Filtered by vendor Microsoft
Subscribe
Search
Total
6671 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-14302 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of Square annotations. By manipulating a document's elements, an attacker can cause a pointer to be reused after it has been freed. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6218. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14303 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of StrikeOut annotations. By manipulating a document's elements, an attacker can cause a pointer to be reused after it has been freed. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6219. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14304 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of Text annotations. By manipulating a document's elements, an attacker can cause a pointer to be reused after it has been freed. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6220. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14305 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of PolyLine annotations. By manipulating a document's elements an attacker can cause a pointer to be reused after it has been freed. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6265. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14306 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of button objects. By manipulating a document's elements, an attacker can cause a pointer to be reused after it has been freed. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6266. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14307 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of Link objects. By manipulating a document's elements, an attacker can cause a pointer to be reused after it has been freed. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6267. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14308 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the valueAsString function. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6326. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14309 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.1.0.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the SeedValue Generic Object parameter provided to the signatureSetSeedValue function. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6329. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14310 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.1.0.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of events. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6330. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14311 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of XFA events. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6331. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14312 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the exportAsFDF function. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6332. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14313 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6362. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14314 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of annotations. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6327. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14315 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of annotations. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6328. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14317 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 Foxit Reader, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.1.0.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6683. | |||||
| CVE-2018-11617 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Format events for ComboBox fields. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5415. | |||||
| CVE-2018-11623 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the addAdLayer method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. The attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6003. | |||||
| CVE-2018-11622 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within ConvertToPDF_x86.dll. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5873. | |||||
| CVE-2018-11619 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the setFocus method. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5417. | |||||
| CVE-2018-11618 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the resetForm method. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5416. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0438 | 2 Cisco, Microsoft | 2 Umbrella Enterprise Roaming Client, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the Cisco Umbrella Enterprise Roaming Client (ERC) could allow an authenticated, local attacker to elevate privileges to Administrator. To exploit the vulnerability, the attacker must authenticate with valid local user credentials. This vulnerability is due to improper implementation of file system permissions, which could allow non-administrative users to place files within restricted directories. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by placing an executable file within the restricted directory, which when executed by the ERC client, would run with Administrator privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0437 | 2 Cisco, Microsoft | 3 Umbrella Enterprise Roaming Client, Umbrella Roaming Module, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the Cisco Umbrella Enterprise Roaming Client (ERC) could allow an authenticated, local attacker to elevate privileges to Administrator. To exploit the vulnerability, the attacker must authenticate with valid local user credentials. This vulnerability is due to improper implementation of file system permissions, which could allow non-administrative users to place files within restricted directories. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by placing an executable file within the restricted directory, which when executed by the ERC client, would run with Administrator privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3196 | 2 Microsoft, Rawether Project | 2 Windows, Rawether | 2019-10-09 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| PCAUSA Rawether framework does not properly validate BPF data, allowing a crafted malicious BPF program to perform operations on memory outside of its typical bounds on the driver's receipt of network packets. Local attackers can exploit this issue to execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14010 | 2 Microsoft, Spidercontrol | 6 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8 and 3 more | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| In SpiderControl MicroBrowser Windows XP, Vista 7, 8 and 10, Versions 1.6.30.144 and prior, an uncontrolled search path element vulnerability has been identified which could be exploited by placing a specially crafted DLL file in the search path. If the malicious DLL is loaded prior to the valid DLL, an attacker could execute arbitrary code on the system. | |||||
| CVE-2017-11158 | 2 Microsoft, Synology | 2 Windows, Cloud Station Drive | 2019-10-09 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Multiple untrusted search path vulnerabilities in the installer in Synology Cloud Station Drive before 4.2.5-4396 on Windows allow local attackers to execute arbitrary code and conduct DLL hijacking attacks via a Trojan horse (1) shfolder.dll, (2) ntmarta.dll, (3) secur32.dll or (4) dwmapi.dll file in the current working directory. | |||||
| CVE-2017-11159 | 2 Microsoft, Synology | 2 Windows, Photo Station Uploader | 2019-10-09 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Multiple untrusted search path vulnerabilities in installer in Synology Photo Station Uploader before 1.4.2-084 on Windows allows local attackers to execute arbitrary code and conduct DLL hijacking attack via a Trojan horse (1) shfolder.dll, (2) ntmarta.dll, (3) secur32.dll or (4) dwmapi.dll file in the current working directory. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17183 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 Reader, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 9.7 allows an Access Violation and crash if insufficient memory exists. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11736 | 2 Microsoft, Mozilla | 3 Windows, Firefox, Firefox Esr | 2019-10-05 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| The Mozilla Maintenance Service does not guard against files being hardlinked to another file in the updates directory, allowing for the replacement of local files, including the Maintenance Service executable, which is run with privileged access. Additionally, there was a race condition during checks for junctions and symbolic links by the Maintenance Service, allowing for potential local file and directory manipulation to be undetected in some circumstances. This allows for potential privilege escalation by a user with unprivileged local access. <br>*Note: These attacks requires local system access and only affects Windows. Other operating systems are not affected.*. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 69 and Firefox ESR < 68.1. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11753 | 2 Microsoft, Mozilla | 3 Windows, Firefox, Firefox Esr | 2019-10-05 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| The Firefox installer allows Firefox to be installed to a custom user writable location, leaving it unprotected from manipulation by unprivileged users or malware. If the Mozilla Maintenance Service is manipulated to update this unprotected location and the updated maintenance service in the unprotected location has been altered, the altered maintenance service can run with elevated privileges during the update process due to a lack of integrity checks. This allows for privilege escalation if the executable has been replaced locally. <br>*Note: This attack requires local system access and only affects Windows. Other operating systems are not affected.*. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 69, Firefox ESR < 60.9, and Firefox ESR < 68.1. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13123 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 Foxit Reader, Windows | 2019-10-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader 9.6.0.25114 and earlier has two unique RecursiveCall bugs involving 3 functions exhausting available stack memory because of Uncontrolled Recursion in the V8 JavaScript engine (issue 1 of 2). | |||||
