Filtered by vendor Octopus
Subscribe
Search
Total
38 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-2247 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2023-12-14 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to unmask variable secrets using the variable preview function | |||||
| CVE-2022-2259 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2023-08-08 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a user to view Workerpools without being explicitly assigned permissions to view these items | |||||
| CVE-2022-1901 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Octopus | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Octopus Server | 2023-08-08 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to unmask sensitive variables by using variable preview. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2781 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2023-08-08 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server it was identified that the same encryption process was used for both encrypting session cookies and variables. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1502 | 1 Octopus | 1 Server | 2023-08-08 | 3.5 LOW | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Permissions were not properly verified in the API on projects using version control in Git. This allowed projects to be modified by users with only ProjectView permissions. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2258 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2023-08-08 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a user to view Tagsets without being explicitly assigned permissions to view these items | |||||
| CVE-2022-2783 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2023-08-08 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server it was identified that a session cookie could be used as the CSRF token | |||||
| CVE-2022-2346 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2023-08-07 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a low privileged guest user to interact with extension endpoints. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2416 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2023-08-04 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a low privileged guest user to craft a request that allows enumeration/recon of an environment. | |||||
| CVE-2022-30532 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Octopus | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Server | 2022-07-28 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy, there is no logging of changes to artifacts within Octopus Deploy. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1881 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2022-07-27 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server an Insecure Direct Object Reference vulnerability exists where it is possible for a user to download Project Exports from a Project they do not have permissions to access. This vulnerability only impacts projects within the same Space. | |||||
| CVE-2019-15508 | 1 Octopus | 2 Server, Tentacle | 2022-07-27 | 3.5 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In Octopus Tentacle versions 3.0.8 to 5.0.0, when a web request proxy is configured, an authenticated user (in certain limited OctopusPrintVariables circumstances) could trigger a deployment that writes the web request proxy password to the deployment log in cleartext. This is fixed in 5.0.1. The fix was back-ported to 4.0.7. | |||||
| CVE-2022-29890 | 1 Octopus | 1 Server | 2022-07-27 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server the help sidebar can be customized to include a Cross-Site Scripting payload in the support link. | |||||
| CVE-2019-19085 | 1 Octopus | 1 Server | 2022-07-27 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| A persistent cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Octopus Server 3.4.0 through 2019.10.5 allows remote authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31818 | 1 Octopus | 1 Server | 2022-07-27 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Affected versions of Octopus Server are prone to an authenticated SQL injection vulnerability in the Events REST API because user supplied data in the API request isn’t parameterised correctly. Exploiting this vulnerability could allow unauthorised access to database tables. | |||||
| CVE-2019-15507 | 1 Octopus | 1 Server | 2022-07-27 | 3.5 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In Octopus Deploy versions 2018.8.4 to 2019.7.6, when a web request proxy is configured, an authenticated user (in certain limited special-characters circumstances) could trigger a deployment that writes the web request proxy password to the deployment log in cleartext. This is fixed in 2019.7.7. The fix was back-ported to LTS 2019.6.7 as well as LTS 2019.3.8. | |||||
| CVE-2020-16197 | 1 Octopus | 2 Octopus Server, Server | 2022-07-27 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Octopus Deploy 3.4. A deployment target can be configured with an Account or Certificate that is outside the scope of the deployment target. An authorised user can potentially use a certificate that they are not in scope to use. An authorised user is also able to obtain certificate metadata by associating a certificate with certain resources that should fail scope validation. | |||||
| CVE-2019-15698 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2022-07-27 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In Octopus Deploy 2019.7.3 through 2019.7.9, in certain circumstances, an authenticated user with VariableView permissions could view sensitive values. This is fixed in 2019.7.10. | |||||
| CVE-2019-14525 | 1 Octopus | 2 Octopus Deploy, Octopus Server | 2022-07-27 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| In Octopus Deploy 2019.4.0 through 2019.6.x before 2019.6.6, and 2019.7.x before 2019.7.6, an authenticated system administrator is able to view sensitive values by visiting a server configuration page or making an API call. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23184 | 1 Octopus | 2 Octopus Deploy, Octopus Server | 2022-07-27 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| In affected Octopus Server versions when the server HTTP and HTTPS bindings are configured to localhost, Octopus Server will allow open redirects. | |||||
| CVE-2019-8944 | 1 Octopus | 2 Octopus Deploy, Octopus Server | 2022-07-27 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An Information Exposure issue in the Terraform deployment step in Octopus Deploy before 2019.1.8 (and before 2018.10.4 LTS) allows remote authenticated users to view sensitive Terraform output variables via log files. | |||||
