Search
Total
6 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-42890 | 2 Apache, Debian | 2 Batik, Debian Linux | 2024-01-07 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to run Java code from untrusted SVG via JavaScript. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics prior to 1.16. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.16. | |||||
| CVE-2022-41704 | 2 Apache, Debian | 2 Batik, Debian Linux | 2024-01-07 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to run untrusted Java code from an SVG. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics prior to 1.16. It is recommended to update to version 1.16. | |||||
| CVE-2022-40146 | 2 Apache, Debian | 2 Batik, Debian Linux | 2024-01-07 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to access files using a Jar url. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11987 | 3 Apache, Fedoraproject, Oracle | 18 Batik, Fedora, Banking Apis and 15 more | 2024-01-07 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 8.2 HIGH |
| Apache Batik 1.13 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, caused by improper input validation by the NodePickerPanel. By using a specially-crafted argument, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17566 | 2 Apache, Oracle | 18 Batik, Api Gateway, Business Intelligence and 15 more | 2024-01-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Apache Batik is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, caused by improper input validation by the "xlink:href" attributes. By using a specially-crafted argument, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests. | |||||
| CVE-2017-5662 | 1 Apache | 1 Batik | 2020-10-20 | 7.9 HIGH | 7.3 HIGH |
| In Apache Batik before 1.9, files lying on the filesystem of the server which uses batik can be revealed to arbitrary users who send maliciously formed SVG files. The file types that can be shown depend on the user context in which the exploitable application is running. If the user is root a full compromise of the server - including confidential or sensitive files - would be possible. XXE can also be used to attack the availability of the server via denial of service as the references within a xml document can trivially trigger an amplification attack. | |||||