Filtered by vendor Ceph
Subscribe
Search
Total
5 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-1700 | 4 Canonical, Ceph, Opensuse and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Ceph, Leap and 1 more | 2022-01-01 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in the way the Ceph RGW Beast front-end handles unexpected disconnects. An authenticated attacker can abuse this flaw by making multiple disconnect attempts resulting in a permanent leak of a socket connection by radosgw. This flaw could lead to a denial of service condition by pile up of CLOSE_WAIT sockets, eventually leading to the exhaustion of available resources, preventing legitimate users from connecting to the system. | |||||
| CVE-2020-25677 | 2 Ceph, Redhat | 2 Ceph-ansible, Ceph Storage | 2021-03-04 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in Ceph-ansible v4.0.41 where it creates an /etc/ceph/iscsi-gateway.conf with insecure default permissions. This flaw allows any user on the system to read sensitive information within this file. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7519 | 2 Ceph, Debian | 2 Ceph, Debian Linux | 2019-10-09 | 2.1 LOW | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| In Ceph, a format string flaw was found in the way libradosstriper parses input from user. A user could crash an application or service using the libradosstriper library. | |||||
| CVE-2017-12155 | 1 Ceph | 1 Ceph | 2019-10-03 | 3.3 LOW | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| A resource-permission flaw was found in the openstack-tripleo-heat-templates package where ceph.client.openstack.keyring is created as world-readable. A local attacker with access to the key could read or modify data on Ceph cluster pools for OpenStack as though the attacker were the OpenStack service, thus potentially reading or modifying data in an OpenStack Block Storage volume. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1129 | 4 Ceph, Debian, Opensuse and 1 more | 10 Ceph, Debian Linux, Leap and 7 more | 2019-08-29 | 3.3 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in the way signature calculation was handled by cephx authentication protocol. An attacker having access to ceph cluster network who is able to alter the message payload was able to bypass signature checks done by cephx protocol. Ceph branches master, mimic, luminous and jewel are believed to be vulnerable. | |||||