| CVE-2017-11348 | 1 Octopus | 2 Octopus Deploy, Octopus Server | 2022-07-27 | 6.3 MEDIUM | 5.7 MEDIUM |
| In Octopus Deploy 3.x before 3.15.4, an authenticated user with PackagePush permission to upload packages could upload a maliciously crafted NuGet package, potentially overwriting other packages or modifying system files. This is a directory traversal in the PackageId value. | |||||
| CVE-2020-26161 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2022-06-03 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| In Octopus Deploy through 2020.4.2, an attacker could redirect users to an external site via a modified HTTP Host header. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31821 | 2 Microsoft, Octopus | 2 Windows, Tentacle | 2022-01-26 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| When the Windows Tentacle docker image starts up it logs all the commands that it runs along with the arguments, which writes the Octopus Server API key in plaintext. This does not affect the Linux Docker image | |||||
| CVE-2020-14470 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2021-07-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In Octopus Deploy 2018.8.0 through 2019.x before 2019.12.2, an authenticated user with could trigger a deployment that leaks the Helm Chart repository password. | |||||
| CVE-2020-12286 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2021-07-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In Octopus Deploy before 2019.12.9 and 2020 before 2020.1.12, the TaskView permission is not scoped to any dimension. For example, a scoped user who is scoped to only one tenant can view server tasks scoped to any other tenant. | |||||
| CVE-2019-19376 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2021-07-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In Octopus Deploy before 2019.10.6, an authenticated user with TeamEdit permission could send a malformed Team API request that bypasses input validation and causes an application level denial of service condition. (The fix for this was also backported to LTS 2019.9.8 and LTS 2019.6.14.) | |||||
| CVE-2021-21270 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopusdsc | 2021-02-01 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| OctopusDSC is a PowerShell module with DSC resources that can be used to install and configure an Octopus Deploy Server and Tentacle agent. In OctopusDSC version 4.0.977 and earlier a customer API key used to connect to Octopus Server is exposed via logging in plaintext. This vulnerability is patched in version 4.0.1002. | |||||
| CVE-2018-9039 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2020-08-24 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In Octopus Deploy 2.0 and later before 2018.3.7, an authenticated user, with variable edit permissions, can scope some variables to targets greater than their permissions should allow. In other words, they can see machines beyond their team's scoped environments. | |||||
| CVE-2019-19375 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2020-08-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In Octopus Deploy before 2019.10.7, in a configuration where SSL offloading is enabled, the CSRF cookie was sometimes sent without the secure attribute. (The fix for this was backported to LTS versions 2019.6.14 and 2019.9.8.) | |||||
| CVE-2019-19084 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2019-11-20 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In Octopus Deploy 3.3.0 through 2019.10.4, an authenticated user with PackagePush permission to upload packages could upload a maliciously crafted package, triggering an exception that exposes underlying operating system details. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15611 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2019-10-03 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In Octopus before 3.17.7, an authenticated user who was explicitly granted the permission to invite new users (aka UserInvite) can invite users to teams with escalated privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2018-12884 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2019-10-03 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In Octopus Deploy 3.0 onwards (before 2018.6.7), an authenticated user with incorrect permissions may be able to create Accounts under the Infrastructure menu. | |||||
| CVE-2019-14268 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2019-08-02 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In Octopus Deploy versions 3.0.19 to 2019.7.2, when a web request proxy is configured, an authenticated user (in certain limited circumstances) could trigger a deployment that writes the web request proxy password to the deployment log in cleartext. This is fixed in 2019.7.3. The fix was back-ported to LTS 2019.6.5 as well as LTS 2019.3.7. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10581 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2018-06-13 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| In Octopus Deploy 3.4.x before 2018.4.7, an authenticated user is able to view/update/save variable values within the Tenant Variables area for Environments that do not exist within their associated Team scoping. This occurs in situations where this authenticated user also belongs to multiple teams, where one of the Teams has the VariableEdit permission or VariableView permissions for the Environment. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16801 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2017-12-01 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Octopus Deploy 3.7.0-3.17.13 (fixed in 3.17.14) allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the Step Template Name parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16810 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2017-11-30 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the All Variables tab in Octopus Deploy 3.4.0-3.13.6 (fixed in 3.13.7) allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the Variable Set Name parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15610 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2017-10-25 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Octopus before 3.17.7. When the special Guest user account is granted the CertificateExportPrivateKey permission, and Guest Access is enabled for the Octopus Server, an attacker can sign in as the Guest account and export Certificates managed by Octopus, including the private key. | |||||