Search
Total
8 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-28322 | 4 Apple, Fedoraproject, Haxx and 1 more | 13 Macos, Fedora, Curl and 10 more | 2023-12-22 | N/A | 3.7 LOW |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exists in curl <v8.1.0 when doing HTTP(S) transfers, libcurl might erroneously use the read callback (`CURLOPT_READFUNCTION`) to ask for data to send, even when the `CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS` option has been set, if the same handle previously wasused to issue a `PUT` request which used that callback. This flaw may surprise the application and cause it to misbehave and either send off the wrong data or use memory after free or similar in the second transfer. The problem exists in the logic for a reused handle when it is (expected to be) changed from a PUT to a POST. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22924 | 6 Debian, Fedoraproject, Haxx and 3 more | 52 Debian Linux, Fedora, Libcurl and 49 more | 2022-07-28 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| libcurl keeps previously used connections in a connection pool for subsequenttransfers to reuse, if one of them matches the setup.Due to errors in the logic, the config matching function did not take 'issuercert' into account and it compared the involved paths *case insensitively*,which could lead to libcurl reusing wrong connections.File paths are, or can be, case sensitive on many systems but not all, and caneven vary depending on used file systems.The comparison also didn't include the 'issuer cert' which a transfer can setto qualify how to verify the server certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8284 | 8 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 5 more | 28 Mac Os X, Macos, Debian Linux and 25 more | 2022-05-13 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| A malicious server can use the FTP PASV response to trick curl 7.73.0 and earlier into connecting back to a given IP address and port, and this way potentially make curl extract information about services that are otherwise private and not disclosed, for example doing port scanning and service banner extractions. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8590 | 1 Netapp | 1 Clustered Data Ontap | 2021-02-12 | 2.1 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.1P18 and 9.3P12 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow an attacker to discover node names via AutoSupport bundles even when the –remove-private-data parameter is set to true. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8578 | 1 Netapp | 1 Clustered Data Ontap | 2021-02-12 | 2.1 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P20 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow an attacker to discover node names via AutoSupport bundles even when the –remove-private-data parameter is set to true. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8588 | 1 Netapp | 1 Clustered Data Ontap | 2021-02-08 | 2.7 LOW | 3.5 LOW |
| Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P20 and 9.5P15 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow unauthorized tenant users to discover the existence of data on other Storage Virtual Machines (SVMs). | |||||
| CVE-2020-8589 | 1 Netapp | 1 Clustered Data Ontap | 2021-02-08 | 2.7 LOW | 3.5 LOW |
| Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P20 and 9.5P15 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow unauthorized tenant users to discover the names of other Storage Virtual Machines (SVMs) and filenames on those SVMs. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8020 | 1 Netapp | 1 Clustered Data Ontap | 2017-11-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| Clustered Data ONTAP versions 8.0, 8.3.1, and 8.3.2 contain a default privileged account which under certain conditions can be used for unauthorized information disclosure. | |||||