Search
Total
86024 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-8393 | 2 Fedoraproject, Pcre | 2 Fedora, Perl Compatible Regular Expression Library | 2017-07-01 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| pcregrep in PCRE before 8.38 mishandles the -q option for binary files, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a crafted file, as demonstrated by a CGI script that sends stdout data to a client. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8394 | 1 Pcre | 1 Perl Compatible Regular Expression Library | 2017-07-01 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| PCRE before 8.38 mishandles the (?(<digits>) and (?(R<digits>) conditions, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (integer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted regular expression, as demonstrated by a JavaScript RegExp object encountered by Konqueror. | |||||
| CVE-2013-1432 | 1 Xen | 1 Xen | 2017-06-30 | 7.4 HIGH | N/A |
| Xen 4.1.x and 4.2.x, when the XSA-45 patch is in place, does not properly maintain references on pages stored for deferred cleanup, which allows local PV guest kernels to cause a denial of service (premature page free and hypervisor crash) or possibly gain privileges via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2013-1964 | 1 Xen | 1 Xen | 2017-06-30 | 6.9 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Xen 4.0.x and 4.1.x incorrectly releases a grant reference when releasing a non-v1, non-transitive grant, which allows local guest administrators to cause a denial of service (host crash), obtain sensitive information, or possibly have other impacts via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2013-4232 | 2 Debian, Libtiff | 2 Debian Linux, Libtiff | 2017-06-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Use-after-free vulnerability in the t2p_readwrite_pdf_image function in tools/tiff2pdf.c in libtiff 4.0.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted TIFF image. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8496 | 2017-06-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8497 | 2017-06-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8498 | 2017-06-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6383 | 2017-06-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-7855. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-7855. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-7855 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2017-9504 | 2017-06-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-9741. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-9741. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-9741 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8813 | 2017-06-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-8831. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2017-8831. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-8831 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2017-9073 | 2017-06-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-0176. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-0176. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-0176 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4612 | 2017-06-08 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-1683. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-1683. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-1683 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4619 | 2017-06-08 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-8317. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2015-8317. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-8317 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2017-9422 | 2017-06-06 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-8920. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-8920. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-8920 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-3073 | 2017-06-01 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-3079. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-3079. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-3079 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2017-9021 | 2017-06-01 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-5937. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-5937. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-5937 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2016-10373 | 2017-05-31 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-10214. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-10214. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-10214 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0924 | 1 Ceragon | 3 Fiberair Ip-10c, Fiberair Ip-10e, Fiberair Ip-10g | 2017-05-27 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| Ceragon FibeAir IP-10 bridges have a default password for the root account, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via a (1) HTTP, (2) SSH, (3) TELNET, or (4) CLI session. | |||||
| CVE-2006-0041 | 2017-05-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2009-0797 | 2017-05-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2009-2418 | 2017-05-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2009-4036 | 2017-05-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2009-4268 | 2017-05-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2009-4275 | 2017-05-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2009. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2009-4276 | 2017-05-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2009. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2011-2481 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2017-05-23 | 4.6 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 7.0.x before 7.0.17 permits web applications to replace an XML parser used for other web applications, which allows local users to read or modify the (1) web.xml, (2) context.xml, or (3) tld files of arbitrary web applications via a crafted application that is loaded earlier than the target application. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of a CVE-2009-0783 regression. | |||||
| CVE-2011-3376 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2017-05-23 | 4.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
| org/apache/catalina/core/DefaultInstanceManager.java in Apache Tomcat 7.x before 7.0.22 does not properly restrict ContainerServlets in the Manager application, which allows local users to gain privileges by using an untrusted web application to access the Manager application's functionality. | |||||
| CVE-2013-2071 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2017-05-23 | 2.6 LOW | N/A |
| java/org/apache/catalina/core/AsyncContextImpl.java in Apache Tomcat 7.x before 7.0.40 does not properly handle the throwing of a RuntimeException in an AsyncListener in an application, which allows context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive request information intended for other applications in opportunistic circumstances via an application that records the requests that it processes. | |||||
| CVE-2014-2109 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2017-05-23 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| The TCP Input module in Cisco IOS 12.2 through 12.4 and 15.0 through 15.4, when NAT is used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption or device reload) via crafted TCP packets, aka Bug IDs CSCuh33843 and CSCuj41494. | |||||
| CVE-2014-2111 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2017-05-23 | 7.1 HIGH | N/A |
| The Application Layer Gateway (ALG) module in Cisco IOS 12.2 through 12.4 and 15.0 through 15.4, when NAT is used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via crafted DNS packets, aka Bug ID CSCue00996. | |||||
| CVE-2014-2112 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2017-05-23 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| The SSL VPN (aka WebVPN) feature in Cisco IOS 15.1 through 15.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via crafted HTTP requests, aka Bug ID CSCuf51357. | |||||
| CVE-2014-2113 | 1 Cisco | 2 Ios, Ios Xe | 2017-05-23 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| Cisco IOS 15.1 through 15.3 and IOS XE 3.3 and 3.5 before 3.5.2E; 3.7 before 3.7.5S; and 3.8, 3.9, and 3.10 before 3.10.2S allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (I/O memory consumption and device reload) via a malformed IPv6 packet, aka Bug ID CSCui59540. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2172 | 2017-05-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7492 | 2017-05-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-7503. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-7503. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-7503 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2011-0540 | 2017-05-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2012-1619 | 2017-05-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2012-3545 | 2017-05-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2013-4360 | 2017-05-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7498 | 2017-05-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-8934. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-8934. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-8934 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7499 | 2017-05-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-8933. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-8933. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-8933 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0051 | 2017-05-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2015-6542 | 2017-05-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-3403. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-3403. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-3403 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0642 | 1 Cisco | 2 Ios, Ios Xe | 2017-05-12 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| Cisco IOS 12.2, 12.4, 15.0, 15.1, 15.2, 15.3, and 15.4 and IOS XE 2.5.x, 2.6.x, 3.1.xS through 3.12.xS before 3.12.3S, 3.2.xE through 3.7.xE before 3.7.1E, 3.3.xSG, 3.4.xSG, and 3.13.xS before 3.13.2S allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) by sending malformed IKEv2 packets over (1) IPv4 or (2) IPv6, aka Bug ID CSCum36951. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0643 | 1 Cisco | 2 Ios, Ios Xe | 2017-05-12 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| Cisco IOS 12.2, 12.4, 15.0, 15.1, 15.2, 15.3, and 15.4 and IOS XE 2.5.x, 2.6.x, 3.1.xS through 3.12.xS before 3.12.3S, 3.2.xE through 3.7.xE before 3.7.1E, 3.3.xSG, 3.4.xSG, and 3.13.xS before 3.13.2S allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and device reload) by sending malformed IKEv2 packets over (1) IPv4 or (2) IPv6, aka Bug ID CSCuo75572. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0646 | 1 Cisco | 2 Ios, Ios Xe | 2017-05-12 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| Memory leak in the TCP input module in Cisco IOS 12.2, 12.4, 15.0, 15.2, 15.3, and 15.4 and IOS XE 3.3.xXO, 3.5.xE, 3.6.xE, 3.8.xS through 3.10.xS before 3.10.5S, and 3.11.xS and 3.12.xS before 3.12.3S allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption or device reload) by sending crafted TCP packets over (1) IPv4 or (2) IPv6, aka Bug ID CSCum94811. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2641 | 2017-05-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2642 | 2017-05-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2643 | 2017-05-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2644 | 2017-05-11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||