that lists all valid usernames, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via a brute-force password-guessing attack. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0996 | 2 Aveva, Schneider-electric | 2 Aveva Edge, Wonderware Intouch 2014 | 2021-05-14 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
| Schneider Electric InduSoft Web Studio before 7.1.3.4 SP3 Patch 4 and InTouch Machine Edition 2014 before 7.1.3.4 SP3 Patch 4 rely on a hardcoded cleartext password to control read access to Project files and Project Configuration files, which makes it easier for local users to obtain sensitive information by discovering this password. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0998 | 2 Aveva, Schneider-electric | 2 Aveva Edge, Wonderware Intouch 2014 | 2021-05-14 | 3.3 LOW | N/A |
| Schneider Electric InduSoft Web Studio before 7.1.3.4 SP3 Patch 4 and InTouch Machine Edition 2014 before 7.1.3.4 SP3 Patch 4 transmit cleartext credentials, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by sniffing the network. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0999 | 2 Aveva, Schneider-electric | 2 Aveva Edge, Wonderware Intouch 2014 | 2021-05-14 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
| Schneider Electric InduSoft Web Studio before 7.1.3.4 SP3 Patch 4 and InTouch Machine Edition 2014 before 7.1.3.4 SP3 Patch 4 store cleartext OPC User credentials in a configuration file, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading this file. | |||||
| CVE-2013-0221 | 2 Opensuse, Redhat | 2 Opensuse, Enterprise Linux | 2021-05-13 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The SUSE coreutils-i18n.patch for GNU coreutils allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault and crash) via a long string to the sort command, when using the (1) -d or (2) -M switch, which triggers a stack-based buffer overflow in the alloca function. | |||||
| CVE-2013-0222 | 2 Opensuse, Redhat | 2 Opensuse, Enterprise Linux | 2021-05-13 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
| The SUSE coreutils-i18n.patch for GNU coreutils allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault and crash) via a long string to the uniq command, which triggers a stack-based buffer overflow in the alloca function. | |||||
| CVE-2013-0223 | 2 Opensuse, Redhat | 2 Opensuse, Enterprise Linux | 2021-05-13 | 1.9 LOW | N/A |
| The SUSE coreutils-i18n.patch for GNU coreutils allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault and crash) via a long string to the join command, when using the -i switch, which triggers a stack-based buffer overflow in the alloca function. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0803 | 1 Gnu | 1 Groff | 2021-05-10 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| GNU Groff uses the current working directory to find a device description file, which allows a local user to gain additional privileges by including a malicious postpro directive in the description file, which is executed when another user runs groff. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31877 | 2021-05-10 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA due to lack of a reference providing provenance. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2012-5781 | 1 Amazon | 1 Elastic Load Balancing | 2021-05-10 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Amazon Elastic Load Balancing API Tools does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate, related to overriding the default JDK X509TrustManager. | |||||
| CVE-2021-32259 | 2021-05-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. | |||||
| CVE-2010-4344 | 1 Exim | 1 Exim | 2021-05-04 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in the string_vformat function in string.c in Exim before 4.70 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an SMTP session that includes two MAIL commands in conjunction with a large message containing crafted headers, leading to improper rejection logging. | |||||
| CVE-2010-4345 | 1 Exim | 1 Exim | 2021-05-04 | 6.9 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Exim 4.72 and earlier allows local users to gain privileges by leveraging the ability of the exim user account to specify an alternate configuration file with a directive that contains arbitrary commands, as demonstrated by the spool_directory directive. | |||||
| CVE-2014-2957 | 1 Exim | 1 Exim | 2021-05-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The dmarc_process function in dmarc.c in Exim before 4.82.1, when EXPERIMENTAL_DMARC is enabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the From header in an email, which is passed to the expand_string function. | |||||
| CVE-2013-4492 | 1 I18n Project | 1 I18n | 2021-05-04 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in exceptions.rb in the i18n gem before 0.6.6 for Ruby allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted I18n::MissingTranslationData.new call. | |||||
| CVE-2014-9342 | 1 F5 | 1 Big-ip | 2021-05-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the tree view (pl_tree.php) feature in Application Security Manager (ASM) in F5 BIG-IP 11.3.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML by accessing a crafted URL during automatic policy generation. | |||||
| CVE-2021-27802 | 2021-04-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2021-24177. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2021-24177. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-24177 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2002-0316 | 1 Xmb Software | 1 Xmb Forum | 2021-04-29 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting vulnerability in eXtreme message board (XMB) 1.6x and earlier allows remote attackers to execute script as other XMB users by inserting the script into an IMG tag. | |||||
| CVE-2003-0375 | 1 Xmb Forum | 1 Xmb | 2021-04-29 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in member.php of XMBforum XMB 1.8.x (aka Partagium) allows remote attackers to insert arbitrary HTML and web script via the "member" parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2003-0483 | 1 Xmb Forum | 1 Xmb | 2021-04-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in XMB Forum 1.8 Partagium allow remote attackers to insert arbitrary script via (1) the member parameter to member.php or (2) the action parameter to buddy.php. | |||||
| CVE-2004-0322 | 1 Xmb Forum | 1 Xmb | 2021-04-29 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in XMB 1.8 Final SP2 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary script as other users via the (1) member parameter in member.php, (2) uid parameter in u2uadmin.php, (3) user parameter in editprofile.php, (4) an onmouseover event in an align tag when bbcode is allowed, or (5) img tag where bbcode is allowed. | |||||