Search
Total
258 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-12416 | 1 Apache | 1 Deltaspike | 2020-09-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| we got reports for 2 injection attacks against the DeltaSpike windowhandler.js. This is only active if a developer selected the ClientSideWindowStrategy which is not the default. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1549 | 1 Ibm | 1 Rational Quality Manager | 2020-08-24 | 4.9 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Rational Quality Manager 5.0 through 5.0.2 and 6.0 through 6.0.5 are vulnerable to HTTP response splitting attacks. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability using specially-crafted URL to cause the server to return a split response, once the URL is clicked. This would allow the attacker to perform further attacks, such as Web cache poisoning, cross-site scripting, and possibly obtain sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 142658. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5314 | 1 Arubanetworks | 1 Arubaos | 2020-08-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Some web components in the ArubaOS software are vulnerable to HTTP Response splitting (CRLF injection) and Reflected XSS. An attacker would be able to accomplish this by sending certain URL parameters that would trigger this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4396 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cloud Orchestrator | 2020-08-24 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Cloud Orchestrator 2.4 through 2.4.0.5 and 2.5 through 2.5.0.9 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting attacks, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and cause the server to return a split response, once the URL is clicked. This would allow the attacker to perform further attacks, such as Web cache poisoning or cross-site scripting, and possibly obtain sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 162236. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4461 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cloud Orchestrator | 2020-08-24 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Cloud Orchestrator 2.4 through 2.4.0.5 and 2.5 through 2.5.0.9 is vulnerable to HTTP Response Splitting caused by improper caching of content. This would allow the attacker to perform further attacks, such as Web Cache poisoning, cross-site scripting and possibly obtain sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 163682. | |||||
| CVE-2019-19389 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Ktor | 2020-08-24 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| JetBrains Ktor framework before version 1.2.6 was vulnerable to HTTP Response Splitting. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1490 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Skype For Business | 2020-08-24 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| A spoofing vulnerability exists when a Skype for Business Server does not properly sanitize a specially crafted request, aka 'Skype for Business Server Spoofing Vulnerability'. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13146 | 1 Field Test Project | 1 Field Test | 2020-08-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The field_test gem 0.3.0 for Ruby has unvalidated input. A method call that is expected to return a value from a certain set of inputs can be made to return any input, which can be dangerous depending on how applications use it. If an application treats arbitrary variants as trusted, this can lead to a variety of potential vulnerabilities like SQL injection or cross-site scripting (XSS). | |||||
| CVE-2019-12387 | 1 Twistedmatrix | 1 Twisted | 2020-08-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| In Twisted before 19.2.1, twisted.web did not validate or sanitize URIs or HTTP methods, allowing an attacker to inject invalid characters such as CRLF. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11718 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Firefox | 2020-08-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Activity Stream can display content from sent from the Snippet Service website. This content is written to innerHTML on the Activity Stream page without sanitization, allowing for a potential access to other information available to the Activity Stream, such as browsing history, if the Snipper Service were compromised. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 68. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6603 | 1 Promise | 1 Webpam Proe | 2020-08-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Promise Technology WebPam Pro-E devices allow remote attackers to conduct XSS, HTTP Response Splitting, and CRLF Injection attacks via JavaScript code in a PHPSESSID cookie. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1474 | 1 Ibm | 1 Bigfix Platform | 2020-08-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| IBM BigFix Platform 9.2.0 through 9.2.14 and 9.5 through 9.5.9 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting attacks, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and cause the server to return a split response, once the URL is clicked. This would allow the attacker to perform further attacks, such as Web cache poisoning or cross-site scripting, and possibly obtain sensitive information. IBM X-force ID: 140692. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1319 | 1 Apache | 1 Allura | 2020-08-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| In Apache Allura prior to 1.8.1, attackers may craft URLs that cause HTTP response splitting. If a victim goes to a maliciously crafted URL, unwanted results may occur including XSS or service denial for the victim's browsing session. | |||||
| CVE-2019-16254 | 2 Debian, Ruby-lang | 2 Debian Linux, Ruby | 2020-08-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Ruby through 2.4.7, 2.5.x through 2.5.6, and 2.6.x through 2.6.4 allows HTTP Response Splitting. If a program using WEBrick inserts untrusted input into the response header, an attacker can exploit it to insert a newline character to split a header, and inject malicious content to deceive clients. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-17742, which addressed the CRLF vector, but did not address an isolated CR or an isolated LF. | |||||
| CVE-2020-14928 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 1 more | 2020-08-14 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| evolution-data-server (eds) through 3.36.3 has a STARTTLS buffering issue that affects SMTP and POP3. When a server sends a "begin TLS" response, eds reads additional data and evaluates it in a TLS context, aka "response injection." | |||||
| CVE-2020-16254 | 1 Chartkick Project | 1 Chartkick | 2020-08-06 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| The Chartkick gem through 3.3.2 for Ruby allows Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) Injection (without attribute). | |||||
| CVE-2020-14954 | 3 Debian, Mutt, Neomutt | 3 Debian Linux, Mutt, Neomutt | 2020-07-28 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Mutt before 1.14.4 and NeoMutt before 2020-06-19 have a STARTTLS buffering issue that affects IMAP, SMTP, and POP3. When a server sends a "begin TLS" response, the client reads additional data (e.g., from a man-in-the-middle attacker) and evaluates it in a TLS context, aka "response injection." | |||||
| CVE-2019-18860 | 1 Squid-cache | 1 Squid | 2020-07-22 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Squid before 4.9, when certain web browsers are used, mishandles HTML in the host (aka hostname) parameter to cachemgr.cgi. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5246 | 1 Traccar | 1 Traccar | 2020-07-16 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Traccar GPS Tracking System before version 4.9 has a LDAP injection vulnerability. It occurs when user input is being used in LDAP search filter. By providing specially crafted input, an attacker can modify the logic of the LDAP query and get admin privileges. The issue only impacts instances with LDAP configuration and where users can craft their own names. This has been patched in version 4.9. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9495 | 1 Apache | 1 Archiva | 2020-06-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Apache Archiva login service before 2.2.5 is vulnerable to LDAP injection. A attacker is able to retrieve user attribute data from the connected LDAP server by providing special values to the login form. With certain characters it is possible to modify the LDAP filter used to query the LDAP users. By measuring the response time for the login request, arbitrary attribute data can be retrieved from LDAP user objects. | |||||
