Search
Total
49350 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-16037 | 1 Gomeplus-h5-proxy Project | 1 Gomeplus-h5-proxy | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| `gomeplus-h5-proxy` is vulnerable to a directory traversal issue, allowing attackers to access any file in the system by placing '../' in the URL. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16039 | 1 Hftp Project | 1 Hftp | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| `hftp` is a static http or ftp server `hftp` is vulnerable to a directory traversal issue, giving an attacker access to the filesystem by placing "../" in the url. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16040 | 1 Gfe-sass Project | 1 Gfe-sass | 2019-10-09 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| gfe-sass is a library for promises (CommonJS/Promises/A,B,D) gfe-sass downloads resources over HTTP, which leaves it vulnerable to MITM attacks. It may be possible to cause remote code execution (RCE) by swapping out the requested resources with an attacker controlled copy if the attacker is on the network or positioned in between the user and the remote server. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16045 | 1 Jquery.js Project | 1 Jquery.js | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| `jquery.js` was a malicious module published with the intent to hijack environment variables. It has been unpublished by npm. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16131 | 1 Unicorn-list Project | 1 Unicorn-list | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| unicorn-list is a web framework. unicorn-list is vulnerable to a directory traversal issue, giving an attacker access to the filesystem by placing "../" in the url. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16180 | 1 Serverabc Project | 1 Serverabc | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| serverabc is a static file server. serverabc is vulnerable to a directory traversal issue, giving an attacker access to the filesystem by placing "../" in the url. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16102 | 1 Serverhuwenhui Project | 1 Serverhuwenhui | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| serverhuwenhui is a simple http server. serverhuwenhui is vulnerable to a directory traversal issue, giving an attacker access to the filesystem by placing "../" in the URL. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16047 | 1 Mysqljs Project | 1 Mysqljs | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| mysqljs was a malicious module published with the intent to hijack environment variables. It has been unpublished by npm. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16048 | 1 Node-sqlite Project | 1 Node-sqlite | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| `node-sqlite` was a malicious module published with the intent to hijack environment variables. It has been unpublished by npm. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16106 | 1 Tmock Project | 1 Tmock | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| tmock is a static file server. tmock is vulnerable to a directory traversal issue, giving an attacker access to the filesystem by placing "../" in the url. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16101 | 1 Serverwg Project | 1 Serverwg | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| serverwg is a simple http server. serverwg is vulnerable to a directory traversal issue, giving an attacker access to the filesystem by placing "../" in the URL. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16099 | 1 No-case Project | 1 No-case | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The no-case module is vulnerable to regular expression denial of service. When malicious untrusted user input is passed into no-case it can block the event loop causing a denial of service condition. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16098 | 1 Charset Project | 1 Charset | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| charset 1.0.0 and below are vulnerable to regular expression denial of service. Input of around 50k characters is required for a slow down of around 2 seconds. Unless node was compiled using the -DHTTP_MAX_HEADER_SIZE= option the default header max length is 80kb, so the impact of the ReDoS is relatively low. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16097 | 1 Tiny-http Project | 1 Tiny-http | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| tiny-http is a simple http server. tiny-http is vulnerable to a directory traversal issue, giving an attacker access to the filesystem by placing "../" in the url. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16103 | 1 Serveryztyzt Project | 1 Serveryztyzt | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| serveryztyzt is a simple http server. serveryztyzt is vulnerable to a directory traversal issue, giving an attacker access to the filesystem by placing "../" in the URL. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16124 | 1 Node-server-forfront Project | 1 Node-server-forfront | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| node-server-forfront is a simple static file server. node-server-forfront is vulnerable to a directory traversal issue, giving an attacker access to the filesystem by placing "../" in the url. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16125 | 1 Rtcmulticonnection-client Project | 1 Rtcmulticonnection-client | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| rtcmulticonnection-client is a signaling implementation for RTCMultiConnection.js, a multi-session manager. rtcmulticonnection-client is vulnerable to a directory traversal issue, giving an attacker access to the filesystem by placing "../" in the url. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16096 | 1 Serveryaozeyan Project | 1 Serveryaozeyan | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| serveryaozeyan is a simple HTTP server. serveryaozeyan is vulnerable to a directory traversal issue, giving an attacker access to the filesystem by placing "../" in the URL. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16053 | 1 Fabric-js Project | 1 Fabric-js | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| `fabric-js` was a malicious module published with the intent to hijack environment variables. It has been unpublished by npm. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15091 | 1 Powerdns | 1 Authoritative | 2019-10-09 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 7.1 HIGH |
| An issue has been found in the API component of PowerDNS Authoritative 4.x up to and including 4.0.4 and 3.x up to and including 3.4.11, where some operations that have an impact on the state of the server are still allowed even though the API has been configured as read-only via the api-readonly keyword. This missing check allows an attacker with valid API credentials to flush the cache, trigger a zone transfer or send a NOTIFY. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16104 | 1 Citypredict.whauwiller Project | 1 Citypredict.whauwiller | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| citypredict.whauwiller is vulnerable to a directory traversal issue, giving an attacker access to the filesystem by placing "../" in the url. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16054 | 1 Nodefabric Project | 1 Nodefabric | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| `nodefabric` was a malicious module published with the intent to hijack environment variables. It has been unpublished by npm. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16091 | 1 Xtalk Project | 1 Xtalk | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| xtalk helps your browser talk to nodex, a simple web framework. xtalk is vulnerable to a directory traversal issue, giving an attacker access to the filesystem by placing "../" in the URL. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14823 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the signer method of XFA's Signature objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5015. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14824 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the insert method of XFAScriptObject objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5016. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14825 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the remove method of XFAScriptObject objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5017. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14826 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the formNodes method of XFA Node objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5018. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14827 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the append method of XFA Node objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5019. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14828 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the w method of XFA Layout objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5020. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14829 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the openList method of XFAScriptObject objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5021. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14830 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the setFocus method of XFAScriptObject objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5022. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14831 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the author attribute of Circle Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5023. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14832 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the style attribute of Caret Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5024. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14833 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the style attribute of Text Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5025. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14834 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the style attribute of FileAttachment annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5026. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14835 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the page method of XFA Layout objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5027. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14836 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the modDate attribute of Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5028. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14837 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 8.3.1.21155. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the pageSpan method of XFA Layout objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5029. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15103 | 2 Heketi Project, Redhat | 2 Heketi, Enterprise Linux | 2019-10-09 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A security-check flaw was found in the way the Heketi 5 server API handled user requests. An authenticated Heketi user could send specially crafted requests to the Heketi server, resulting in remote command execution as the user running Heketi server and possibly privilege escalation. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15107 | 1 Thekelleys | 1 Dnsmasq | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability was found in the implementation of DNSSEC in Dnsmasq up to and including 2.78. Wildcard synthesized NSEC records could be improperly interpreted to prove the non-existence of hostnames that actually exist. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15119 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Qemu and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Qemu and 1 more | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| The Network Block Device (NBD) server in Quick Emulator (QEMU) before 2.11 is vulnerable to a denial of service issue. It could occur if a client sent large option requests, making the server waste CPU time on reading up to 4GB per request. A client could use this flaw to keep the NBD server from serving other requests, resulting in DoS. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15120 | 2 Debian, Powerdns | 2 Debian Linux, Recursor | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue has been found in the parsing of authoritative answers in PowerDNS Recursor before 4.0.8, leading to a NULL pointer dereference when parsing a specially crafted answer containing a CNAME of a different class than IN. An unauthenticated remote attacker could cause a denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15132 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Dovecot | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Dovecot | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in dovecot 2.0 up to 2.2.33 and 2.3.0. An abort of SASL authentication results in a memory leak in dovecot's auth client used by login processes. The leak has impact in high performance configuration where same login processes are reused and can cause the process to crash due to memory exhaustion. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16225 | 1 Aegir Project | 1 Aegir | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| aegir is a module to help automate JavaScript project management. Version 12.0.0 through and including 12.0.7 bundled and published to npm the user (that performed a aegir-release) GitHub token. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15133 | 1 Miekg-dns Prject | 1 Miekg-dns | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A denial of service flaw was found in miekg-dns before 1.0.4. A remote attacker could use carefully timed TCP packets to block the DNS server from accepting new connections. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16219 | 1 Yttivy Project | 1 Yttivy | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| yttivy is a static file server. yttivy is vulnerable to a directory traversal issue, giving an attacker access to the filesystem by placing "../" in the url. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16218 | 1 Dgard8.lab6 Project | 1 Dgard8.lab6 | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| dgard8.lab6 is a static file server. dgard8.lab6 is vulnerable to a directory traversal issue, giving an attacker access to the filesystem by placing "../" in the url. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16217 | 1 Webrtc-experiment | 1 Fbr-client | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| fbr-client sends files through sockets via socket.io and webRTC. fbr-client is vulnerable to a directory traversal issue, giving an attacker access to the filesystem by placing "../" in the url. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16216 | 1 Tencent-server Project | 1 Tencent-server | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| tencent-server is a simple web server. tencent-server is vulnerable to a directory traversal issue, giving an attacker access to the filesystem by placing "../" in the url. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16211 | 1 Lessindex Project | 1 Lessindex | 2019-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| lessindex is a static file server. lessindex is vulnerable to a directory traversal issue, giving an attacker access to the filesystem by placing "../" in the url. | |||||