| CVE-2019-13124 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 Foxit Reader, Windows | 2019-10-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader 9.6.0.25114 and earlier has two unique RecursiveCall bugs involving 3 functions exhausting available stack memory because of Uncontrolled Recursion in the V8 JavaScript engine (issue 2 of 2). | |||||
| CVE-2018-8501 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Office, Office 365 Proplus, Powerpoint and 1 more | 2019-10-03 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft PowerPoint software when the software fails to properly handle objects in Protected View, aka "Microsoft PowerPoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This affects Office 365 ProPlus, PowerPoint Viewer, Microsoft Office, Microsoft PowerPoint. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8622 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Windows 10 | 2019-10-03 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Windows Subsystem for Linux in Windows 10 1703 allows an elevation of privilege vulnerability when it fails to properly handle handles NT pipes, aka "Windows Subsystem for Linux Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability". | |||||
| CVE-2017-8624 | 1 Microsoft | 7 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 4 more | 2019-10-03 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| CLFS in Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows an elevation of privilege vulnerability due to the way it handles objects in memory, aka "Windows CLFS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability". | |||||
| CVE-2017-8625 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2019-10-03 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Internet Explorer in Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows an attacker to bypass Device Guard User Mode Code Integrity (UMCI) policies due to Internet Explorer failing to validate UMCI policies, aka "Internet Explorer Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability". | |||||
| CVE-2018-8497 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 10, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019 | 2019-10-03 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Kernel handles objects in memory, aka "Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." This affects Windows Server 2016, Windows 10, Windows Server 2019, Windows 10 Servers. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8633 | 1 Microsoft | 7 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 4 more | 2019-10-03 | 8.5 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Windows Error Reporting (WER) in Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows an elevation of privilege vulnerability, aka "Windows Error Reporting Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability". | |||||
| CVE-2017-8579 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2019-10-03 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| The DirectX component in Microsoft Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows an authenticated attacker to run arbitrary code in kernel mode via a specially crafted application, aka "DirectX Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2017-2938 | 5 Adobe, Apple, Google and 2 more | 7 Flash Player, Mac Os X, Chrome Os and 4 more | 2019-10-03 | 7.5 HIGH | 7.3 HIGH |
| Adobe Flash Player versions 24.0.0.186 and earlier have a security bypass vulnerability related to handling TCP connections. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8485 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows Rt 8.1 and 3 more | 2019-10-03 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when DirectX improperly handles objects in memory, aka "DirectX Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." This affects Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2016, Windows 8.1, Windows 10, Windows 10 Servers. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8554, CVE-2018-8561. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8484 | 1 Microsoft | 7 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 4 more | 2019-10-03 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the DirectX Graphics Kernel (DXGKRNL) driver improperly handles objects in memory, aka "DirectX Graphics Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." This affects Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2016, Windows 8.1, Windows 10, Windows 10 Servers. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8471 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 2 more | 2019-10-03 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Microsoft RemoteFX Virtual GPU miniport driver handles objects in memory, aka "Microsoft RemoteFX Virtual GPU miniport driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." This affects Windows Server 2016, Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows 7, Windows Server 2019. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8469 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2019-10-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Microsoft Edge that could allow an attacker to escape from the AppContainer sandbox in the browser, aka "Microsoft Edge Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8463. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8578 | 1 Microsoft | 7 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 4 more | 2019-10-03 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Win32k in Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows an elevation of privilege vulnerability when it fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8577, CVE-2017-8580, CVE-2017-8581, and CVE-2017-8467. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8577 | 1 Microsoft | 7 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 4 more | 2019-10-03 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| Win32k in Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows an elevation of privilege vulnerability when it fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8578, CVE-2017-8580, CVE-2017-8581, and CVE-2017-8467. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8576 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2019-10-03 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| The graphics component in Microsoft Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows an authenticated attacker to run arbitrary code in kernel mode via a specially crafted application, aka "Microsoft Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2017-8574 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2019-10-03 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| Graphics in Microsoft Windows 10 1607, 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows an elevation of privilege vulnerability when it fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8573 and CVE-2017-8556. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8463 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Edge, Windows 10 | 2019-10-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Microsoft Edge that could allow an attacker to escape from the AppContainer sandbox in the browser, aka "Microsoft Edge Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8469. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8660 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2019-10-03 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Microsoft Edge in Microsoft Windows 10 1511, 1607, 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user, due to the way that Microsoft browser JavaScript engines render content when handling objects in memory, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8649, CVE-2017-8729, CVE-2017-8738, CVE-2017-8740, CVE-2017-8741, CVE-2017-8748, CVE-2017-8752, CVE-2017-8753, CVE-2017-8755, CVE-2017-8756, and CVE-2017-11764. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8462 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2019-10-03 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the DirectX Graphics Kernel (DXGKRNL) driver improperly handles objects in memory, aka "DirectX Graphics Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." This affects Windows Server 2016, Windows 10, Windows 10 Servers. | |||||