| CVE-2016-11068 | 1 Mattermost | 1 Mattermost Server | 2020-06-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Mattermost Server before 3.2.0. Attackers could read LDAP fields via injection. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5217 | 1 Twitter | 1 Secure Headers | 2020-05-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.8 MEDIUM |
| In Secure Headers (RubyGem secure_headers), a directive injection vulnerability is present in versions before 3.8.0, 5.1.0, and 6.2.0. If user-supplied input was passed into append/override_content_security_policy_directives, a semicolon could be injected leading to directive injection. This could be used to e.g. override a script-src directive. Duplicate directives are ignored and the first one wins. The directives in secure_headers are sorted alphabetically so they pretty much all come before script-src. A previously undefined directive would receive a value even if SecureHeaders::OPT_OUT was supplied. The fixed versions will silently convert the semicolons to spaces and emit a deprecation warning when this happens. This will result in innocuous browser console messages if being exploited/accidentally used. In future releases, we will raise application errors resulting in 500s. Depending on what major version you are using, the fixed versions are 6.2.0, 5.1.0, 3.8.0. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5574 | 1 Sixapart | 1 Movable Type | 2020-05-15 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| HTML attribute value injection vulnerability in Movable Type series (Movable Type 7 r.4606 (7.2.1) and earlier (Movable Type 7), Movable Type Advanced 7 r.4606 (7.2.1) and earlier (Movable Type Advanced 7), Movable Type for AWS 7 r.4606 (7.2.1) and earlier (Movable Type for AWS 7), Movable Type 6.5.3 and earlier (Movable Type 6.5), Movable Type Advanced 6.5.3 and earlier (Movable Type Advanced 6.5), Movable Type 6.3.11 and earlier (Movable Type 6.3), Movable Type Advanced 6.3.11 and earlier (Movable Type 6.3), Movable Type Premium 1.29 and earlier, and Movable Type Premium Advanced 1.29 and earlier) allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML attribute value via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2020-6245 | 1 Sap | 1 Businessobjects Business Intelligence Platform | 2020-05-14 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| SAP Business Objects Business Intelligence Platform, version 4.2, allows an attacker with access to local instance, to inject file or code that can be executed by the application due to Improper Control of Resource Identifiers. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3246 | 1 Cisco | 1 Umbrella | 2020-05-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the web server of Cisco Umbrella could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to perform a carriage return line feed (CRLF) injection attack against a user of an affected service. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to access a crafted URL. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to inject arbitrary HTTP headers into valid HTTP responses sent to the browser of the user. | |||||
| CVE-2017-18854 | 1 Netgear | 1 Readynas Os Firmware | 2020-05-07 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| NETGEAR ReadyNAS 6.6.1 and earlier is affected by command injection. | |||||
| CVE-2017-18856 | 1 Netgear | 1 Readynas Os Firmware | 2020-05-07 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| NETGEAR ReadyNAS devices before 6.6.1 are affected by command injection. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5336 | 1 Rsa | 1 Archer | 2020-05-07 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| RSA Archer, versions prior to 6.7 P1 (6.7.0.1), contain a URL injection vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability by tricking a victim application user to execute malicious JavaScript code on the affected system. | |||||
| CVE-2017-18788 | 1 Netgear | 106 D3600, D3600 Firmware, D6000 and 103 more | 2020-05-04 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by command injection by an authenticated user. This affects D3600 before 1.0.0.67, D6000 before 1.0.0.67, D6100 before 1.0.0.56, D6200 before 1.1.00.24, D6220 before 1.0.0.32, D6400 before 1.0.0.66, D7000 before 1.0.1.52, D7000v2 before 1.0.0.44, D7800 before 1.0.1.30, D8500 before 1.0.3.35, DGN2200v4 before 1.0.0.96, DGN2200Bv4 before 1.0.0.96, EX2700 before 1.0.1.28, EX6150v2 before 1.0.1.54, EX6100v2 before 1.0.1.54, EX6200v2 before 1.0.1.52, EX6400 before 1.0.1.72, EX7300 before 1.0.1.72, EX8000 before 1.0.0.102, JNR1010v2 before 1.1.0.44, JWNR2010v5 before 1.1.0.44, PR2000 