Search
Total
36 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-42004 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2023-12-04 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 11.3, 11.4, and 11.5 is potentially vulnerable to CSV injection. A remote attacker could execute malicious commands due to improper validation of csv file contents. IBM X-Force ID: 265262. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43907 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2023-08-29 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 11.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system by sending a specially crafted request. IBM X-Force ID: 240901. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43904 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2023-08-29 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 11.3 and 11.4 could disclose sensitive information to an attacker due to improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts. IBM X-Force ID: 240895. | |||||
| CVE-2023-35893 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Security Guardium, Linux Kernel | 2023-08-22 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.6, 11.3, 11.4, and 11.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system by sending a specially crafted request. IBM X-Force ID: 258824. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43910 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Security Guardium, Linux Kernel | 2023-07-27 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 11.3 could allow a local user to escalate their privileges due to improper permission controls. IBM X-Force ID: 240908. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39076 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Security Guardium, Linux Kernel | 2022-04-27 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.5 and 11.3 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 215585. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20427 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Security Guardium, Linux Kernel | 2021-08-19 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 11.2 uses an inadequate account lockout setting that could allow a remote attacker to brute force account credentials. IBM X-Force ID: 196314. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20557 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Security Guardium, Linux Kernel | 2021-05-25 | 9.0 HIGH | 7.2 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 11.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system by sending a specially crafted request. IBM X-Force ID: 199184. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20419 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Security Guardium, Linux Kernel | 2021-05-25 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 11.2 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 196280. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20389 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Security Guardium, Linux Kernel | 2021-05-25 | 2.1 LOW | 7.8 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 11.2 stores user credentials in plain clear text which can be read by a local user. IBM X-Force ID: 195770. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20385 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2021-05-25 | 9.0 HIGH | 7.2 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 11.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system. By sending a specially-crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 195766. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4990 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2021-05-25 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 11.2 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database. IBM X-Force ID: 192710. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4184 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2021-03-17 | 7.5 HIGH | 7.3 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 11.2 performs an operation at a privilege level that is higher than the minimum level required, which creates new weaknesses or amplifies the consequences of other weaknesses. IBM X-Force ID: 174802.. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4952 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Security Guardium, Linux Kernel | 2021-01-29 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 11.2 could allow an authenticated user to gain root access due to improper access control. IBM X-Force ID: 192028. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4688 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Security Guardium, Linux Kernel | 2021-01-22 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.6 and 11.2 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system as an unprivileged user, caused by command injection vulnerability. IBM X-Force ID: 186700. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4921 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Security Guardium, Linux Kernel | 2021-01-22 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.6 and 11.2 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database. IBM X-Force ID: 191398. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1501 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2020-08-28 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.5, 10.6, and 11.0 could allow an unauthorized user to obtain sensitive information due to missing security controls. IBM X-Force ID: 141226. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4422 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2020-08-24 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 9.0, 9.5, and 10.6 are vulnerable to a privilege escalation which could allow an authenticated user to change the accessmgr password. IBM X-Force ID: 162768. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4185 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2020-08-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.5, 10.6, and 11.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 174803. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4180 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2020-06-03 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 11.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system. By sending a specially-crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 174735. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1509 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2019-10-09 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium EcoSystem 10.5 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.This weakness might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. The software might connect to a malicious host while believing it is a trusted host, or the software might be deceived into accepting spoofed data that appears to originate from a trusted host. IBM X-Force ID: 141417. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1498 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2019-10-09 | 2.1 LOW | 7.8 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium EcoSystem 10.5 stores user credentials in plain in clear text which can be read by a local user. IBM X-Force ID: 141223. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1597 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0, 10.0.1, 10.1, 10.1.2, 10.1.3, 10.1.4, and 10.5 Database Activity Monitor does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 132610. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1268 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2019-10-09 | 2.1 LOW | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10 and 10.5 uses a one-way cryptographic hash against an input that should not be reversible, such as a password, but the software does not also use a salt as part of the input. IBM X-Force ID: 124743. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1122 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2019-10-03 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 8.2, 9.0, and 10.0 contains a vulnerability that could allow a local attacker with CLI access to inject arbitrary commands which would be executed as root. IBM X-Force ID: 121174. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1598 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2019-10-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 Database Activity Monitor uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 132611. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4292 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2019-07-03 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.5 could allow a remote attacker to upload arbitrary files, which could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the vulnerable web server. IBM X-Force ID: 160698. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1267 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2019-05-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.1 processes patches, image backups and other updates without sufficiently verifying the origin and integrity of the code. IBM X-Force ID: 124742. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1255 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2018-06-06 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0, 10.0.1, and 10.1 through 10.1.4 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 124675. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1757 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2018-01-03 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially-crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database. IBM X-Force ID: 135858. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1271 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2017-12-19 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 9.0, 9.1, and 9.5 supports interaction between multiple actors and allows those actors to negotiate which algorithm should be used as a protection mechanism such as encryption or authentication, but it does not select the strongest algorithm that is available to both parties. IBM X-Force ID: 124746. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1254 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2017-07-17 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 7.1 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 is vulnerable to a XML External Entity Injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose highly sensitive information or consume memory resources. IBM X-Force ID: 124634. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1264 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2017-07-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 does not prove or insufficiently proves that the actors identity is correct which can lead to exposure of resources or functionality to unintended actors. IBM X-Force ID: 124739. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6065 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2017-02-07 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium Database Activity Monitor appliance could allow a local user to inject commands that would be executed as root. | |||||
| CVE-2016-0249 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2016-11-28 | 7.5 HIGH | 8.6 HIGH |
| SQL injection vulnerability in IBM Security Guardium Database Activity Monitor 8.2 before p310, 9.x through 9.5 before p700, and 10.x through 10.1 before p100 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2016-0247 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2016-11-28 | 2.1 LOW | 7.8 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 8.2 before p310, 9.x through 9.5 before p700, and 10.x through 10.1 before p100 allows local users to obtain sensitive cleartext information via unspecified vectors, as demonstrated by password information. | |||||