before 1.0.0.20, R6100 before 1.0.1.20, R6250 before 1.0.4.16, R6300v2 before 1.0.4.18, R6400 before 1.0.1.32, R6400v2 before 1.0.2.46, R6700 before 1.0.1.36, R6900 before 1.0.1.34, R7000 before 1.0.9.18, R6900P before 1.3.0.8, R7000P before 1.3.0.8, R7100LG before 1.0.0.34, R7300DST before 1.0.0.58, R7500 before 1.0.0.118, R7500v2 before 1.0.3.24, R7800 before 1.0.2.40, R7900 before 1.0.2.4, R8000 before 1.0.4.4_1.1.42, R7900P before 1.1.5.14, R8000P before 1.1.5.14, R8300 before 1.0.2.110, R8500 before 1.0.2.110, R9000 before 1.0.2.52, WN2000RPTv3 before 1.0.1.14, WN3000RPv3 before 1.0.2.50, WN3100RPv2 before 1.0.0.40, WNDR3400v3 before 1.0.1.16, WNDR3700v4 before 1.0.2.94, WNDR4300 before 1.0.2.96, WNDR4300v2 before 1.0.0.50, WNDR4500v3 before 1.0.0.50, WNR1000v4 before 1.1.0.44, WNR2000v5 before 1.0.0.62, WNR2020 before 1.1.0.44, WNR2050 before 1.1.0.44, and WNR3500Lv2 before 1.2.0.46. | |||||
| CVE-2018-21227 | 1 Netgear | 24 D7800, D7800 Firmware, R6400 and 21 more | 2020-05-01 | 5.2 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by command injection by an authenticated user. This affects D7800 before 1.0.1.34, R6400v2 before 1.0.2.34, R6700 before 1.0.1.30, R6900 before 1.0.1.30, R6900P before 1.0.0.62, R7000 before 1.0.9.12, R7000P before 1.0.0.62, R7500v2 before 1.0.3.26, R7800 before 1.0.2.42, R9000 before 1.0.3.10, WNDR4300v2 before 1.0.0.50, and WNDR4500v3 before 1.0.0.50. | |||||
| CVE-2018-21228 | 1 Netgear | 26 D7800, D7800 Firmware, Ex6100 and 23 more | 2020-04-28 | 5.2 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by command injection by an authenticated user. This affects D7800 before 1.0.1.34, EX6100v2 before 1.0.1.50, EX6150v2 before 1.0.1.50, EX6200v2 before 1.0.1.44, EX6400 before 1.0.1.60, EX7300 before 1.0.1.60, R6100 before 1.0.1.16, R7500 before 1.0.0.110, R7800 before 1.0.2.32, R9000 before 1.0.2.30, WN3000RPv3 before 1.0.2.50, WNDR4300v2 before 1.0.0.50, and WNDR4500v3 before 1.0.0.50. | |||||
| CVE-2017-18754 | 1 Netgear | 6 Wndr3700, Wndr3700 Firmware, Wndr4300 and 3 more | 2020-04-24 | 5.2 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by command injection by an authenticated user. This affects WNDR3700v4 before 1.0.2.88, WNDR4300v1 before 1.0.2.90, and WNR2000v5 before 1.0.0.58. | |||||
| CVE-2018-21119 | 1 Netgear | 4 Wac505, Wac505 Firmware, Wac510 and 1 more | 2020-04-24 | 5.2 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by command injection by an authenticated user. This affects WAC505 before 5.0.5.4 and WAC510 before 5.0.5.4. | |||||
| CVE-2017-18767 | 1 Netgear | 26 D7800, D7800 Firmware, D8500 and 23 more | 2020-04-24 | 5.2 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by command injection by an authenticated user. This affects D7800 before 1.0.1.34, D8500 before 1.0.3.39, R6400 before 1.0.1.14, R6400v2 before 1.0.2.32, R6700 before 1.0.1.22, R6900 before 1.0.1.22, R7000 before 1.0.9.4, R7100LG before 1.0.0.32, R7300 before 1.0.0.56, R7800 before 1.0.2.36, R7900 before 1.0.2.10, R8000 before 1.0.3.24, R8300 before 1.0.2.74, and R8500 before 1.0.2.74. | |||||
| CVE-2018-21114 | 1 Netgear | 26 D7800, D7800 Firmware, Ex6100 and 23 more | 2020-04-24 | 5.2 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by command injection by an authenticated user. This affects D7800 before 1.0.1.44, EX6150v2 before 1.0.1.70, EX6100v2 before 1.0.1.70, EX6200v2 before 1.0.1.64, EX7300 before 1.0.2.136, EX6400 before 1.0.2.136, R6100 before 1.0.1.16, R7500 before 1.0.0.110, R7800 before 1.0.2.32, R9000 before 1.0.4.12, WN3000RPv2 before 1.0.0.56, WN3000RPv3 before 1.0.2.52, WNDR4300v2 before 1.0.0.50, and WNDR4500v3 before 1.0.0.50. | |||||
| CVE-2017-18773 | 1 Netgear | 18 D6100, D6100 Firmware, D7800 and 15 more | 2020-04-24 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by command injection by an authenticated user. This affects D6100 before V1.0.0.55, D7800 before V1.0.1.24, EX6150v2 before 1.0.0.48, R6100 before 1.0.1.14, R7500 before 1.0.0.110, R7500v2 before V1.0.3.16, R7800 before V1.0.2.36, WNDR4300v1 before 1.0.2.90, WNDR4300v2 before 1.0.0.48, WNDR4500v3 before 1.0.0.48, and WNR2000v5 before 1.0.0.48. | |||||
| CVE-2017-18804 | 1 Netgear | 4 R7800, R7800 Firmware, R9000 and 1 more | 2020-04-23 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by command injection. This affects R7800 before 1.0.2.16 and R9000 before 1.0.2.4. | |||||
| CVE-2017-18793 | 1 Netgear | 2 R7800, R7800 Firmware | 2020-04-23 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| NETGEAR R7800 devices before 1.0.2.36 are affected by command injection. | |||||
| CVE-2018-21146 | 1 Netgear | 12 D7800, D7800 Firmware, R7800 and 9 more | 2020-04-23 | 5.2 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by command injection by an authenticated user. This affects D7800 before 1.0.1.34, R7800 before 1.0.2.42, R8900 before 1.0.3.10, R9000 before 1.0.3.10, WNDR4300v2 before 1.0.0.54, and WNDR4500v3 before 1.0.0.54. | |||||
| CVE-2017-18801 | 1 Netgear | 10 D7000, D7000 Firmware, R6220 and 7 more | 2020-04-23 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by command injection. This affects R6220 before 1.1.0.50, R6700v2 before 1.1.0.38, R6800 before 1.1.0.38, WNDR3700v5 before 1.1.0.48, and D7000 before 1.0.1.50. | |||||
| CVE-2018-21112 | 1 Netgear | 10 D7800, D7800 Firmware, R7500 and 7 more | 2020-04-23 | 5.2 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by command injection by an authenticated user. This affects D7800 before 1.0.1.44, R7500v2 before 1.0.3.38, R7800 before 1.0.2.52, R8900 before 1.0.4.12, and R9000 before 1.0.4.12. | |||||
| CVE-2017-18851 | 1 Netgear | 10 D8500, D8500 Firmware, R6100 and 7 more | 2020-04-23 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by command injection by an authenticated user. This affects D8500 through 1.0.3.28, R6400 through 1.0.1.22, R6400v2 through 1.0.2.18, R8300 through 1.0.2.94, R8500 through 1.0.2.94, and R6100 through 1.0.1.12. | |||||
| CVE-2017-18806 | 1 Netgear | 20 Wac120, Wac120 Firmware, Wac510 and 17 more | 2020-04-23 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by command injection. This affects WAC510 before 1.3.0.10, WAC120 before 2.1.4, WNDAP620 before 2.1.3, WND930 before 2.1.2, WN604 before 3.3.7, WNDAP660 before 3.7.4.0, WNDAP350 before 3.7.4.0, WNAP320 before 3.7.4.0, WNAP210v2 before 3.7.4.0, and WNDAP360 before 3.7.4.0. | |||||
| CVE-2017-18802 | 1 Netgear | 10 D7800, D7800 Firmware, Ex6200 and 7 more | 2020-04-23 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by command injection. This affects R6100 before 1.0.1.14, R7500 before 1.0.0.110, R7500v2 before 1.0.3.16, R7800 before 1.0.2.32, EX6200v2 before 1.0.1.50, and D7800 before 1.0.1.22. | |||||
| CVE-2017-18805 | 1 Netgear | 20 Wac120, Wac120 Firmware, Wac510 and 17 more | 2020-04-23 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by command injection. This affects WAC510 before 1.3.0.10, WAC120 before 2.1.4, WNDAP620 before 2.1.3, WND930 before 2.1.2, WN604 before 3.3.7, WNDAP660 before 3.7.4.0, WNDAP350 before 3.7.4.0, WNAP320 before 3.7.4.0, WNAP210v2 before 3.7.4.0, and WNDAP360 before 3.7.4.0. | |||||
| CVE-2017-18795 | 1 Netgear | 4 D6100, D6100 Firmware, D6220 and 1 more | 2020-04-23 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by command injection. This affects D6220 before 1.0.0.28 and D6100 before 1.0.0.50_0.0.50. | |||||
| CVE-2017-18796 | 1 Netgear | 14 R6400, R6400 Firmware, R6700 and 11 more | 2020-04-23 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by command injection. This affects R6400 before 1.0.1.24, R6700 before 1.0.1.26, R6900 before 1.0.1.28, R7000 before 1.0.9.10, R7000P before 1.0.1.16, R6900P before 1.0.1.16, and R7800 before 1.0.2.36. | |||||
| CVE-2017-18841 | 1 Netgear | 10 D7000, D7000 Firmware, R6220 and 7 more | 2020-04-23 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by command injection. This affects R6220 before 1.1.0.46, R6700v2 before 1.1.0.38, R6800 before 1.1.0.38, WNDR3700v5 before 1.1.0.46, and D7000 before 1.0.1.50. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11814 | 1 Qdpm | 1 Qdpm | 2020-04-22 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| A Host Header Injection vulnerability in qdPM 9.1 may allow an attacker to spoof a particular header and redirect users to malicious websites. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5249 | 1 Puma | 1 Puma | 2020-04-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In Puma (RubyGem) before 4.3.3 and 3.12.4, if an application using Puma allows untrusted input in an early-hints header, an attacker can use a carriage return character to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is known as HTTP Response Splitting. While not an attack in itself, response splitting is a vector for several other attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS). This is related to CVE-2020-5247, which fixed this vulnerability but only for regular responses. This has been fixed in 4.3.3 and 3.12.4. | |||||